ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03492255CYCLONESUpdated Jul 21, 2021

CYCLONES - CYClophosphamide LOw Dose and No Extra Steroid

An interventional study of Cyclophosphamide and Methylprednisolone in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Terminated at 2 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-21.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Significative difference between percentage of renal response (primary outcome) between the two study arms.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Glucocorticoids (GC) use has increased survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly in cases of nephritis and a more significant improvement to 80% with the introduction of therapy combined with immunosuppressants. This therapeutic scheme, however, results in a very high incidence of irreversible damage that is associated in more than 70% of the cases to GC use and in a smaller proportion to the use of high dose cyclophosphamide.

CYCLONES is a Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial with the aim of evaluating the efficacy of a regimen for lupus nephritis treatment using only intravenous corticosteroid administration. This intravenous corticosteroid regimen has already been tested (with Rituximab instead of Cyclophosphamide) with high response rates for lupus nephritis and significant reduction of side effects.

After selection, patients will be randomized in two arms: 116 patients will receive Euro-Lupus nephritis regimen and other 116 will undergo treatment with CYCLONES regimen.

The primary endpoint is the partial response (protein/creatinine ratio \< 3 with decrease at least of 50% of the initial value and increase of creatinine not higher than 15% of the initial value) or complete response (protein/creatinine ratio \< 500 with decrease at least of 50% of the initial value and increase of creatinine not higher than 15% of the initial value in 6 months. Secondary outcome measures will be evaluated such as osteoporosis and bone metabolism parameters, ophthalmologic evaluation of the collateral effects related to glucocorticoids, lipid profile and therapy adherence.

Read the detailed description

The use of glucocorticoids (GC) greatly increased the survival of patients with SLE, particularly in cases of nephritis and a more significant improvement to 80% with the introduction of therapy combined with immunosuppressants in the late 1960s. This therapeutic regimen, however, results in a very high incidence of irreversible damage to the patient that is associated in more than 70% of the cases to GC use and in a smaller proportion to the use of a high dose of cyclophosphamide. In the last years, some less toxic schemes have been proposed. The use of low-dose cyclophosphamide has been shown to have equal efficacy as high dose for the induction of remission of lupus nephritis with a fifteen-year follow-up.

Regarding GC, lower doses of methylprednisolone (MP) pulse have been shown to have similar efficacy and lower risk of infection. In addition, retrospective studies have found that high doses of oral GC during the induction period are associated with a higher incidence of side effects without a corresponding increase in efficacy . But it was only in 2013 that the first study was published that did not use oral GC in the treatment of lupus nephritis induction with excellent results.

In transplantation area, there are already several trials minimizing the use of GC proposing in the first days after transplantation the use the methylprednisolone (MP) IV pulse (day 1, 500mg, day 2, 250mg and day 3, 125mg) followed by oral GC for 4 days (60mg, 40mg, 30mg and 20mg). In this study, the same incidence of acute rejection occurred when compared to patients who were treated with oral GC for a prolonged period.

Regarding the route of administration of GC, it is important to emphasize that MP is three times more active through non-genomic pathway than through genomic pathway, which, in theory, results in a higher efficiency and lower collateral effect, when compared to the GC oral route that has similar potency through the two pathways. In addition, MP has a simpler and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, whereas for oral prednisolone this kinetics is more complex and difficult to predict the dose required to achieve a specific concentration.

Therefore, the present study intends to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of cyclophosphamide (EUROLUPUS scheme) associated to usual GC dose compared with EUROLUPUS with no extra oral GC regimen.

The estimated number of patients was 116 patients for each arm (considering an error α = 0.05 and a power (1-β) of 80%).

In moderate flares, due to other systemic manifestations, the use of a maximum of 20mg / day of prednisone for 1 month and a progressive reduction of 5mg every 15 days until withdrawal is allowed. Other immunosuppressive, biological, intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis will be prohibited.

Regarding statistics, an Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis will be performed for the randomized patients, so that patients presenting side effects or low adherence to treatment will remain in the randomized group and will be evaluated at week 24.

The proportion of patients achieving complete and partial remission at week 24 will be compared by the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. The same statistical methodology will be applied to compare the number of events listed as secondary endpoints.

02

Conditions studied

  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
03

In context

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

1,207 studies on the registry are indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; 405 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is close to the median of 52 across 876 interventional studies indexed under Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic.

Browse Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 611 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All the criteria below have to be completed:

  1. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria and/or SLICC: according to the thematic protocol (Petri M, et al., Arthritis Rheum, 2012);
  2. Age ≥18 years;
  3. Lupus Glomerulonephritis Class III, IV or V according to the International Society of Nephrology (ISN)/Renal Pathology Society (RPS) Classification confirmed on renal (according to the routine protocol of our outpatient clinic) performed up to 3 months to 1 year prior to selection;
  4. Menopause or use method;
  5. .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. \< 40 ml/min calculated (Cockcroft \& Gault);
  2. Intolerance to medication;
  3. \< 1,000/mm3;
  4. Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  5. Infection requiring hospitalization;
  6. Patients who used Cyclophosphamide in the last 6 months or biological in the last year;
  7. Thrombotic renal microangiopathy;
  8. Chronic terminal renal disease and/or class VI ;
  9. Non-adhesion profile;
  10. Need to use another therapeutic scheme;
  11. GC dose in the last 3 months not greater than 20mg/day.

11.Central nervous system (CNS) disorders or hemolytic anemia and severe thrombocytopenia (\< 50,000 /mm3).

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Eurolupus: Cyclophosphamide + Methylprednisolone + oral GC

    The EUROLUPUS group will receive Cyclophosphamide (6 doses of 500 mg / fortnightly) + 3 doses of Methylprednisolone (750 mg) initial + oral glucocorticoid (GC) (prednisone) ≤ 30 mg/day with a gradual reduction of 5 mg/month (EUROLUPUS). From the 3rd month, the group will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (2-3 g) until 6 months with gradual reduction of GC from 5 mg/month until the minimum dose of 5 mg/month.

    Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Methylprednisolone · Drug: Prednisone · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil

  • Experimental
    Cyclones Group: Cyclophosphamide+Methylprednisolone no oral GC

    CYCLONES Group will receive for 3 months Cyclophosphamide (6 doses of 500mg / fortnightly) + Methylprednisolone \[500 mg (day 0 and day 15), 250 mg (day 30 and day 45) and 125 mg (day 60 and day 75)\] without oral glucocorticoid (GC). From the third month, the group will receive only oral MMF (2-3 g) until the 6th month. Patients using GC ≤ 20 mg/day may enter the protocol with immediate reduction to 15 mg/day with a reduction of 5mg/month until complete withdrawal.

    Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Methylprednisolone · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Interventions

  • Patients in both EUROLUPUS group and CYCLONES Group will receive for 3 months Cyclophosphamide (6 doses of 500mg/biweekly)

  • Patients in EUROLUPUS group will receive Methylprednisolone \[750 mg for three consecutive days). Patients in CYCLONES Group will receive Methylprednisolone \[500 mg (day 0 and day 15), 250 mg (day 30 and day 45) and 125 mg (day 60 and day 75).

  • Patients in EUROLUPUS group will receive oral prednisone ≤ 30 mg/day with a reduction of 5mg/month until complete withdrawal.

  • From the third month of protocol, patients in both EUROLUPUS group and CYCLONES Group will receive mycophenolate mofetil (2-3 g/day) until the sixth month of study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Partial renal response

    The primary endpoint is partial renal response, a composition of: urinary protein/creatinine ratio \< 3g/g with decrease of at least 50% of the initial value and increase of creatinine (mg/dL) not higher than 15% of the initial value

    Time frame: Six months

  2. Complete renal response

    Complete renal response, according to a composition of: urinary protein/creatinine ratio \< 0,5 (g/g) with decrease of at least 50% of the initial value and increase of creatinine (mg/dL) not higher than 15% of the initial value.

    Time frame: Six months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Osteoporosis evaluation

    Evaluation of osteoporosis by bone densitometry (DXA)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Bone structure evaluation

    Evaluation of bone structure by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT)\]

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Glaucoma evaluation

    Ophthalmologic evaluation for glaucoma secondary to glucocorticoids use

    Time frame: 15 days, 30 days and 3 months

  4. Cataract evaluation

    Ophthalmologic evaluation for cataract secondary to glucocorticoids use

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Change from baseline Total cholesterol at 6 months

    Lipid profile evaluation including total cholesterol in mg/dL

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  6. Change from baseline Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) at 6 months

    Lipid profile evaluation including Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in mg/dL

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  7. Change from baseline High-density lipoprotein (HDL) at 6 months

    Lipid profile evaluation including High-density lipoprotein (HDL) in mg/dL

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  8. Change from baseline Triglycerides at 6 months

    Lipid profile evaluation including triglycerides in mg/dL

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  9. Change from baseline Anti-High-density lipoprotein (anti-HDL) at 6 months

    Lipid profile evaluation including anti-High-density lipoprotein (anti-HDL)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  10. Therapy adherence by a self-report medication adherence measure (8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale)

    Therapy adherence will be evaluated by a self-report medication adherence measure (8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale). A total score of all items are calculated with a sum score ranging from 0 to 8 for adherence. The scores will be trichotomized into the following 3 levels of adherence: high adherence (score 8), medium adherence (score 6 to \<8), and low adherence (score \<6).

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Change from baseline Serum levels of prednisone using Area Under the Curve [AUC] at 30 days, 3 months and 6 months

    Serum levels of prednisone will be measured along the follow up using Area Under the Curve \[AUC\]

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 3 months and 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Rheumatology Division of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo
    São Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
  • Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
    São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Costenbader KH, Desai A, Alarcon GS, Hiraki LT, Shaykevich T, Brookhart MA, Massarotti E, Lu B, Solomon DH, Winkelmayer WC. Trends in the incidence, demographics, and outcomes of end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis in the US from 1995 to 2006. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jun;63(6):1681-8. doi: 10.1002/art.30293. PubMed 21445962 ↗
  • Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Rahman P, Ibanez D, Tam LS. Accrual of organ damage over time in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2003 Sep;30(9):1955-9. PubMed 12966597 ↗
  • Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D, Sebastiani GD, Garrido Ed Ede R, Danieli MG, Abramovicz D, Blockmans D, Mathieu A, Direskeneli H, Galeazzi M, Gul A, Levy Y, Petera P, Popovic R, Petrovic R, Sinico RA, Cattaneo R, Font J, Depresseux G, Cosyns JP, Cervera R. Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;46(8):2121-31. doi: 10.1002/art.10461. PubMed 12209517 ↗
  • Ruiz-Arruza I, Lozano J, Cabezas-Rodriguez I, Medina JA, Ugarte A, Erdozain JG, Ruiz-Irastorza G. Restrictive Use of Oral Glucocorticoids in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Prevention of Damage Without Worsening Long-Term Disease Control: An Observational Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):582-591. doi: 10.1002/acr.23322. Epub 2018 Mar 7. PubMed 28704598 ↗
  • Condon MB, Ashby D, Pepper RJ, Cook HT, Levy JB, Griffith M, Cairns TD, Lightstone L. Prospective observational single-centre cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of treating lupus nephritis with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil but no oral steroids. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1280-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202844. Epub 2013 Jun 5. PubMed 23740227 ↗
  • Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcon GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, Bruce IN, Isenberg D, Wallace DJ, Nived O, Sturfelt G, Ramsey-Goldman R, Bae SC, Hanly JG, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Clarke A, Aranow C, Manzi S, Urowitz M, Gladman D, Kalunian K, Costner M, Werth VP, Zoma A, Bernatsky S, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Khamashta MA, Jacobsen S, Buyon JP, Maddison P, Dooley MA, van Vollenhoven RF, Ginzler E, Stoll T, Peschken C, Jorizzo JL, Callen JP, Lim SS, Fessler BJ, Inanc M, Kamen DL, Rahman A, Steinsson K, Franks AG Jr, Sigler L, Hameed S, Fang H, Pham N, Brey R, Weisman MH, McGwin G Jr, Magder LS. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug;64(8):2677-86. doi: 10.1002/art.34473. PubMed 22553077 ↗
  • Then Bergh F, Kumpfel T, Schumann E, Held U, Schwan M, Blazevic M, Wismuller A, Holsboer F, Yassouridis A, Uhr M, Weber F, Daumer M, Trenkwalder C, Auer DP. Monthly intravenous methylprednisolone in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - reduction of enhancing lesions, T2 lesion volume and plasma prolactin concentrations. BMC Neurol. 2006 May 23;6:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-6-19. PubMed 16719908 ↗
  • Ruiz-Irastorza G, Danza A, Khamashta M. Glucocorticoid use and abuse in SLE. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Jul;51(7):1145-53. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker410. Epub 2012 Jan 23. PubMed 22271756 ↗
  • Rohatagi S, Barth J, Mollmann H, Hochhaus G, Soldner A, Mollmann C, Derendorf H. Pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone and prednisolone after single and multiple oral administration. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Oct;37(10):916-25. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04266.x. PubMed 9505983 ↗
  • Levic Z, Micic D, Nikolic J, Stojisavljevic N, Sokic D, Jankovic S, Kendereski A, Mavra M. Short-term high dose steroid therapy does not affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients. Clinical assessment by the insulin tolerance test. J Endocrinol Invest. 1996 Jan;19(1):30-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03347855. PubMed 8851689 ↗
  • Barkhof F, Tas MW, Frequin ST, Scheltens P, Hommes OR, Nauta JJ, Valk J. Limited duration of the effect of methylprednisolone on changes on MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology. 1994 Jul;36(5):382-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00612124. PubMed 7936181 ↗
  • Contreras G, Pardo V, Leclercq B, Lenz O, Tozman E, O'Nan P, Roth D. Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 4;350(10):971-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031855. PubMed 14999109 ↗
  • Petri M, Buyon J, Kim M. Classification and definition of major flares in SLE clinical trials. Lupus. 1999;8(8):685-91. doi: 10.1191/096120399680411281. PubMed 10568907 ↗
  • Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Goldsmith CH, Fortin P, Ginzler E, Gordon C, Hanly JG, Isenberg DA, Kalunian K, Nived O, Petri M, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Snaith M, Sturfelt G. The reliability of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 May;40(5):809-13. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400506. PubMed 9153540 ↗
  • Appel GB, Contreras G, Dooley MA, Ginzler EM, Isenberg D, Jayne D, Li LS, Mysler E, Sanchez-Guerrero J, Solomons N, Wofsy D; Aspreva Lupus Management Study Group. Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May;20(5):1103-12. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008101028. Epub 2009 Apr 15. PubMed 19369404 ↗
  • Vincenti F, Schena FP, Paraskevas S, Hauser IA, Walker RG, Grinyo J; FREEDOM Study Group. A randomized, multicenter study of steroid avoidance, early steroid withdrawal or standard steroid therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2008 Feb;8(2):307-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02057.x. Erratum In: Am J Transplant.2008 May;8(5):1080. PubMed 18211506 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2021, 38 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2018
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
StartActual
Apr 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 2, 2021
CompletionActual
Jul 2, 2021
Last update
Jul 21, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03492255
Collaborators
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Start date
Apr 12, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 2, 2021
Completion
Jul 2, 2021
Last update
Jul 21, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cyclophosphamide

Start the discussion