ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03482570Updated Apr 2, 2018

Activity Behaviours in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion

An observational study in Malignant Pleural Effusion, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-02.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to objectively assess activity behaviours (i.e., physical activity and sedentary behaviour) in patients with malignant pleural effusion. First, we aim to describe the physical activity and sedentary behavior of patients with MPE in Hong Kong. Secondarily, we aim to assess the relationships between activity behaviours and survival, quality of life, and respiratory symptoms e.g. shortness of breath.

Read the detailed description

The development of a malignant pleural effusion (MPE) can be a consequence of metastatic spread of any cancer, but most commonly lung, breast and gynecological cancers or from primary pleural neoplasms (e.g., mesothelioma). The presence of MPE represents incurable disease and median survival ranges from 3 to 12 months from first presentation. Breathlessness is a common and debilitating symptom reported by this patient group and interventions are aimed at managing symptoms for optimal quality of life.

Breathlessness and other symptoms that result from MPE are likely to limit a person's ability to be physically active. Activity behaviours encompasses physical activity behaviour (i.e., low intensity physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) and sedentary behaviour (i.e., sitting or reclining activities low in energy expenditure) accumulated during waking hours. Performance status measures are routinely used in cancer populations and are largely based on self-reported activity behaviors. While performance status is a reliable predictor of survival in patients with MPE, such measures are subjective, broad and significantly, can differ between patients and clinicians. Measures of performance status may fail to detect small, but meaningful changes in activity behaviours. Objective assessment of activity behaviours using accelerometers could provide a more reliable and sensitive method to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour, particularly in advanced cancer populations. Objective assessment of activity behaviours using accelerometers has been demonstrated to accurately measure physical activity when compared to oxygen consumption. Triaxial accelerometry is considered the most accurate assessment for physical activity in chronic disease populations.

Preliminary research in patients with MPE indicates that patients have very low activity levels. Participants with MPE spent more that 70% of waking hours sedentary (i.e., activities of very low energy expenditure, sitting or lying down). Those patients with MPE with the best performance status and longest survival were significantly more active and less sedentary than those with a poor performance status and limited survival. However, these preliminary results require replication. Further, it is not yet known if activity behaviours are associated with quality of life or symptoms such as dyspnea in this patient population. Evidence from other cancer survivor populations suggests that activity behaviours are linked to quality of life and symptoms. In patients with breast, colorectal, lung and ovarian cancer, those that are more physically active report better quality of life. In patients with lung cancer, symptoms such as breathlessness and fatigue appear to be associated with lower physical activity levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malignant Pleural Effusion

Keywords

  • Activity behaviors
  • Malignant pleural effusion
03

In context

Pleural Effusion, Malignant

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 112 across 37 observational studies indexed under Pleural Effusion, Malignant.

Browse Pleural Effusion, Malignant studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,292 studies on the registry; 348 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with an MPE

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with an MPE (i.e. one in which malignant cells are identified in the pleural fluid or pleural ); or a large exudative pleural effusion without other causes in a patient with known disseminated extra-thoracic

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Age \<18 years; pleural infection; pregnant or lactating; inability to consent or comply with the protocol; anticipated pleural drainage procedure within one week subsequent to recruitment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceActiGraph

    Activity behaviours will be objectively assessed by 7-day triaxial accelerometer assessment (ActiGraph GT3X+ Pensacola, FL, USA). Participants will be asked to wear an accelerometer around their waist, 24 hours a day for 7 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Activity Behaviours (vertical axis movement counts per min)

    Recorded objectively by a triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+ Pensacola, FL, USA).

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Quality of life (in mm)

    Assessed by a 100 mm visual analogue scale with "the best imaginable health state" at 0 mm and "the worst imaginable health state" at 100 mm

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Respiratory symptoms (in mm)

    Assessed by a 100 mm visual analogue scale with "no breathlessness" at 0 mm and "worst breathlessness imaginable" at 100 mm.

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Survival (in number of days)

    Recorded from date of Actigraph initialization to death or 12-month, whichever comes first

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
    • David CL Lam, PhD,MD · Contactdcllam@hku.hk · (852) 2255 5814
    • David CL Lam, PhD,MD · Principal investigator
    • Macy MS Lui, MBBS · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Clive AO, Kahan BC, Hooper CE, Bhatnagar R, Morley AJ, Zahan-Evans N, Bintcliffe OJ, Boshuizen RC, Fysh ET, Tobin CL, Medford AR, Harvey JE, van den Heuvel MM, Lee YC, Maskell NA. Predicting survival in malignant pleural effusion: development and validation of the LENT prognostic score. Thorax. 2014 Dec;69(12):1098-104. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205285. Epub 2014 Aug 6. PubMed 25100651 ↗
  • Thomas R, Francis R, Davies HE, Lee YC. Interventional therapies for malignant pleural effusions: the present and the future. Respirology. 2014 Aug;19(6):809-22. doi: 10.1111/resp.12328. Epub 2014 Jun 19. PubMed 24947955 ↗
  • Owen N. Sedentary behavior: understanding and influencing adults' prolonged sitting time. Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):535-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.08.024. Epub 2012 Sep 8. PubMed 22968124 ↗
  • Kelly LA, McMillan DG, Anderson A, Fippinger M, Fillerup G, Rider J. Validity of actigraphs uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for assessment of physical activity in adults in laboratory conditions. BMC Med Phys. 2013 Nov 26;13(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1756-6649-13-5. PubMed 24279826 ↗
  • Van Remoortel H, Giavedoni S, Raste Y, Burtin C, Louvaris Z, Gimeno-Santos E, Langer D, Glendenning A, Hopkinson NS, Vogiatzis I, Peterson BT, Wilson F, Mann B, Rabinovich R, Puhan MA, Troosters T; PROactive consortium. Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jul 9;9:84. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-84. PubMed 22776399 ↗
  • Jeffery E, Lee YG, McVeigh J, Straker L, Wooding T, Newton RU, Peddle-McIntyre C. Feasibility of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in patients with malignant pleural effusion. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3133-3141. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3721-9. Epub 2017 Apr 28. PubMed 28455548 ↗
  • Vallance JK, Boyle T, Courneya KS, Lynch BM. Associations of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time with health-related quality of life among colon cancer survivors. Cancer. 2014 Sep 15;120(18):2919-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28779. Epub 2014 Jun 4. PubMed 24898175 ↗
  • Solberg Nes L, Liu H, Patten CA, Rausch SM, Sloan JA, Garces YI, Cheville AL, Yang P, Clark MM. Physical activity level and quality of life in long term lung cancer survivors. Lung Cancer. 2012 Sep;77(3):611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.05.096. Epub 2012 Jun 6. PubMed 22681871 ↗
  • Sloan JA, Cheville AL, Liu H, Novotny PJ, Wampfler JA, Garces YI, Clark MM, Yang P. Impact of self-reported physical activity and health promotion behaviors on lung cancer survivorship. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Apr 29;14:66. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0461-3. PubMed 27129406 ↗
  • Lynch BM, Cerin E, Owen N, Hawkes AL, Aitken JF. Prospective relationships of physical activity with quality of life among colorectal cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Sep 20;26(27):4480-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7917. PubMed 18802160 ↗
  • Canario AC, Cabral PU, de Paiva LC, Florencio GL, Spyrides MH, Goncalves AK. Physical activity, fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 Jan-Feb;62(1):38-44. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.01.38. PubMed 27008491 ↗
  • Beesley VL, Price MA, Butow PN, Green AC, Olsen CM; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group; Australian Ovarian Cancer Study - Quality of Life Study Investigators; Webb PM. Physical activity in women with ovarian cancer and its association with decreased distress and improved quality of life. Psychooncology. 2011 Nov;20(11):1161-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1834. Epub 2010 Aug 26. PubMed 20740686 ↗
  • Cheville AL, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Basford JR, Wampfler JA, Garces YI, Jatoi A, Yang P. The value of a symptom cluster of fatigue, dyspnea, and cough in predicting clinical outcomes in lung cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Aug;42(2):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.11.005. Epub 2011 Mar 12. PubMed 21398089 ↗
  • O'Driscoll M, Corner J, Bailey C. The experience of breathlessness in lung cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1999 Mar;8(1):37-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1999.00129.x. PubMed 10362952 ↗
  • Fysh ET, Thomas R, Read CA, Kwan BC, Yap E, Horwood FC, Lee P, Piccolo F, Shrestha R, Garske LA, Lam DC, Rosenstengel A, Bint M, Murray K, Smith NA, Lee YC. Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion (AMPLE) trial: a multicentre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis. BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 6;4(11):e006757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757. Erratum In: BMJ Open. 2015 May 06;5(5):e006757corr1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006757corr1.. Lam, Ben C H [corrected to Kwan, Ben C H]. PubMed 25377015 ↗
  • Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available. PubMed 7165009 ↗
  • Light RW, Rogers JT, Cheng D, Rodriguez RM. Large pleural effusions occurring after coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiovascular Surgery Associates, PC. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 1;130(11):891-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00004. PubMed 10375337 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2019, 23 months after the start.

Of 22 observational studies under Pleural Effusion, Malignant, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 5, 2018
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
StartActual
Jan 31, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2019
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2020
Last update
Apr 2, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03482570
Collaborators
The University of Western Australia, Edith Cowan University, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Responsible party
Dr. David Chi-leung Lam (Clinical Associate Professor, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
Start date
Jan 31, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2018

Study contacts

David CL Lam, PhD, MD
principal investigator · University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion