ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03482011OASIS-1Updated Sep 25, 2020Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab (LY3074828) in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Mirikizumab and Placebo in Psoriasis, sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Completed at 69 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-25.

Sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
530
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 35 studies in Psoriasis by Eli Lilly and Company — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Psoriasis · Eli Lilly and Company.

Enrollment
8th of 35
530 · median 162
Started
2018
with 5 others
Phase 3
15 of 35
none open now
Registered
22nd of 35
by date

Among the 35 studies in Psoriasis by Eli Lilly and Company, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment, is one of 6 that started in 2018, is one of 15 in phase 3, and was the 22nd registered.

Psoriasis

2,030 studies on the registry are indexed under Psoriasis; 276 are open to participants now.

Browse Psoriasis studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 35 studies in Psoriasis by Eli Lilly and Company is open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

Who these studies take

Of the 173 Psoriasis studies recruiting now, 91 (53%) set no upper age limit and 66 (38%) stop at 75 or younger; 25 take children under 18; 40 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 35 studies in Psoriasis by Eli Lilly and Company, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirikizumab in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

03

Conditions studied

  • Psoriasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Psoriasis
  • IL-23
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Present with chronic plaque psoriasis based on an investigator confirmed diagnosis of chronic psoriasis vulgaris for at least 6 months prior to baseline and meet the following criteria:

    • plaque psoriasis involving ≥10% BSA and absolute PASI score ≥12 in affected skin at screening and baseline
    • sPGA score of ≥3 at screening and baseline
  • Candidate for systemic therapy and/or phototherapy for psoriasis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have an unstable or uncontrolled illness, including but not limited to a cerebro-cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematologic, or neurologic disease or abnormal laboratory values at screening, that in the opinion of the investigator, would potentially affect participant safety within the study or of interfering with the interpretation of data.
  • Breastfeeding or nursing women.
  • Have had serious, opportunistic, or chronic/recurring infection within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Have received a Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination within 12 months or received (s) (including attenuated live vaccines) within 12 weeks of baseline or intend to receive either during the study.
  • Have any other skin conditions (excluding psoriasis) that would affect interpretation of the results.
  • Have received systemic nonbiologic psoriasis therapy or phototherapy within 28 days prior to baseline.
  • Have received topical psoriasis treatment within 14 days prior to baseline.
  • Have received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics, or anti-interleukin (IL)-17 targeting biologics within 12 weeks prior to baseline.
  • Have previous exposure to any biologic therapy targeting IL-23 (including ustekinumab), either licensed or .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
530 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mirikizumab

    Induction Period: Participants received 250 milligrams (mg) mirikizumab administered subcutaneously (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W). Maintenance Period: Participants received one of the four options below: Placebo administered SC every 8 weeks (Q8W) for responders (≥PASI 90). 125 mg mirikizumab administered SC Q8W for responders (≥PASI 90). 250 mg mirikizumab administered SC Q8W for responders (≥PASI 90). 250 mg mirikizumab administered SC Q8W for non-responders (\<PASI 90).

    Drug: Mirikizumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Induction Period: Participants received placebo administered SC Q4W. Maintenance Period: Participants received one of the two options below: Placebo administered SC Q8W for responders (≥PASI 90). 250 mg mirikizumab administered SC Q4W during week 16 to week 32 and Q8W during week 40 and 48 for non-responders (\< PASI 90).

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Administered SC

    Also known as: LY3074828

  • DrugPlacebo

    Administered SC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment of (sPGA) (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline

    The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis (PsO) lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participant's PsO was assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of "0" or "1" with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.

    Time frame: Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 90)

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 100)

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement

    The BSA is the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's body surface on a continuous scale from 0% (no involvement) to 100% (full involvement), in which 1% corresponds to the size of the participant's hand (including the palm, fingers, and thumb). The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptoms Score of 0 in Those With a PSS Symptoms Score ≥1 at Baseline

    PSS is a patient-administered assessment of 4 symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, and burning); 3 signs (redness, scaling, and cracking); and 1 item on the discomfort related to symptoms/signs. The overall severity for each individual symptom/sign from the patient's psoriasis is indicated by selecting the number from a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom/sign in the past 24 hours, where 0=no symptom/sign and 10=worst imaginable symptom/sign. In addition, a symptoms score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (worst imaginable symptoms), and a signs score of 0 (no signs) to 30 (worst imaginable signs) will be reported. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥5

    The DLQI is a patient-reported, 10-question, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". For all questions, if unanswered the question is scored as "0". Totals range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment). A DLQI total score of 0 to 1 is considered as having no effect on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and a 5-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response (PASI 90) After Re-randomization at the Start of the Randomized Withdrawal Period

    PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

    Time frame: Week 52

  8. Change in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline

    The Palmoplantar PASI is a composite score derived from the sum scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by a score for the extent of palm and sole area involvement, ranging from 0 (no PPASI) to 72 (most severe PPASI). The PPASI was only assessed if participants have palmoplantar psoriasis at baseline. Least Squares Mean (LS Mean) was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

    Time frame: Week 16

  9. Change in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline

    The PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (\<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total score ranging from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

    Time frame: Week 16

  10. Change in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline

    The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix PsO by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed PsO 0 (none) to 4 (PsO in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix PsO 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix PsO in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis). LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

    Time frame: Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline on the Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)

    SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. LS Mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)

    SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. LS Mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  13. Percentage of Participants With Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PatGA (0,1)) and >=2 Improvement From Baseline

    The PatGA is a single-item self-reported instrument asking the participant to rate the severity of their psoriasis "today" by circling a number on the numeric rating scale from 0 (Clear = no psoriasis) to 5 (Severe = the worst their psoriasis has ever been). Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO)

    The WPAI-PSO consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of psoriasis, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which psoriasis affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which psoriasis affected activities outside of work. Four scores are derived: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism and impairment in activities performed outside of work. Each WPAI score is expressed as impairment percentages (0-100) with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, that is, worse outcomes. LS Mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  15. Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11

    QIDS-SR16 is a participant-administered, 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days and rate each on a 4-point scale: 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The sum of the 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains \[sad mood, concentration, self-criticism, suicidal ideation, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance (initial, middle and late insomnia or hypersomnia), decrease/increase in appetite/weight, and psychomotor agitation/retardation\] to give a single total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Whereas 0-5 indicates no symptoms. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 16

  16. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (0,1)

    The DLQI is a patient-reported, 10-question, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". For all questions, if unanswered the question is scored as "0". Totals range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment). A DLQI total score of 0 to 1 is considered as having no effect on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and a 5-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Week 16

  17. Induction Period: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab at Week 16

    Minimum observed serum concentration at steady state (Ctrough,ss) of mirikizumab at Week 16.

    Time frame: Week 16: Day 113

07

Results

Posted Sep 25, 2020

Participant flow

Induction Period (16 Weeks)
Participant flow — Induction Period (16 Weeks)
MilestonePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WPlacebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Placebo Responder)Placebo Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q4W /Q8W (Placebo Non-Responders)250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q8W (Miri Non-Responders)
Started107423000000
Received at least one dose of study drug107422000000
Completed101412000000
Not completed611000000
Withdrew: Adverse event13000000
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy31000000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01000000
Withdrew: Screen failure01000000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject25000000
Maintenance Period (36 Weeks)
Participant flow — Maintenance Period (36 Weeks)
MilestonePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WPlacebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Placebo Responder)Placebo Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q4W /Q8W (Placebo Non-Responders)250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q8W (Miri Non-Responders)
Started00794919091140
Relapse001041320
Roll over to i6t-mc-amah (nct03556202)00688868587121
Completed00690868687123
Not completed001454417
Withdrew: Adverse event00000114
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy00121109
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00002001
Withdrew: Physician decision00010111
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00012122
Follow-up Period (12 Weeks)
Participant flow — Follow-up Period (12 Weeks)
MilestonePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WPlacebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Placebo Responder)Placebo Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q4W /Q8W (Placebo Non-Responders)250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q8W (Miri Non-Responders)
Started0011024421
Completed00052324
Not completed001501217
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00020115
Withdrew: Adverse event00000014
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy00130006
Withdrew: Physician decision00000001
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00000001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment of (sPGA) (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline

The sPGA is the physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis (PsO) lesions overall at a given time point. Lesions were categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. Participant's PsO was assessed as 0 (clear), 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), or 5 (very severe). An sPGA responder was defined as having a post-baseline sPGA score of "0" or "1" with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment of (sPGA) (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants With a Static Physician's Global Assessment of (sPGA) (0,1) With at Least a 2-point Improvement From Baseline6.5 (1.9 to 11.2)69.3 (64.9 to 73.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 63.0 · 95% CI 56.5 to 69.4
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 90)

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 90)
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥90% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 90)6.5 (1.9 to 11.2)64.3 (59.7 to 68.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 57.8 · 95% CI 51.3 to 64.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)0.9 (0.0 to 2.8)17.0 (13.4 to 20.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 15.6 · 95% CI 11.6 to 19.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥75% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI 75)9.3 (3.8 to 14.9)82.5 (78.9 to 86.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 73.6 · 95% CI 67.1 to 80.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 100)

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 100)
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Score (PASI 100)0.9 (0.0 to 2.8)32.4 (27.9 to 36.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 30.8 · 95% CI 26.0 to 35.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement

The BSA is the percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participant's body surface on a continuous scale from 0% (no involvement) to 100% (full involvement), in which 1% corresponds to the size of the participant's hand (including the palm, fingers, and thumb). The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants With ≤1% of Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis Involvement0.9 (0.0 to 2.8)49.2 (44.4 to 53.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 48.1 · 95% CI 42.9 to 53.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptoms Score of 0 in Those With a PSS Symptoms Score ≥1 at Baseline

PSS is a patient-administered assessment of 4 symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, and burning); 3 signs (redness, scaling, and cracking); and 1 item on the discomfort related to symptoms/signs. The overall severity for each individual symptom/sign from the patient's psoriasis is indicated by selecting the number from a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 that best describes the worst level of each symptom/sign in the past 24 hours, where 0=no symptom/sign and 10=worst imaginable symptom/sign. In addition, a symptoms score ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (worst imaginable symptoms), and a signs score of 0 (no signs) to 30 (worst imaginable signs) will be reported. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptoms Score of 0 in Those With a PSS Symptoms Score ≥1 at Baseline
percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) Symptoms Score of 0 in Those With a PSS Symptoms Score ≥1 at Baseline0 (0.0 to 0.0)19.0 (15.2 to 22.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 18.3 · 95% CI 14.5 to 22.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥5

The DLQI is a patient-reported, 10-question, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". For all questions, if unanswered the question is scored as "0". Totals range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment). A DLQI total score of 0 to 1 is considered as having no effect on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and a 5-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥5
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score of (0,1) With at Least a 5-Point Improvement (Reduction) From Baseline in Participants With a Baseline DLQI Total Score ≥55.4 (0.8 to 10.1)54.7 (49.7 to 59.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 49.6 · 95% CI 42.8 to 56.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response (PASI 90) After Re-randomization at the Start of the Randomized Withdrawal Period

PASI combines the extent of body surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of scaling, redness, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis (PsO) to 72 for the most severe disease. For each region the percent area of skin involved was estimated from 0 (0%) to 6 (90%-100%) and severity was estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration and scaling with a scores range from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (severe involvement). Each area is scored separately and the scores then combined for the final PASI. Final PASI calculated as: sum of severity parameters for each region \* area score \* weighing factor \[head (0.1), upper limbs (0.2), trunk (0.3), lower limbs (0.4)\]. Overall scores range from 0 (no PsO) to 72 (the most severe disease).

Time frame:
Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response (PASI 90) After Re-randomization at the Start of the Randomized Withdrawal Period
Percentage of participants250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Clinical Response (PASI 90) After Re-randomization at the Start of the Randomized Withdrawal Period18.7 (10.7 to 26.7)85.6 (78.3 to 92.8)84.6 (77.2 to 92.0)
Statistical analysis
  • 250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 66.7 · 95% CI 56.0 to 77.5
  • 250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 65.9 · 95% CI 54.9 to 77.0
SecondaryChange in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline

The Palmoplantar PASI is a composite score derived from the sum scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by a score for the extent of palm and sole area involvement, ranging from 0 (no PPASI) to 72 (most severe PPASI). The PPASI was only assessed if participants have palmoplantar psoriasis at baseline. Least Squares Mean (LS Mean) was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline
score on a scalePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Change in Palmoplantar Psoriasis Severity Index (PPASI) Total Score in Participants With Palmoplantar Involvement at Baseline-1.13 ± 1.29-5.83 ± 0.72
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -4.70 · 95% CI -7.31 to -2.10
SecondaryChange in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline

The PSSI is a physician assessment of erythema, induration and desquamation and percent of scalp that is covered with a scores range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe). The composite score is derived from the sum of scores for erythema, induration, and desquamation multiplied by the score recorded for the extent of the scalp area involved, 1 (\<10%) to 6 (90%-100%) with a total score ranging from 0 (less severity) to 72 (more severity). LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline
score on a scalePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Change in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) Total Score in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline-2.70 ± 0.95-20.03 ± 0.55
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -17.33 · 95% CI -19.28 to -15.39
SecondaryChange in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline

The NAPSI scale is used to evaluate the severity of fingernail bed Ps and fingernail matrix PsO by area of involvement. The fingernail is divided into quadrants. Each fingernail is given a score for fingernail bed PsO 0 (none) to 4 (PsO in 4 quadrants of the fingernail) and fingernail matrix PsO 0 (none) to 4 (Ps in 4 quadrants of the matrix), depending on the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of any of the features of fingernail bed or matrix PsO in each quadrant. The sum of all fingernails equals the total NAPSI score range is from 0 (no effect) to 80 (more severe psoriasis). LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model with treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, and previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as covariates.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline
score on a scalePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Change in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Total Score in Participants With Fingernail Involvement at Baseline-2.04 ± 1.60-9.01 ± 0.89
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -6.98 · 95% CI -10.37 to -3.58
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)

SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. LS Mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)
score on a scalePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Change From Baseline on the Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS)0.35 ± 0.695.21 ± 0.43
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 4.86 · 95% CI 3.50 to 6.22
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)

SF-36 consists of 36 questions measuring 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, general health perceptions, mental health, social function, and vitality. The patient's responses are solicited using Likert scales that vary in length, with 3-6 response options per item. The SF-36 can be scored into the 8 health domains named above and two overall summary scores: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores. The domain and summary scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. LS Mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)
score on a scalePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Change From Baseline on the SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS)0.32 ± 0.735.10 ± 0.46
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 4.78 · 95% CI 3.33 to 6.23
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PatGA (0,1)) and >=2 Improvement From Baseline

The PatGA is a single-item self-reported instrument asking the participant to rate the severity of their psoriasis "today" by circling a number on the numeric rating scale from 0 (Clear = no psoriasis) to 5 (Severe = the worst their psoriasis has ever been). Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PatGA (0,1)) and >=2 Improvement From Baseline
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants With Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PatGA (0,1)) and >=2 Improvement From Baseline1.0 (0.0 to 2.8)69.5 (65.0 to 73.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 68.1 · 95% CI 63.2 to 72.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO)

The WPAI-PSO consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of psoriasis, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which psoriasis affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which psoriasis affected activities outside of work. Four scores are derived: absenteeism, presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism and impairment in activities performed outside of work. Each WPAI score is expressed as impairment percentages (0-100) with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, that is, worse outcomes. LS Mean was calculated using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Psoriasis (WPAI-PSO)
score on a scalePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Absenteeism0.10 ± 1.87-3.57 ± 1.12
Presenteeism-4.54 ± 2.39-24.79 ± 1.42
Overall Absenteeism and Presenteeism-3.45 ± 2.82-24.54 ± 1.68
Impairment in Activities Performed Outside of Work-6.83 ± 2.27-29.73 ± 1.41
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · ANOVA · p = 0.002 · Mean difference (net): -3.68 · 95% CI -7.30 to -0.06
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -20.24 · 95% CI -24.89 to -15.60
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -21.09 · 95% CI -26.56 to -15.62
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -22.91 · 95% CI -27.39 to -18.43
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11

QIDS-SR16 is a participant-administered, 16-item instrument intended to assess the existence and severity of symptoms of depression. A participant is asked to consider each statement as it relates to the way they have felt for the past 7 days and rate each on a 4-point scale: 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The sum of the 16 items corresponding to 9 depression domains \[sad mood, concentration, self-criticism, suicidal ideation, interest, energy/fatigue, sleep disturbance (initial, middle and late insomnia or hypersomnia), decrease/increase in appetite/weight, and psychomotor agitation/retardation\] to give a single total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Whereas 0-5 indicates no symptoms. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value, previous exposure to biologic therapy (yes/no), body weight (\<100 kg or \>=100 kg), and geographic region (North America or Other) as fixed factors.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11
score on a scalePlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Change From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS-SR16) Total Score in Those With a Baseline QIDS-SR16 Total Score ≥11-4.95 ± 1.94-4.42 ± 1.43
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · ANCOVA · p = 0.004 · Mean difference (net): 0.53 · 95% CI -3.08 to 4.14
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (0,1)

The DLQI is a patient-reported, 10-question, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". For all questions, if unanswered the question is scored as "0". Totals range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment). A DLQI total score of 0 to 1 is considered as having no effect on a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and a 5-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold. Percentage response is calculated by number of participants with a response divided by number of participants with non-missing values multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (0,1)
Percentage of participantsPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4W
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (0,1)8.7 (3.3 to 14.1)57.1 (52.4 to 61.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo Q4W vs 250 mg Miri Q4W · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 · Risk difference (rd): 48.8 · 95% CI 41.6 to 55.9
SecondaryInduction Period: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab at Week 16

Minimum observed serum concentration at steady state (Ctrough,ss) of mirikizumab at Week 16.

Time frame:
Week 16: Day 113
Reported as:
Geometric mean · micrograms per milliliter(micrograms/mL)
Induction Period: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab at Week 16
micrograms per milliliter(micrograms/mL)250 mg Miri Q4W
Induction Period: Pharmacokinetics (PK): Minimum Observed Serum Concentration at Steady State (Ctrough,ss) of Mirikizumab at Week 162.00 ± 139

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline Up To 64 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Q4W0/107 (0%)2/107 (1.9%)51/107 (47.7%)
250 mg Miri Q4W0/422 (0%)5/422 (1.2%)199/422 (47.2%)
Placebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Placebo Responder)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)
Placebo Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q4W /Q8W (Placebo Non-Responders)0/94 (0%)0/94 (0%)0/94 (0%)
250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W0/91 (0%)3/91 (3.3%)49/91 (53.8%)
250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W0/90 (0%)1/90 (1.1%)61/90 (67.8%)
250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W0/91 (0%)3/91 (3.3%)55/91 (60.4%)
250mg Miri Q4W to 250mg Miri Q8W(Miri Non-Responders)0/140 (0%)0/140 (0%)0/140 (0%)
Relapse0/47 (0%)0/47 (0%)17/47 (36.2%)
Placebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Responder) Follow-up Period0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Placebo Q4W Discontinued During Induction-Follow-up Period0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
Placebo Q4W to Placebo Non-Responder-Follow-up Period0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)
250 mg Miri Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Responders) Follow-up Period0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
250mg Miri Q4W to 125 mg Miri Q8W(Responders) Follow-up Period0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
250mg Miri Q4W to 250mg Miri Q8W(Responders) Follow-up Period0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)
250 Miri Q4W Discontinued During Induction-Follow-up0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
250 Miri Q4W to Miri Nonresponder-Follow-up Period0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WPlacebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Placebo Responder)Placebo Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q4W /Q8W (Placebo Non-Responders)250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W250mg Miri Q4W to 250mg Miri Q8W(Miri Non-Responders)RelapsePlacebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Responder) Follow-up PeriodPlacebo Q4W Discontinued During Induction-Follow-up PeriodPlacebo Q4W to Placebo Non-Responder-Follow-up Period250 mg Miri Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Responders) Follow-up Period250mg Miri Q4W to 125 mg Miri Q8W(Responders) Follow-up Period250mg Miri Q4W to 250mg Miri Q8W(Responders) Follow-up Period250 Miri Q4W Discontinued During Induction-Follow-up250 Miri Q4W to Miri Nonresponder-Follow-up Period
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/1070/4220/70/940/911/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/1070/4220/70/941/910/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders0/1070/4220/70/941/910/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/1070/4220/70/940/910/901/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
EpilepsyNervous system disorders0/1070/4220/70/940/910/901/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Glomerulonephritis membranousRenal and urinary disorders0/1070/4220/70/940/910/901/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
TonsillectomySurgical and medical procedures0/1070/4220/70/941/910/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Bile duct stoneHepatobiliary disorders1/1070/4220/70/940/910/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Ligament ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1070/4220/70/940/910/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Arthritis bacterialInfections and infestations0/1071/4220/70/940/910/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 295
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WPlacebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Placebo Responder)Placebo Q4W to 250 mg Miri Q4W /Q8W (Placebo Non-Responders)250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to Placebo Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responders to 125 mg Miri Q8W250 mg Miri Q4W Responder to 250 mg Miri Q8W250mg Miri Q4W to 250mg Miri Q8W(Miri Non-Responders)RelapsePlacebo Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Responder) Follow-up PeriodPlacebo Q4W Discontinued During Induction-Follow-up PeriodPlacebo Q4W to Placebo Non-Responder-Follow-up Period250 mg Miri Q4W to Placebo Q8W (Responders) Follow-up Period250mg Miri Q4W to 125 mg Miri Q8W(Responders) Follow-up Period250mg Miri Q4W to 250mg Miri Q8W(Responders) Follow-up Period250 Miri Q4W Discontinued During Induction-Follow-up250 Miri Q4W to Miri Nonresponder-Follow-up Period
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations14/10755/4220/70/9415/9113/909/910/1402/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/10716/4220/70/947/915/9010/910/1401/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Injection site painGeneral disorders5/10722/4220/70/942/915/906/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Vaginal infectionInfections and infestations0/331/1240/40/270/300/260/320/341/160/10/10/60/20/40/20/10/7
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/10710/4220/70/942/915/904/910/1401/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/10710/4220/70/945/913/903/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1073/4220/70/943/914/902/910/1402/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
PharyngitisInfections and infestations3/1077/4220/70/940/913/904/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders0/1070/4220/70/944/910/900/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1079/4220/70/942/912/904/910/1400/470/10/40/60/20/40/40/50/16

Baseline characteristics

All randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WTotal
Mean45.7 ± 13.7046.4 ± 13.5646.3 ± 13.58
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WTotal
Female33124157
Male74299373
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WTotal
Hispanic or Latino41317
Not Hispanic or Latino115364
Unknown or Not Reported92357449
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native145064
Asian33139172
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American426
White56231287
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Placebo Q4W250 mg Miri Q4WTotal
South Korea114556
Puerto Rico51520
United States166985
Japan104454
Taiwan124961
Poland114455
Mexico156176
Germany165874
Russia113849
08

Study locations

69 sites
  • Univ of Connecticut
    Farmington, Connecticut 06032, United States
  • Florida Academic Dermatology Centers
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Renstar Medical Research
    Ocala, Florida 34470, United States
  • Forward Clinical Trials, Inc
    Tampa, Florida 33624, United States
  • Arlington Dermatology
    Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008, United States
  • The South Bend Clinic
    South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States
  • Oregon Medical Research Center
    Portland, Oregon 97223, United States
  • Dermatology and Skin Surgery Center
    Exton, Pennsylvania 19341, United States
  • University of Utah MidValley Dematology
    Murray, Utah 84107, United States
  • Multicare Health System
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis Mahlow
    Mahlow, Brandenburg 15831, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster
    Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen 48149, Germany
  • Praxis Gerlach
    Dresden, Sachsen 01097, Germany
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • ISA GmbH
    Berlin, 10789, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg - Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Clinical Research Hamburg GmbH
    Hamburg, 22143, Germany
  • Toho University School of Medicine, Sakura Hospital
    Sakura, Chiba 285-8741, Japan
  • Takagi Dermatological Clinic
    Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-0013, Japan
  • Kanto Rosai Hospital
    Kawasaki, Kanagawa 211-8510, Japan
  • Yokohama City University Hospital
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan
  • Ryukyu University Hospital
    Nakagami-gun, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
  • Kume Clinic
    Nishi-ku Sakai-shi, Osaka 593-8324, Japan
  • Shimane University Hospital
    Izumo, Shimane 693-8501, Japan
  • Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center
    Hachioji, Tokyo 193-0998, Japan
  • NTT Medical Center Tokyo
    Shinagawa-KU, Tokyo 141-8625, Japan
  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital
    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan
  • Seibo Hospital
    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 161-8521, Japan
  • Shirasaki Clinic
    Takaoka-shi, Toyama 9330871, Japan
  • Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital
    Bucheon,, Gyeonggi-do 14647, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13620, Korea, Republic of
  • Bundang CHA General Hospital
    Sungnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 13496, Korea, Republic of
  • Ajou University Hospital
    Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16499, Korea, Republic of
  • Kyung Hee University Hospital
    Seoul, Korea 02447, Korea, Republic of
  • Korea University Guro Hospital
    Seoul, Korea 08308, Korea, Republic of
  • Ulsan University Hospital
    Ulsan, Korea 44033, Korea, Republic of
  • Chungnam National University Hospital
    Daejeon, 35015, Korea, Republic of
  • Chonnam National University Hospital
    Gwangju, 61469, Korea, Republic of
  • Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System
    Seoul, 03722, Korea, Republic of
  • Hanyang University Medical Center
    Seoul, 04763, Korea, Republic of
  • Konkuk University Hospital
    Seoul, 05030, Korea, Republic of
  • Centro Medico del Angel S.C.
    Mexicali, Baja California 21100, Mexico
  • Hospital de Jesus
    Mexico City, Distrito Federal 06090, Mexico
  • Instituto Dermatologico de Jalisco Dr. Jose Barba Rubio
    Zapopan, Jalisco 45190, Mexico
  • Clínica Enfermedades Crónicas y Procedimientos Especiales SC
    Morella, Michoacan 58249, Mexico
  • B&B Investigaciones Medicas, SC
    Mazatlan, Sinaloa 82140, Mexico
  • Kohler Milstein Research, S.A. de C.V.
    Merida, Yucatan 97070, Mexico
  • RM Pharma Specialists S.A. de C.V.
    Distrito Federal, 3100, Mexico
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Aplicadas a la Neurociencia A.C
    Durango, 34000, Mexico
  • NZOZ ZDROWIE Osteo-Medic
    Bialystok, 15-351, Poland
  • "Dermed" Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.
    Lodz, 90-265, Poland
  • Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne
    Swidnik, 21-040, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne AMED
    Warszawa, 01-518, Poland
  • DermMEDICA Sp. z o.o.
    Wroclaw, 51-318, Poland
  • Office of Dr. Alma M. Cruz
    Carolina, 00985, Puerto Rico
  • GCM Medical Group PSC
    San Juan, 00909, Puerto Rico
  • GBUZ Clinical dermatology and venereological dispensary
    Krasnodar, 350000, Russian Federation
  • State scientific centre for dermatovenerology and cosmetolog
    Moscow, 107076, Russian Federation
  • First Moscow State Medical University n.a. Sechenov
    Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
  • GOU VPO 'Smolensk State Medical Academy of Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russian Federation'
    Smolensk, 214000, Russian Federation
  • SPb SBHI Skin-venerologic dispensary #10
    St. Petersburg, 194021, Russian Federation
  • Tver State Medical University
    Tver, 170100, Russian Federation
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei City, Zhongzheng District 100, Taiwan
  • National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu
    Hsinchu, 30059, Taiwan
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung
    Kaohsiung, 83301, Taiwan
  • Taipei Medical University- Shuang Ho Hospital
    New Taipei City, 23561, Taiwan
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
    Taichung City, 40201, Taiwan
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, 70403, Taiwan
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou
    Taoyuan Hsien, 10508, Taiwan
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and EU, whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.

Access criteria: A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · vivli.org

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2019, 10 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2020, 1 year 6 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Mar 2020.

Of 217 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Psoriasis, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 26. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 227 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 23, 2018
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
StartActual
Apr 24, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 21, 2019
CompletionActual
Jan 16, 2020
Results delay requested
Mar 6, 2020
Results first posted
Sep 25, 2020
Last update
Sep 25, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03482011
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
Start date
Apr 24, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 21, 2019
Completion
Jan 16, 2020
Results posted
Sep 25, 2020
Last update
Sep 25, 2020

Study contacts

Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST)
study director · Eli Lilly and Company

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mirikizumab

Start the discussion