An interventional study of Personal resources' enhancement: self-efficacy and perceived social support and Personal resources' enhancement: perceived social support and self-efficacy in Stress, Psychological, Occupational and Burnout, Professional, sponsored by University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-11-04.
Sponsored by University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of internet intervention for reduction of occupational stress and its negative consequences (job burnout, depression) among medical professionals through the enhancement of the resources that are critical for coping with stress: self-efficacy and perceived social support.
Medical professionals are at high risk for job stress and burnout. Research show that the negative effects of stress can be reduced through strengthening personal resources such as self-efficacy and perceived social support. In line with cultivation and enabling hypotheses (Schwarzer \& Knoll, 2007; Benight \& Bandura, 2004) either self-efficacy cultivates perceived support, or rather perceived support enables self-efficacy. This study aims at testing both hypotheses in experimental design by applying them as a theoretical framework for the Med-Stress: evidence-based, CBT-framed internet intervention to foster resource accumulation among medical professionals.
The effectiveness of intervention will be tested in a four-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of: 1) self-efficacy and perceived support sequential enhancement (cultivation hypothesis), 2) perceived support and self-efficacy sequential enhancement (enabling hypothesis), 3) only self-efficacy, and 4) only social support enhancement (controls). Primary outcomes are job stress and burnout, secondary outcomes include work engagement, depression, and secondary traumatic stress. Self-efficacy and perceived support are expected to mediate the relationships between condition assignment and outcomes. Assessments include baseline (T1), three- or six-weeks post-test (depending on the condition, T2), as well as six- and twelve-months follow-ups (T3, T4). Intervention effect sizes and between-groups comparisons at post-test and follow-ups will be calculated.
This study will contribute to the findings on the role of personal resources in the development of job stress and burnout by demonstrating the cultivation vs enabling effects of self-efficacy and perceived social support.
Exclusion Criteria:
Behavioral: Personal resources' enhancement: self-efficacy and perceived social support
Behavioral: Personal resources' enhancement: perceived social support and self-efficacy
Behavioral: Personal resources' enhancement: self-efficacy
Behavioral: Personal resources' enhancement: perceived social support
The condition reflects cultivation hypothesis and consists of 2 sequential modules with self-efficacy enhancement module (SE) preceding perceived social support enhancement module (SS). Each module is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: 1) SE: mastery experience, vicarious experience, and action planning, 2) SS: received support \& cognitive distortions, social skills \& peer support, action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 6 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
The condition reflects enabling hypothesis and consists of 2 sequential modules with perceived social support enhancement module (SS) preceding self-efficacy enhancement module (SE). Each module is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: 1) SS: received support \& cognitive distortions, social skills \& peer support, and action planning, 2) SE: mastery experience, vicarious experience, and action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 6 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
The condition consists of self-efficacy enhancement module (SE) and is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: mastery experience, vicarious experience, and action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 3 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
The condition consists of perceived social support enhancement module (SS) and is comprised of 3 evidence-based, CBT-framed exercises: received support \& cognitive distortions, social skills \& peer support, and action planning. Participants will have an option to engage in one or more out of four additional modules: relaxation, cognitive reconstruction, mindfulness, and lifestyle. The condition takes 3 weeks, 1 week per exercise.
Change on Perceived Stress Scale 14 (PSS-14)
The PSS-14 is a measure of perceived stress. It consists of 14 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. Higher total score represents higher perceived stress. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related stress.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PSS-14 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Perceived Stress Scale 14 (PSS-14)
The PSS-14 is a measure of perceived stress. It consists of 14 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. Higher total score represents higher perceived stress. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related stress.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PSS-14 (6 months)
Change on Perceived Stress Scale 14 (PSS-14)
The PSS-14 is a measure of perceived stress. It consists of 14 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. Higher total score represents higher perceived stress. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related stress.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PSS-14 (12 months)
Change on Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI)
The OLBI is a measure of job burnout. It consists of 16 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 4. The questionnaire consists of two subscales: exhaustion and disengagement, To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher job burnout.
Time frame: Change from baseline on OLBI (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI)
The OLBI is a measure of job burnout. It consists of 16 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 4. The questionnaire consists of two subscales: exhaustion and disengagement, To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher job burnout.
Time frame: Change from baseline on OLBI (6 months)
Change on Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI)
The OLBI is a measure of job burnout. It consists of 16 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 4. The questionnaire consists of two subscales: exhaustion and disengagement, To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher job burnout.
Time frame: Change from baseline on OLBI (12 months)
Change on Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3)
The UWES-3 is a measure of work engagement. It consists of 3 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 6. Higher total score represents higher work engagement.
Time frame: Change from baseline on UWES-3 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3)
The UWES-3 is a measure of work engagement. It consists of 3 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 6. Higher total score represents higher work engagement.
Time frame: Change from baseline on UWES-3 (6 months)
Change on Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3)
The UWES-3 is a measure of work engagement. It consists of 3 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 6. Higher total score represents higher work engagement.
Time frame: Change from baseline on UWES-3 (12 months)
Change on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 is a measure of depression. It consists of 9 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 3. Higher total score represents higher depression.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PHQ-9 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 is a measure of depression. It consists of 9 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 3. Higher total score represents higher depression.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PHQ-9 (6 months)
Change on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 is a measure of depression. It consists of 9 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 3. Higher total score represents higher depression.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PHQ-9 (12 months)
Change on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5)
The PCL-5 is a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. It consists of 20 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. The questionnaire consists of four subscales: intrusions, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and arousal. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher posttraumatic stress disorder. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related secondary traumatic stress.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PCL-5 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5)
The PCL-5 is a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. It consists of 20 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. The questionnaire consists of four subscales: intrusions, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and arousal. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher posttraumatic stress disorder. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related secondary traumatic stress.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PCL-5 (6 months)
Change on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist 5 (PCL-5)
The PCL-5 is a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder. It consists of 20 items with response scale ranging from 0 to 4. The questionnaire consists of four subscales: intrusions, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and arousal. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher posttraumatic stress disorder. Instruction was adapted to refer to work-related secondary traumatic stress.
Time frame: Change from baseline on PCL-5 (12 months)
Change on Work Stress and Job Burnout Self-Efficacy Scale (WSBSES)
The WSBSES is a measure of self-efficacy to cope with work stress and job burnout. It consists of 28 items with the response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher self-efficacy.
Time frame: Change from baseline on WSBSES (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Work Stress and Job Burnout Self-Efficacy Scale (WSBSES)
The WSBSES is a measure of self-efficacy to cope with work stress and job burnout. It consists of 28 items with the response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher self-efficacy.
Time frame: Change from baseline on WSBSES (6 months)
Change on Work Stress and Job Burnout Self-Efficacy Scale (WSBSES)
The WSBSES is a measure of self-efficacy to cope with work stress and job burnout. It consists of 28 items with the response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher self-efficacy.
Time frame: Change from baseline on WSBSES (12 months)
Change on Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS), Subscale 3
The BSSS Subscale 3 measures social support seeking. Instruction and rating scale ware adapted to refer to social support self-efficacy. It consists of 5 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher social support self-efficacy.
Time frame: Change from baseline on BSSS, Subscale 3 (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS), Subscale 3
The BSSS Subscale 3 measures social support seeking. Instruction and rating scale ware adapted to refer to social support self-efficacy. It consists of 5 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher social support self-efficacy.
Time frame: Change from baseline on BSSS, Subscale 3 (6 months)
Change on Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS), Subscale 3
The BSSS Subscale 3 measures social support seeking. Instruction and rating scale ware adapted to refer to social support self-efficacy. It consists of 5 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher total score represents higher social support self-efficacy.
Time frame: Change from baseline on BSSS, Subscale 3 (12 months)
Change on Who Can You Count On Scale
The scale measures perceived social support. It consists of 32 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 5. The questionnaire consists of 4 subscales: support form supervisors, support from friends, support from family, friends. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher perceived social support.
Time frame: Change from baseline on Who Can You Count On Scale (3 or 6 weeks depending on the study condition)
Change on Who Can You Count On Scale
The scale measures perceived social support. It consists of 32 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 5. The questionnaire consists of 4 subscales: support form supervisors, support from friends, support from family, friends. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher perceived social support.
Time frame: Change from baseline on Who Can You Count On Scale (6 months)
Change on Who Can You Count On Scale
The scale measures perceived social support. It consists of 32 items with response scale ranging from 1 to 5. The questionnaire consists of 4 subscales: support form supervisors, support from friends, support from family, friends. To compute total score subscales are summed. Higher total score represents higher perceived social support.
Time frame: Change from baseline on Who Can You Count On Scale (12 months)
Secondary Trauma Exposure Scale (STES)
The STES measures job-related indirect exposure to traumatic events. It consists of 12 items with response scale for 10 items ranging from 0 to 1 and for remaining 2 items from 0 to 7. Higher total score represents higher secondary trauma exposure.
Time frame: Baseline
Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
The CEQ measures expectancy and credibility of the intervention. It consists of 6 items, with response scale for 4 items ranging from 1 to 9, and for remaining 2 items from 0% to 100%. Higher total score represents higher treatment credibility and user's expectancy for improvement.
Time frame: Baseline
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw