ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07754903BTTSUpdated Aug 11, 2026

Basic Trauma Training Programme for Newly Graduated Nurses in Saudi Trauma Centres

An interventional study of Basic Trauma Training (BTT) Programme and Standard Institutional Orientation in Nurse Retention, Burnout, Professional and Job Satisfaction, sponsored by Lincoln University College. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-11.

Sponsored by Lincoln University College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

New nurses often find it difficult to adjust when they start working in fast-paced, high-pressure trauma units, and many leave their jobs within the first two years. This study looks at whether a two-day training programme, called Basic Trauma Training (BTT), helps newly graduated nurses in Saudi trauma hospitals feel more confident, satisfied and engaged in their work, and more likely to stay in the nursing profession.

The study takes place at two trauma hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Because it is not practical to randomly assign nurses to groups in this real-world hospital setting, the study compares an earlier group of new nurses, who receive standard hospital orientation only, with a later group, who receive standard orientation plus the two-day BTT training. Both groups complete questionnaires before and after their orientation or training period, answering questions about job satisfaction, engagement, stress and their plans to stay in the role. The study also looks at actual staff retention using hospital employment records at 6 and 12 months. Nurses in the comparison group are offered the BTT training later, once their part of the study is complete, so that everyone has the chance to take part in the training.

Read the detailed description

This is a two-site, non-equivalent comparison-group quasi-experimental study using a pre-test/post-test design. Allocation is non-random and determined by intake cohort within each participating site: an earlier intake of eligible newly graduated nurses forms the comparator group, and a subsequent intake forms the intervention group, so that study arm is not confounded with site.

The intervention, Basic Trauma Training (BTT), is a structured two-day (14 contact-hour) educational programme developed in alignment with Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) Specialised Professional Programme accreditation standards. It comprises five modules: trauma systems and primary survey principles; advanced trauma assessment and clinical reasoning; critical trauma interventions and patient safety; interprofessional communication and team leadership; and psychological preparedness, peer support and self-care. Delivery combines didactic teaching, high-fidelity simulation using the PEARLS debriefing framework, and facilitated reflective discussion. The comparator condition is standard institutional orientation (approximately five days of general clinical induction without trauma-specific structured training). Comparator-arm participants are offered BTT, with the same continuing professional development credit, after their follow-up assessment (waitlist design).

Individual-level randomisation was not adopted due to contamination risk between nurses working on the same unit, and because staffing and rostering decisions are governed by institutional service demand rather than research allocation. Contamination is managed through scheduling separation, controlled distribution of training materials, and a two-item contamination check at follow-up.

The primary outcome is workforce sustainability, a formative composite index of four equally weighted, standardised components: job satisfaction (MOAQ-JSS), work engagement (UWES-9), personal burnout (CBI-PB, reverse scored), and retention intention. The primary analysis is a linear mixed-effects model with a time-by-arm interaction term, adjusting for site, prior trauma exposure, months since graduation, and delivery block. Secondary outcomes include the four composite components analysed individually, role transition stress (Rizzo Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict scales), trauma-care self-efficacy, general self-efficacy (GSE-10), and actual workforce retention from institutional HR records at 6 and 12 months. An exploratory mediation analysis examines whether role transition stress and self-efficacy mediate the effect of BTT on workforce sustainability.

The study is reported in accordance with the SPIRIT 2025 statement for trial protocols and the TREND statement for non-randomised intervention evaluations, with intervention reporting following the TIDieR checklist.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nurse Retention
  • Burnout, Professional
  • Job Satisfaction
  • Transition to Practice, Professional

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • newly graduated nurses
  • trauma nursing
  • workforce sustainability
  • transition shock
  • job demands-resources model
  • Saudi Arabia
  • quasi-experimental
03

In context

Burnout, Professional

216 studies on the registry are indexed under Burnout, Professional; 33 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 128 is above the median of 80 across 161 interventional studies indexed under Burnout, Professional.

Browse Burnout, Professional studies →

Lead sponsor

Lincoln University College is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) licensure
  • Less than 12 months of post-licensure clinical experience at baseline
  • Current direct patient-facing employment in a trauma-related intensive care unit at King Saud Medical City or Northern Medical Tower
  • Willing and able to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 12 months of post-licensure clinical experience
  • Employment outside trauma-related ICU settings
  • Agency or temporary staffing status
  • Extended leave during the intervention or data-collection period
  • Prior formal trauma-specific training (ATCN, TNCC) before enrolment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
128 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention (BTT)

    Participants receive the Basic Trauma Training (BTT) programme, a two-day (14 contact-hour) simulation-based educational intervention, in addition to standard institutional orientation

    Behavioral: Basic Trauma Training (BTT) Programme

  • Experimental
    Comparator (Standard Orientation)

    Participants receive standard institutional orientation only (approximately five days of general clinical induction, without trauma-specific structured training). BTT is offered to this group after their follow-up (T1) assessment.

    Other: Standard Institutional Orientation

Interventions

  • BehavioralBasic Trauma Training (BTT) Programme

    A structured two-day, 14-contact-hour educational programme comprising five modules: trauma systems and primary survey principles; advanced trauma assessment and clinical reasoning; critical trauma interventions and patient safety; interprofessional communication and team leadership; and psychological preparedness, peer support and self-care. Delivered via didactic teaching, high-fidelity simulation using the PEARLS debriefing framework, and facilitated reflective discussion.

  • OtherStandard Institutional Orientation

    Standard existing onboarding programme for newly employed nursing staff, comprising approximately five days of general clinical induction without trauma-specific structured training. Content and duration are documented at baseline to characterise the comparator condition precisely.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Workforce Sustainability (Composite Index)

    A formative composite index of four equally weighted, standardised (z-score) components: job satisfaction (Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale, MOAQ-JSS, 3 items, 7-point Likert), work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, UWES-9, 0-6 frequency scale), personal burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, CBI-PB, 6 items, 0-100 scale, reverse scored), and retention intention (validated instrument, to be finalised). Each component is standardised using the pooled baseline mean and SD across both arms at T0, and the four standardised components are averaged.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0) and 4-6 weeks post-intervention/orientation (T1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Job Satisfaction

    Measured using the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale (MOAQ-JSS, 3 items, 7-point Likert scale)

    Time frame: Baseline (T0) and 4-6 weeks post-intervention/orientation (T1)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Aggar C, Bloomfield J, Thomas TH, Gordon CJ. Australia's first transition to professional practice in primary care program for graduate registered nurses: a pilot study. BMC Nurs. 2017 Mar 23;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0207-5. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28344514 ↗
  • Lyu XC, Huang SS, Ye XM, Zhang LY, Zhang P, Wang YJ. What influences newly graduated registered nurses' intention to leave the nursing profession? An integrative review. BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 19;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01685-z. PubMed 38243209 ↗
  • Rush KL, Janke R, Duchscher JE, Phillips R, Kaur S. Best practices of formal new graduate transition programs: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:139-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PubMed 30965203 ↗
  • Duchscher JE. Transition shock: the initial stage of role adaptation for newly graduated registered nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2009 May;65(5):1103-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04898.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9. PubMed 19183235 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers. The study involves sensitive health information collected from psychiatric nurses and patients in Saudi Arabia, and the informed consent process does not include permission for public sharing of de-identified participant-level data. To protect participant confidentiality and comply with institutional ethical requirements, applicable Saudi data protection regulations, and the approvals granted by the relevant Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), only aggregated study results will be published. Researchers interested in additional information may contact the Principal Investigator to discuss the availability of study materials, including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and data collection instruments, where appropriate.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07754903
Lead sponsor
Lincoln University College
Collaborators
King Saud Medical City, Lincoln University College Malaysia
Responsible party
ALANAZI ABDULAZIZ SULTAN L (Principle Investigator, Lincoln University College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 10, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2026

Study contacts

Abdulaziz Sultan L. Alanazi
Contact
sultan.phdscholar@lincoln.edu.my
+966 53 113 0431
Faridah Mohd Said Dr.
Contact
faridah.msaid@lincoln.edu.my
+60122200419
Abdulaziz L Alanazi
principal investigator · Lincoln University College
Faridah M Said
study director · Lincoln University College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion