ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03471247CYCLEUpdated Oct 9, 2026

CYCLE: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early In-bed Cycling for Mechanically Ventilated Patients

An interventional study of In-Bed Cycle Ergometer and Routine PT in Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness, Critical Care and Mechanical Ventilation, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 16 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
363
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients who survive critical illness usually experience long-lasting physical and psychological impairments, which are often debilitating. Rehabilitation interventions started in the ICU may reduce this morbidity. In-bed cycling, which uses a special bicycle that attaches to the hospital bed, allows critically ill patients who are mechanically ventilated (MV) to gently exercise their legs while in the ICU. The main goal of this study is to determine whether critically ill MV adults recover faster if they receive early in-bed cycling than if they do not. Another objective is to determine whether in-bed cycling is a cost-effective intervention. 360 patients admitted to the ICU and receiving MV will be enrolled in the study. Following informed consent, patients will be randomized to either (1) early in-bed cycling and routine physiotherapy or (2) routine physiotherapy alone. Patients' strength and physical function will be measured throughout the study. If early in-bed cycling during critical illness improves short-term physical and functional outcomes, it could accelerate recovery and reduce long-term disability in ICU survivors.

Read the detailed description

Background: Survivors of critical illness have a long road of physical, cognitive, and psychological recovery. Although medical advances have reduced the mortality of critical illness, survival often comes with substantial long-term morbidity and societal cost. At 1-year follow-up, \~35% of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors had sub-normal 6-minute walk distance, and \~50% had not returned to work. Rehabilitation interventions started in the ICU may reduce this morbidity. In-bed cycling is a novel technology that may help critically ill, mechanically ventilated (MV) patients receive exercise very early to prevent or attenuate muscle weakness. Patients on MV typically receive prolonged bedrest and are often perceived as 'too sick' for physiotherapy (PT) interventions. However expert consensus and our previous multicentre pilot work suggest these interventions are safe. The CYCLE RCT will evaluate whether early in-bed cycling compared to usual PT interventions improves patient-reported outcomes.

Objectives:

  1. CYCLE RCT: To determine if early in-bed cycling and routine PT compared to routine PT alone in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults improves the primary outcome of physical function at 3 days after ICU discharge and secondary outcomes of strength, physical function, frailty, psychological distress, quality of life, mortality, and healthcare utilization.
  2. Economic Evaluation: To determine the cost-effectiveness of cycling and routine PT compared to routine PT alone among critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults.

Design: 360-patient concealed open-label RCT with blinded outcome assessment

Population: Critically ill adults receiving MV in a medical-surgical ICU

Methods: After informed consent, patients will be randomized to receive 30 minutes/day of cycling, 5 days per week and routine PT interventions or routine PT interventions alone. Assessors, blinded to treatment allocation, will measure the primary outcome of patients' physical function at 3 days post-ICU. Secondary outcomes will be measured at ICU awakening, ICU discharge, 3 days post-ICU, hospital discharge, and 90-days post-enrollment.

Relevance: By 2026, demand for ICU services is estimated to increase by 40% and more survivors will be at risk for post-ICU disability. If early cycling during critical illness improves short-term physical and functional outcomes, it could accelerate recovery and reduce long-term disability in ICU survivors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness
  • Critical Care
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Respiratory Failure
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,675 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 300 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 363 is above the median of 55 across 1,056 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 738 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is ≥ 18 years of age
  • Patient is invasively mechanically ventilated ≤ 4 days
  • Expected additional 2 day ICU stay
  • Ability to ambulate independently (with or without gait aid) before their critical illness
  • ICU length of stay ≤ 7 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-hospital inability to follow simple commands in local language at baseline
  • Acute conditions impairing ability to receive cycling
  • Severe cognitive impairment pre-ICU
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Acute proven or suspected central or peripheral neuromuscular weakness affecting the legs (e.g., stroke, Guillian-Barre syndrome, spinal injury)
  • Temporary pacemaker (internal or external)
  • Expected hospital mortality ≥ 90%
  • Equipment unable to fit patient's body dimensions (elg., leg amputation, morbid obesity)
  • Palliative goals of care
  • Pregnancy (suspected or proven)
  • Specific surgical exclusion as stipulated by surgery or ICU team
  • Physician declines
  • Cycling exemption not resolved during first 4 days of mechanical ventilation
  • Patient already able to march on spot at time of screening
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
363 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    In-Bed Cycle Ergometer + Routine PT

    Patients will receive 30 minutes of in-bed cycling once per day, 5 days per week, while they remain in the ICU, for up to a maximum of 28 days. They will also receive routine physiotherapy.

    Device: In-Bed Cycle Ergometer · Other: Routine PT

  • Active comparator
    Routine PT

    Patients will receive routine physiotherapy interventions per current institutional practice

    Other: Routine PT

Interventions

  • DeviceIn-Bed Cycle Ergometer

    Physiotherapists will place the patient's legs in a specialized in-bed cycle ergometer allowing for gentle leg exercise. Exercise can performed in passive, active-assisted, or active mode.

    Also known as: Restorative Therapies RT300 Supine

  • OtherRoutine PT

    Includes, based on the patient's alertness and medical stability, activities to maintain or increase limb range of motion and strength, in- and out- of bed mobility, ambulation, and assistance with optimizing airway clearance and respiratory function.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physical Function Test for ICU-scored (PFIT-s)

    Patients complete 4 activities: arm and leg strength, ability to stand, and step cadence. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores = better function.

    Time frame: 3 days after ICU discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Function Test for ICU-scored (PFIT-s)

    Patients complete 4 activities: arm and leg strength, ability to stand, and step cadence. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores = better function.

    Time frame: ICU Awakening, approximately 6 days after ICU admission; ICU Discharge, approximately 12 days after ICU admission; Hospital Discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission

  2. Muscle Strength

    Manual muscle testing using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale. The patient exerts a force against the examiner's resistance. Each muscle is assessed on a 6-point scale (0 = no contraction, 5 = contraction sustained against maximal resistance). Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores = better strength.

    Time frame: ICU Awakening, approximately 6 days after ICU admission; ICU Discharge, approximately 12 days after ICU admission; 3 days after ICU discharge; Hospital Discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission

  3. 30 Second Sit to Stand

    Patient completes as many sit to stand repetitions as possible in 30 seconds. Total number of repetitions is recorded as patient's score. Higher repetitions represent better function.

    Time frame: ICU Awakening, approximately 6 days after ICU admission; ICU Discharge, approximately 12 days after ICU admission; 3 days after ICU discharge; Hospital Discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission

  4. Two Minute Walk Test

    Maximum distance walked in 2 minutes measured in metres on a continuous scale.

    Time frame: ICU Discharge, approximately 12 days after ICU admission; 3 days after ICU discharge; Hospital Discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission

  5. Patient-Reported Functional Scale-ICU (PRFS-ICU)

    Assesses patient's perception of their physical function. Patients rate their ability to perform 6 mobility activities on a 0-10 scale (0=unable to perform activity, 10=able to perform activity at same level as before ICU admission). Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing better function.

    Time frame: ICU discharge, approximately 12 days after ICU admission; hospital discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission; 3 months after enrollment

  6. Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale

    Rates the patient's ability to complete 6 tasks: bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, continence, and bed mobility. A rater assesses whether the patient is dependent or independent according to pre-specified criteria. Scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores representing better function.

    Time frame: Baseline; ICU discharge, approximately 12 days after ICU admission; hospital discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission

  7. Clinical Frailty Scale

    Patients are ranked on a scale from 1-9 according to level of frailty based on clinical descriptions (1 = very fit, 9 = terminally ill).

    Time frame: Baseline; hospital discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission

  8. Intensive Care Psychological Assessment Tool (IPAT)

    Patients answer 10 questions related to critical care-related psychological distress. Scores range from 0-20, with scores of 7 or greater indicating a patient at risk of future psychological morbidity.

    Time frame: After ICU awakening assessment, approximately 7 days after ICU admission

  9. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: From study admission to ICU discharge, approximately 10 days

  10. Length of stay

    ICU and Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: From hospital admission to ICU discharge (approximately 14 days) and hospital discharge (approximately 21 days)

  11. Health-Related Quality of Life - EuroQol-5D-5L and Visual Analogue Scale

    Five question self-administered, preference-based instrument to measure mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression, as well as a visual analogue scale (VAS) global assessment of health. For each dimension, the participant chooses 1 of 5 levels that best describes their health on that day: "no problem" (1), "slight" (2), "moderate" (3), "severe" (4), or "unable/extreme" (5). The VAS is the participant's rating of their health on a scale of 0 "worst health you can imagine" to 100 "best health you can imagine".

    Time frame: ICU discharge, approximately 12 days after ICU admission; hospital discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission; 3 months after enrollment

  12. Mortality

    Death in ICU, hospital, or post-discharge.

    Time frame: From study admission to 3 months after enrollment

  13. Hospital Discharge Location

    For survivors: home, inpatient rehabilitation, other hospital, chronic care, assisted living facility, nursing home.

    Time frame: Hospital discharge, approximately 28 days after ICU admission

  14. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Patient answers 14 questions related to anxiety and depression. Scores range from 0-21 with higher score indicating more distress.

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment

  15. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)

    A measure of health outcomes for economic evaluation that incorporates the impact of an intervention on both the quantity and quality of life.

    Time frame: 3 months after enrollment

  16. Healthcare Utilization

    Includes emergency room visits and hospitalizations, family doctor visits, specialist visits and outpatient clinics, other healthcare professional services.

    Time frame: From study admission to 3 months after enrollment

  17. Intervention and Healthcare Costs

    Includes emergency room visits and hospitalizations, family doctor visits, specialist visits and outpatient clinics, assistive devices, renovations and modifications, other healthcare professional services, employment status and time off work, assistance from others.

    Time frame: From study admission to 3 months after enrollment

07

Study locations

16 sites
  • University of Maryland Medical Centre
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Duke University Hospital
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Austin Health - Austin Hospital
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • Brant Community Healthcare System - Brantford General Hospital
    Brantford, Ontario N3R 1G9, Canada
  • Hamilton Health Sciences - Hamilton General Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
  • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada
  • Hamilton Health Sciences - Juravinski Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8V 1C3, Canada
  • Kingston Health Sciences Centre - Kingston General Hospital
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital
    London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
  • The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
  • Niagara Health System - St. Catharines Site
    St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 0A9, Canada
  • St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
  • Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Chaudiere-Appalaches - Hotel-Dieu de Levis
    Lévis, Quebec G6V 3Z1, Canada
  • Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et de Services Sociaux du Nord-de-L'Ile-de-Montreal - Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
    Montreal, Quebec H4J 1C5, Canada
  • Centre Integre Universitaire de Sante et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Heels-Ansdell D, Kelly L, O'Grady HK, Farley C, Reid JC, Berney S, Pastva AM, Burns KE, D'Aragon F, Herridge MS, Seely A, Rudkowski J, Rochwerg B, Fox-Robichaud A, Ball I, Lamontagne F, Duan EH, Tsang J, Archambault PM, Verceles AC, Muscedere J, Mehta S, English SW, Karachi T, Serri K, Reeve B, Thabane L, Cook D, Kho ME. Early In-Bed Cycle Ergometry With Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Statistical Analysis Plan for CYCLE (Critical Care Cycling to Improve Lower Extremity Strength), an International, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 28;13:e54451. doi: 10.2196/54451. PubMed 39467285 ↗
  • Reid JC, Molloy A, Strong G, Kelly L, O'Grady H, Cook D, Archambault PM, Ball I, Berney S, Burns KEA, D'Aragon F, Duan E, English SW, Lamontagne F, Pastva AM, Rochwerg B, Seely AJE, Serri K, Tsang JLY, Verceles AC, Reeve B, Fox-Robichaud A, Muscedere J, Herridge M, Thabane L, Kho ME; CYCLE Investigators. Research interrupted: applying the CONSERVE 2021 Statement to a randomized trial of rehabilitation during critical illness affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06640-y. PubMed 36056378 ↗
  • Kho ME, Reid J, Molloy AJ, Herridge MS, Seely AJ, Rudkowski JC, Buckingham L, Heels-Ansdell D, Karachi T, Fox-Robichaud A, Ball IM, Burns KEA, Pellizzari JR, Farley C, Berney S, Pastva AM, Rochwerg B, D'Aragon F, Lamontagne F, Duan EH, Tsang JLY, Archambault P, English SW, Muscedere J, Serri K, Tarride JE, Mehta S, Verceles AC, Reeve B, O'Grady H, Kelly L, Strong G, Hurd AH, Thabane L, Cook DJ; CYCLE Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Critical Care Cycling to Improve Lower Extremity Strength (CYCLE): protocol for an international, multicentre randomised clinical trial of early in-bed cycling for mechanically ventilated patients. BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 23;13(6):e075685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075685. PubMed 37355270 ↗
  • Kho ME, Berney S, Pastva AM, Kelly L, Reid JC, Burns KEA, Seely AJ, D'Aragon F, Rochwerg B, Ball I, Fox-Robichaud AE, Karachi T, Lamontagne F, Archambault PM, Tsang JL, Duan EH, Muscedere J, Verceles AC, Serri K, English SW, Reeve BK, Mehta S, Rudkowski JC, Heels-Ansdell D, O'Grady HK, Strong G, Obrovac K, Ajami D, Camposilvan L, Tarride JE, Thabane L, Herridge MS, Cook DJ. Early In-Bed Cycle Ergometry in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. NEJM Evid. 2024 Jul;3(7):EVIDoa2400137. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400137. Epub 2024 Jun 12. PubMed 38865147 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 9, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in May 2023, 55 months.

Of 421 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Respiratory Insufficiency, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's 55 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 439 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 7, 2018
First posted
Mar 20, 2018
StartActual
Oct 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 26, 2023
CompletionActual
Aug 26, 2024
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03471247
Collaborators
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2018
Start date
Oct 15, 2018
Primary completion
May 26, 2023
Completion
Aug 26, 2024
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Michelle Kho, PT, PhD
principal investigator · McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion