CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03469024Updated Sep 21, 2023

Effectiveness of a Home Rehabilitation Program vs an e-Health Program in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Home Rehabilitation Program and e-Health program in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Universidad de Almeria. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 67 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-21.

Sponsored by Universidad de Almeria · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 67 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objetive of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of a home rehabilitaton program vs a e-Health program. Therapeutic approach will be by electroanalgesia and exercise of patients with chronic low back pain.

Read the detailed description

A double blind clinical trial will be developed in a sample of 80 subjects with chronic low back pain. Patients will receive 3 weekly sessions of electroanalgesia and an exercise program for 8 weeks, for a total of 24 sessions. The aim is to analyze the effectiveness of a home rehabilitation program vs a web platform program on disability, pain, fear of movement, quality of life, resistance of the trunk flexors, lumbar mobility in flexion and muscular electrical activity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Electroanalgesia
  • Exercise program
  • Randomized clinical trial
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 67 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Low back pain ≥ 3 months.
  • Age between 30 and 67 years old.
  • Score ≥ 4 points on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
  • Not being receiving physical therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of lumbar stenosis.
  • Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis.
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
  • Treatment with corticosteroids or oral medication in recent weeks.
  • History of spine surgery.
  • Contraindication of analgesic electrical therapy.
  • Have previously received a treatment of electrical analgesia or exercise.
  • Central or peripheral nervous system disease.
  • Agoraphobia
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Home rehabilitation program

    It consists in a home rehabilitation program. Patients will recieve electroanalgesia with TENS and an exercise program following the McKenzie method. At first and second sessions, patients will be instructed on how to use electroanalgesia and how to perform the exercises. Then, patients will perform the therapy at home. Patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 4 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions

    Other: Home Rehabilitation Program

  • Active comparator
    e-Health program

    It consists in a support system for the treatment of chronic low back pain based on web technologies. The system can register a subject and provide a treatment of electroanalgesia and exercise through the Mckenzie method. Video applications of electroanalgesia and exercises will be shown to patients who use their computer or mobile device to access the platform through the Internet. The treatments will be recommended by the system based on the database that is configured to accommodate the application of electroanalgesia and McKenzie exercises based on the diagnosis according to the McKenzie method.patients will perform the treatment 3 times per week, for 4 weeks, with a total of 24 sessions

    Other: e-Health program

Interventions

  • OtherHome Rehabilitation Program

    It consists in a home rehabilitation program performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine.

  • Othere-Health program

    It consists in an e-Health rehabilitation program through a web platform performing electroanalgesia and an exercise program following the Mckenzie method. Patients will be instructed in the use of the TENS device using 5x9cm electrodes at the bilateral paravertebral level, the patients that present radicular pain, the electrodes will be placed in the path of the affected nerve. The realization of exercises will be through the application of an Mckezie protocol. The duration will be the same as that used to carry out the Mckenzie protocol. Mckenzie exercises are designed to make changes in the internal components periarticular of the spine.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).

    This is a self-reported questionnaire consisting in 24 items reflecting limitations in different activities of daily living attributed to low back pain including walking, vending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care and daily activities.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Idex.

    It has 10 items associated to activities of daily living, each ítem has a puntuation fron 0 to 5 points.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months.

  2. Change from baseline in pain intensity. Visual analogue scale.

    A 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

  3. Change from baseline in Fear of Movement. Tampa Scale of kinesiophobia.

    Is a 17-item questionnaire that measures the fear of movement and (re)injury.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

  4. Change from baseline on Quality of Life. SF-36 Health questionnaire.

    . SF-36 Health questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100% and indicate the self-perceived health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

  5. Change from Mcquade Test.

    It measures the isometric endurance of trunk flexion muscles.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

  6. Change from baseline in lumbar mobility flexion.

    For the quantification of lumbar flexion an angular inclinometer is used (Fleximeter UM 8320-3 RJ Code Research Institute, Brazil).

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

  7. Changes from baseline in Lumbar electromyography.

    The degree of electromyographic activation of the lumbar paravertebral musculature will be carried out by using a set of electrodes of 3x7 dimensions that will be applied uniformly in the lumbar region from the spinal level from L2 to L5.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

  8. Change from baselina in range of motion and lumbar segmental mobility

    This variable is quantified using the SpinalMouse ® device (Phisiotech, Spain). It is an electronic computer-aided measuring device that measures sagittal spinal amplitude of movement (ROM) and intersegmental angles in a non-invasive way.

    Time frame: At baseline, at 8 weeks and at 6 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Almería
    Almería, Andalucía 04120, Spain
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Von Korff M, Moore JC. Stepped care for back pain: activating approaches for primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):911-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_part_2-200105011-00016. PubMed 11346328 ↗
  • Schaafsma FG, Whelan K, van der Beek AJ, van der Es-Lambeek LC, Ojajarvi A, Verbeek JH. Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub3. PubMed 23990391 ↗
  • Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, Strauch K, Chenot JF, Leonhardt C, Keller S, Baum E, Pfingsten M, Hildebrandt J, Basler HD, Kochen MM, Donner-Banzhoff N. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1714-20. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181cd656f. PubMed 21374895 ↗
  • Walker BF. The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord. 2000 Jun;13(3):205-17. doi: 10.1097/00002517-200006000-00003. PubMed 10872758 ↗
  • Elfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 15;27(2):125-34. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00002. PubMed 11805656 ↗
  • Haladay DE, Miller SJ, Challis J, Denegar CR. Quality of systematic reviews on specific spinal stabilization exercise for chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;43(4):242-50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4346. Epub 2013 Jan 14. PubMed 23321935 ↗
  • Palacin-Marin F, Esteban-Moreno B, Olea N, Herrera-Viedma E, Arroyo-Morales M. Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):947-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318281a36c. PubMed 23238489 ↗
  • Descarreaux M, Normand MC, Laurencelle L, Dugas C. Evaluation of a specific home exercise program for low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Oct;25(8):497-503. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.127078. PubMed 12381971 ↗
  • Petersen T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, Olsen S, Jacobsen S. The effect of McKenzie therapy as compared with that of intensive strengthening training for the treatment of patients with subacute or chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Aug 15;27(16):1702-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208150-00004. PubMed 12195058 ↗
  • Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, Wells GA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub3. PubMed 18843638 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03469024
Lead sponsor
Universidad de Almeria
Collaborators
Funding: Junta de Andalucía
Responsible party
Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez (PhD, Universidad de Almeria) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 19, 2018
Start date
May 1, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2020
Completion
Apr 15, 2021
Last update
Sep 21, 2023

Study contacts

Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad de Almeria

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion