ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03467425Updated Sep 7, 2020Results posted

INTREPID: Investigation of TRELEGY Effectiveness: Usual Practice Design

A Phase 4 interventional study of FF/UMEC/VI and Inhaled Corticosteroid in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 143 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-07.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,109
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 25 studies testing fluticasone furoate in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. fluticasone furoate · Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Enrollment
3rd of 25
3,109 · median 229
Started
2018
with 4 others
Phase 4
13 of 25
2 open now
Registered
16th of 25
by date
Lead sponsor
21 of 25
GlaxoSmithKline

Among the 25 studies testing fluticasone furoate in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, this one is the 3rd largest by enrollment, is one of 5 that started in 2018, is one of 13 in phase 4, and was the 16th registered.

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

5,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 857 are open to participants now.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 25 studies testing fluticasone furoate in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive are open now, in 2 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 2 open studies →

About fluticasone furoate

fluticasone furoate: first FDA approval 2007 (FLONASE SENSIMIST ALLERGY RELIEF), first EMA approval 2008. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 557 Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies recruiting now, 306 (55%) set no upper age limit and 82 (15%) stop at 75 or younger; 29 take children under 18; 89 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 40 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 25 studies testing fluticasone furoate in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of TRELEGY ELLIPTA relative to non-ELLIPTA Multiple Inhaler Triple Therapies (MITT) for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) control within the usual clinical practice setting. The study will be conducted once TRELEGY ELLIPTA has been approved in the countries in which the study will be conducted and is available commercially. This is a randomized, open-label, effectiveness, phase 4 study of 24 weeks' duration in COPD subjects to evaluate TRELEGY ELLIPTA (fluticasone furoate [FF]/vilanterol [VI]/umeclidinium bromide [UMEC]: 100 microgram [mcg]/62.5 mcg/25 mcg) inhalation powder taken once daily using a single ELLIPTA inhaler compared with any non-ELLIPTA MITT in the usual care setting. Effectiveness of TRELEGY ELLIPTA will be assessed by comparing proportion of COPD Assessment Test (CAT) responders at Week 24 between two treatment groups. TRELEGY and ELLIPTA are trademarks of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) group of companies. The study will enroll approximately 3000 subjects.

03

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

  • FF/VI/UMEC
  • TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • COPD
  • Effectiveness
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Capable of giving signed .
  • Subjects with a documented physician diagnosis of .
  • A score of >=10 on the CAT at screening.
  • Subjects who have a history of treatment with systemic/oral , antibiotics and/or hospitalization for at least one COPD exacerbation in the 3 years prior to randomization. This will be captured through subject recall and/or medical records and must be documented in subject's notes. Prior use of systemic/oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics alone does not qualify as an exacerbation history unless the use was associated with treatment of worsening symptoms of COPD.
  • Subjects currently receiving one of the non-ELLIPTA maintenance therapies listed below who have been prescribed it continually for at least 16 weeks prior to randomization. Continuous prescription is defined as a minimum of 60 days' prescription cover during the prior 16 weeks. The non-ELLIPTA maintenance therapy must be one of the following: Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) in combination with Long-acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonist (LAMA) and Long Acting Beta-Agonist (LABA) (MITT) or LAMA and LABA used in combination as a dual therapy or LABA and ICS used in combination as a dual therapy. Subjects who are currently on a dual maintenance therapy for COPD must be considered by their physician to require a step-up to triple therapy. The reason for the physician decision to step- up must be documented. Subjects who are receiving only COPD medication on an 'as required' basis are not eligible.
  • Subjects must be aged >=40 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women of child bearing potential: Women who are pregnant or lactating or are planning on becoming pregnant during the study.
  • Subjects with any life-threatening condition i.e. low probability, in the opinion of the investigator, of 6-month survival due to severity of or comorbid condition.
  • Subjects with resolution of an exacerbation less than 2 weeks prior to visit 1, must not be randomized. Subjects may be rescreened 2 weeks after resolution of exacerbation (exacerbation is defined by treatment with systemic and/or antibiotic).
  • Subjects with historical or current evidence of uncontrolled or disease. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the effectiveness or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.
  • A history of allergy or to any corticosteroid, anticholinergic/muscarinic receptor antagonist, beta2-agonist, lactose/milk protein or magnesium stearate or a medical condition such as narrow-angle glaucoma, prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction that, in the opinion of the investigator contraindicates study participation.
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the treating investigator, are chronic users of oral corticosteroids for respiratory or other indications (if unsure discuss with the medical monitor prior to screening). Chronic use is defined as more than 14 days continuous use during the 12 weeks prior to visit 1.
  • Subjects taking any drug treatment within 30 days prior to Visit 1 or within five half-lives (t½) of the prior investigational study (whichever is the longer of the two).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,109 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TRELEGY ELLIPTA (FF/UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg)

    Eligible subjects will receive a blended combination of FF in the first strip (100 mcg per blister) and UMEC/VI in second strip (62.5 mcg UMEC per blister and 25 mcg VI per blister), a single inhalation once daily in the morning in the same TRELEGY ELLIPTA Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) via inhalation route for a period of 24 weeks. Study treatment may be augmented with other prescribed COPD medications such as including rescue medications, which will be prescribed and obtained according to usual practice.

    Drug: FF/UMEC/VI · Drug: COPD rescue medications

  • Active comparator
    Non-ELLIPTA MITT

    Eligible subjects will receive the ICS/LAMA/LABA products twice daily and dosing regimens as prescribed by their physician for a period of 24 weeks. Study treatment may be augmented with other prescribed COPD medications such as including rescue medications, which will be prescribed and obtained according to usual practice.

    Drug: Inhaled Corticosteroid · Drug: LAMA · Drug: LABA · Drug: COPD rescue medications

Interventions

  • DrugFF/UMEC/VI

    Drug pages: Fluticasone furoate · GSK573719 · Vilanterol

    FF is a dry white powder containing 100 mcg GW685698 blended with lactose in one blister in the first strip of the DPI. UMEC/VI is a dry white powder containing 62.5 mcg of UMEC and 25 mcg of VI per blister, both blended together with lactose and magnesium stearate in the second strip of the DPI.

  • DrugInhaled Corticosteroid

    Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) as prescribed by the physician.

  • DrugLAMA

    LAMA as prescribed by the physician.

  • DrugLABA

    LABA as prescribed by the physician.

  • DrugCOPD rescue medications

    Rescue medications for COPD will be prescribed and obtained according to usual practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Responders and Non-responders Based on the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) at Week 24 and Number of Participants With Imputed CAT Score at Week 24

    The CAT is a 8-item questionnaire, used to measure the health status of par. with COPD. Par. rated their experience on a 6-point scale: 0 (no impact) to 5 (maximum impact). CAT score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 8 items with a range of 0-40. Higher scores indicate greater disease impact. Responders were par. who had a change from Baseline score \>=2 at Week 24. Non-responders were the par. who had change from Baseline score \<2 at Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus the Baseline value (Day 1). A composite strategy was applied when intercurrent events of randomized treatment modification, change in pulmonary rehabilitation or start of oxygen therapy occurred, otherwise a treatment policy strategy was applied. Missing Week 24 CAT data were imputed assuming missing at random and are presented in a separate category. Number of responders, non-responders based on CAT and par. with imputed CAT score at Week 24 are presented.

    Time frame: At Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24

    FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FEV1 measurements were collected using a spirometer. Baseline was defined as the value recorded at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as FEV1 value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. A treatment policy strategy was used for the intercurrent events of randomized treatment discontinuation, randomized treatment modification, change of pulmonary rehabilitation status and start of oxygen therapy. Only those participants with non-missing covariates were included in the analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Making at Least 1 Critical Error in Inhalation Technique at Week 24

    Participants were trained on the correct use of their inhaler devices. All participants who had spirometry measured were to have an assessment of inhaler errors. During the assessment, participants were asked to demonstrate inhaler use when taking their regular dose of medication. A critical error is defined as an error that is most likely to result in no or significantly reduced medication being inhaled. These errors were recorded in an error checklist, during the assessment. A hypothetical strategy was used for the intercurrent event of randomized treatment modification. Percentage of participants making at least 1 critical error in inhalation technique at the Week 24 is presented.

    Time frame: At Week 24

07

Results

Posted Sep 7, 2020

Participant flow

This was a Phase IV, open-label, randomized study to evaluate the effectiveness of TRELEGY ELLIPTA relative to non-ELLIPTA multiple inhaler triple therapies (MITT) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) control within the usual clinical practice setting. TRELEGY and ELLIPTA are registered trademarks of GlaxoSmithKline group of companies.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-ELLIPTA MITT
Started15451547
Randomized but did not start ip10
Completed ip12561359
Not completed ip288188
Withdrew ip (wip): lost to follow-up1524
Wip: protocol deviation02
Wip: adverse event11229
Wip: lack of efficacy5628
Wip: physician decision1427
Wip: withdrawal by participant9178
Completed14981493
Not completed4754
Withdrew: Adverse event99
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy31
Withdrew: Protocol violation01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1825
Withdrew: Physician decision21
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1517

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Responders and Non-responders Based on the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) at Week 24 and Number of Participants With Imputed CAT Score at Week 24

The CAT is a 8-item questionnaire, used to measure the health status of par. with COPD. Par. rated their experience on a 6-point scale: 0 (no impact) to 5 (maximum impact). CAT score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the 8 items with a range of 0-40. Higher scores indicate greater disease impact. Responders were par. who had a change from Baseline score \>=2 at Week 24. Non-responders were the par. who had change from Baseline score \<2 at Week 24. Change from Baseline was calculated as Week 24 value minus the Baseline value (Day 1). A composite strategy was applied when intercurrent events of randomized treatment modification, change in pulmonary rehabilitation or start of oxygen therapy occurred, otherwise a treatment policy strategy was applied. Missing Week 24 CAT data were imputed assuming missing at random and are presented in a separate category. Number of responders, non-responders based on CAT and par. with imputed CAT score at Week 24 are presented.

Time frame:
At Week 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Responders and Non-responders Based on the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) at Week 24 and Number of Participants With Imputed CAT Score at Week 24
ParticipantsFF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-ELLIPTA MITT
Responders731616
Non-responders756835
Participants with imputed CAT score5292
Statistical analysis
  • FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPI vs Non-ELLIPTA MITT · Regression, Logistic · p = <0.001 (Analysis was performed using logistic regression model with covariates of treatment group, Baseline CAT score, number of exacerbations in the prior year, actual prior medication use strata and country.) · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 1.13 to 1.51Statistical comparison is presented for combined data of responders, non-responders and those with imputed CAT score at Week 24.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FEV1 measurements were collected using a spirometer. Baseline was defined as the value recorded at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as FEV1 value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value. A treatment policy strategy was used for the intercurrent events of randomized treatment discontinuation, randomized treatment modification, change of pulmonary rehabilitation status and start of oxygen therapy. Only those participants with non-missing covariates were included in the analysis.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liters
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 24
LitersFF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-ELLIPTA MITT
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 241.446 ± 0.01051.396 ± 0.0108
Statistical analysis
  • FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPI vs Non-ELLIPTA MITT · ANCOVA · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 0.050 · 95% CI 0.026 to 0.073Analysis was performed using an ANCOVA with covariates of treatment group, Baseline FEV1, actual prior medication use strata, country and timing of spirometry.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Making at Least 1 Critical Error in Inhalation Technique at Week 24

Participants were trained on the correct use of their inhaler devices. All participants who had spirometry measured were to have an assessment of inhaler errors. During the assessment, participants were asked to demonstrate inhaler use when taking their regular dose of medication. A critical error is defined as an error that is most likely to result in no or significantly reduced medication being inhaled. These errors were recorded in an error checklist, during the assessment. A hypothetical strategy was used for the intercurrent event of randomized treatment modification. Percentage of participants making at least 1 critical error in inhalation technique at the Week 24 is presented.

Time frame:
At Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Making at Least 1 Critical Error in Inhalation Technique at Week 24
Percentage of ParticipantsFF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-ELLIPTA MITT
Percentage of Participants Making at Least 1 Critical Error in Inhalation Technique at Week 2463
Statistical analysis
  • FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPI vs Non-ELLIPTA MITT · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.103 · Odds ratio (or): 1.99 · 95% CI 0.87 to 4.53Analysis was performed using logistic regression model with covariates of treatment group, actual prior medication use strata and country.

Adverse events

Collected over Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious AEs (non-SAEs) were collected from the start of study treatment up to Week 24. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPI8/1,545 (0.5%)114/1,545 (7.4%)32/1,545 (2.1%)
Non-Ellipta MITT8/1,547 (0.5%)114/1,547 (7.4%)3/1,547 (0.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 128
Most frequent serious events
EventFF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-Ellipta MITT
PneumoniaInfections and infestations26/154530/1547
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders26/154528/1547
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways diseaseInfections and infestations6/15459/1547
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders3/15457/1547
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders5/15455/1547
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders5/15452/1547
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders4/15455/1547
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/15454/1547
SepsisInfections and infestations3/15452/1547
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/15451/1547
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-Ellipta MITT
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders32/15453/1547

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-ELLIPTA MITTTotal
Mean67.8 ± 8.7867.8 ± 8.5967.8 ± 8.68
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-ELLIPTA MITTTotal
Female7087291437
Male8378181655
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)FF /UMEC/VI: 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg by ELLIPTA DPINon-ELLIPTA MITTTotal
Asian- Central/South Asian Heritage12719
Asian- East Asian Heritage011
Asian- South East Asian Heritage167
Black or African American347
White- Arabic/North African Heritage6713
White- White/Caucasian/European Heritage152315213044
White and Black or African American011
08

Study locations

143 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Aschaffenburg, Bayern 63739, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dachau, Bayern 85221, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Garmisch-Partenirchen, Bayern 82467, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Wallerfing, Bayern 94574, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cottbus, Brandenburg 03050, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fuerstenwalde, Brandenburg 15517, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Potsdam, Brandenburg 14467, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Potsdam, Brandenburg 14469, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ruedersdorf, Brandenburg 15562, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Darmstadt, Hessen 64283, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Frankfurt, Hessen 60389, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Frankfurt, Hessen 60596, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fulda, Hessen 36039, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Marburg, Hessen 35037, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rodgau, Hessen 63110, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ruesselsheim, Hessen 65428, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hannover, Niedersachsen 30167, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hannover, Niedersachsen 30173, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Peine, Niedersachsen 31224, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Wardenburg, Niedersachsen 26203, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bergisch Gladbach, Nordrhein-Westfalen 51429, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen 53119, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 45355, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 45359, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gelsenkirchen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 45879, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Koeln, Nordrhein-Westfalen 51069, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rheine, Nordrhein-Westfalen 48431, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Warendorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen 48231, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Koblenz, Rheinland-Pfalz 56068, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt 06108, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Teuchern, Sachsen-Anhalt 06682, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Delitzsch, Sachsen 04509, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04103, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04157, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04207, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04275, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Leipzig, Sachsen 04357, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Geesthacht, Schleswig-Holstein 21502, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Luebeck, Schleswig-Holstein 23558, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein 24837, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Schmoelln, Thueringen 04626, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10119, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10367, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10625, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10717, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 10969, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 12159, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 12203, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 13086, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 13156, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 13187, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Berlin, 14059, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Deggendorf, 94469, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hamburg, 22299, Germany
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alkmaar, 1815 JD, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Breda, 4818 CK, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dordrecht, 3318 AT, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Groningen, 9718 AW, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Groningen, 9728 NT, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Harderwijk, 3844 DG, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Heerlen, 6419 PC, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hengelo, 7555 DL, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hoorn, 1624 NP, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kloosterhaar, 7694 AC, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rotterdam, 3045 PM, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rotterdam, 3051 GV, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rotterdam, 3083 AN, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Zeist, 3703 CD, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Zutphen, 7207 AE, Netherlands
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Marbella - Málaga, Andalucia 29603, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Laredo, Cantabria 39770, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid 28850, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alcorcón (Madrid), 28922, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alzira/Valencia, 46600, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08003, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08023, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Basurto/Bilbao, 48013, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Benalmádena, Málaga, 29630, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Caceres, 10003, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Cádiz, 10009, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    L'Hospitalet De Llobregat. Barcelona, 08907, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    La Roca Del Valles (Barcelona), 08430, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Logroño, 26006, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Loja/ Granada, 18300, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Palma de Mallorca, 07010, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ponferrada (León), 24404, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pozuelo De Alarcón/Madrid, 28223, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Segovia, 40002, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sevilla, 41009, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Vigo-Pontevedra, 36312, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Angered, SE-424 22, Sweden
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Flen, SE-642 37, Sweden
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Göteborg, SE-413 90, Sweden
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Göteborg, SE-417 17, Sweden
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Göteborg, SE-418 73, Sweden
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Härnösand, SE-871 82, Sweden

Showing the first 100 of 143 sites across 5 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Worsley S, Snowise N, Halpin DMG, Midwinter D, Ismaila AS, Irving E, Sansbury L, Tabberer M, Leather D, Compton C. Clinical effectiveness of once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol in usual practice: the COPD INTREPID study design. ERJ Open Res. 2019 Nov 4;5(4):00061-2019. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00061-2019. eCollection 2019 Oct. PubMed 31720293 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints of the study.

Access criteria: Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

Data sharing details ↗ · clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 17 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2020, 10 months after primary completion.

Of 71 industry-sponsored phase 4 interventional studies under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 22. This study's 17 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 157 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2018
First posted
Mar 16, 2018
StartActual
Apr 11, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 10, 2019
CompletionActual
Oct 10, 2019
Results first posted
Sep 7, 2020
Last update
Sep 7, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 7, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03467425
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 16, 2018
Start date
Apr 11, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 10, 2019
Completion
Oct 10, 2019
Results posted
Sep 7, 2020
Last update
Sep 7, 2020

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Fluticasone furoate · GSK573719 · Vilanterol

Start the discussion