ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03463369Updated Apr 14, 2021

A First-In-Human Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of JNJ-64300535, a DNA Vaccine, Administered by Electroporation-Mediated Intramuscular Injection, in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Are on Stable Nucleos(t)Ide Therapy and Virologically Suppressed

A Phase 1 interventional study of JNJ-64300535 and Placebo in Hepatitis B, Chronic, sponsored by Janssen Sciences Ireland UC. Completed at 14 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-14.

Sponsored by Janssen Sciences Ireland UC (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and reactogenicity of escalating doses of JNJ-64300535 delivered via electroporation-mediated intramuscular injection in nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA)-treated chronic hepatitis B (CHB) participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatitis B, Chronic

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hepatitis B, Chronic

895 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 100 across 659 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis B, Chronic.

Browse Hepatitis B, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Sciences Ireland UC is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has chronic virus envelope antigen (HBeAg) negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection documented by a positive hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) test and/or detectable HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) at least 6 months prior to the screening visit
  • Is on a stable treatment with one of the approved oral nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) polymerase inhibitors tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, or entecavir for greater than or equal to (>=)12 months prior to screening. A history of switching between the above treatments is acceptable as long as it was not triggered by virologic failure
  • Must demonstrate HBV DNA levels less than (\<)60 international unit/milliliter (IU/mL) on 2 occasions separated by greater than (>)6 months (of which one can be the screening assessment).
  • Has HBsAg levels at screening between 100 IU/mL and 10,000 IU/mL
  • Has normal (ALT) levels for at least 6 months prior to baseline with no documented measurement exceeding 1.25 times [ULN]). Minimal requirement is documentation of two ALT results within the year prior to baseline of which one can be the screening assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of advanced hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis in 1 of the assessments below done less than or equal to (\<=)6 month prior to baseline: a. Metavir score 3 or 4 in a liver OR b. Fibroscan result of >9 kilopascal (kPa) OR c. Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) result of >=1.55 meter/second (m/s)
  • Clinical signs or history of liver cirrhosis or hepatic decompensation:

    1. Metavir score 4 in a historical biopsy OR
    2. ascites, esophageal varices, or hepatic encephalopathy OR
    3. documentation of one of the following laboratory abnormality within 12 months of screening:

    i. direct (conjugated) >1.2 times (ULN) OR ii. (PT) >1.2 times ULN OR iii. serum albumin \<3.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL)

  • Positive serology test at screening for any of the following:

    1. anti- surface (ant-HBs) antibodies
    2. HBeAg
    3. anti- (HIV)-1 or anti-HIV-2 antibodies
    4. anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies
    5. anti- virus (ant-HCV) antibodies
    6. anti-hepatitis D virus (anti-HDV) antibodies
  • Participants with any evidence of liver disease of non-HBV etiology. This includes but is not limited to hepatitis A, C, or D virus infections (as above), drug- or alcohol-related liver disease, hepatitis, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, α-1 antitrypsin deficiency, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or any other non-HBV liver disease considered by the investigator
  • Has a history of persistent or recurrent hyperbilirubinemia unless explained by known Gilbert's Disease
  • History of blood disorders (bleeding problems or a blood clot, thalassemia major or sickle cell anemia).
  • History of severe local or systemic reactions to any vaccination or a history of severe allergic reactions.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Placebo + Nucleos(t)ide Analogs (NA)

    Participants will receive placebo intramuscular (IM) injection on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 12, along with standard of care NA treatment.

    Biological: Placebo · Drug: Nucleos(t)ide Analogs (NA)

  • Experimental
    JNJ-64300535 + NA

    Participants will receive JNJ-64300535 IM injection on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 12, along with standard of care NA treatment.

    Biological: JNJ-64300535 · Drug: Nucleos(t)ide Analogs (NA)

Interventions

  • BiologicalJNJ-64300535

    Participants will receive JNJ-64300535 vaccine by electroporation-mediated IM injection on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 12.

  • BiologicalPlacebo

    Participants will receive 1 mL (0.9 percent \[%\] sodium chloride \[NaCl\]) of placebo solution matching to JNJ-64300535 electroporation-mediated IM injection on Day 1, Week 4, and Week 12.

  • Participants will receive NA as a standard of care treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity and Relationship to Study Treatment and Dose Level

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity of AEs will be graded according to the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events as follows: Mild = Grade 1, Moderate = Grade 2, Severe = Grade 3, Potentially life-threatening = Grade 4.

    Time frame: Up to Week 16

  2. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities

    Number of participants with laboratory abnormalities related to hematology, serum chemistry, coagulation, liver function tests and urinalysis will be reported. Laboratory abnormalities will be graded according to the DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events as follows: Mild = Grade 1, Moderate = Grade 2, Severe = Grade 3, Potentially life-threatening = Grade 4.

    Time frame: Up to Week 16

  3. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

    Number of participants with clinically significant changes in the vital signs including blood pressure, pulse/heart rate, and body temperature will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to Week 16

  4. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination (Palpation of Lymph Nodes, Height, Body Weight, and Skin Examination) Findings

    Number of participants with clinically significant changes in physical examination parameters will be reported. Full physical examination (including palpation of lymph nodes, height, body weight, and skin examination) and symptom-directed physical examination will be performed.

    Time frame: Up to Week 16

  5. Number of Participants With Acute Injection Site Reactions on Day 1

    Participants will be assessed for the acute injection site reactions. Acute reactions means the reactions which occur within 0 to 2 hours post-vaccination. Acute reactions will be graded as follows: Grade 0 = Normal, Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening.

    Time frame: From 0 to 2 hours post-vaccination on Day 1

  6. Number of Participants With Acute Injection Site Reactions at Week 4

    Participants will be assessed for the acute injection site reactions. Acute reactions means the reactions which occur within 0 to 2 hours post-vaccination. Acute reactions will be graded as follows: Grade 0 = Normal, Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening.

    Time frame: From 0 to 2 hours post-vaccination at Week 4

  7. Number of Participants With Acute Injection Site Reactions at Week 12

    Participants will be assessed for the acute injection site reactions. Acute reactions means the reactions which occur within 0 to 2 hours post-vaccination. Acute reactions will be graded as follows: Grade 0 = Normal, Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening.

    Time frame: From 0 to 2 hours post-vaccination at Week 12

  8. Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions After Vaccination on Day 1

    Participants will be assessed for the Reactogenicity. Reactogenicity means injection site reactions which occur after 7 days post- vaccination. Severity of reactions will be graded as follows: Grade 0 = Normal, Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening.

    Time frame: Up to 7 days post-vaccination on Day 1

  9. Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions After Vaccination on Week 4

    Participants will be assessed for the Reactogenicity. Reactogenicity means injection site reactions which occur after 7 days post-vaccination. Severity of reactions will be graded as follows: Grade 0 = Normal, Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening.

    Time frame: Up to 7 days post-vaccination on Week 4

  10. Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions After Vaccination on Week 12

    Participants will be assessed for the Reactogenicity. Reactogenicity means injection site reactions which occur after 7 days post- vaccination. Severity of reactions will be graded as follows: Grade 0 = Normal, Grade 1 = Mild, Grade 2 = Moderate, Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening.

    Time frame: Up to 7 days post-vaccination on Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Positive Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Specific T Cells Response

    Percentage of participants with a positive HBV-specific T cells response, assessed by interferon (IFN)-gamma ELISpot assay will be reported.

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 2, 6, 14, 24, 48, and 60

  2. Time to Detection of HBV Specific T-Cell Responses

    Time to HBV Specific T-Cell response is defined as the time interval between Day 1 (vaccination) to the date of first evidence of positive HBV Specific T-Cell response.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 60

  3. Percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Responses

    The activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets and their cytokine expression patterns (expressing at least 1 interleukin \[IL\]-2, tumor necrosis factor-alpha \[TNF-α\] or IFN-γ specific to any antigen) will be determined by Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS).

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 2, 6, 14, 24, 48, and 60

  4. Hepatitis B Antigen-Specific Cellular Immune Response

    Magnitude of Hepatitis B antigen-specific cellular immune responses will be assessed by ICS.

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 2, 6, 14, 24, 48, and 60

  5. Number of TriGrid Delivery System (TDS)-Intramuscular (IM) v2.0 Device Fault Conditions by Type

    Number of TDS-IM v2.0 device fault conditions by type will be observed. User reported fault conditions will be documented to enable assessment of the device reliability. Device functions to be assessed include electrode/needle deployment, study treatment administration, and electroporation application.

    Time frame: Day 1, Week 4 and 12

07

Study locations

14 sites
  • ZiekenhuisNetwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) - Stuivenberg
    Antwerp, Belgium
  • Universite Catholique de Louvain (UCL) - Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
    Brussels, Belgium
  • Universite Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) - Hopital Erasme
    Brussels, Belgium
  • Ruprecht-Karls-U Mannheim
    Mannheim, Baden-Wuerttemberg 68167, Germany
  • MH Hannover
    Hannover, Lower Saxony 30625, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
    UK Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia 45122, Germany
  • IFI Hamburg
    Hamburg, Germany
  • UK Leipzig
    Leipzig, Germany
  • Universität Regensburg
    Regensburg, Germany
  • Queen Elizabeth - Birmingham
    Birmingham, B15 2GW, United Kingdom
  • Royal Free - London
    London, NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
  • King's College - London
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • Bart's Health - Blizard Inst. London
    London, United Kingdom
  • Pennine Acute Hospitals - Manchester
    Manchester, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2021, 35 months.

Of 73 industry-sponsored phase 1 interventional studies under Hepatitis B, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26. This study's 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 81 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 28, 2018
First posted
Mar 13, 2018
StartActual
Apr 18, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 23, 2021
CompletionActual
Mar 23, 2021
Last update
Apr 14, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03463369
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2018
Start date
Apr 18, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 23, 2021
Completion
Mar 23, 2021
Last update
Apr 14, 2021

Study contacts

Janssen Sciences Ireland UC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Sciences Ireland UC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: JNJ-64300535

Start the discussion