ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03462511Updated Jun 26, 2024Results posted

Hydroxyurea Adherence for Personal Best in Sickle Cell Disease (HABIT): Efficacy Trial

An interventional study of HABIT Intervention and Standard of Care in Sickle Cell Disease, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-26.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Many youth with chronic disease have difficulty taking medication every day and therefore do not receive full benefit from treatment. Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disease that affects African Americans and other underserved communities. Hydroxyurea (HU) is the sole FDA-approved drug therapy for SCD and is highly effective and improves quality of life. The proposed study, a 5-site four-year randomized control trial (RCT), builds upon the investigators' recent feasibility study of the same title. Overall goals are reducing barriers to HU use and improving adherence for youth 10-18 years through creation of a daily medication habit. The goal of the proposed multi-site study is to test the efficacy of the HABIT intervention at 6 months and sustainability of the effect at 12 months.

Read the detailed description

Barriers to medication adherence are common in youth with chronic illness and are a source of racial/ethnic disparities in underserved communities. An inherited blood disease, Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is characterized by chronic and acute illness and reduced quality of life (QOL). It affects African Americans and other underserved communities. Hydroxyurea (HU) is the sole FDA-approved drug therapy for SCD and is highly effective and improves QOL. Poor adherence is common among youth and young adults with SCD.

The importance of poor medication adherence, use of community-based health workers (CHWs) to bridge the gap between health services and underserved parent-youth dyads affected by SCD, the strength of the science, the success of the investigators' multi-ethnic feasibility study, and the potential application of study findings to youth with other serious chronic illnesses speak to the importance of this trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

  • Hydroxyurea
  • Community health worker (CHW)
  • Text messages
  • Medication adherence
03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,125 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 239 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 40 across 762 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,135 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 179 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 146 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria - Youth:

  • One of the two most common sickle cell disease variants (HbSS or HbS-B0 thalassemia)
  • Age 10 through18 years (inclusive)
  • Currently prescribed hydroxyurea (HU) ≥18 months (for identifying historical Personal best HbF)
  • Current HU dose is within 5% of dose at Personal Best HbF
  • Pre-enrollment HbF ≥15% below historical Personal best, based on mean of ≥2 HbF assessments over preceding 12 months
  • Youth able to speak/read English or Spanish

Inclusion Criteria - Parent:

  • Parent/guardian speaks/reads English or Spanish
  • Parent/ legal guardian willing to participate
  • Family expects to reside in community for ≥ 1.5 years

Exclusion Criteria - Youth:

  • Youth not prescribed HU
  • \<2 HbF assessments over past 12 months
  • Transfusion within 3 months preceding enrollment
  • Final screen HbF (visit 0) of ≤15% decrease below Personal best HbF
  • Sexually active female 10 years or older and not using reliable contraception (due to HU teratogenic risk)
  • Pregnancy
  • Cognitive impairment (>2 levels below expected grade)
  • Youth not residing with parent/legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria - Parent:

  • Parent/legal guardian does not reside with youth
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Dyads randomized to the control group will receive: Standard care and Education handouts.

    Other: Standard of Care · Other: Education materials

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    In addition to standard care and education handouts, dyads randomized to the intervention group will receive the HABIT intervention, which includes CHW support and tailored text messages.

    Behavioral: HABIT Intervention · Other: Standard of Care · Other: Education materials

Interventions

  • BehavioralHABIT Intervention

    Dyads randomized to the intervention group will receive the HABIT intervention, which includes CHW support and tailored text messages.

  • OtherStandard of Care

    Standard of care used to treat patients with SCD

  • OtherEducation materials

    Education materials provided to all patients enrolled in the trial

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Biomarker Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF)

    A serum biomarker obtained from youth used to measure adherence to hydroxyurea

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Mean Change in Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) by Hydroxyurea

    The days covered by hydroxyurea was assessed using youth prescription refill data and was used to measure hydroxyurea adherence. The baseline measure is the proportion of days covered by hydroxyurea in the year prior to study enrollment, using prescription refill data.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Youth Score on Peds Quality of Life (Generic Quality of Life)

    Used to measure health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0-100 with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. Mean Change in Youth Score on PedsQL Sickle Cell Disease Module (Disease Specific Quality of Life)

    Used to measure sickle cell disease specific health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0-100 with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 9 months and 12 months

  3. Mean Change in Parent Youth Concordance Regarding Self-management Responsibility

    Concordance between parent and youth scores Sickle Cell Family Responsibility scores for 11 items measuring self-management tasks. Scores range from 0-11 with a higher score indicating better concordance.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 26, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention GroupControl Group
Started2426
Completed2223
Not completed23
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject23

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change in Biomarker Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF)

A serum biomarker obtained from youth used to measure adherence to hydroxyurea

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Percent fetal hemoglobin
Mean Change in Biomarker Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF)
Percent fetal hemoglobinIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline to Month 62.7 ± 1.30.3 ± 1.3
Month 6 to Month 12-1.7 ± 1.21.8 ± 1.3
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.067 (Independent variables: study month, study group, their interactions and a person-level random intercept to incorporate clustering.) · Mean difference (net): 2.4
PrimaryMean Change in Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) by Hydroxyurea

The days covered by hydroxyurea was assessed using youth prescription refill data and was used to measure hydroxyurea adherence. The baseline measure is the proportion of days covered by hydroxyurea in the year prior to study enrollment, using prescription refill data.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · change in percentage of PDC
Mean Change in Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) by Hydroxyurea
change in percentage of PDCIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline and 6 months17.9 ± 27.313.1 ± 29.7
6 months and 12 months-1.6 ± 22.8-1.9 ± 33.7
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.60
SecondaryMean Change in Youth Score on Peds Quality of Life (Generic Quality of Life)

Used to measure health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0-100 with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 4 months, 9 months and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change in Youth Score on Peds Quality of Life (Generic Quality of Life)
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline to 9 months10.3 ± 12.62.0 ± 12.3
9 months to 12 months-2.5 ± 11.61.1 ± 16.2
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · Regression, Linear · p = <0.001
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.04
SecondaryMean Change in Youth Score on PedsQL Sickle Cell Disease Module (Disease Specific Quality of Life)

Used to measure sickle cell disease specific health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0-100 with a higher score indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, 9 months and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change in Youth Score on PedsQL Sickle Cell Disease Module (Disease Specific Quality of Life)
score on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline to 9 months16.4 ± 23.39.0 ± 12.0
9 months to 12 months-4.3 ± 21.9-0.7 ± 15.7
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.47
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.045
SecondaryMean Change in Parent Youth Concordance Regarding Self-management Responsibility

Concordance between parent and youth scores Sickle Cell Family Responsibility scores for 11 items measuring self-management tasks. Scores range from 0-11 with a higher score indicating better concordance.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change in Parent Youth Concordance Regarding Self-management Responsibility
units on a scaleIntervention GroupControl Group
Baseline to 6 months1.6 ± 2.41.4 ± 2.5
6 months to 12 months0.3 ± 2.10.5 ± 2.3
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.002
  • Intervention Group vs Control Group · Regression, Linear · p = 0.23

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)
Intervention Group0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The following variables were collected for children: Age, Sex, Race, Ethnicity, No other chronic conditions besides sickle cell disease, Number of emergency room visits, Number of hospitalizations, Biomarker fetal hemoglobin, Proportion of days covered by hydroxyurea The following variables were collected for parent/primary caregiver: Parent status, Parent education, Caregiver affected by sickle cell disease, Other people at home affected by sickle cell disease

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Mean14.1 ± 1.913.0 ± 1.713.3 ± 1.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Female121123
Male121527
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino358
Not Hispanic or Latino212142
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American212041
White000
More than one race369
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
United States242650
No other chronic condition besides Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
No other chronic condition besides Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Count of participants121325
Had 1 or more ED visits in past year
Had 1 or more ED visits in past year(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Count of participants111021
Had 1 more hospitalizations in past year
Had 1 more hospitalizations in past year(Participants)Intervention GroupControl GroupTotal
Count of participants111122

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
    Manhasset, New York 11030, United States
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
    The Bronx, New York 10461, United States
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Bruzzese JM, Usseglio J, Iannacci-Manasia L, Diggs KA, Smaldone AM, Green NS. Mental and Emotional Health of Caregivers of Youth with Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(3):1070-1104. PubMed 38015138 ↗
  • Askew MA, Smaldone AM, Gold MA, Smith-Whitley K, Strouse JJ, Jin Z, Green NS. Pediatric hematology providers' contraceptive practices for female adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease: A national survey. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Oct;69(10):e29877. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29877. Epub 2022 Jul 20. PubMed 35856776 ↗
  • Smaldone A, Manwani D, Aygun B, Smith-Whitley K, Jia H, Bruzzese JM, Findley S, Massei J, Green NS. HABIT efficacy and sustainability trial, a multi-center randomized controlled trial to improve hydroxyurea adherence in youth with sickle cell disease: a study protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1746-6. PubMed 31615480 ↗
  • Green NS, Manwani D, Aygun B, Appiah-Kubi A, Smith-Whitley K, Castillo Y, Soriano L, Jia H, Smaldone AM. Hydroxyurea Adherence for Personal Best in Sickle Cell Treatment (HABIT) efficacy trial: Community health worker support may increase hydroxyurea adherence of youth with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Apr;71(4):e30878. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30878. Epub 2024 Feb 6. PubMed 38321562 ↗
  • Green NS, Manwani D, Smith-Whitley K, Aygun B, Appiah-Kubi A, Smaldone AM. Mental health assessment of youth with sickle cell disease and their primary caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Sep;69(9):e29797. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29797. Epub 2022 May 25. PubMed 35614571 ↗
  • Lalji R, Koh L, Francis A, Khalid R, Guha C, Johnson DW, Wong G. Patient navigator programmes for children and adolescents with chronic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 9;10(10):CD014688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014688.pub2. PubMed 39382077 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 14, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 40 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2024, 2 years 5 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Nov 2022.

Of 164 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anemia, Sickle Cell, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 54. This study's 40 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 172 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 49.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 6, 2018
First posted
Mar 12, 2018
StartActual
Aug 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2021
Results delay requested
Nov 11, 2022
Results first posted
Jun 26, 2024
Last update
Jun 26, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03462511
Responsible party
Arlene Smaldone (Professor of Nursing, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2018
Start date
Aug 15, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Dec 31, 2021
Results posted
Jun 26, 2024
Last update
Jun 26, 2024

Study contacts

Arlene Smaldone, PhD, CPNP-PC
principal investigator · Columbia University School of Nursing
Nancy S Green, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion