ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03461861Updated Jul 3, 2023Results posted

Network-Level Mechanisms for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Development

A Phase 2 interventional study of AGB101 220 mg and Placebo in APOE 4, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-03.

Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this project is to test the hypothesis that AGB101 low dose levetiracetam extended release formulation can reduce abnormal hyperfunctional activity in the hippocampus in normal, healthy adults. The investigators will compare the functional connectivity results after taking AGB101 or placebo.

Read the detailed description

In this study the investigators want to find out whether the use of a perturbation, such as AGB101 low dose of levetiracetam extended release formulation, in healthy adults can reduce abnormal hippocampal network activity. The investigators also want to study whether this low dose of LEV can improve memory function.

Generic levetiracetam is a type of drug called an anti-epileptic or anti-seizure medication. It is FDA approved worldwide for adults and children as young as one month with seizures. It is a generic drug used in long-term epilepsy treatment. It is relatively safe and has an acceptable side-effect profile.

AGB101 has been developed as a novel extended release formulation of low dose levetiracetam (below clinically marketed doses for epilepsy) for slowing the progression of amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

It is known that age and the APOE 4 gene are important risk factors for late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Further studies have shown that cognitively normal, older adults have more hyperfunctional brain network activity, increased alpha beta accumulation, decreased memory function, and decreased brain volume, which is consistent with Alzheimer's disease patterns.

02

Conditions studied

  • APOE 4

Keywords

  • Healthy
  • Adult
  • Normal Memory
  • APOE 4
  • Brain
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • MRI
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Hippocampus
  • Genetic testing
  • Dementia
  • AGB101
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,765 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 881 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 68 across 2,861 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 546 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.

Of its 74 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 57 (77%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fluent in English
  • At least eight (8) years of education
  • Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) (62) score \< 6
  • Hachinski Ischemic Score ≤ 4
  • Normal general cognitive function as well as 1) normal memory function, documented by MOCA score of 23 or greater, and a RBANS Delayed Memory Index score of 85 or greater.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological disease, such as Parkinson's disease, multi-infarct dementia, Huntington's disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, brain tumor, progressive supranuclear palsy, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, or a history of significant head trauma or known structural brain abnormalities
  • Major psychiatric disease or chronic unstable medical conditions
  • History of drug abuse
  • History of alcohol abuse (4 or greater drinks per day on average)
  • Unable to complete MRI scans (no Pacemaker/Defibrillator)
  • Known clinically significant abnormalities in B12 or thyroid function tests
  • End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)
  • Hemodialysis (HD)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AGB101 220 mg, then Placebo

    AGB101 220 mg/day capsule, once daily dosing for 2 weeks. After a 4 week washout, to be followed by Placebo, given as a capsule, once daily dosing for 2 weeks.

    Drug: AGB101 220 mg · Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Placebo, then AGB101 220 mg

    Placebo, given as a capsule, once daily for 2 weeks. After a 4 week washout, to be followed by AGB101 220 mg/day capsule, once daily dosing for 2 weeks.

    Drug: AGB101 220 mg · Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • AGB101 oral dose of 220 mg/day capsule, given as once-daily dosing.

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo, oral capsule given once-daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks

    The seed-based functional connectivity strengths of the hippocampus network and the default mode network will be employed to measure the changes between AGB101 and Placebo perturbation. The functional connectivity strengths will be measured with the median of the Pearson cross-correlation coefficients over entire brain regions.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after treatment between AGB101 and Placebo

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the Better

    Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), delayed recall Scaled integer will be employed to measure the episodic memory changes before and after AGB101 treatment. The AVLT score will be recorded as a standard score. The theoretical range: min 50, max 155, the higher the better. The higher the number is, the better the memory. It is an integer number.

    Time frame: Placebo vs AGB101 2 weeks after treatment paired t-test

07

Results

Posted Jul 3, 2023
Limitations and caveats
26 total patients were enrolled in the project, and 25 total patients were included in analysis. One enrolled subject did not have detectable LEV in their blood sample and was discarded in analysis.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mg
Started1313
Completed1313
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryFunctional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks

The seed-based functional connectivity strengths of the hippocampus network and the default mode network will be employed to measure the changes between AGB101 and Placebo perturbation. The functional connectivity strengths will be measured with the median of the Pearson cross-correlation coefficients over entire brain regions.

Time frame:
2 weeks after treatment between AGB101 and Placebo
Reported as:
Median · Pearson coefficient
Functional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks
Pearson coefficientAGB101 220 mgPlacebo
Functional Connectivity Strengths of Neural Networks0.233 ± 0.1320.318 ± 0.127
Statistical analysis
  • AGB101 220 mg vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.007567 · Median difference (final values): -0.083 · 95% CI -0.0886 to -0.0774
SecondaryRey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the Better

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), delayed recall Scaled integer will be employed to measure the episodic memory changes before and after AGB101 treatment. The AVLT score will be recorded as a standard score. The theoretical range: min 50, max 155, the higher the better. The higher the number is, the better the memory. It is an integer number.

Time frame:
Placebo vs AGB101 2 weeks after treatment paired t-test
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the Better
score on a scaleAGB101 220 mgPlacebo
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), Delayed Recall Scaled Integer. The Higher is the Better108 ± 17105 ± 16
Statistical analysis
  • AGB101 220 mg vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.900593 · Mean difference (final values): 3.12 · 95% CI 1.72 to 4.52

Adverse events

Collected over From Baseline Visit Through 4 Week Follow Up Call (an average of 12 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AGB101 220 mg0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)6/26 (23.1%)
Placebo0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)3/26 (11.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAGB101 220 mgPlacebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/261/26
SleepinessGeneral disorders1/260/26
Brain ZapsNervous system disorders0/261/26
Visual AuraNervous system disorders0/261/26
Cold SymptomsInfections and infestations1/260/26
Feeling JitteryNervous system disorders1/260/26
Depressed MoodPsychiatric disorders1/260/26

Baseline characteristics

One enrolled subject did not have detectable LEV in their blood sample and was discarded in analysis

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)AGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mgTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years549
>=65 years8816
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mgTotal
Mean66 ± 467 ± 566.2 ± 4.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mgTotal
Female9615
Male4610
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino131225
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White131225
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)AGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mgTotal
United States131226
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Status
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Status(Participants)AGB101 220 mg, Then PlaceboPlacebo, Then AGB101 220 mgTotal
APOE e4 Carrier325
APOE e4 Non-Carrier101020
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Reiman EM, Chen K, Alexander GE, Caselli RJ, Bandy D, Osborne D, Saunders AM, Hardy J. Functional brain abnormalities in young adults at genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jan 6;101(1):284-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2635903100. Epub 2003 Dec 19. PubMed 14688411 ↗
  • Filippini N, MacIntosh BJ, Hough MG, Goodwin GM, Frisoni GB, Smith SM, Matthews PM, Beckmann CF, Mackay CE. Distinct patterns of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 28;106(17):7209-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811879106. Epub 2009 Apr 8. PubMed 19357304 ↗
  • Sheline YI, Raichle ME, Snyder AZ, Morris JC, Head D, Wang S, Mintun MA. Amyloid plaques disrupt resting state default mode network connectivity in cognitively normal elderly. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 15;67(6):584-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.024. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19833321 ↗
  • Li W, Antuono PG, Xie C, Chen G, Jones JL, Ward BD, Singh SP, Franczak MB, Goveas JS, Li SJ. Aberrant functional connectivity in Papez circuit correlates with memory performance in cognitively intact middle-aged APOE4 carriers. Cortex. 2014 Aug;57:167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 30. PubMed 24905971 ↗
  • Sheline YI, Morris JC, Snyder AZ, Price JL, Yan Z, D'Angelo G, Liu C, Dixit S, Benzinger T, Fagan A, Goate A, Mintun MA. APOE4 allele disrupts resting state fMRI connectivity in the absence of amyloid plaques or decreased CSF Abeta42. J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):17035-40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3987-10.2010. PubMed 21159973 ↗
  • Koh MT, Haberman RP, Foti S, McCown TJ, Gallagher M. Treatment strategies targeting excess hippocampal activity benefit aged rats with cognitive impairment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Mar;35(4):1016-25. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.207. Epub 2009 Dec 23. PubMed 20032967 ↗
  • Sanchez PE, Zhu L, Verret L, Vossel KA, Orr AG, Cirrito JR, Devidze N, Ho K, Yu GQ, Palop JJ, Mucke L. Levetiracetam suppresses neuronal network dysfunction and reverses synaptic and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer's disease model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):E2895-903. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121081109. Epub 2012 Aug 6. PubMed 22869752 ↗
  • Devi L, Ohno M. Effects of levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug, on memory impairments associated with aging and Alzheimer's disease in mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2013 May;102:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 13. PubMed 23416036 ↗
  • Bakker A, Krauss GL, Albert MS, Speck CL, Jones LR, Stark CE, Yassa MA, Bassett SS, Shelton AL, Gallagher M. Reduction of hippocampal hyperactivity improves cognition in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuron. 2012 May 10;74(3):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.023. PubMed 22578498 ↗
  • Vossel KA, Beagle AJ, Rabinovici GD, Shu H, Lee SE, Naasan G, Hegde M, Cornes SB, Henry ML, Nelson AB, Seeley WW, Geschwind MD, Gorno-Tempini ML, Shih T, Kirsch HE, Garcia PA, Miller BL, Mucke L. Seizures and epileptiform activity in the early stages of Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.136. PubMed 23835471 ↗
  • Palop JJ, Chin J, Roberson ED, Wang J, Thwin MT, Bien-Ly N, Yoo J, Ho KO, Yu GQ, Kreitzer A, Finkbeiner S, Noebels JL, Mucke L. Aberrant excitatory neuronal activity and compensatory remodeling of inhibitory hippocampal circuits in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2007 Sep 6;55(5):697-711. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.025. PubMed 17785178 ↗
  • Tuminello ER, Han SD. The apolipoprotein e antagonistic pleiotropy hypothesis: review and recommendations. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011 Feb 24;2011:726197. doi: 10.4061/2011/726197. PubMed 21423560 ↗
  • Dickerson BC, Salat DH, Bates JF, Atiya M, Killiany RJ, Greve DN, Dale AM, Stern CE, Blacker D, Albert MS, Sperling RA. Medial temporal lobe function and structure in mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2004 Jul;56(1):27-35. doi: 10.1002/ana.20163. PubMed 15236399 ↗
  • Mohajeri MH, Saini K, Schultz JG, Wollmer MA, Hock C, Nitsch RM. Passive immunization against beta-amyloid peptide protects central nervous system (CNS) neurons from increased vulnerability associated with an Alzheimer's disease-causing mutation. J Biol Chem. 2002 Sep 6;277(36):33012-7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203193200. Epub 2002 Jun 14. PubMed 12068009 ↗
  • Tampellini D, Capetillo-Zarate E, Dumont M, Huang Z, Yu F, Lin MT, Gouras GK. Effects of synaptic modulation on beta-amyloid, synaptophysin, and memory performance in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 27;30(43):14299-304. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3383-10.2010. PubMed 20980585 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Apr 1, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 1, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03461861
Responsible party
Yang Wang (Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2018
Start date
Apr 11, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2021
Completion
Mar 31, 2021
Results posted
Jul 3, 2023
Last update
Jul 3, 2023

Study contacts

Yang Wang, PhD
principal investigator · The Medical College of Wisconsin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Levetiracetam

Start the discussion