ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03459417Updated Dec 13, 2019

Safety and Efficacy of Intrathecally Administered Magnesium Sulfate

An interventional study of intrathecal morphine+LA and intrathecal morphine+LA+ Mg sulp. 50 in Abdominal Cancer and Abdominal Pain, sponsored by South Egypt Cancer Institute. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-13.

Sponsored by South Egypt Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Magnesium sulfate safety profile has been documented by histopathological analysis in experimental studies. magnesium sulfate added to local anesthetics decrease postoperative opioid requirements.

Read the detailed description

Spinal anesthesia is commonly used for the major abdominal cancer surgery because of decreasing the risks of general anesthesia.The quality and duration of sensory and motor block and decrease post operative pain is important in the major abdominal cancer surgery and patient's content satisfaction. Opioids in high doses and other drug such as clonidine and neostigmine added to local anesthetics to this purpose, but significant side effects.

Magnesium sulfate block the N- methyle -D- aspartate (NMDA) channels in a voltage-dependent way to be improve the quality and duration of spinal block. However, the use of magnesium sulfate safety profile has been documented by histopathological analysis in experimental studies. Systemic delivery of magnesium sulfate decrease postoperative opioid requirements. In experimental studies, spinal injection of magnesium sulfate reduces the respond to painful stimulus in rats.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Cancer
  • Abdominal Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Abdominal Pain

387 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Pain; 58 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 70 across 290 interventional studies indexed under Abdominal Pain.

Browse Abdominal Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

South Egypt Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with II or III, 21-year-old or older with major abdominal cancer surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant coexisting, hepatorenal, or other end organ disease, obesity ( > 38 kg/m2), to regional anesthesia and sensitivity to local anesthetic drugs
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    intrathecal morphine+LA

    patients will receive intrathecal 15 mg (3 mL) of LA (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) intrathecal with 0.5 mg preservative free morphine.

    Procedure: intrathecal morphine+LA

  • Active comparator
    intrathecal morphine+LA+Mg sulp. 50

    patients will receive intrathecal 15 mg (3 mL) of LA (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) intrathecal with 0.5 mg preservative free morphine + magnesium sulfate 50 mg.

    Procedure: intrathecal morphine+LA+ Mg sulp. 50

  • Active comparator
    intrathecal morphine+LA+ Mg sulp.100

    patients will receive intrathecal 15 mg (3 mL) of LA (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) intrathecal with 0.5 mg preservative free morphine + magnesium sulfate 100 mg.

    Procedure: intrathecal morphine+LA+ Mg sulp. 100

Interventions

  • Procedureintrathecal morphine+LA

    Lumbar puncture will be performed in the sitting position. A 25 gauge (pencil point, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) spinal needle will be introduced into the subarachnoid space at the L3-L4 lumber level midline approach with the needle orifice cephalad. Cerebrospinal fluid will be aspirated and the ready mixture will be injected to subarachnoid space over the period of 15 s, with barbotage. patients will receive intrathecal LA 15 mg (3 mL) (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%) intrathecal with 0.5 mg preservative free morphine + magnesium sulfate 100 mg.

  • Procedureintrathecal morphine+LA+ Mg sulp. 50

    Lumbar puncture will be performed in the sitting position. A 25 gauge (pencil point, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) spinal needle will be introduced into the subarachnoid space at the L3-L4 lumber level midline approach with the needle orifice cephalad. Cerebrospinal fluid will be aspirated and the ready mixture will be injected to subarachnoid space over the period of 15 s, with barbotage.patients will receive intrathecal 15 mg (3 mL) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% intrathecal +0.5 mg preservative free morphine + magnesium sulphate 50 mg.

  • Procedureintrathecal morphine+LA+ Mg sulp. 100

    Lumbar puncture will be performed in the sitting position. A 25 gauge (pencil point, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) spinal needle will be introduced into the subarachnoid space at the L3-L4 lumber level midline approach with the needle orifice cephalad. Cerebrospinal fluid will be aspirated and the ready mixture will be injected to subarachnoid space over the period of 15 s, with barbotage.patients will receive intrathecal 15 mg (3 mL) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% intrathecal with 0.5 mg preservative free morphine + magnesium sulphate 100 mg.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change pain sensation using VAS scores

    pain sensation using VAS scores with movement (0-10) 0=no pain 10=worst pain ever

    Time frame: at 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 hours post operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in MAP

    Mean arterial pressure

    Time frame: at 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 hours post operative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Arab Republic of Egypt
    Assiut, 0020, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in May 2019, 16 months.

Of 85 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Abdominal Pain, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 30. This study's 16 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 101 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 21, 2018
First posted
Mar 8, 2018
StartActual
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 1, 2019
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2019
Last update
Dec 13, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03459417
Lead sponsor
South Egypt Cancer Institute
Responsible party
Alaa Ali M. Elzohry (Lecturer, South Egypt Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 8, 2018
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
May 1, 2019
Completion
Jun 1, 2019
Last update
Dec 13, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion