ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04498234Updated Oct 31, 2023

Comparison Between U\S Guided Erector Spinaeblock and Paravertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Post Mastectomy Pain

An interventional study of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 % in Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Para-vertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Post Mastectomy Pain, sponsored by South Egypt Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-31.

Sponsored by South Egypt Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2020; still recruiting 6 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 299 studies in Pain with a site in Egypt — 64 open to participants now, 79 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Pain · Egypt.

Planned enrollment
69th of 285
108 · median 62
Started
2020
with 18 others
No phase
189 of 299
52 open now
Primary completion
2023-12
later than 8 of 78 live
Registered
91st of 299
by date

Among the 299 studies in Pain with a site in Egypt, this one is the 69th largest by planned enrollment of the 285 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 19 that started in 2020, is one of 189 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 8 of the 78 other live ones, and was the 91st registered.

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

Browse Pain studies →

Open to participants now

64 of the 299 studies in Pain with a site in Egypt are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

59 more — sign in →

All 64 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Egypt have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Egypt →

Who these studies take

Of the 929 Pain studies recruiting now, 384 (41%) set no upper age limit and 434 (47%) stop at 75 or younger; 146 take children under 18; 222 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 20 Years to 70 Years · female · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 299 studies in Pain with a site in Egypt, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

compare between ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and ultrasound guided paravertebral block on acute and chronic post mastectomy pain

Read the detailed description

Management of postoperative analgesia following breast surgery extending beyond a simple lumpectomy can sometimes be a challenge, especially when such surgery is being performed as a day-case procedure. Patients undergoing mastectomy have a very high possibility of developing postsurgical pain syndrome, as high as 20% to 50%.There has been some evidence to suggest regional analgesia techniques reduce the incidence of postsurgical pain in patients undergoing mastectomy. This underlines the importance of performing regional anaesthetic and analgesic techniques for postoperative analgesia following breast surgery.There are many techniques of regional analgesia as thorasic epidural block , paravertebral block , PECS1 block ,PECS2 block , and recently erector spinae plan block.Paravertebral blocks have superseded thoracic epidurals when it comes to choice of a regional anaesthesia technique to provide analgesia for breast surgery.The injection of local anaesthetic solution in the paravertebral space results in a unilateral block, which is sensory, motor, and sympathetic. The uptake of the local anaesthetic solution is enhanced due to the absence of fascial sheaths binding the spinal nerves.TPVB produces ipsilateral somatic and sympathetic nerve blockade due to a direct effect of the local anesthetic on the somatic and sympathetic nerves in the TPVS, extension into the intercostal space laterally, and the epidural space medially. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (US-ESP) block is a novel analgesic technique, in which local anaesthetic is injected into fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle. It is possible to block the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerve depending on the level of injection and amount of local anaesthetic injected. Erector spinae block (ESP) leads to effective post-operative analgesia where it is performed at T4-5 level for breast cancer and thoracic surgery , when performed bilaterally it has been reported to be as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia.The drug spreads in craniocaudal fashion over several levels as the erector spinae fascia extends from nuchal fascia cranially to the sacrum caudally. Forero et al. recently described US-ESP block for thoracic neuropathic pain. This block could be effective in both acute post-operative thoracic and abdominal surgeries and also neuropathic pain in these regions.

03

Conditions studied

  • Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Para-vertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Post Mastectomy Pain

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Gender : female .
  2. Age : 20 to 70 years old .
  3. Scheduled for : either left or right modified radical mastectomy (MRM)
  4. Physical status : (ASA) physical status I and II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1-ASA > III 2 -age> 70 years old. 3-patients refusal to the procedure. 4-Infection of the skin at or near site of needle puncture. 5- Coagulopathy . 6- Drug or allergy to the studied drugs. 7- Central or peripheral neuropthy . 8-Pre-operative opoid consumption ( within 24 hours preoperative ) 9- Anomalies of the vertebral column .

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GROUP(A) (CONTROL GROUP)

    Patients will receive standard regimen of anesthesia .

    Procedure: ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

  • Experimental
    Group B

    Patients will receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4.

    Procedure: ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

  • Experimental
    Group C

    Patients will receive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .

    Procedure: ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

Interventions

  • Procedureultrasound guided erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine 0.25% And ultrasound guided Paraveretebral block with bupivacaine 0.25 %

    One groupvwill receive 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml ) into interfascial plane below erector spinae muscle at level of T4 and the other group willreceive (0.3 ml /kg ) 0.25% bubivicaine divided equially at each level of T2 , T4 and T6 at thoracic paravertebral space .

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. analgesic requirement

    Total morphine consumption during first 24 hours post operatively.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. stress response

    Effect on stress response: serum level of cortisol and noradrenaline (immediately preoperative, after intubation, immediately postoperative, and after 24 hours postoperative)

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Chronic post mastectomy pain

    Chronic post mastectomy will be assessed at pain clinic at 1st, 3rd, 6 th month postoperatively using (LANSS ) score .

    Time frame: 6 month

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • South Egypt Cancer Institute
    Assiut, 171516, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2023, 43 months after the start.

Of 3,731 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23. This study's planned 43 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,830 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 19, 2020
First posted
Aug 4, 2020
StartActual
May 1, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2023
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2023
Last update
Oct 31, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04498234
Lead sponsor
South Egypt Cancer Institute
Responsible party
Romany Gergis Naeem Gendy (assistant lecturer, South Egypt Cancer Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 4, 2020
Start date
May 1, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 31, 2023

Study contacts

Romany G. Naeem, MSc
Contact
Romanytreka22@gmail.com
1006231332 ext. 0020
Romany G. Naeem, MSc
principal investigator · assistant lecturer

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion