An interventional study of Standards vision tests and OdySight medical application assessment in Near Vision, sponsored by Tilak Healthcare. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-27.
Sponsored by Tilak Healthcare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This study evaluates the level of agreement between visual parameters tested using OdySight, a mobile application, and standards in office methods.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects with near visual acuity between +1.0 and +0.7 logMAR , when eligible and providing informed consent, assigned to evaluation with OdySight mobile medical application
Other: Standards vision tests · Device: OdySight medical application assessment
Subjects with near visual acuity between +0.6 and +0.3 logMAR , when eligible and providing informed consent, assigned to evaluation with OdySight mobile medical application
Other: Standards vision tests · Device: OdySight medical application assessment
Subjects with near visual acuity between +0.2 and +0.0 logMAR , when eligible and providing informed consent, assigned to evaluation with OdySight mobile medical application
Other: Standards vision tests · Device: OdySight medical application assessment
Subjects vision : near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and scotoma and metamorphopsia detection will be assessed by gold-standard tests and with the OdySight medical application
Subjects vision : near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and scotoma and metamorphopsia detection will be assessed by gold-standard tests and with the OdySight medical application
Near visual acuity assessment with OdySight versus with near visual acuity chart
To assess the equivalence between a smartphone based evaluation of near visual acuity with ODYSIGHT (NVA module) and a standardized method (Sloan ETDRS near vision letter chart).
Time frame: 1 day ( During evaluation visit)
Near visual acuity assessment with OdySight versus with ETDRS chart
To assess the relation between the ETDRS visual acuity at a 4-meter distance and near visual acuity evaluated with ODYSIGHT (NVA module)
Time frame: 1 day ( During evaluation visit)
Contrast sensitivity assessment with OdySight versus with Pelli-Robson
To compare the smartphone based evaluation of the contrast sensitivity with ODYSIGHT (contrast sensitivity module) and a standardized method (Pelli-Robson chart)
Time frame: 1 day ( During evaluation visit)
Scotoma/metamorphopsia detection with OdySight versus with standard Amsler grid
To compare the smartphone based evaluation of the Amsler Grid with ODYSIGHT (Amsler grid module) and standardized methods (paper Amsler Grid)
Time frame: 1 day ( During evaluation visit)
Global functional disorders assessment with Odysight versus with OCT
To compare functional disorder(s) detected or measured by ODYSIGHT application with anatomical data (OCT: Optical coherence tomography)
Time frame: 1 day ( During evaluation visit)
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Tilak Healthcare