ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07825428Updated Sep 17, 2026

AI-Stratified Myopia Control for Children in Remote Areas

An interventional study of Routine Screening and Referral and AI-Guided Tiered Management in Myopia, sponsored by Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 9 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cluster-randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-based, risk-stratified, tiered intervention model for childhood myopia prevention and control in resource-limited county areas of China, compared with the conventional screening-and-referral approach, with schools in project counties of Guizhou or Yunnan Province randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control group over a 12-month follow-up period.

The study is motivated by the pressing reality that myopia among Chinese children is not only widespread but also occurring at younger ages than ever before, bringing with it a lifelong risk of sight-threatening complications, yet in remote county areas, routine vision screening programs are not yet widely available or well-established, due to a shortage of trained eye care professionals, the practical difficulties of performing cycloplegic refraction in school settings, and the lack of systematic follow-up, all of which make it hard to identify children with myopia or pre-myopia. Given that artificial intelligence may offer a practical way to assess risk without the need for pupil dilation, this study will enroll children in grades 1 through 3 from local primary schools. Over 12 months, an AI model will dynamically categorize children based on screening results and guide management adjustments(outdoor activity and defocus lenses) for the intervention group, while the control group receives routine care.

The findings are expected to provide evidence to inform and optimize AI-based myopia prevention and control strategies in remote areas.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Myopia prevention and control
  • Artificial intelligence-based risk stratification
  • Cluster randomized controlled trial
  • Remote areas
  • Childhood myopia
03

In context

Myopia

1,159 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 225 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,600 is above the median of 78 across 923 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.

Browse Myopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

  1. School level:

    Inclusion Criteria:

    • The school is a regular public primary school located within a project county in Guizhou Province or Yunnan Province.
    • The school has the organizational capacity to conduct myopia screening and follow-up studies in children and adolescents, including the ability to coordinate screening organization, parent communication, collection, result feedback, and follow-up coordination.
    • The number of students in grades 1-3 in study school is sufficient to meet the requirements for conducting a cluster randomized study.

    Exclusion Criteria:

    • The school has implemented a similar systematic myopia intervention program within the past year that may affect the evaluation of study outcomes.
    • Student mobility is high, with a predicted high risk of transfer, missed visits, or loss to follow-up within 12 months.
    • There is a lack of accessible medical institutions near the school to support necessary cycloplegic examinations and related services.
  2. Participant level:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age of participants is 6-9 years (equivalent to grades 1-3 of primary school).
  • Participants can be able to complete baseline and follow-up examinations including visual acuity, non-cycloplegic autorefraction, and axial length measurements.
  • For participants who have previously received myopia control interventions such as low-dose atropine eye drops, defocus spectacle lenses, or red-light therapy, a of at least 1 month is required prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline spherical equivalent refraction (SER) ≤ -10.00 D.
  • Presence of ocular or systemic diseases (including infections) that may affect visual acuity or refraction, or use of systemic or topical medications that may alter ocular status or affect ocular health.
  • Presence of any ocular conditions that preclude suitability for the interventions in this study, including but not limited to amblyopia, manifest strabismus, or current use of orthokeratology lenses.
  • Presence of any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for enrollment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Washout period

A planned gap after a treatment, so that its effects can lessen before the study treatment or a study assessment. Ask the study team and the doctor who prescribed it before changing any medicine.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group

    The intervention group receives routine screening (uncorrected visual acuity + non-cycloplegic autorefraction + axial length), followed by AI-based risk stratification at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Tiered interventions are adjusted according to the most recent risk-stratification result into three tiers: hyperopia, pre-myopia, and myopia. Corresponding tiered interventions are provided: outdoor activity (2 h/day on weekends) for tier 1; plano defocus lenses (≥8 h/day) + outdoor activity for tier 2; and defocus lenses (≥12 h/day) + outdoor activity for tier 3. Participants with unclear AI risk stratification or newly onset myopia will be advised to undergo cycloplegic refraction and then to receive study-assigned intervention. For those already using myopia interventions (e.g., atropine, defocus spectacles), guardians will be fully informed of the study plan; if they agree, a 1-month washout period is required before starting the study intervention.

    Behavioral: AI-Guided Tiered Management

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    The control group receives the traditional model of "routine screening + feedback and referral." Based on routine screening using uncorrected visual acuity combined with non-cycloplegic autorefraction and axial length, screening reports, feedback, and referrals are provided to parents according to the technical standards of the national health industry.

    Behavioral: Routine Screening and Referral

Interventions

  • BehavioralRoutine Screening and Referral

    Based on routine screening combining uncorrected visual acuity with non-cycloplegic autorefraction and axial length, the control group provides parents with screening reports, feedback, and referrals according to the national health industry standard, which provides tiered recommendations ranging from routine monitoring and eye hygiene, to ophthalmologic consultation for those at risk of myopia, to regular 3- to 6-month re-examination for those with reduced uncorrected but normal corrected visual acuity, and to timely referral for those identified as screening-positive or with possible visual function abnormalities.

  • BehavioralAI-Guided Tiered Management

    Students in the intervention group receive routine vision screening followed by AI-based risk stratification, which classifies each student into one of three categories, hyperopia, pre-myopia, or myopia, to guide subsequent tiered interventions. For children with hyperopia, the intervention consists of prescribed outdoor activities, with a target of 2 hours per day on weekends and daily activity records. For those with pre-myopia, the intervention combines plano defocus lenses (A.M.L.™) worn for at least 8 hours per day with the same outdoor activity regimen. For those with myopia, the intervention includes defocus lenses (A.M.L.™) worn for at least 12 hours per day, also combined with outdoor activities and records. All tiered assignments are dynamically adjusted at each follow-up visit based on the most recent AI classification.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rapid refractive progression

    The rapid refractive progression is defined as axial length elongation \>0.2 mm over 12 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Screened myopia

    Screened myopia is defined as uncorrected visual acuity \< 5.0 and spherical equivalent refraction \< -0.50 D as measured by non-cycloplegic autorefraction.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

  2. Axial length change

    Axial length change is defined as the difference in axial length obtained at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up in children.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Cost-effectiveness

    Cost-effectiveness in this study refers to the economic evaluation assessing the balance between the resources invested and the health outcomes achieved in the context of childhood myopia prevention and control in resource-limited settings.

    Time frame: During the 12-month follow-up period

  2. Duration of outdoor activity

    Outdoor activity duration will be assessed through parent-reported daily diaries at each follow-up visit.

    Time frame: During the 12-month follow-up period

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 13 months later.

Of 200 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myopia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 434 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2026
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07825428
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center
Collaborators
Orbis, Shanghai United Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Xiangui He, PhD
Contact
xianhezi@163.com
+86 15000755422

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion