An interventional study of Clinical nurse (supernurse) evaluation and Pulmonologist evaluation in Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Apnea and Multidisciplinary Communication, sponsored by Annie C Lajoie. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-10.
Sponsored by Annie C Lajoie · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Sleep apnea is a prevalent problem and references for the evaluation of this condition often exceeds the sleep clinic's capacity thus creating important delays in the patients' care.
The overall goal of this project is to assess the feasibility and the non-inferiority of integrating a clinical nurse, or supernurse, to the initial consultation team.
The hypothesis is that the integration of a clinical nurse to the sleep clinic's evaluation team is non inferior in terms of patients' outcomes such as improvement of symptoms and quality of life as well as adherence to treatment.
This study is supported by funding dedicated to teaching and research activities related to sleep-disordered breathing.
Exclusion criteria :
Patients randomized in this group will have their first sleep clinic evaluation with the clinical nurse. She will then discuss each case with the pulmonologist and validate the diagnostic and therapeutic avenue.
Other: Clinical nurse (supernurse) evaluation
Patients randomized in this group will have their first sleep clinic evaluation with the pulmonologist.
Other: Pulmonologist evaluation
The first evaluation of the patient refered to the sleep clinic will be performed by the clinical nurse then discussed with the pulmonologist in charge.
The first evaluation of the patient refered to the sleep clinic will be performed only by the pulmonologist.
Improvement in symptoms
Based on the Epworth Sleepiness scale (ranging from 0 to 24 points, higher values indicates increased sleepiness)
Time frame: Assessed at three months
Improvement in symptoms
Based on the Epworth Sleepiness scale (ranging from 0 to 24 points, higher values indicates increased sleepiness)
Time frame: Assessed at six months
Improvement in quality of life
Based on the Quebec Sleep questionnaire
Time frame: Assessed at three months
Improvement in quality of life
Based on the Quebec Sleep Questionnaire
Time frame: Assessed at six months
Positive pressure treatment adherence
Number of hours used per night according to CPAP report
Time frame: Assessed at six months
Mandibular advancement device treatment adherence
According to the patient's usage report
Time frame: Assessed at six months
Weight loss treatment adherence
Changes from baseline weight (kg)
Time frame: Assessed at six months
Positional therapy
Proportion of time spent supine at baseline and at control cardio-respiratory recording
Time frame: Assessed at six months
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.