CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03449316Updated Feb 28, 2018

Inhaler Technique in Elderly Patients: Impact on Disease Exacerbations

A Phase 4 interventional study of Inhaler technique education in Asthma and COPD, sponsored by Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 130 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-28.

Sponsored by Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
146
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 130 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Introduction COPD and Asthma affect more than 10% of the population. Most patients use their inhaler incorrectly, mainly the elderly, thereby becoming more susceptible to poor clinical control and exacerbations. Placebo device training is regarded as one of the best teaching methods, but there is scarce evidence to support it as the most effective one to improve major clinical outcomes. Our objective is to perform a single-blinded RCT to assess the impact of this education tool in these patients.

Methods and Analysis A multicentre single-blinded RCT will be set, comparing a placebo-device training programme versus usual care, with a one-year follow-up, in elderly patients with Asthma or COPD. Intervention will be provided at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months, with interim analysis at an intermediate time point. Exacerbation rates were set as primary outcomes, and quality of life, adherence rates, clinical control and respiratory function were chosen as secondary outcomes. A sample size of 146 participants (73 in each arm) was estimated as adequate to detect a 50% reduction in event rates. Two-sample proportions Chi-squared test will be used to study primary outcome and subgroup analysis will be carried out according to major baseline characteristics.

Discussion The investigators expect to confirm that inhaler performance education will significantly reduce exacerbation rate and improve clinical and functional control.

Ethics and dissemination:

Every participant will sign a consent form. A Data Safety Monitoring Board will be set up to evaluate data throughout the study and to monitor stop earlier criteria. Identity of all participants will be protected. Results will be presented in scientific meeting and published in peer-reviewed journals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma
  • COPD

Keywords

  • Nebulizers and Vaporizers
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 130 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of COPD or Asthma, medicated with any kind of inhaler device (pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pMDI) with or without Spacer, Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) or Soft Mist), aged ≥65 years and being a regular user of primary health care services (defined as having at least one consultation performed in the last two years with his/her own Family Doctor). In order to minimize diagnostic inaccuracy, Asthma and COPD diagnosis will be reviewed in every participant at baseline prior to enrolment and according to GINA and GOLD strategies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe or acute illness (such as unstable cardiovascular status, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction (within one month) or pulmonary embolism, haemoptysis of unknown origin, recent pneumothorax (within one month), recent thoracic, abdominal or eye surgery (within one month), acute nausea or vomiting, severe respiratory distress, dementia). Patients with intermittent asthma, as well as COPD patients with mild obstruction (GOLD class I) will be excluded, since these patients do not need to take inhaler medication on a daily basis, and tend to have a low frequency of disease exacerbations.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
146 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Inhaler technique education

    This group will receive a structured and regular follow-up plan, with education on inhaler technique. Patients will be trained by a Family Doctor (the primary investigator) in terms of the inhaler technique using placebo devices similar to their own devices. A teach-to-goal approach will be used, repeating all correct steps as many times as needed in order for patients to perform them correctly at each evaluation. There will be visits at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months to assess outcomes. In each visit, and prior to the main intervention with the primary investigator, assessment of the inhaler technique and application of all questionnaires (clinical control, treatment adhesion and quality of life) will be performed by a secondary blinded investigator.

    Behavioral: Inhaler technique education

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    This group will receive usual care from their own Family doctors, with no specific intervention. Each doctor will perform the necessary consultations according to his real life judgment. Besides this, this group will perform visits at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months to assess secondary outcomes. At each visit, assessment of the inhaler technique and application of all questionnaires (clinical control, treatment adhesion and quality of life) will be performed by a secondary blinded investigator. At any appointment, if the patient asks for or if the clinician decides to teach inhaler technique, that will be recorded. If any adjustments are made in drug classes or device types in every participants, this information will be recorded.

Interventions

  • BehavioralInhaler technique education

    Teaching of inhalers use with placebo devices in real training

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    This outcome will be quantifyed as "time to event" For Asthma, an event will be defined as increased respiratory clinical symptoms leading the patient to search for medical care, and resulting in any of the following: * Need for increased inhaled corticosteroid dose of at least 4x the regular dose * Need for increase of short-acting β2 agonists on a daily basis * Need for oral corticosteroids * Need for oral antibiotics * Hospitalization or Emergency Room (ER) visit with increased respiratory clinical symptoms. For COPD, an event will be defined as increased respiratory clinical symptoms inducing the patient to search for medical care, and resulting in any of the following: * Need for increase of long-acting β2 agonists on a daily basis * Need for oral corticosteroids * Need for oral antibiotics * Hospitalization or ER visit with increased respiratory clinical symptoms. Respiratory-related mortality and all-cause mortality will also be considered an adverse event.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical assessment

    COPD Assessment Tools (CAT) \[scale from 0 (worst) to 40 (best) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months

  2. Clinical assessment

    modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) \[scale from 0 (best) to 4 (worst) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months

  3. Clinical assessment

    Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) \[scale from 0 (worst) to 30 (best) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months

  4. Clinical assessment

    Asthma Control Test (ACT) \[scale from 5 (worst) to 25 (best) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months

  5. Quality of Life

    Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) \[scale from 32 (worst) to 224 (best) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  6. Quality of Life

    St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire \[scale from 0 (best) to 75 (worst) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  7. Quality of Life

    Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) \[scale from 0 (best) to 60 (worst) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  8. Functional control

    Functional control using FEV1 in liters.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  9. Functional control

    Functional control using FVC in liters.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  10. Functional control

    Functional control using PEF in liters/sec.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  11. Functional control

    Functional control using MEF25-75, in % of predicted values.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  12. Functional control

    Functional control using FEV1/FVC ratio.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  13. Adherence rate

    Adherence rate using the Brief Medication Questionnaire \[scale from 0 (best) to 11 (worst) points\]

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

  14. Inhaler technique performance

    Number of errors in inhaler technique (that will be standardized to a score up to 100% scale) \[To evaluate inhaler technique performance with each device, the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team (ADMIT) protocols and guidelines will be used, evaluating all the recommended steps for inhaler use on each one of them. For those devices that do not have any protocol from the ADMIT group, investigators will use the recommendations from the manufacture's Summary of Product Characteristics.

    Time frame: Evaluation at 12 months.

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Maricoto T, Correia-de-Sousa J, Taborda-Barata L. Inhaler technique education in elderly patients with asthma or COPD: impact on disease exacerbations-a protocol for a single-blinded randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):e022685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022685. PubMed 30696670 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — All data from the trial will be kept in a safe place of the principal investigator's institutional facilities and by the Data Safety Monitoring Board, in accordance with the national and international clinical research policies.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03449316
Lead sponsor
Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit
Responsible party
Tiago Maricoto (Principal Investigator, Aveiro-Aradas Family Health Unit) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 28, 2018
Start date
Jun 1, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 28, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion