CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03446391Updated Dec 16, 2024

Matched Pair Study - Kinematic Vs Mechanical Alignment

An observational study in Osteoarthritis, Knee and Joint Disease, sponsored by Medacta International SA. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-16.

Sponsored by Medacta International SA · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative knee function after total knee arthroplasty performed according to the anatomical alignment and compare these results to those of a matched historical cohort of patients operated with mechanical alignment.

Read the detailed description

The 25 patients, of the Kinematic group, are prospectively enrolled. While, the data of patients of the Mechanical group, are retrospectively collected from an historical collection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Joint Disease
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients will be recruited during the preoperative visit at the investigational site. All patients scheduled for a total knee replacements, meeting the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be invited to the study.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients presenting with disease that meets the indications for use for Medacta implants defined by this study (on-label use).
  2. Patients necessitating primary Total Knee Replacement
  3. Patients who are willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study. Written informed consent must be obtained prior to the patient's surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those with one or more medical conditions identified as a contraindication defined by the labeling on Medacta implants used in this study.
  2. Previous osteotomy around the knee
  3. Ligament instability likely to require higher level of constraint
  4. Previous infection or inflammatory disease
  5. Extraarticular deformities for which a femoral intramedullary guide rod can't be inserted into the canal and use of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) or Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) is required.
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Kinematic alignment with GMK Sphere®

    Patients enrolled prospectively with surgeries planned to get kinematic alignment

    Procedure: Kinematic alignment · Device: GMK Sphere®

  • Mechanical alignment with GMK Sphere®

    Historical group who had mechanical alignment, match-paired with the prospective group

    Procedure: Mechanical alignment · Device: GMK Sphere®

Interventions

  • ProcedureKinematic alignment

    The principle for kinematically aligning the femoral component is to remove the correct amount of bone and cartilage from the distal and posterior femur after accounting for wear and saw blade kerf, so that the total thickness of the missing and removed tissue matches the thickness of the femoral component.

  • ProcedureMechanical alignment

    Classic mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is meant to co-align the prosthetic components to the mechanical axes of the femur and tibia and restore neutral overall limb alignment

  • DeviceGMK Sphere®

    The GMK Sphere® is a total knee prosthesis . The design of the GMK Sphere® is characterized by a spherical medial femoral condyle and an asymmetrical fixed tibial UHMWPE polyethylene insert with a concave spherical medial compartment.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare clinical outcomes of mechanical vs kinematic with new Knee Society Score

    The new KSS (from the publication of 2011, Giles R. Scuderi MD "The New Knee Society Knee Scoring System" Clin Orthop Relat Res (2012) 470:3-19) includes a part filled by the surgeon and one by the patient. The first outcome is focused on the "Functional Activities" subscore, excluding the "Discretionary knee activities". The maximum is 85 points while the minimum is -10 points. The "Functional Activities" score includes 3 subscores: WALKING AND STANDING (min -10, max 30), STANDARD ACTIVITIES (min 0, max 30) and ADVANCED ACTIVITIES (min 0, max 25)

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient functional improvement, satisfaction and symptoms

    The functional improvement, satisfaction and symptoms is the sum of the following subscores of the new KSS: "Functional Activities", "Patient Satisfaction" and "Symptoms"

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  2. Residual deformity

    The residual deformity is evaluated by long axis Xray analysis: HKA angle

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  3. Flexion-extension contracture

    The flexion-extension contracture is evaluated by a subscore of the new KSS: "Joint motion"

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  4. Self-reported pain, function and stiffness

    These aspects are evaluated through KOOS score

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

  5. Ability to forget about artificial joint

    Through the use of the Forgotten Joint Score

    Time frame: 1-year follow-up

06

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Vinzenz Krankenhaus Brakel
    Brakel, North Rhine-Westphalia 33034, Germany
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03446391
Lead sponsor
Medacta International SA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 26, 2018
Start date
Jan 2, 2018
Primary completion
May 18, 2019
Completion
May 18, 2019
Last update
Dec 16, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion