CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03444779TUBERIMPACTUpdated Dec 2, 2024

Comparative Evaluation of Minimally Invasive "tibial Tuberoplasty" Surgical Technique Versus Conventional Open Surgery for Tibial Plateau Fractures

An interventional study of Tibial Tuberoplasty and Open technique in Schatzker Type 2 or 3 Tibial Plateau Fracture, sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital. Completed at 12 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-02.

Sponsored by Poitiers University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
137
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

PMSI (French Medico-Administrative Database) data shows more than 10000 proximal tibial fractures diagnosed in 2014 and 4055 lateral tibial plateau fractures operated in 2013 in France. 50% of these surgical fractures is related to the lateral condyle and causes split/depression (Schatzker 2) or pure depression (Schatzker 3). This high rate results from the recent democratization of high-risk sports, as well as an aging population with increased risks of falling. Aside from the resulting reduced physical activity, the social and professional impact of these fractures is undeniable and represents significant costs for our health care system. A recently published prospective case series reports 28 job losses out of 41 patients treated.

The clinical outcome of these patients depends mainly on the primary stability provided by the surgical treatment, after the greatest anatomical reduction possible. Indeed, Giannoudis and al. have demonstrated that under simple X-rays, the smaller the detected step-off, the better the outcome.The aim is to allow for recovery of good joint mobility to promote rapid resumption of activity and to limit the onset of early osteoarthritis.

The classical technique used for reduction and osteosynthesis of tibial plateau fractures (open surgical technique using a bone tamp) has several pitfalls : devascularization of the bone and skin, risks of infection and functional rehabilitation difficulties with delayed recovery of weight bearing. Moreover, this technique does not allow for the simultaneous diagnosis and treatment of other possible lesions, such as meniscal injuries in particular.

Since 2011, Poitiers University Hospital is offering to its patients a new minimally invasive technique for the reduction and stabilization of tibial plateau fractures, baptized "Tibial Tuberoplasty". The concept derives from the divergent use of vertebral kyphoplasty, initially dedicated for spinal injuries and transposed here to the tibial plateau. This technique involves expansion of the tibial plateau through inflation of a kyphoplasty balloon, filling of the created cavity with cement (PMMA, calcium phosphate) and percutaneous screw fixation.

Orthopaedic surgeons of Poitiers University Hospital performed the first tibial tuberoplasties through a feasibility study on 36 cadaveric subjects and then transposed the technique to human. Surgeons identified major advantages such as minimal skin damage, possible treatment of posterior and multi-fragmented compressions (lifting in a single block by the balloon), reinforcement of the stability of the assembly using cement, possible use of combined arthroscopy (for concomitant meniscal injuries treatment).

This technique allows for optimization of the fracture reduction by elevating the posterior fragments with the inflatable bone tamp through an anterior approach. The reduction is made possible thanks to the specificity of the inflatable bone tamp which inflates and reduces the area of least resistance.

The aim of this innovative technique is focused on the anatomical reduction in order to restore the convexity of the tibial plateau which is similar to the balloon convexity.

The results from the first 40 patients operated since 2011 are promising and show a proportion of 70% presenting less than 5 mm step-off reduction. A larger scale multicenter randomized controlled trial is now requested to further demonstrate the superiority of the "Tibial Tuberoplasty" to the standard treatment.

The coordinator investigator designed this study to evaluate the quality of tibial fracture reduction offered by percutaneous "Tibial Tuberoplasty" versus conventional open surgery for tibial plateau fracture but also its impact on clinical outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schatzker Type 2 or 3 Tibial Plateau Fracture

Keywords

  • tibial plateau fracture
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • ballon reduction
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old.
  2. Patients with a Schatzker type 2 or 3 tibial plateau fracture (compression with or without split) demonstrated on CT-scan and located in the lateral or medial condyle of tibia.
  3. Patients with fractures caused by trauma.
  4. Patients with fractures 10 days old maximum.
  5. Understand and accept the constraints of the study.
  6. Be a beneficiary or affiliated member of a Health Insurance plan.
  7. Give written consent for the study after having received clear information.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age \< 18 years old.
  2. Patients with fractures resulting from osteolysis.
  3. Patients with open fractures.
  4. Patients with fractures more than 10 days old.
  5. Patients with concomitant fracture(s) or condition(s) during the trauma reducing the range of motion.
  6. Patients unable to walk before the injury.
  7. History of sepsis in the injured knee.
  8. Contraindications to anesthesia, contrast agent, medical devices or cement.
  9. History of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media, bone filler or metal.
  10. Patients with a degenerative joint disease (polyarthritis, etc.).
  11. Absence of signature of the informed consent form.
  12. Patients not covered by French national health insurance.
  13. Subjects requiring closer protection, i.e. minors, pregnant women, nursing mothers, subjects deprived of their freedom by a court or administrative decision, subjects admitted to a health or social welfare establishment, major subjects under legal protection, and finally patients in an emergency setting.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
137 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    The patients will be treated with an open technique: cutaneous incision with submeniscal arthrotomy under guidance of a fluoroscope. The reduction will be performed using a spatula, a bone tamp or open reduction internal fixation. The osteosynthesis and filling of the cavity will be performed by the same surgical access.

    Device: Open technique

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    The patients will be treated with the "Tibial Tuberoplasty" technique under fluoroscopic guidance with or without arthroscopy. The reduction will be performed by an anterior approach using a kyphoplasty balloon. The combined osteosynthesis including cannulated screws and cementoplasty will both be performed by a percutaneous technique.

    Device: Tibial Tuberoplasty

Interventions

  • DeviceTibial Tuberoplasty

    Kyphoplasty ballon

  • DeviceOpen technique

    Cutaneous incision with submeniscal arthrotomy under guidance of a fluoroscope.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-operative radiological step-off reduction blindly measured by high resolution CT-scan

    Compare step-off anatomical reduction of tibial plateau fracture by "Tibial Tuberoplasty" versus conventional open surgery using CT-scan

    Time frame: Day 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. Knee range of motion (degrees)

    Knee range of motion

    Time frame: Day 21, Day 45, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24

  2. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    The NPRS is an 11-point scale from 0-10 ("0" = no pain and "10" = the most intense pain imaginable). Patients verbally select a value that is most in line with the intensity of pain that they have experienced in the last 24 hours.

    Time frame: Inclusion, Day 2, Day 21, Day 45, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24

  3. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

    The KOOS questionnaire is a functional score validated in the French language and one of the only validated in knee trauma. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was developed as an extension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index with the purpose of evaluating short-term and long-term symptoms and function in subjects with knee injury and osteoarthritis. The KOOS holds five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The KOOS has been validated for several orthopaedic interventions such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, meniscectomy and total knee replacement.

    Time frame: Inclusion, Day 21, Day 45, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24

  4. Score on Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Health questionnaire

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument used to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) which comprises a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system is composed of 5 questions assessing mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression with 5 possible responses for each item: 1- no problems, 2- slight problems, 3- moderate problems, 4- severe problems and 5- extreme problems). A global index with a maximum score of 1 is calculated from the responses to these 5 dimensions by means of normograms. The maximum score of 1 indicates the best possible quality of life. The visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 also allows the patient to rate his/her perceived quality of life, where 100 indicates the best possible quality of life.

    Time frame: Inclusion, Day 45, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12 and Month 24

  5. Description of Adverse events

    Adverse events

    Time frame: from Inclusion to Month 24 (End Of Study)

  6. Time to partial and full weight-bearing

    Time to partial and full weight-bearing

    Time frame: from Day 0 (surgery) to Month 24 (End Of Study)

06

Study locations

12 sites
  • CHU d'Amiens
    Amiens, France
  • CHU Angers
    Angers, France
  • AP-HP / Hopital Ambroise Paré
    Boulogne-Billancourt, France
  • CHU de Brest
    Brest, France
  • CHU Dijon
    Dijon, France
  • CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, France
  • CHU de Poitiers
    Poitiers, France
  • CHU de Rennes
    Rennes, France
  • CHU Rouen
    Rouen, France
  • CHRU Tours
    Tours, France
  • CH Versailles
    Versailles, France
  • CHU de Martinique
    Fort de France, Martinique
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Vendeuvre T, Monlezun O, Brandet C, Ingrand P, Durand-Zaleski I, Gayet LE, Germaneau A, Khiami F, Roulaud M, Herpe G, Rigoard P. Comparative evaluation of minimally invasive 'tibial tuberoplasty' surgical technique versus conventional open surgery for Schatzker II-III tibial plateau fractures: design of a multicentre, randomised, controlled and blinded trial (TUBERIMPACT study). BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(8):e026962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026962. PubMed 31481365 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03444779
Lead sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
Start date
Oct 26, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 26, 2022
Completion
Nov 14, 2024
Last update
Dec 2, 2024

Study contacts

Tanguy VENDEUVRE, Dr
principal investigator · Poitiers Hospital University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion