CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03443271Updated Feb 23, 2018

Effect of TAP Block on Stress Hormones

A Phase 4 interventional study of TAP Block with Bupivicaine and TAP Block with Placebo drug in Abdominal Hysterectomy and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Aga Khan University. Completed. Open to female participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-23.

Sponsored by Aga Khan University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Random allocation of patients in two groups; Tap block group (T group) and control group (C group). All patients will receive standard general anesthesia and postoperative pain management. The TAP group patient will receive ultrasound guided (US) TAP block with 20 cc of 0.25% of bupivacaine and control group will receive 20cc of normal saline. TAP block in both groups will be performed with US guidance and the study drug will be injected after complete visualization of the needle tip between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles.

Venous blood samples (5 ml for each time) for metabolic and stress hormones, including, Serum cortisol and nor-epinephrine will be collected before anesthesia at the time of cannulation (T1),60 minutes after incision(T2), 6hrs (T3)and 12 h (T4) after the surgery.

Postoperatively patient will be put on patient controlled intravenous infusion of nalbuphine

Read the detailed description

Total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) is a commonly performed major surgical procedure that results in substantial postoperative pain and discomfort. It has been shown that surgical pain and trauma can lead to a number of hormonal changes initiated by the neuronal activation of the hypothalamic pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system, which can have a detrimental effect on the patient. Strenuous effort has been made to inhibit the stress response to surgery and evaluate its outcome.

It has been shown that this stress response is influenced by the mode of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. A surgery induced stress response blunted by regional technique and the potential benefits of regional analgesia on surgical outcome are still under scrutiny. Among the postoperative analgesic technique, epidural analgesia has shown to significantly abolish the perioperative stress responses after number of surgeries including hysterectomy. In Pakistan only a small proportion of women wants to avail the epidural service due to fears and misconception.

Another modality of regional technique that has gained popularity as a part of multimodal analgesia is transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. It is a newly developed block involving the nerves of the anterior abdominal wall. The abdominal wall sensory afferents course through the transversus abdominis plane superficial to the transversus abdominis muscle. An important component of the pain experienced by patients after abdominal surgery derives from the abdominal wall incision.

The efficacy of the TAP block in providing postoperative analgesia as a part of multimodal analgesia has been demonstrated in number of surgeries including colonic resection surgery, caesarean delivery, radical prostatectomy and also hysterectomy. In literature search investigators did not find any clinical study that has been carried out to see the effect of TAP block on stress response after hysterectomy. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that the TAP block, as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, would attenuate stress response after TAH when compared with placebo. The investigators will also see any difference in postoperative pain and rescue analgesic demands and side effects among patients.

Rationale for the study

Background information:

Failure to adequately control postoperative acute pain can have a number of unwanted physiological and psychosocial consequences for the patient including dissatisfaction, myocardial problems, prolonged hospital stay and even the potential progression to chronic pain. Pain associated with abdominal surgery can be very severe and can lead to a number of hormonal changes initiated by the neuronal activation of the hypothalamic pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system, which can have a detrimental effect on the patient.

Current postoperative analgesic regimens rely heavily on systemic opioid analgesics which are associated with a number of undesirable side effects including nausea, vomiting, constipation, respiratory depression, and many others. In addition developing countries like Pakistan have limited supply of good quality opioids ,thus safer alternatives need to be evaluated. As a result postoperative pain management in a developing country like Pakistan has been less than suboptimal and barriers include general lack of resources in terms of personnel, drug availability and basic equipment

It has been observed that in developing countries only 45% of anesthetist had ready access to morphine and pethidine. Currently, the cost of importing morphine to developing countries is disproportionately high. A survey of opioid costs in 2003 showed that opioid drugs were up to 10 times more expensive in the developing world than in the developed world, after adjustment for differences in gross domestic product. Therefore in order to find the alternatives; local anaesthetic techniques by means of regional analgesic technique can provide excellent postoperative pain relief and their use should be encouraged whenever possible. There is a need to find techniques to improve postoperative analgesia which will decrease the requirement for opioids, are safe, cost effective, easy to perform and acceptable to patients.

TAP block a form of regional analgesia has been investigated as a part of multimodal analgesia and has shown promising result in decreasing the pain scores and opioid consumption but its role in inhibiting the surgical stress response is still not known. TAP block has been practiced at Aga Khan University hospital (AKUH) since 2012 now, but no data regarding its effect on stress hormones has been collected.

Work has been done on epidural analgesia, which is also a type of regional technique and attenuation of stress hormones is seen by the investigators with this form of analgesia. Epidural analgesia is an invasive procedure, which is expensive and requires expertise and equipment. It is not routinely practiced in our part of the world due to the above mentioned reasons. Epidural analgesia is used at AKUH, but it often less acceptable to patients as it is performed near the spinal cord and also because of the cost related issue.

Therefore the rational of this study is to observe, if a less expensive, easy to perform and safer form of regional analgesia like TAP block has an inhibitory effect on the surgical response or not. If favorable results are seen with TAP block, it can be incorporated in the practice guidelines of pain management for abdominal hysterectomies and related surgeries.

Primary Objective

This study is designed to test the hypothesis that the TAP block, as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, would attenuate stress response after TAH when compared with placebo. An ultrasound (US)-guided TAP block will be performed before surgical incision.

Venous blood samples (20 ml) for metabolic and stress hormones, including cortisol and norepinephrine will be collected before anesthesia (T1) at the time of cannulation, and 30 minutes after incision(T2) 6hrs (T3)and 24 h (T4) after the surgery.

Secondary Objectives The investigators will observe any difference in postoperative pain by numeric rating score (NRS) and rescue analgesic demands by the reading on patient controlled analgesia pump, total opioid consumption and side effects like nausea, vomiting, sedation by scoring them.

Patient satisfaction score by scoring system

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Hysterectomy
  • Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • transversus abdominis plane block
  • abdominal hysterectomy
  • stress response
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for elective TAH via Pfannenstiel abdominal wall incision under general anaesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded if there is patient refusal to participate in the study, history of relevant drug allergy, or medical therapies considered to result in tolerance to opioids, hysterectomy performed for malignancy or inability to use patient control analgesia (PCA) devise
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group T (TAP Block with Bupivicaine)

    Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed in this group. Bupivicaine 0.25 % 20 ml will be administered in the block on either side.

    Procedure: TAP Block with Bupivicaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Group C (TAP Block with Placebo drug)

    Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed in this group. 0.9 % Saline 20 ml will be administered in the block on either side.

    Procedure: TAP Block with Placebo drug

Interventions

  • ProcedureTAP Block with Bupivicaine

    Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed and patient will be administered 20 ml of 0.25 % Bupivicaine on each side.

  • ProcedureTAP Block with Placebo drug

    Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed and patient will be administered 20 ml of 0.9% Saline on each side.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Serum Cortisol

    Serum cortisol measured in µg/dL

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  2. Serum Norepinephrine

    Serum norepinephrine levels in pg/ml

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Score

    Pain will be measure by a Numeric Rating Score at rest and on movement. Numeric Rating Score will be from 1 to 10 where 1 is no pain and 10 is the most severe pain

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  2. Rescue analgesia

    Number of times rescue analgesia was required

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  3. Total amount of opioid consumption

    Total consumption in milligrams from Patient controlled intravenous analgesia machine

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

  4. Side effects

    Nausea, Vomiting and sedation

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    7-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 7=strong¬ly agree)

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Stanley G, Appadu B, Mead M, Rowbotham DJ. Dose requirements, efficacy and side effects of morphine and pethidine delivered by patient-controlled analgesia after gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Apr;76(4):484-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.4.484. PubMed 8652316 ↗
  • Woodhouse A, Mather LE. The effect of duration of dose delivery with patient-controlled analgesia on the incidence of nausea and vomiting after hysterectomy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jan;45(1):57-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00635.x. PubMed 9489595 ↗
  • Ng A, Swami A, Smith G, Davidson AC, Emembolu J. The analgesic effects of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine after total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jul;95(1):158-62, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200207000-00028. PubMed 12088961 ↗
  • Nishiyama T, Yamashita K, Yokoyama T. Stress hormone changes in general anesthesia of long duration: isoflurane-nitrous oxide vs sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Dec;17(8):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.009. PubMed 16427527 ↗
  • Chae BK, Lee HW, Sun K, Choi YH, Kim HM. The effect of combined epidural and light general anesthesia on stress hormones in open heart surgery patients. Surg Today. 1998;28(7):727-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02484619. PubMed 9697266 ↗
  • Li Y, Zhu S, Yan M. Combined general/epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine 0.375%) versus general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1562-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1976. PubMed 18420877 ↗
  • Yokoyama M, Itano Y, Katayama H, Morimatsu H, Takeda Y, Takahashi T, Nagano O, Morita K. The effects of continuous epidural anesthesia and analgesia on stress response and immune function in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1521-1527. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184287.15086.1E. PubMed 16244024 ↗
  • Ozyuvaci E, Altan A, Karadeniz T, Topsakal M, Besisik A, Yucel M. General anesthesia versus epidural and general anesthesia in radical cystectomy. Urol Int. 2005;74(1):62-7. doi: 10.1159/000082712. PubMed 15711112 ↗
  • Schricker T, Berroth A, Pfeiffer U, Schreiber M, Malik E, Schmidt M, Goertz A, Georgieff M. Influence of vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy on perioperative glucose metabolism. Anesth Analg. 1996 Nov;83(5):991-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199611000-00016. PubMed 8895274 ↗
  • Minhas MR, Kamal R, Afshan G, Raheel H. Knowledge, attitude and practice of parturients regarding Epidural Analgesia for labour in a university hospital in Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2005 Feb;55(2):63-6. PubMed 15813631 ↗
  • Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):408-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384. Epub 2009 Jan 26. PubMed 19174373 ↗
  • Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001 Oct;56(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x. No abstract available. PubMed 11576144 ↗
  • McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1108. PubMed 17179269 ↗
  • Netter FH Back and Spinal Cord. In: Netter FH, ed. Atlas of Human Anatomy Summit. New Jersey, USA: The Ciba-Geigy Corporation, 1989:145-55.
  • McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):186-91, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3. PubMed 18165577 ↗
  • O'Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):91. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.10.006. No abstract available. Erratum In: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):286. McDonnell, John G [added]; McShane, Alan J [added]. PubMed 16418039 ↗
  • Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2056-60. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181871313. PubMed 19020158 ↗
  • Brennan F, Carr DB, Cousins M. Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):205-21. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268145.52345.55. PubMed 17578977 ↗
  • Kehlet H, Holte K. Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg. 2001 Nov;182(5A Suppl):3S-10S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00781-4. PubMed 11755891 ↗
  • Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available. PubMed 11020770 ↗
  • Taylor R Jr, Pergolizzi JV, Raffa RB, Munzi E. Opioids: pharmacology, clinical uses and adverse effects. In: Tvildiani D, Gegechkori K, eds. Opioids: Pharmacology, Clinical Uses and Adverse Effects. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2012:75-94
  • Hodges SC, Mijumbi C, Okello M, McCormick BA, Walker IA, Wilson IH. Anaesthesia services in developing countries: defining the problems. Anaesthesia. 2007 Jan;62(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04907.x. PubMed 17156220 ↗
  • De Lima L, Sweeney C, Palmer JL, Bruera E. Potent analgesics are more expensive for patients in developing countries: a comparative study. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2004;18(1):59-70. PubMed 15148009 ↗
  • Engquist A, Brandt MR, Fernandes A, Kehlet H. The blocking effect of epidural analgesia on the adrenocortical and hyperglycemic responses to surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(4):330-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1977.tb01227.x. PubMed 906788 ↗
  • Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):616-7. No abstract available. PubMed 18020088 ↗
  • Webster K. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block: Abdominal plane regional anaesthesia. Update Anaesth. 2008; 24:25-30
  • Myles PS, Wengritzky R. Simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting impact scale for audit and post-discharge review. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Mar;108(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer505. Epub 2012 Jan 29. PubMed 22290456 ↗
  • Jankovic Z, Ahmad N, Ravishankar N, Archer F. Transversus abdominis plane block: how safe is it? Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1758-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181853619. No abstract available. PubMed 18931248 ↗
  • Rosario DJ, Jacob S, Luntley J, Skinner PP, Raftery AT. Mechanism of femoral nerve palsy complicating percutaneous ilioinguinal field block. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Mar;78(3):314-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.3.314. PubMed 9135313 ↗
  • Walker G. Transversus abdominis plane block: a note of caution! Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):265. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep387. No abstract available. PubMed 20086069 ↗
  • Ismail S, Ahmed A, Hoda MQ, Asghar S, Habib A, Aziz A. Mid-axillary transversus abdominis plane block and stress response after abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled placebo trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Jul 1;38(7):768-776. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001413. PubMed 33399377 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03443271
Lead sponsor
Aga Khan University
Responsible party
Samina Ismail (Professor, Aga Khan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 23, 2018
Start date
Jun 17, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 19, 2017
Completion
Sep 20, 2017
Last update
Feb 23, 2018

Study contacts

Samina Ismail
principal investigator · Aga Khan University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion