ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03441633SPAFUpdated Jun 9, 2023Results posted

Apixaban Drug Utilization Study In Stroke Prevention In Atrial Fibrillation (Spaf)

An observational study in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-09.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
51,690
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Apixaban is a direct anticoagulant, which inhibits the factor Xa. Its clinical efficiency in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with NVAF (non/valvular atrial fibrillation) was demonstrated as well as has shown better safety profile compared with warfarin. A Drug Utilization study will evaluate whether this drug has been used in accordance with the approved indication and recommendations described in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) and estimate possible misuse or overuse apixaban.

Read the detailed description

The primary research question is to evaluate the apixaban utilization according to the approved SPAF indication and recommendations by EMA.

In addition a comparison with a cohort of NVAF patients treated with VKA, dabigatran and rivaroxaban for the SPAF indication will also be performed.

Objective 1: To characterize patients using apixaban according to demographics, comorbidity, risk of thromboembolic events (CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-Vasc scores), risk of bleeding events (HAS-BLED score), comedications and compare it with the profile of patients treated with VKA, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Objective 2: Describe the level of appropriate usage according to the posology recommended in the apixaban SmPC.

Objective 3: Describe the potential interactions with other drugs prescribed concomintatly according with the SmPC recommendations.

Objective 4: Estimate the level of apixaban adherence by the medication possession ratio (MPR) and discontinuation rates and compare it with VKA, dabigatran and rivaroxaban cohort.

Objective 5: To analyze INR (International Normalized Ratio) values during the last 12 months and to obtain TTR (Time in Therapeutic Range) values in patients previously treated with VKA, and during the whole study period for those in the cohort treated with VKA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • apixaban
  • stroke
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,957 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 933 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51,690 is above the median of 300 across 1,390 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,323 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 597 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

SIDIAP currently collects information from 274 primary health care centers, including more than 5.8 million patients, about 80 % of the Catalonia population, or more than 10 % of the Spanish population covered by the Catalan Institute of Health.

The study population for these cohorts includes all eligible subjects from the source population with a first -recorded prescription of apixaban VKA, dabigatran or rivaroxaban for the SPAF indication, registered in SIDIAP database and diagnosis of NVAF for study period.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients more than 18 years-old.
  2. Patients diagnosed with NVAF registered in primary care according to ICD-10.
  3. Patients initiating apixaban (naïve or VKA experienced), VKA (naïve or VKA experienced), dabigatran or rivaroxaban for the SPAF indication.
  4. Continuous enrolment in the 12 months pre-index.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with valvular heart disease (ICD 10: I05.0-I05.09, I08.0-I08.9) including patients with mitral prosthetic valves.
  2. Lost to follow-up (e.g. transfer to primary care center non-ICS).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
51,690 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Group 1. Apixaban

    Patients who are on treatment with apixaban. 1a. patients who have initiated with apixaban as treatment naïve (no prior prescription of VKA previous to the 12 months before index date). 1b. patients who previously have been treated with VKA in the 12 months before index date.

    Drug: apixaban

  • Group 2. VKA

    Patients who are on treatment with VKA. 2a. patients who have initiated with VKA as treatment naïve (no prior prescription of VKA previous to the 12 months before index date). 2b. patients who previously have been treated with VKA in the 12 months before index date.

    Drug: VKA

  • Group 3. Dabigatran

    Patients who are on treatment with dabigatran. 3a. patients who have initiated with dabigatran as treatment naïve (no prior prescription of VKA previous to the 12 months before index date). 3b. patients who previously have been treated with VKA in the 12 months before index date.

    Drug: dabigatran

  • Group 4. Rivaroxaban

    Patients who are on treatment with rivaroxaban. 4a. patients who have initiated with rivaroxaban as treatment naïve (no prior prescription of VKA previous to the 12 months before index date). 4b. patients who previously have been treated with VKA in the 12 months before index date.

    Drug: rivaroxaban

Interventions

  • current or new medication

  • current or new medication

  • DrugVKA

    current or new medication

  • current or new medication

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Smoking Habit

    Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included smoking habit.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Alcoholic Habit

    Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included alcoholic habit.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: MEDEA

    Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included MEDEA. MEDEA was a deprivation index that was associated with overall mortality in urban areas. It included factors like job, education, housing conditions and single parent homes. The MEDEA index was categorized in quintiles for urban areas, with quintile 1 corresponding to the least deprived population and quintile 5, the most deprived.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included BMI. BMI was defined as an index for assessing overweight and underweight and was obtained by dividing body weight in kilograms (kg) by height in meters squared (m\^2).

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Number of Participants by Comorbidity

    Comorbidity was defined as the presence of one or more additional diseases or disorders co-occurring with (that is, concomitant or concurrent with) a primary disease or disorder.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after date of first prescription

  6. Risk of Bleeding Events: HAS-BLED Score

    Risk of bleeding events was assessed by using HAS-BLED score. HAS-BLED was a scoring system that was developed to assess 1 year risk of occurrence of major hemorrhage. HAS-BLED score was assessed by combining score of 9 risk factors: hypertension history, renal disease, liver disease, stroke history, prior major bleeding or predisposition to bleeding, labile international normalized ratio (INR), age \>65 years, medication usage predisposing to bleeding and alcohol or drug usage history. The total score ranged from 0 to 9 where 0 = low risk of bleed per 100 participants-year and \>3 = high risk of bleed per 100 participants-year.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months prior to enrollment

  7. Risk of Thromboembolic Events: CHADS2 Score

    Thromboembolic events were defined as an embolic stroke that occurred when a blood clot that formed elsewhere in the body breaks loose and travels to the brain via bloodstream. Risk of thromboembolic events was calculated using CHADS2 score. CHADS2 score was assessed by combining score of 5 risk factors (congestive heart failure history, hypertension history, age \>=75 years, diabetes mellitus history and stroke/transient ischemic attack symptoms previously). Total CHADS2 score ranged from 0-6 where 0 =low risk and 6 =high risk of stroke.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months prior to enrollment

  8. Risk of Thromboembolic Events: CHA2DS2Vasc Score

    Thromboembolic events were defined as an embolic stroke that occurred when a blood clot that formed elsewhere in the body breaks loose and travels to the brain via bloodstream. Risk of thromboembolic events was calculated using CHA2DS2Vasc score. CHA2DS2Vasc score was assessed by combining score of 8 risk factors (female, \>=65 and \<75 years, congestive heart failure history, hypertension history, diabetes mellitus history, vascular disease history, age \>=75 years and stroke/TIA symptoms previously). Total CHA2DS2Vasc score ranged from 0-9 where 0=low risk and 9=high risk of stroke.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months prior to enrollment

  9. Number of Participants by Comedications

    Comedication was defined as the second or alternative medication used to relieve the side-effects of another medicine.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after date of first prescription

  10. Number of Participants With Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban as Assessed by Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)

    MPR was one of the methods of measuring adherence and was defined as the ratio of all days supply to elapsed days, during the 12-month observation period. All days supply defined as sum of number of days supply between the start date and last prescription dispensed. Elapsed days defined as number of days between the start date and the last prescription dispensed. There were three categories of adherence: poor defined as \<80% of MPR, good defined as between 80% and 120% of MPR and over adherence defined as \>120% of MPR.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after date of first prescription

  11. Number of Participants With Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban as Assessed by Discontinuation Throughout the Year

    Discontinuation rate was defined as the lack of subsequent prescription of the index drugs within 2 months after last supply day of the last prescription. It was analyzed by calculating the treatment withdrawal or switch rate.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after date of first prescription

  12. Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban by Number of Defined Daily Dose (NDDD)

    NDDD was a measure that represented the average daily maintenance dose for the main indication of a drug.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after date of first prescription

  13. International Normalized Ratio (INR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA

    INR was defined as the ratio of the participant's prothrombin time and the normal mean prothrombin time. Prothrombin time defined as a time taken by the blood to clot in participants receiving oral anticoagulant medication. INR was categorized according to the risk level: risk for coagulation (INR\<2); optimal range (2\<INR\<3); and risk of hemorrhages (INR\>3).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after date of first prescription

  14. Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA

    TTR was defined as the duration of time in which the participant's INR values were within a desired range (2 to 3). INR was defined as the ratio of the participant's prothrombin time and the normal mean prothrombin time. Prothrombin time defined as a time taken by the blood to clot in participants receiving oral anticoagulant medication. INR was categorized according to the risk level: risk for coagulation (INR\<2); optimal range (2\<INR\<3); and risk of hemorrhages (INR\>3).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after date of first prescription

07

Results

Posted Apr 19, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Started47121423322121922286363285595351321562
Completed47121423322121922286363285595351321562
Not completed0000000000

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Smoking Habit

Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included smoking habit.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Smoking Habit
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Missing2072318447112142252335438
Non-smoker3104946194401191166234168462330791030
Ex-smoker459833676163202635572608102
Smoker942371725250688895912351091392
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.74 · 95% CI 0.68 to 0.82
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 1.14 to 1.52
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.04 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.17
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.755 · Odds ratio (or): 0.95 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.13
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.426 · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.83
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.930 · Odds ratio (or): 0.93 · 95% CI 0.77 to 1.12
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.78 · 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.25 · 95% CI 1.10 to 1.42
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.08 · 95% CI 0.98 to 1.19
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.755 · Odds ratio (or): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.14
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.426 · Odds ratio (or): 1.13 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.52
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.930 · Odds ratio (or): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.74 to 0.84
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.19 · 95% CI 1.08 to 1.32
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.16 · 95% CI 1.08 to 1.26
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.755 · Odds ratio (or): 0.82 · 95% CI 0.60 to 1.13
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.426 · Odds ratio (or): 1.48 · 95% CI 0.82 to 2.52
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.930 · Odds ratio (or): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.40
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.54 · 95% CI 0.49 to 0.60
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.51 · 95% CI 1.29 to 1.76
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.72 · 95% CI 1.54 to 1.93
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.755 · Odds ratio (or): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.72 to 1.17
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.426 · Odds ratio (or): 1.25 · 95% CI 0.78 to 1.95
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.930 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.20
PrimaryNumber of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Alcoholic Habit

Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included alcoholic habit.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Alcoholic Habit
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Missing216235311299408399112632112475366
No intake17498101433711198421210545501696923
Moderate intake76524762413944758505187915255
Risk consumption361333521623354618
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.99 · 95% CI 0.90 to 1.09
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.98 to 1.25
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.164 · Odds ratio (or): 1.52 · 95% CI 0.94 to 2.45
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.826 · Odds ratio (or): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.87 to 1.22
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.190 · Odds ratio (or): 1.16 · 95% CI 0.94 to 1.43
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.526 · Odds ratio (or): 0.58 · 95% CI 0.18 to 1.57
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.12 · 95% CI 1.01 to 1.24
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.164 · Odds ratio (or): 1.17 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.83
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.826 · Odds ratio (or): 1.09 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.26
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.190 · Odds ratio (or): 0.93 · 95% CI 0.77 to 1.13
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.526 · Odds ratio (or): 1.26 · 95% CI 0.62 to 2.65
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.36 · 95% CI 1.28 to 1.45
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.24 · 95% CI 1.14 to 1.35
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.164 · Odds ratio (or): 1.36 · 95% CI 0.98 to 1.95
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.826 · Odds ratio (or): 1.04 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.41
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.190 · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.82 to 1.76
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.526 · Odds ratio (or): 1.21 · 95% CI 0.17 to 4.50
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.28 · 95% CI 1.16 to 1.42
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.25 · 95% CI 1.10 to 1.43
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.164 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.49 to 1.64
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.826 · Odds ratio (or): 1.06 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.34
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.190 · Odds ratio (or): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.66 to 1.23
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.526 · Odds ratio (or): 0.64 · 95% CI 0.09 to 2.36
PrimaryNumber of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: MEDEA

Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included MEDEA. MEDEA was a deprivation index that was associated with overall mortality in urban areas. It included factors like job, education, housing conditions and single parent homes. The MEDEA index was categorized in quintiles for urban areas, with quintile 1 corresponding to the least deprived population and quintile 5, the most deprived.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: MEDEA
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Missing - Urban area190901754161202811057230145
Quintile 1 - Urban area71622447353114973558156973230
Quintile 2 - Urban area75421647532531573461148803234
Quintile 3 - Urban area82525648012760652447137904230
Quintile 4 - Urban area80723147442863555429152837300
Quintile 5 - Urban area73519346902733841388139683250
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.36 · 95% CI 1.20 to 1.53
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.014 · Odds ratio (or): 1.01 · 95% CI 0.89 to 1.15
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.87 · 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.86 · 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.013 · Odds ratio (or): 0.85 · 95% CI 0.74 to 0.97
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.157 · Odds ratio (or): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.31
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.124 · Odds ratio (or): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.82 to 1.29
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.062 · Odds ratio (or): 0.77 · 95% CI 0.61 to 0.96
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.079 · Odds ratio (or): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.78 to 1.22
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.140 · Odds ratio (or): 1.09 · 95% CI 0.86 to 1.38
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 1.17 to 1.45
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.014 · Odds ratio (or): 0.97 · 95% CI 0.87 to 1.09
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.01 · 95% CI 0.91 to 1.12
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.94 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.05
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.013 · Odds ratio (or): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.74 to 0.93
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.157 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.76 to 1.13
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.124 · Odds ratio (or): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.81 to 1.20
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.062 · Odds ratio (or): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.65 to 0.96
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.079 · Odds ratio (or): 1.23 · 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.140 · Odds ratio (or): 1.21 · 95% CI 0.99 to 1.49
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.96 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.05
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.014 · Odds ratio (or): 0.91 · 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.013 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.157 · Odds ratio (or): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.54
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.124 · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.53 to 1.29
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.062 · Odds ratio (or): 0.75 · 95% CI 0.48 to 1.13
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.079 · Odds ratio (or): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.57 to 1.33
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.140 · Odds ratio (or): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.67 to 1.59
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.39 · 95% CI 0.32 to 0.47
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.014 · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.73 to 0.97
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.70 · 95% CI 1.51 to 1.91
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.86 · 95% CI 1.65 to 2.10
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.013 · Odds ratio (or): 0.94 · 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.157 · Odds ratio (or): 1.35 · 95% CI 1.00 to 1.80
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.124 · Odds ratio (or): 1.41 · 95% CI 1.04 to 1.88
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.062 · Odds ratio (or): 0.76 · 95% CI 0.55 to 1.05
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.079 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.140 · Odds ratio (or): 0.81 · 95% CI 0.56 to 1.15
PrimaryNumber of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Body Mass Index (BMI)

Socio-demographics were characteristics of a population. One of the socio-demographics characteristics included BMI. BMI was defined as an index for assessing overweight and underweight and was obtained by dividing body weight in kilograms (kg) by height in meters squared (m\^2).

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Their Sociodemographic Characteristics: Body Mass Index (BMI)
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Missing1424261689834509879601781746311
18.5 - 25 kg per m^2 (Normal)42325344713029578272144464271
Less than (<) 18.5 kg per m^2 (Underweight)126141062108160
25 - 30 kg per m^2 (Overweight)122949310074687121197353061289482
Greater than (>) 30 kg per m^2 (Obese)16244101062860764778783171617498
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.91 to 1.25
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.202 · Odds ratio (or): 1.38 · 95% CI 0.58 to 3.23
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.003 · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.76 to 0.93
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.083 · Odds ratio (or): 0.82 · 95% CI 0.66 to 1.03
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.011 · Odds ratio (or): 1.99 · 95% CI 0.68 to 6.18
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.227 · Odds ratio (or): 0.89 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.06
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.23 · 95% CI 1.03 to 1.47
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.01 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.16
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.202 · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.58 to 2.66
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.95 · 95% CI 0.87 to 1.04
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.003 · Odds ratio (or): 0.87 · 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.083 · Odds ratio (or): 0.97 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.17
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.011 · Odds ratio (or): 0.06 · 95% CI 0.02 to 1.05
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.227 · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.16 · 95% CI 0.99 to 1.35
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.63 · 95% CI 1.47 to 1.82
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.202 · Odds ratio (or): 1.70 · 95% CI 0.98 to 3.25
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.29 · 95% CI 1.20 to 1.38
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.003 · Odds ratio (or): 0.94 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.00
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.083 · Odds ratio (or): 0.86 · 95% CI 0.56 to 1.28
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.011 · Odds ratio (or): 0.49 · 95% CI 0.13 to 8.58
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.227 · Odds ratio (or): 1.04 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.42
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.12 · 95% CI 0.81 to 1.55
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.50 · 95% CI 1.28 to 1.76
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.202 · Odds ratio (or): 1.04 · 95% CI 0.36 to 2.73
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.28 · 95% CI 1.15 to 1.43
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.003 · Odds ratio (or): 0.95 · 95% CI 0.86 to 1.06
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.083 · Odds ratio (or): 1.27 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.68
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.011 · Odds ratio (or): 1.37 · 95% CI 0.18 to 6.21
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.227 · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.72 to 1.17
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.67 · 95% CI 0.50 to 0.87
PrimaryNumber of Participants by Comorbidity

Comorbidity was defined as the presence of one or more additional diseases or disorders co-occurring with (that is, concomitant or concurrent with) a primary disease or disorder.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months after date of first prescription
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Comorbidity
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Number of Participants by Comorbidity36951316264501731819318203087037311417
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.68 · 95% CI 0.61 to 0.75
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.052 · Odds ratio (or): 0.85 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.15
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.73 · 95% CI 0.67 to 0.80
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.052 · Odds ratio (or): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.61 to 1.03
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.26 · 95% CI 1.17 to 1.36
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.052 · Odds ratio (or): 0.74 · 95% CI 0.45 to 1.27
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.21
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.052 · Odds ratio (or): 0.57 · 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84
PrimaryRisk of Bleeding Events: HAS-BLED Score

Risk of bleeding events was assessed by using HAS-BLED score. HAS-BLED was a scoring system that was developed to assess 1 year risk of occurrence of major hemorrhage. HAS-BLED score was assessed by combining score of 9 risk factors: hypertension history, renal disease, liver disease, stroke history, prior major bleeding or predisposition to bleeding, labile international normalized ratio (INR), age \>65 years, medication usage predisposing to bleeding and alcohol or drug usage history. The total score ranged from 0 to 9 where 0 = low risk of bleed per 100 participants-year and \>3 = high risk of bleed per 100 participants-year.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months prior to enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · bleed per 100 participants-year
Risk of Bleeding Events: HAS-BLED Score
bleed per 100 participants-yearApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Risk of Bleeding Events: HAS-BLED Score1.7 ± 1.02.7 ± 1.12.2 ± 1.12.5 ± 1.01.9 ± 1.12.4 ± 1.21.5 ± 1.02.6 ± 1.01.6 ± 1.02.6 ± 1.1
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.22 · 95% CI -0.26 to -0.17
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.09 · 95% CI -0.18 to -0.01
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.19 · 95% CI -0.23 to -0.15
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.11 · 95% CI -0.19 to -0.04
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 0.50 · 95% CI 0.47 to 0.53
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.17 · 95% CI -0.32 to -0.02
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 0.17 · 95% CI 0.12 to 0.23
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.24 · 95% CI -0.37 to -0.10
PrimaryRisk of Thromboembolic Events: CHADS2 Score

Thromboembolic events were defined as an embolic stroke that occurred when a blood clot that formed elsewhere in the body breaks loose and travels to the brain via bloodstream. Risk of thromboembolic events was calculated using CHADS2 score. CHADS2 score was assessed by combining score of 5 risk factors (congestive heart failure history, hypertension history, age \>=75 years, diabetes mellitus history and stroke/transient ischemic attack symptoms previously). Total CHADS2 score ranged from 0-6 where 0 =low risk and 6 =high risk of stroke.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months prior to enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · stroke risk per year
Risk of Thromboembolic Events: CHADS2 Score
stroke risk per yearApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Risk of Thromboembolic Events: CHADS2 Score1.7 ± 1.32.8 ± 1.41.9 ± 1.32.3 ± 1.31.8 ± 1.32.5 ± 1.51.5 ± 1.32.6 ± 1.41.5 ± 1.22.6 ± 1.4
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.18 · 95% CI -0.24 to -0.12
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.23 · 95% CI -0.35 to -0.12
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.23 · 95% CI -0.28 to -0.18
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.21 · 95% CI -0.31 to -0.11
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 0.21 · 95% CI 0.17 to 0.25
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.50 · 95% CI -0.70 to -0.30
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 0.08 · 95% CI 0.01 to 0.14
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.37 · 95% CI -0.54 to -0.20
PrimaryRisk of Thromboembolic Events: CHA2DS2Vasc Score

Thromboembolic events were defined as an embolic stroke that occurred when a blood clot that formed elsewhere in the body breaks loose and travels to the brain via bloodstream. Risk of thromboembolic events was calculated using CHA2DS2Vasc score. CHA2DS2Vasc score was assessed by combining score of 8 risk factors (female, \>=65 and \<75 years, congestive heart failure history, hypertension history, diabetes mellitus history, vascular disease history, age \>=75 years and stroke/TIA symptoms previously). Total CHA2DS2Vasc score ranged from 0-9 where 0=low risk and 9=high risk of stroke.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months prior to enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · stroke risk per year
Risk of Thromboembolic Events: CHA2DS2Vasc Score
stroke risk per yearApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Risk of Thromboembolic Events: CHA2DS2Vasc Score3.0 ± 1.74.4 ± 1.63.2 ± 1.73.7 ± 1.62.9 ± 1.83.9 ± 1.92.7 ± 1.84.0 ± 1.72.7 ± 1.74.1 ± 1.7
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.34 · 95% CI -0.42 to -0.26
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.33 · 95% CI -0.46 to -0.19
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.38 · 95% CI -0.45 to -0.32
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.27 · 95% CI -0.39 to -0.15
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 0.19 · 95% CI 0.14 to 0.24
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.62 · 95% CI -0.86 to -0.37
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.10 · 95% CI -0.18 to -0.01
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -0.43 · 95% CI -0.64 to -0.21
PrimaryNumber of Participants by Comedications

Comedication was defined as the second or alternative medication used to relieve the side-effects of another medicine.

Time frame:
Up to 30 days after date of first prescription
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Comedications
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Number of Participants by Comedications47121406322121882286352285594751321532
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.008 · Odds ratio (or): 1.88 · 95% CI 0.77 to 5.30
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.008 · Odds ratio (or): 0.62 · 95% CI 0.33 to 1.12
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.008 · Odds ratio (or): 0.55 · 95% CI 0.20 to 1.99
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.008 · Odds ratio (or): 0.39 · 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban as Assessed by Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)

MPR was one of the methods of measuring adherence and was defined as the ratio of all days supply to elapsed days, during the 12-month observation period. All days supply defined as sum of number of days supply between the start date and last prescription dispensed. Elapsed days defined as number of days between the start date and the last prescription dispensed. There were three categories of adherence: poor defined as \<80% of MPR, good defined as between 80% and 120% of MPR and over adherence defined as \>120% of MPR.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months after date of first prescription
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban as Assessed by Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
MPR: Poor adherence16215156343110357241177147131
MPR: Good adherence259276460015113206133378360
MPR: Over adherence331419090124
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.41 · 95% CI 1.14 to 1.75
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.67 · 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.10 · 95% CI 0.03 to 2.01
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.58 · 95% CI 1.23 to 2.04
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.44 · 95% CI 0.34 to 0.57
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.43 · 95% CI 0.02 to 3.73
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.66 · 95% CI 0.52 to 0.84
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.14 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.36
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.52 · 95% CI 0.06 to 3.41
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.65 · 95% CI 0.50 to 0.85
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.90 to 1.37
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.22 to 5.85
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 3.37 · 95% CI 2.86 to 3.99
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.11 · 95% CI 0.09 to 0.13
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.34 · 95% CI 0.11 to 1.52
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.23 · 95% CI 0.78 to 1.91
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.01 · 95% CI 0.00 to 0.09
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 2.07 · 95% CI 0.07 to 18.00
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.58 · 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.51 · 95% CI 0.41 to 0.63
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 29.40 · 95% CI 11.01 to 123.80
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.31 · 95% CI 0.91 to 1.86
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.10 · 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 9.73 · 95% CI 2.81 to 46.50
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban as Assessed by Discontinuation Throughout the Year

Discontinuation rate was defined as the lack of subsequent prescription of the index drugs within 2 months after last supply day of the last prescription. It was analyzed by calculating the treatment withdrawal or switch rate.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months after date of first prescription
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban as Assessed by Discontinuation Throughout the Year
ParticipantsApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Number of Participants With Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban as Assessed by Discontinuation Throughout the Year8812361132685100912710022481191322
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.08 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.27
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.45 · 95% CI 1.15 to 1.83
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.09 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.27
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.18 · 95% CI 0.96 to 1.47
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 0.89 · 95% CI 0.79 to 1.01
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 4.82 · 95% CI 3.14 to 7.55
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 1.41 · 95% CI 1.19 to 1.67
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · Chi-squared · p = 0.000 · Odds ratio (or): 2.92 · 95% CI 2.12 to 4.05
PrimaryApixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban by Number of Defined Daily Dose (NDDD)

NDDD was a measure that represented the average daily maintenance dose for the main indication of a drug.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months after date of first prescription
Reported as:
Median · milligrams per day
Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban by Number of Defined Daily Dose (NDDD)
milligrams per dayApixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-Naive
Apixaban Adherence With VKA, Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban by Number of Defined Daily Dose (NDDD)15.0 (15.0 to 30.0)30.0 (15.0 to 30.0)16.0 (16.0 to 32.0)16.0 (16.0 to 32.0)53.0 (53.0 to 53.0)16.0 (5.0 to 53.0)22.0 (22.0 to 29.0)22.0 (22.0 to 29.0)21.0 (15.0 to 28.0)28.0 (21.0 to 28.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Dabigatran: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 3.63 · 95% CI 3.02 to 4.24
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Dabigatran: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 0.11 · 95% CI -0.77 to 0.98
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 1.51 · 95% CI 0.84 to 2.17
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 1.98 · 95% CI 1.16 to 2.80
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 0.90 · 95% CI 0.41 to 1.39
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): -2.25 · 95% CI -4.32 to -0.18
  • Apixaban: Naive vs Warfarin: Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 28.52 · 95% CI 27.56 to 29.48
  • Apixaban: Non Naive vs Warfarin: Non-Naive · ANOVA · p = 0.000 · Mean difference (final values): 1.93 · 95% CI -1.05 to 4.90
PrimaryInternational Normalized Ratio (INR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA

INR was defined as the ratio of the participant's prothrombin time and the normal mean prothrombin time. Prothrombin time defined as a time taken by the blood to clot in participants receiving oral anticoagulant medication. INR was categorized according to the risk level: risk for coagulation (INR\<2); optimal range (2\<INR\<3); and risk of hemorrhages (INR\>3).

Time frame:
Up to 12 months after date of first prescription
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
International Normalized Ratio (INR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA
ratioAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-Naive
International Normalized Ratio (INR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA2.5 ± 0.42.5 ± 0.42.5 ± 0.32.6 ± 0.4
PrimaryTime in Therapeutic Range (TTR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA

TTR was defined as the duration of time in which the participant's INR values were within a desired range (2 to 3). INR was defined as the ratio of the participant's prothrombin time and the normal mean prothrombin time. Prothrombin time defined as a time taken by the blood to clot in participants receiving oral anticoagulant medication. INR was categorized according to the risk level: risk for coagulation (INR\<2); optimal range (2\<INR\<3); and risk of hemorrhages (INR\>3).

Time frame:
Up to 12 months after date of first prescription
Reported as:
Median · days
Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA
daysAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non-Naive
Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) Values During the Last 12 Months Values in Participants Previously Treated With VKA60.2 (47.2 to 71.8)59.6 (47.7 to 68.4)66.2 (52.2 to 77.4)58.9 (43.2 to 68.2)

Adverse events

Collected over Not applicable as safety data was not planned to be collected during the study. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Apixaban: Naive———
Apixaban: Non Naive———
Acenocoumarol: Naive———
Acenocoumarol: Non-Naive———
Warfarin: Naive———
Warfarin: Non Naive———
Dabigatran: Naive———
Dabigatran: Non-Naive———
Rivaroxaban: Naive———
Rivaroxaban: Non-Naive———

Baseline characteristics

Study population included all participants with a first-recorded prescription of apixaban, VKA, dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation(SPAF) registered in information system for the improvement of research in primary care(SIDIAP) database during the study and diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation(NVAF).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Apixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-NaiveTotal
Mean71.8 ± 11.178.1 ± 8.773.5 ± 12.374.6 ± 10.769.7 ± 13.474.9 ± 12.969.9 ± 12.376.5 ± 9.569.3 ± 13.276.4 ± 10.572.8 ± 12.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Apixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-NaiveTotal
Female266175115531949792051399479264981125559
Male2051672166819813071581456474248375126131
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Apixaban: NaiveApixaban: Non NaiveAcenocoumarol: NaiveAcenocoumarol: Non-NaiveWarfarin: NaiveWarfarin: Non NaiveDabigatran: NaiveDabigatran: Non-NaiveRivaroxaban: NaiveRivaroxaban: Non-NaiveTotal
Count of participants——————————0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • IDIAP Jordi Gol
    Barcelona, Catalonia 8007, Spain
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 7, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2016 to primary completion in Mar 2017, 12 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2019, 2 years 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2018
First posted
Feb 22, 2018
StartActual
Feb 18, 2016
Primary completionActual
Mar 8, 2017
CompletionActual
Mar 8, 2017
Results first posted
Apr 19, 2019
Last update
Jun 9, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03441633
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 22, 2018
Start date
Feb 18, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 8, 2017
Completion
Mar 8, 2017
Results posted
Apr 19, 2019
Last update
Jun 9, 2023

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion