ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03439852Updated Jun 18, 2023Results posted

Modifying Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Filipino Faith Leaders

An interventional study of Light-to-Moderate Physical Activity / Sedentary Time in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior and Healthy Aging, sponsored by University of Hawaii. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-18.

Primary conditionSedentary BehaviorRegistry: Motor ActivityReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Motor Activity — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Sedentary Behavior
Why
  1. Motor Activity is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Sedentary Behavior.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Hawaii · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The outcomes of this application will provide nursing researchers with information about ways to increase physical activity (PA) and decrease sedentary time (ST) in at-risk older Filipinos adults who are lay leaders in Filipino Catholic clubs in Hawaii. The proposed 12-week PA/ST program will include both a group-based component (3 group discussions during monthly club meetings) and a personalized telephone counseling component (12 weekly calls from nursing students to problem solve barriers to increasing light-to-moderate physical activity and decreasing / breaking up sedentary time). The project will stimulate multidisciplinary research at our School of Nursing and School of Medicine and has the potential to help older at-risk Filipinos reach national guidelines for healthy levels of physical activity and lower the amount of time they spend sitting/being sedentary.

Read the detailed description

Asian-Americans (A-As) are under-represented in chronic disease research, including lifestyle interventions. A-As are 42% of population in Hawaii and across the U.S. they are projected to more than double to 34.4 million by 2060, with a much higher proportion of older A-As compared to other races. Within A-As, Filipino-Americans have high rates of hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, especially as they age. This is largely due to unhealthy diets, high BMIs, sedentary behaviors, and low physical activity (PA). Our previous work found Filipino seniors are under-active and spend > 8 hours a day in sedentary time (ST). About 90% of Filipinos in Hawaii are Catholic and previous PA interventions involving faith-based organizations have been shown to be culturally relevant for ethnic minorities and can effectively increase PA. Our innovative application focuses on changing both PA and ST in 250 Filipino lay leaders who represent their parish within the Oahu Council of Filipino Catholic Clubs (OCFCCs). OCFCCs maintain Filipinos' Catholic traditions and their cultural heritage. This project builds on our previous research with Filipino leaders from these clubs, and our expertise with effective PA and ST interventions. Team includes 3 nursing faculty, 1 medical school faculty, a project director, and from 9-12 graduate /undergraduate nursing students. The students will participate in a community-engaged 3-yr research project relevant both to their future research efforts and their use of self-management strategies with patients who at-risk for chronic diseases. The investigators will develop, implement, and test the efficacy of a culturally tailored PA/ST intervention for under-active/sedentary Filipino seniors (ages: 55-75 yrs) some of who may have multiple morbidities under medical control. The investigators will initially strengthen our partnership with OCFCC by engaging council members in semi-structured meetings where key cultural and familial issues that hinder/facilitate PA/ST will be discussed, the project's name/logo will be created, and plans to facilitate clubs' engagement across 3-year project will be solidified. Specific Aims: 1) test the efficacy of a Light-to-Moderate PA-LMPA/ST intervention with ten OCFCC clubs (25 lay leaders/club; n = 250 total) that will be randomly assigned to either a 12wk LMPA/ST intervention consisting of 3 group discussions during club meetings plus 12 counseling calls, or to Delayed Treatment condition initially given health education materials and 12 contact-matched calls on topics unrelated to PA/ST; then, the LMPA/ST intervention. 2) test maintenance of LMPA/ST 12 wks after LMPA/ST intervention ends. 3) analyze LMPA/ST self-report \& accelerometer data collected at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 wks, and test demographic, psychosocial, environmental, and group factors as mediators/moderators of change in LMPA/ST. 4) discuss project findings with statewide Diocesan Congress of Filipino Catholic Clubs and the feasibility of using lay leaders to change the LMPA/ST of their parishioners from churches across Hawaii via a train-the-trainer lay leader model. This project will stimulate community engaged/team science research at our School of Nursing and enhance students' research skills.

02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior
  • Healthy Aging

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • physical activity
  • Sedentary time
03

In context

Sedentary Behavior Reclassified

1,273 studies on the registry are indexed under Sedentary Behavior; 300 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 60 across 1,076 interventional studies indexed under Sedentary Behavior.

Browse Sedentary Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Hawaii is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Compared within Sedentary Behavior, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Motor Activity. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Member in one of 10 Filipino Catholic Clubs (within the Oahu Council of Filipino Catholic Clubs) on the island of Oahu in the state of Hawaii

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: less than 55 years OR older than 75 years of age
  2. Planning to move (off the island of Oahu) in the next 9 months
  3. : If BMI is \< 18.5 or > 40 (we will be measuring their height and weight to determine BMI at enrollment)
  4. Currently exercising: Regularly (weekly) active at a moderate intensity* or higher >60 minutes a week (* = brisk walk)
  5. Currently in Treatment: Actively having cancer treatment or in physical therapy following surgery/stroke
  6. A recent (in last 6 months) diagnosis of: Cancer, Heart disease, had a heart attack, Lung disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stroke, or underwent surgery
  7. Physician recommends that person have only supervised physical activity (i.e., in a health care / physical therapy setting)
  8. Needs a cane or walker (or other assistive device) to walk especially outdoors on uneven surfaces

Need health care provider's approval/clearance before enrollment if potential participant has the following:

  1. Asthma or other respiratory disease made worse by exercise
  2. A heart valve problem or is taking medications for a heart condition
  3. Severe osteoarthritis
  4. Insulin dependent Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes (or often has a blood glucose > 235 mg/dl or 13mmol/L) (need MD clearance if do not know blood glucose)
  5. Diagnosis/Treatment for Cancer over last 12 months or had a Stroke in the past (> 6 months ago)
  6. Resting blood pressure ≥ 160/90 (with or without medications) (need MD clearance if do not know BP)
  7. Has chest pain when exercising or recently (last 4 weeks) developed any chest pain (i.e., when not doing physical activity)
  8. Has tendency to lose consciousness or collapse from dizziness
  9. Has a bone or joint problem that could be aggravated by physical activity
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary behavior

    The telephone counseling plus group cohesion intervention is designed to increase Light-to-Moderate intensity physical activity (LMPA) and reduce Sedentary time (ST). The 12-wk intervention includes group discussions during 3 regular monthly club meetings when clubs' accumulated milestones for LMPA/ST min/wk will be identified and future cumulative club goals for PA/ST set. In addition, each member will receive 12 weekly personalized phone calls from health coaches who will use motivational interviewing to set individualized LMPA/ST goals setting, reduce barriers, and facilitate social support for LMPA/ST change.

    Behavioral: Light-to-Moderate Physical Activity / Sedentary Time

  • No intervention
    Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging

    Delayed Treatment (DT) / Healthy Aging materials Condition is for 12 weeks and participants receive 12 phone calls using a previously developed contact-matched protocol that uses mailed healthy aging information and telephone calls to assess symptom ratings. After the initial 12 weeks they then receive the LMPA/ST intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralLight-to-Moderate Physical Activity / Sedentary Time

    12 weeks of telephone counseling -motivational interviewing designed to increase leisure-time physical activity and decrease amount of sitting each day

    Also known as: LMPA/ST

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Minutes Per Week of Hi/Light Intensity Physical Activity

    The Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) survey was used to assess this outcome. Participants reported the number of times/week they do a specific physical activity, and then choose one of 6 time frames that represent the amount of time they did that activity, from less than one hr/week to 9 or more hours/week. Minutes per week of high-light intensity were defined as the sum of all the minutes of physical activities with \>2 and \<3 Metabolic Equivalents (METs).

    Time frame: Measured at Baseline and after 12 weeks

  2. Minutes Per Week of Moderate-to-vigorous Intensity Physical Activity

    The CHAMPS survey was used to assess this outcome. Minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity were defined as the sum of all the minutes of physical activities with \>3 METs. For both conditions this was from baseline to at 12 weeks

    Time frame: Measured at Baseline and after 12 weeks

  3. Minutes Per Week Hi/Light Intensity Physical Activity

    The CHAMPS survey was used to assess this outcome. Participants reported the number of times/week they do a specific physical activity, and then choose one of 6 time frames that represent the amount of time they did that activity, from less than one hr/week to 9 or more hours/week. Minutes per week of high-light intensity were defined as the sum of all the minutes of physical activities with \>2 and \<3 METs. For LMPA/ST condition, their post-intervention was at 12 weeks and their maintenance was at 24 weeks. For DT/HA condition, their post-intervention was at 24 weeks and their maintenance was at 36 weeks.

    Time frame: 12 weeks after LMPA intervention ended

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hours Per Week of Sedentary Time

    Sedentary behavior was measured via the Measure of Older Adults' Sedentary Time (MOST), a validated survey with good test-retest reliability and results from ST interventions have found it sensitive to change. The survey asked respondents to report the time they spent doing 7 different tasks/activities (over last week) while sitting or lying (other than sleeping/napping/ill in bed) including: (1) TV or video/DVD watching, (2) other screen use/internet use: computer/tablet/Smartphone, (3) reading, (4) socializing with friends or family (in-person or when talking on phone), (5) driving/riding in car or city bus, (6) doing hobbies, and (7) any other activities. The total time spent sitting for each task/activity and total across all tasks was calculated.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 12 weeks

  2. Breaks in Sitting Time Per Hour at Home

    The Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ) asked respondents to consider the past 7 days, and report how many breaks from sitting were taken in an hour at work and at home. This could include standing, stretching, or taking a short walk. Participants were asked to not count breaks to prepare meals at home

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks

  3. Breaks Per Hour in Sitting Time at Work

    The Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ) asked respondents to consider the past 7 days, and report how many breaks from sitting were taken in an hour at work. This could include standing, stretching, or taking a short walk. Participants were asked to not count lunch breaks/coffee breaks at work

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks

  4. Percent That Met 150 Minutes of Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) Per Week

    Outcome was a binary variable reporting whether a participant met 150 min per week of MVPA at each of the two time points (1=met the recommendation, 0=did not meet).

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 18, 2023

Participant flow

Recruitment occurred onsite at Catholic churches in the community.

Baseline to 12 Weeks
Participant flow — Baseline to 12 Weeks
MilestoneLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging
Started1223
Completed816
Not completed47
Withdrew: Failed complete 12 wk survey47
12weeks to 24weeks
Participant flow — 12weeks to 24weeks
MilestoneLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging
Started816
Completed616
Not completed20
Withdrew: Failed complete 12 or 24 wk surveys20
24 Weeks to 36 Weeks Follow up
Participant flow — 24 Weeks to 36 Weeks Follow up
MilestoneLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging
Started616
Completed516
Not completed10
Withdrew: Failed to complete 36 wk survey10

Outcome measures

PrimaryMinutes Per Week of Hi/Light Intensity Physical Activity

The Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) survey was used to assess this outcome. Participants reported the number of times/week they do a specific physical activity, and then choose one of 6 time frames that represent the amount of time they did that activity, from less than one hr/week to 9 or more hours/week. Minutes per week of high-light intensity were defined as the sum of all the minutes of physical activities with \>2 and \<3 Metabolic Equivalents (METs).

Time frame:
Measured at Baseline and after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · minutes per week
Minutes Per Week of Hi/Light Intensity Physical Activity
minutes per weekLight-to-Moderate Physical Activity and Sedentary TIme ConditionDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition
Baseline445 ± 274335 ± 300
12 weeks626 ± 271493 ± 330
Statistical analysis
  • Light-to-Moderate Physical Activity and Sedentary TIme Condition vs Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (net): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.26 to 1.39
PrimaryMinutes Per Week of Moderate-to-vigorous Intensity Physical Activity

The CHAMPS survey was used to assess this outcome. Minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity were defined as the sum of all the minutes of physical activities with \>3 METs. For both conditions this was from baseline to at 12 weeks

Time frame:
Measured at Baseline and after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · minutes per week
Minutes Per Week of Moderate-to-vigorous Intensity Physical Activity
minutes per weekLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Behavior ConditionDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition
baseline180 ± 207171 ± 175
12-weeks238 ± 191308 ± 268
Statistical analysis
  • Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Behavior Condition vs Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 (Calculated) · Median difference (net): 1.14 · 95% CI -0.37 to 2.64
PrimaryMinutes Per Week Hi/Light Intensity Physical Activity

The CHAMPS survey was used to assess this outcome. Participants reported the number of times/week they do a specific physical activity, and then choose one of 6 time frames that represent the amount of time they did that activity, from less than one hr/week to 9 or more hours/week. Minutes per week of high-light intensity were defined as the sum of all the minutes of physical activities with \>2 and \<3 METs. For LMPA/ST condition, their post-intervention was at 12 weeks and their maintenance was at 24 weeks. For DT/HA condition, their post-intervention was at 24 weeks and their maintenance was at 36 weeks.

Time frame:
12 weeks after LMPA intervention ended
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes per week
Minutes Per Week Hi/Light Intensity Physical Activity
Minutes per weekLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Behavior ConditionDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition
Post-intervention626 ± 271504 ± 430
Maintenance695 ± 408550 ± 461
Statistical analysis
  • Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Behavior Condition vs Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): -0.72 · 95% CI -2.31 to 0.88
SecondaryHours Per Week of Sedentary Time

Sedentary behavior was measured via the Measure of Older Adults' Sedentary Time (MOST), a validated survey with good test-retest reliability and results from ST interventions have found it sensitive to change. The survey asked respondents to report the time they spent doing 7 different tasks/activities (over last week) while sitting or lying (other than sleeping/napping/ill in bed) including: (1) TV or video/DVD watching, (2) other screen use/internet use: computer/tablet/Smartphone, (3) reading, (4) socializing with friends or family (in-person or when talking on phone), (5) driving/riding in car or city bus, (6) doing hobbies, and (7) any other activities. The total time spent sitting for each task/activity and total across all tasks was calculated.

Time frame:
Baseline and after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Hours per week
Hours Per Week of Sedentary Time
Hours per weekLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time ConditionDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition
Baseline5.4 ± 4.96.3 ± 6.3
12 Weeks5.4 ± 3.96.5 ± 5.1
Statistical analysis
  • Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time Condition vs Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (net): 0.96 · 95% CI -2.67 to 4.60
SecondaryBreaks in Sitting Time Per Hour at Home

The Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ) asked respondents to consider the past 7 days, and report how many breaks from sitting were taken in an hour at work and at home. This could include standing, stretching, or taking a short walk. Participants were asked to not count breaks to prepare meals at home

Time frame:
baseline and after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · breaks per hour
Breaks in Sitting Time Per Hour at Home
breaks per hourLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time ConditionDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition
baseline2.5 ± 1.71.1 ± 1.0
12 weeks4.6 ± 1.51.7 ± 1.4
Statistical analysis
  • Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time Condition vs Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (net): -0.76 · 95% CI -1.11 to -0.40
SecondaryBreaks Per Hour in Sitting Time at Work

The Workplace Sitting Breaks Questionnaire (SITBRQ) asked respondents to consider the past 7 days, and report how many breaks from sitting were taken in an hour at work. This could include standing, stretching, or taking a short walk. Participants were asked to not count lunch breaks/coffee breaks at work

Time frame:
baseline and after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · breaks per hour in sitting at work
Breaks Per Hour in Sitting Time at Work
breaks per hour in sitting at workLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time ConditionDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition
baseline2.6 ± 1.81.5 ± 1.5
12 weeks4.2 ± 1.31.4 ± 1.7
Statistical analysis
  • Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time Condition vs Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Mean difference (net): -0.62 · 95% CI -1.15 to 0.10
SecondaryPercent That Met 150 Minutes of Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) Per Week

Outcome was a binary variable reporting whether a participant met 150 min per week of MVPA at each of the two time points (1=met the recommendation, 0=did not meet).

Time frame:
baseline and after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percent That Met 150 Minutes of Moderate-to-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) Per Week
ParticipantsLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time ConditionDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition
baseline met 150 min MVPA69
12-wks met 150 min MVPA510
Statistical analysis
  • Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time Condition vs Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging Condition · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.05 · Median difference (net): -0.49 · 95% CI -2.10 to 1.11Repeated measures generalized linear model test effects of time/group, \& interaction rate met MVPA, adjusting for within subject correlation.

Adverse events

Collected over Continuous systematic collection adverse events after enrollment first began March, 2018 via surveys (collected 12, 24, 36 weeks after enrollment) and verbal questions at the end of telephone calls held weekly after enrollment for first 12 -24 weeks depending on condition.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary Time0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Delayed Treatment/Healthy Aging0/23 (0%)1/23 (4.3%)0/23 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLight to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy Aging
Serious adverse event - hospitalizationSurgical and medical procedures0/121/23

Baseline characteristics

Adults recruited from community-based Catholic Churches

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
Mean65.5 ± 6.663.8 ± 6.164.4 ± 6.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
Female101828
Male257
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian122234
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White011
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
United States122335
Minutes per week physical activity
Minutes per week physical activity(minutes per week)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
Mean180 ± 207171 ± 175174 ± 183
Minutes/week of High-Light physical activity
Minutes/week of High-Light physical activity(minutes per week)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
Mean445 ± 274335 ± 300370 ± 293
Breaks per hour at baseline
Breaks per hour at baseline(breaks per hour)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
Mean2.5 ± 1.71.1 ± 1.01.8 ± 1.3
Sitting time hours per day
Sitting time hours per day(hours per day)Light to Moderate Physical Activity/Sedentary TimeDelayed Treatment/Healthy AgingTotal
Mean5.4 ± 4.96.3 ± 6.35.8 ± 5.6

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Hawaii at Manoa, Office of Research Services
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Deidentified data will be available for Univ. of Hawaii graduate students/post-doctoral fellows who have been involved in the project for dissertations or publications, first, then to others. Individuals wishing to use our data will be required to fill out a Data Sharing Request Form, which asks for information on the type of data set being requested, anticipated data use, research questions, study design, variables, analysis plan, and human subjects approval. We will also plan for general release and sharing of deidentified data (following the acceptance for publication of the main findings from the study) as we believe this to be essential for expedited translation of research results into larger arenas to improve human health.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 22 months.

Results were first posted in Jun 2023, 3 years 4 months after primary completion.

Of 733 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sedentary Behavior, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31. This study's 22 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 741 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 7, 2018
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
StartActual
Mar 11, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jan 22, 2020
CompletionActual
May 31, 2021
Results first posted
Jun 18, 2023
Last update
Jun 18, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03439852
Lead sponsor
University of Hawaii
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
Start date
Mar 11, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 22, 2020
Completion
May 31, 2021
Results posted
Jun 18, 2023
Last update
Jun 18, 2023

Study contacts

Clementina Ceria-Ulep, PhD
principal investigator · University of Hawaii
Cheryl L Albright, PhD
principal investigator · University of Hawaii

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion