CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03438643IMMUNO-PECUpdated Dec 23, 2025

Dynamic of Immunocompetent Populations in Patients Treated With Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

An observational study in Graft Versus Host Disease and Extracorporeal Photopheresis, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-23.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Observational

Why this study was terminated
lack of inclusions
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a cellular therapy indicated in the treatment of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). In this study protocol, patients suffering from inaugural cGVHD will be treated with the association of ECP and corticosteroid treatment. Treatment will start by an induction stage with 2 sessions of ECP per week until the 10th week followed by a maintenance stage including one session every other week until the 22th week. The objective of this study is to highlight the immunological mechanism of extracorporeal photopheresis treatment. Indeed, ECP is based on an immunomodulatory immunological effect and despite several hypotheses highlighted by different teams; clear mechanisms still need to be defined. This French multicenter study realize an immunological follow-up before and during treatment to elucidate the impact of ECP on immune system of responder patient.

02

Conditions studied

  • Graft Versus Host Disease
  • Extracorporeal Photopheresis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Graft versus host disease
  • Extracorporeal photopheresis
  • Immunomodulatory
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients treated with ECP and corticosteroid as first-line treatment for cGVHD.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥18 years who had a first allo-CSH for hematological pathology
  • Body weight ≥ 40 kg.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of inaugural cGVHD requiring systemic treatment.
  • Any source of hematopoietic stem cells is allowed.
  • All conditioning treatments are allowed.
  • Patient validated by the local investigator as eligible for treatment with ECP according to the criteria of the investigating centers
  • Patient treated according to the study plan with a ECP in 2 steps
  • Patient having signed informed consent.
  • Prophylaxis of GVH maintained during the onset of cGVHD is accepted.
  • Effective contraception for men and women of childbearing age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cGVHD ≥ 2nd line of treatment
  • Exclusive pulmonary cGVHD
  • cGVHD before J100
  • cGVHD occurring after Donor Lymphocyte Injection (DLI)
  • Overlaps syndrome aGVHD-cGVHD
  • Late aGVHD
  • Relapsed patient or progressive disease
  • Non-controlled infection
  • Second Allograft
  • Leukopenia \<0.5G / l at screening
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient

    Patients treated with ECP and corticosteroid as first-line treatment for cGVHD

    Diagnostic Test: Blood samples · Diagnostic Test: skin biopsy

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testBlood samples

    Blood samples (42mL) will be taken before and during treatment.

  • Diagnostic testskin biopsy

    skin biopsy will be taken before and during treatment.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in circulating immunocompetent subsets for responder and non-responder patients treated with ECP in inaugural cGVHD.

    Time frame: at 6-week follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in circulating immunocompetent subsets frequency for responder and non-responder patients treated with ECP in inaugural cGVHD.

    Time frame: at 22-week follow-up

  2. Response rate (complete and partial response) according to NIH criteria

    Efficacy of ECP in inaugural cGVHD in combination with immunosuppressive therapy (prednisone + ciclosporin)

    Time frame: at 10 weeks and at 22 weeks

  3. Comparison of serum and tissue biomarkers in responder and non-responder patients between the initial treatment and 6-week follow-up.

    Time frame: at baseline, at 6 week follow-up

  4. QLQ-C30 version 3.0

    Evaluation of the quality of life for patients. QLQ-C30 is a composite score. QLQ-C30 Summary Score = (Physical Functioning+ Role Functioning+ Social Functioning+ Emotional Functioning+ Cognitive Functioning+ 10 0-Fatigue+ 100 * Pain+ 100 * Nausea\_Vomiting+ 100 * Dyspnoea+ 100 * Sleeping Disturbances+ 100 * Appetite Loss+ 100 * Constipation+ 100 * Diarrhoea)/13

    Time frame: between 10-week and 22-week follow-ups.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU
    Lille, France
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03438643
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Lille
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
Start date
May 7, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2019
Completion
Dec 2, 2019
Last update
Dec 23, 2025

Study contacts

Ibrahim YAKOU BAGHA, MD,PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Lille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion