CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03437473Updated Dec 27, 2018

Safety and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulator in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

An interventional study of SetPoint Medical Neurostimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway System in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by SetPoint Medical Corporation. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-27.

Sponsored by SetPoint Medical Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multi-site, first-in-human study to assess safety and efficacy of an active implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) device in 15 adult patients with active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an incomplete response or intolerability to at least two different mechanisms of action.

Read the detailed description

This is a two-stage study where Stage 1 is open label, and Stage 2 is randomized and sham controlled where the sites and subjects are blinded to treatment. Three subjects will be enrolled in Stage 1 of the study. And 12 subjects will be enrolled in Stage 2. Subjects will be treated for a total of 12 weeks.

Subjects will be asked to visit the clinic at day 0, week 1-6, week 8 and week 12. During these visits, the following activities will be conducted: standard patient and physician assessments of RA activity, blood sample collection for RA biomarkers, and a hand MRI.

Subjects who complete the study will have the option to enroll in a long-term extension study. Subjects that do not participate in the extension study can opt to either have their device permanently inactivated and left in place or have the device surgically explanted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female and 22-75 years of age, inclusive
  2. Have provided informed consent
  3. Have a diagnosis of adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis as defined by the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria (Aletaha, 2010)
  4. Have moderately to severely active RA defined by at least 4/28 tender and 4/28 swollen joints and CDAI score >10
  5. Have been treated at approved doses with at least 2 biologic DMARDs and/or new targeted synthetic DMARDs (e.g. JAK inhibition) for at least 3 months and either:

    1. experienced insufficient efficacy or loss of efficacy
    2. experienced intolerance of such treatment
  6. Have had regular use of at least 1 conventional DMARDs for at least the 12 weeks prior to study entry with a continuous, non-changing dose for at least 8 weeks prior to screening visit
  7. Women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant at the time of screening and must agree to use a double barrier method of contraception throughout the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have taken the following within the defined time period prior to screening visit:

    i. Rituximab: 6 months ii. Infliximab, golimumab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, tocilizumab: 60 days iii. Abatacept, etanercept, anakinra: 30 days iv. Tofacitinib: 30 days v. Investigational biologic agents: 6 months for depleting agents, 60 days for others vi. Investigational small molecules: 5 times the pharmacokinetic half-life or 30 days, whichever is longer vii. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection: 30 days

  2. Are currently receiving corticosteroids at doses greater than 10 mg per day of prednisone (or equivalent) or have been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of corticosteroids within 2 weeks of screening visit
  3. Have started treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or have been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of NSAIDs within 2 weeks of screening visit
  4. Documented significant psychiatric illness or substance abuse
  5. Active infection requiring treatment with antibiotics
  6. Uncontrolled hypertension
  7. Uncontrolled diabetes
  8. History of stroke
  9. Known cardiac disease, including cardiomyopathy with ejection fraction \<40%, recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina, or heart failure with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms
  10. Known neurological syndromes
  11. Known atherosclerotic disease including contralateral carotid artery
  12. BMI \<18.5 or >35
  13. Any condition per the investigator's clinical judgment that precludes participation in the study
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active stimulation QD

    Device: SetPoint Medical Neurostimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway System

  • Active comparator
    Active stimulation QID

    Device: SetPoint Medical Neurostimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway System

  • Sham comparator
    No stimulation

    Device: SetPoint Medical Neurostimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway System

Interventions

  • DeviceSetPoint Medical Neurostimulation of the Cholinergic Anti-inflammatory Pathway System

    Active Implantable Vagus Nerve Stimulation device.

    Also known as: SetPoint System

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence of Adverse Events

    treatment-emergent incidence rates of Adverse Events, Adverse Device Effects, Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Device Effects, Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects, and Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects

    Time frame: Enrollment to Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 - C-reactive protein (CRP)

    comparison between the active device group and the inactive device group of the change in DAS28-CRP

    Time frame: change from baseline at Day 0 and Week 12

  2. change in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, 50 and 70 response rates

    comparison between the active device group and the inactive device group of the change in ACR 20/50/70

    Time frame: change from baseline at Day 0 and Week 12

  3. change in European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response and remission rate

    comparison between the active device group and the inactive device group of the change in EULAR

    Time frame: change from baseline at Day 0 and Week 12

  4. change in hand MRI

    comparison between the active device group and the inactive device group of the change in Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System (OMERACT RAMRIS) hand MRI index of synovitis

    Time frame: change from baseline at Day 0 and Week 12

06

Study locations

4 sites
  • Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties
    Aventura, Florida 33180, United States
  • Florida Medical Clinic, P.A.
    Zephyrhills, Florida 33542, United States
  • Northwell Health Division of Rheumatology
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03437473
Lead sponsor
SetPoint Medical Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 19, 2018
Start date
Mar 6, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2018
Completion
Dec 10, 2018
Last update
Dec 27, 2018

Study contacts

Mark Genovese, MD
study director · Stanford University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion