ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03432663Updated Feb 14, 2018

Time-dependent Amiodarone Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intravenous amiodarone(1) and Intravenous amiodarone(2) in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Instituto de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular Hospital Zambrano-Hellion Tec Salud. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-02-14.

Sponsored by Instituto de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular Hospital Zambrano-Hellion Tec Salud · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2008, registered Jan 2018).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 46 studies testing amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation — 12 open to participants now, 12 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Amiodarone · Atrial Fibrillation.

Enrollment
35th of 46
60 · median 124
Started
2008
with 2 others
Phase 4
20 of 46
5 open now
Registered
24th of 46
by date

Among the 46 studies testing amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation, this one is the 35th largest by enrollment, is one of 3 that started in 2008, is one of 20 in phase 4, and was the 24th registered.

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 46 studies testing amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation are open now, in 8 countries. Each count lists the studies.

All 12 open studies →

About amiodarone

Amiodarone: first FDA approval 1985 (CORDARONE). What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 612 Atrial Fibrillation studies recruiting now, 407 (67%) set no upper age limit and 44 (7%) stop at 75 or younger; 21 take children under 18; 43 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →
Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 46 studies testing amiodarone in Atrial Fibrillation, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Sixty consecutive emergency patients with newly diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation were randomized into two groups. The first received intravenous amiodarone infusions continuously for 24 hours; the second received Amiodarone until sinus rhythms was reached or for up to 72 hours.

The efficacy and safety of administering intravenous infusions of amiodarone for up to 72 hours were investigated and compared to the efficacy and safety of administering a standard 24 hours infusion of amiodarone. Specifically, the use of up to 72 hours infusions was considered as a new strategy to improve rates of conversion to sinus rhythm without altering the safety profile of the drug.

Read the detailed description

An open randomized clinical trial was conducted that included 60 emergency adult patients who were candidates for drug cardioversion after first symptomatic episodes of AF.

The patients were randomized in equal proportions and sequentially placed in one of two treatment groups; no patient knew to which group he or she belonged. The first group received intravenous amiodarone infusions at doses of 5 mg/Kg for over 30 min, followed by 20 mg/Kg until 24 hours was reached. The second group received intravenous amiodarone infusions at doses of 5 mg/Kg for over 30 min, followed by 20 mg/Kg every 24 hours for up to 72 hours.

All patients were continuously monitored using electrocardiograms, and echocardiograms were performed within 24 hours after the randomized trial began. The exact time of each patient's cardioversion was documented. In addition, general laboratory tests, lipid profiles, thyroid profiles and chest X-rays were obtained for all patients.

A sample size of 30 subjects in each group was calculated. A conversion rate of 60% was assumed, according to literature, and an estimated increase to 90% was assumed for the experimental group to find differences with a power of 0.8 and an alpha error of 0.05.

The primary goal was to obtain was a sinus rhythm conversion rate. The secondary goal was to obtain a combined complication rate by noting various complications in the patients, such as phlebitis, symptomatic hypotension that required vasopressors, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting and any organ embolism.

03

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Intravenous Amiodarone
  • Drug safety profile
  • Chemical cardioversion
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years old
  • Emergency patients
  • First symptomatic episodes of Atrial Fibrillation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability,
  • Previous use of antiarrhythmic drugs
  • Use of digoxin seven or fewer days prior to the study
  • Active thyroid disease
  • Known adverse reactions to amiodarone
  • Other ventricular arrhythmias
  • for anticoagulation
  • Acute renal failure
  • Chronic liver disease
  • Transaminase levels that were twice the normal levels
  • Acute pulmonary edema
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (> 180/110 mmHg)
  • Unstable angina
  • Patients who were pregnant and/or breast feeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    24h infusion

    Intravenous amiodarone infusions at doses of 5 mg/Kg for over 30 min, followed by 20 mg/Kg until 24 h was reached Intravenous amiodarone (1)

    Drug: Intravenous amiodarone(1)

  • Experimental
    72h infusion

    Intravenous amiodarone infusions at doses of 5 mg/Kg for over 30 min, followed by 20 mg/Kg every 24 h for up to 72 h or until sinus rhythm was reached Intravenous amiodarone (2)

    Drug: Intravenous amiodarone(2)

Interventions

  • Intravenous amiodarone infusions at doses of 5 mg/Kg for over 30 min, followed by 20 mg/Kg until 24 h was reached

    Also known as: 24 hour amiodarone

  • Intravenous amiodarone infusions at doses of 5 mg/Kg for over 30 min, followed by 20 mg/Kg every 24 h for up to 72 h or until sinus rhythm was reached

    Also known as: 72 hour amiodarone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Obtain a continuous sinus rhythm

    Monitoring using continuous telemetry.

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication rate of continuous amiodarone intravenous infusion

    Obtain a combined complication rate by noting various complications in the patients, such as phlebitis, symptomatic hypotension that required vasopressors, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting and any organ embolism.

    Time frame: 72 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González". Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
    Monterrey, Nuevo León 64460, Mexico
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cotter G, Blatt A, Kaluski E, Metzkor-Cotter E, Koren M, Litinski I, Simantov R, Moshkovitz Y, Zaidenstein R, Peleg E, Vered Z, Golik A. Conversion of recent onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm: the effect of no treatment and high-dose amiodarone. A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Eur Heart J. 1999 Dec;20(24):1833-42. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1747. PubMed 10581142 ↗
  • Snow V, Weiss KB, LeFevre M, McNamara R, Bass E, Green LA, Michl K, Owens DK, Susman J, Allen DI, Mottur-Pilson C; AAFP Panel on Atrial Fibrillation; ACP Panel on Atrial Fibrillation. Management of newly detected atrial fibrillation: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 16;139(12):1009-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-12-200312160-00011. PubMed 14678921 ↗
  • Joseph AP, Ward MR. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of sotalol, amiodarone, and digoxin for the reversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Jul;36(1):1-9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.107655. PubMed 10874228 ↗
  • Tuseth V, Jaatun HJ, Dickstein K. Amiodarone infusion in the treatment of acute atrial fibrillation or flutter: high versus low dose treatment. Heart. 2005 Jul;91(7):964-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.049171. No abstract available. PubMed 15958375 ↗
  • Waldo AL. Management of atrial fibrillation: the need for AFFIRMative action. AFFIRM investigators. Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Sep 15;84(6):698-700. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00419-1. No abstract available. PubMed 10498142 ↗
  • Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1825-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021328. PubMed 12466506 ↗
  • Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2370-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370. PubMed 11343485 ↗
  • Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998 Sep 8;98(10):946-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946. PubMed 9737513 ↗
  • Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1994 Feb;89(2):724-30. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.2.724. PubMed 8313561 ↗
  • Kumana CR, Cheung BM, Cheung GT, Ovedal T, Pederson B, Lauder IJ. Rhythm vs. rate control of atrial fibrillation meta-analysed by number needed to treat. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Oct;60(4):347-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02449.x. PubMed 16187966 ↗
  • Lim HS, Hamaad A, Lip GY. Clinical review: clinical management of atrial fibrillation - rate control versus rhythm control. Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):271-9. doi: 10.1186/cc2827. Epub 2004 Feb 19. PubMed 15312210 ↗
  • Chevalier P, Durand-Dubief A, Burri H, Cucherat M, Kirkorian G, Touboul P. Amiodarone versus placebo and class Ic drugs for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jan 15;41(2):255-62. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02705-5. PubMed 12535819 ↗
  • Hauser TH, Pinto DS, Josephson ME, Zimetbaum P. Early recurrence of arrhythmia in patients taking amiodarone or class 1C agents for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 2004 May 1;93(9):1173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.051. PubMed 15110217 ↗
  • Khan IA, Mehta NJ, Gowda RM. Amiodarone for pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2003 Jun;89(2-3):239-48. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00477-1. PubMed 12767548 ↗
  • Hagens VE, Van Gelder IC, Crijns HJ; RAte Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion Of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RACE) Study Group. The RACE study in perspective of randomized studies on management of persistent atrial fibrillation. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Jun;7(2):118-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1027439430017. PubMed 14618033 ↗
  • McNamara RL, Tamariz LJ, Segal JB, Bass EB. Management of atrial fibrillation: review of the evidence for the role of pharmacologic therapy, electrical cardioversion, and echocardiography. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 16;139(12):1018-33. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-12-200312160-00012. PubMed 14678922 ↗
  • Maisel WH, Kuntz KM, Reimold SC, Lee TH, Antman EM, Friedman PL, Stevenson WG. Risk of initiating antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients admitted to a university hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Aug 15;127(4):281-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-4-199708150-00004. PubMed 9265427 ↗
  • Kreiss Y, Sidi Y, Gur H. Efficacy and safety of intravenous amiodarone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation: experience in patients admitted to a general internal medicine department. Postgrad Med J. 1999 May;75(883):278-81. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.75.883.278. PubMed 10533631 ↗
  • Xanthos T, Bassiakou E, Vlachos IS, Bassiakos S, Michalakis K, Moutzouris DA, Papadimitriou L. Intravenous and oral administration of amiodarone for the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation after digoxin administration. Int J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 18;121(3):291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Apr 16. PubMed 17434635 ↗
  • Vardas PE, Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Tsatsakis AM, Simantirakis EN, Chlouverakis GI. Amiodarone as a first-choice drug for restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled study. Chest. 2000 Jun;117(6):1538-45. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.6.1538. PubMed 10858380 ↗
  • Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation--Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000 Nov 25;356(9244):1789-94. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03230-x. PubMed 11117910 ↗
  • Bernard EO, Schmid ER, Schmidlin D, Scharf C, Candinas R, Germann R. Ibutilide versus amiodarone in atrial fibrillation: a double-blinded, randomized study. Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1031-4. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000053555.78624.0F. PubMed 12682468 ↗
  • Thomas SP, Guy D, Wallace E, Crampton R, Kijvanit P, Eipper V, Ross DL, Cooper MJ. Rapid loading of sotalol or amiodarone for management of recent onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized, digoxin-controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2004 Jan;147(1):E3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00526-x. PubMed 14691441 ↗
  • Decker WW, Smars PA, Vaidyanathan L, Goyal DG, Boie ET, Stead LG, Packer DL, Meloy TD, Boggust AJ, Haro LH, Laudon DA, Lobl JK, Sadosty AT, Schears RM, Schiebel NE, Hodge DO, Shen WK. A prospective, randomized trial of an emergency department observation unit for acute onset atrial fibrillation. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;52(4):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.12.015. Epub 2008 Mar 14. PubMed 18339449 ↗
  • del Arco C, Martin A, Laguna P, Gargantilla P; Investigators in the Spanish Atrial Fibrillation in Emergency Medicine Study Group (GEFAUR). Analysis of current management of atrial fibrillation in the acute setting: GEFAUR-1 study. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;46(5):424-30. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 May 31. PubMed 16271674 ↗
  • Carlsson J, Miketic S, Windeler J, Cuneo A, Haun S, Micus S, Walter S, Tebbe U; STAF Investigators. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: the Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (STAF) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 21;41(10):1690-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00332-2. PubMed 12767648 ↗
  • Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S, Wyse DG, Dorian P, Lee KL, Bourassa MG, Arnold JM, Buxton AE, Camm AJ, Connolly SJ, Dubuc M, Ducharme A, Guerra PG, Hohnloser SH, Lambert J, Le Heuzey JY, O'Hara G, Pedersen OD, Rouleau JL, Singh BN, Stevenson LW, Stevenson WG, Thibault B, Waldo AL; Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure Investigators. Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2667-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708789. PubMed 18565859 ↗
  • Galve E, Rius T, Ballester R, Artaza MA, Arnau JM, Garcia-Dorado D, Soler-Soler J. Intravenous amiodarone in treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: results of a randomized, controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1079-82. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00595-1. PubMed 8609324 ↗
  • Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991 Aug;22(8):983-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.8.983. PubMed 1866765 ↗
  • Martinez-Marcos FJ, Garcia-Garmendia JL, Ortega-Carpio A, Fernandez-Gomez JM, Santos JM, Camacho C. Comparison of intravenous flecainide, propafenone, and amiodarone for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;86(9):950-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01128-0. PubMed 11053705 ↗
  • Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Hamilos ME, Marketou ME, Chlouverakis GI, Vardas PE. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of procainamide versus propafenone versus amiodarone for the conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 15;99(12):1721-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.059. Epub 2007 Apr 26. PubMed 17560882 ↗
  • Cybulski J, Kulakowski P, Budaj A, Danielewicz H, Maciejewicz J, Kawka-Urbanek T, Ceremuzynski L. Intravenous amiodarone for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2003 Jul;26(7):329-35. doi: 10.1002/clc.4950260707. PubMed 12862299 ↗
  • Hilleman DE, Spinler SA. Conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with intravenous amiodarone: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Jan;22(1):66-74. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.1.66.33492. PubMed 11794432 ↗
  • National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK). Atrial Fibrillation: The Management of Atrial Fibrillation. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2014 Jun. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK248059/ PubMed 25340239 ↗
  • January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; ACC/AHA Task Force Members. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014 Dec 2;130(23):e199-267. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000041. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2014 Dec 2;130(23):e272-4. PubMed 24682347 ↗
  • Freemantle N, Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mitchell S, Eckert L, Reynolds M. Mixed treatment comparison of dronedarone, amiodarone, sotalol, flecainide, and propafenone, for the management of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2011 Mar;13(3):329-45. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq450. Epub 2011 Jan 11. PubMed 21227948 ↗
  • Nadarasa K, Williams MJ. Single high oral dose amiodarone for cardioversion of recent onset atrial fibrillation. Heart Lung Circ. 2012 Aug;21(8):444-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2012.03.015. Epub 2012 May 2. PubMed 22554874 ↗
  • Patel DA, Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Shah S, Gilliland Y. Clinical implications of left atrial enlargement: a review. Ochsner J. 2009 Winter;9(4):191-6. PubMed 21603443 ↗
  • Danias PG, Caulfield TA, Weigner MJ, Silverman DI, Manning WJ. Likelihood of spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Mar 1;31(3):588-92. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00534-2. PubMed 9502640 ↗
  • Emren SV, Kocabas U, Duygu H, Levent F, Simsek EC, Yapan Emren Z, Tuluce S. The role of HATCH score in predicting the success rate of sinus rhythm following electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(9):978-84. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2016.0044. Epub 2016 Apr 4. PubMed 27040017 ↗
  • Suenari K, Chao TF, Liu CJ, Kihara Y, Chen TJ, Chen SA. Usefulness of HATCH score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation for Asians. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(1):e5597. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005597. PubMed 28072697 ↗
  • Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Le Heuzey JY, Kay GN, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann S, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Camm AJ, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Europace. 2006 Sep;8(9):651-745. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul097. No abstract available. Erratum In: Europace. 2007 Sep;9(9):856. PubMed 16987906 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2008 to primary completion in Nov 2009, 15 months.

Of 129 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 81. This study's 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 81.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 29, 2018
First posted
Feb 14, 2018
StartActual
Aug 1, 2008
Primary completionActual
Nov 30, 2009
CompletionActual
Nov 30, 2009
Last update
Feb 14, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03432663
Lead sponsor
Instituto de Cardiología y Medicina Vascular Hospital Zambrano-Hellion Tec Salud
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2018
Start date
Aug 1, 2008
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2009
Completion
Nov 30, 2009
Last update
Feb 14, 2018

Study contacts

Luis A Sanchez-Trujillo, MD
principal investigator · Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Tecnológico de Monterrey. Monterrey. México

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Amiodarone

Start the discussion