ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03429582Updated Aug 3, 2026

Comparison of Cervical CIN II/III Treatment Outcomes With Thermal Ablation Device

An interventional study of Standard C02 Cryotherapy and Single Tip Thermoablation in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,154
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China — 10 open to participants now, 14 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Uterine Cervical Dysplasia · China.

Enrollment
9th of 34
1,154 · median 330
Started
2020
with 5 others
No phase
12 of 55
4 open now
Registered
24th of 55
by date

Among the 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China, this one is the 9th largest by enrollment of the 34 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2020, is one of 12 with no phase, and was the 24th registered.

Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

409 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; 76 are open to participants now.

Browse Uterine Cervical Dysplasia studies →

Open to participants now

10 of the 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

5 more — sign in →

All 10 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in China have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in China →

Who these studies take

Of the 42 Uterine Cervical Dysplasia studies recruiting now, 18 (43%) set no upper age limit and 21 (50%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · female · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will be to compare two thermoablation modalities using devices adapted to low and middle income countries (LMICs) to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer. The investigators will investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) with these devices are non-inferior compared to that of conventional cryotherapy. The results of this study will affect other research areas by serving as a springboard to exploring treatment alternatives that are amenable to low-resource settings and thus will reach the most vulnerable populations.

Read the detailed description

The standard treatment for cervical pre-cancer is gas-based cryotherapy, the freezing of tissue to ablate (destroy) lesions. Although cryotherapy is relatively simple to perform, the necessary gas tanks are generally expensive, difficult to obtain and transport, and pose a danger of explosion. An urgent need exists for a point-of-care treatment technology that is accessible, portable, and inexpensive. An alternative ablative procedure in use since the 1970s is thermoablation (also known as cold coagulation or thermocoagulation), which utilizes heat to destroy pre-cancer. Despite its long-standing use, there are no standardized guidelines for thermoablation. There is also little data on patient and provider acceptability, potential side effects, and the impact of different treatment protocols on quality of life. For these reasons, international and national agencies have been hesitant to adopt the technique as an alternative to cryotherapy. The purpose of this research study is to develop a patient-centered thermoablation protocol that is simple, safe, and effective.

Currently, the most common treatment technique for thermoablation involves a multiple-tip protocol, which uses differently shaped probe-tips to cover the affected area. This technique requires a considerable degree of expertise, and may not be the most appropriate strategy for settings where highly trained healthcare providers are scarce. In collaboration with WiSAP Medical Technology (Brunnthal, Germany), the manufacturer of the most widely used thermoablator, the investigators modified the original device to meet the needs of low-resource settings. The LMIC-adapted thermoablator is lightweight, portable, and easy to operate. The investigators will further modify the LMIC-adapted thermoablator to test the non-inferiority of two thermoablation treatment approaches against the standard of care (i.e. gas-based cryotherapy). The experimental approaches include:

  1. Single tip: A 19mm conical tip with a nipple is applied to the cervix for 40-seconds at 100ºC, a single application of which should ablate the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) in the majority of women. In the rare instance that the SCJ is not completely ablated, additional 20 second applications can be applied, or
  2. Multiple tips: A narrow nipple shaped tip at 100ºC is placed in the endocervix for 20 seconds. This is followed by the placement of a 12 mm flat tip at 100ºC on the ectocervix for as many 20-second applications as necessary to ablate the entire SCJ.

These will be tested against traditional CO2 cryotherapy treatment using a MedGyn device in a standard double-freeze procedure (3 minute freeze, 5 minute thaw, 3 minute freeze).

Women will be recruited at colposcopy clinics run by the Ministry of Health and the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) in the Mexico City metropolitan region. Eligible women will be those over the age of 18, who are able and willing to provide informed consent and a reliable or permanent address, and with a biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ diagnosis. Women wo are pregnant, plan to become pregnant during the study duration, with a history of total hysterectomy, past surgeries destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years, with a disfigure or hard-to-reach cervix, and those with contraindications for ablative treatment will be excluded from the study.

The investigators will approach 1,602 women with CIN2+ during a four-year enrollment phase (48 months). Assuming an 80% participation rate, approximately 1,282 women will be enrolled; of these, 1,155 (90%) will be eligible for ablation treatment (i.e. no contraindications) and 129 will be ineligible and undergo alternative treatments (i.e. LEEP or invasive cancer treatment). The investigators estimate that approximately 20% will be lost to follow-up at the 12-month visit, resulting in complete data on a total of 924 women (57.7% of 1,602) treated with CO2-based cryotherapy, single-tip thermoablation, or multiple-tip thermoablation. The investigators will monitor the percentages of ineligible women, contraindications, and loss to follow-up in real time and adjust recruitment accordingly to achieve the target sample size.

The clinical endpoint of the study will be residual disease at the 12-month follow-up visit as determined by colposcopy, four-quadrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage (ECC). HPV testing will also be performed at this visit to differentiate between persistent or new infection. Cytology, VIA and care HPV tests will also be performed to evaluate the most effective post treatment screening strategy.

At a pre-treatment visit, consented women will receive a pregnancy test as part of the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the study. Pre-vaginal cultures will be collected to be analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The same cultures will be collected at a 6-week follow-up visit. Consented women will be enrolled and undergo a pelvic exam and visual inspection of the cervix following placement of diluted acetic acid on the cervix. Images of the cervix will be taken with a mobile colposcopy device will be taken before and after treatment. Women will be asked to evaluate their pain level after speculum insertion, immediately before treatment, and immediately after treatment. These women will also complete a quality of life assessment. Women deemed ineligible for cryotherapy will undergo LEEP immediately. In the case of suspected cancer, women will be appropriately referred.

Six weeks post-treatment, women who return for a visit for evaluation of treatment side effects; these women will be administered a post-treatment patient satisfaction survey, and complete a questionnaire to assess the presence of pain or cramps, bleeding, stenosis, watery discharge, malodorous discharge and be evaluated for evidence of cervicitis. In addition, vaginal cultures will be collected and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea, and chlamydia.

One year post-treatment, women will return for a follow-up visit to determine residual disease, which is the primary endpoint. Residual disease will be determined by colposcopy and four-quadrant biopsies. In addition, VIA, cytology, and high-risk HPV DNA testing with careHPV will be performed. Genotyping and next-generation sequencing will be repeated to differentiate between persistent and new infections. The investigators will evaluate sensitivity of VIA, cytology, and HPV testing post-treatment. Women will be asked to again complete the quality of life assessment and treatment acceptability instrument. Women diagnosed with recurrent/untreated CIN2+ on biopsy will be asked to return to undergo LEEP. Women with suspected cancer on biopsy will be referred to the local cancer hospital for standard of care.

03

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Keywords

  • Human Papilloma Virus
  • Thermoablation
  • Thermocoagulation
  • Cryotherapy
  • Cervica Pre-cancer
  • Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs)
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Criteria for inclusion

  • Women aged 18 and older
  • results of CIN2, CIN2-3, CIN3, or high-grade CIN not otherwise specified
  • Willing and able to provide
  • Willing and able to provide permanent or reliable address

Criteria for exclusion

  • Pregnant or plans to become pregnant during study
  • History of total hysterectomy (verified by medical record or pelvic evaluation)
  • Previous surgery destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years
  • Patient not eligible for cryotherapy or thermoablation (lesion >75% of cervix, lesion extends into canal or there is suspicion for invasive cancer)
  • Cervix shape disfigured or hard to reach
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,154 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard C02 Cryotherapy

    Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue

    Device: Standard C02 Cryotherapy

  • Experimental
    Single Tip Thermoablation

    Thermoablator outfitted with a 19mm conical tip

    Device: Single Tip Thermoablation

  • Experimental
    Multiple Tip Thermoablation

    Thermoablator outfitted with detachable probes

    Device: Multiple Tip Thermoablation

Interventions

  • DeviceStandard C02 Cryotherapy

    Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue

  • DeviceSingle Tip Thermoablation

    Thermoablator outfitted with a 19mm conical tip

  • DeviceMultiple Tip Thermoablation

    Thermoablator outfitted with detachable probes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Residual CIN2+ diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis

    To compare CIN2+ cure rates 12-months post-treatment for CO2-based cryotherapy and both single versus multiple tips thermoablation strategies

    Time frame: 12-months post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient's pain assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES scale

    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Patients with Cervical Dysplasia Version 4 (FACIT-CD). Consists of 5-subscales listed below. For all subscales and the scale, 0 is the worst outcome, higher scores are better outcomes. All subscales are summed. Subscale ranges are as follows: Physical well-being:0 to 32, Treatment satisfaction:0 to 16, General perceptions:0 to 28, Emotional well-being:0 to 44, Relationship support: 0 to 16 Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale, construct being measured is pain for anyone over the age of 3. Scale range: Minimum = 0, Maximum = 10. For each scale range, what is a better or worse outcome: 0 is a better outcome (no pain), higher scores are worse outcomes, and 10 is the worst outcome (worst pain). There are no subscales.

    Time frame: Immediately after speculum insertion, immediately before treatment, and immediately after treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Patient's satisfaction with treatment assessed with the FACIT-CD questionnaire (FACIT Measurement System)

    FACIT-CD Version 4: 5-subscales. For all subscales and the scale, 0 is the worst outcome, higher scores are better outcomes. All subscales are summed. Subscale ranges are as follows: Physical well-being:0 to 32, Treatment satisfaction: 0 to 16, General perceptions: 0 to 28, Emotional well-being:0 to 44, Relationship support: 0 to 16

    Time frame: At enrollment, 6-week visit, and 12-month follow-up visit

  2. Patient's hope for the future using the Herth Hope Index

    Herth Hope Index. The construct is hope in adults in clinical settings. Scale ranges: 1 to 4. For the total index, 12 is the worst outcome. Higher scores are better outcomes. There are no subscales.

    Time frame: At enrollment and at 12-month follow-up visit

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
    Shenzhen, China
  • Hospital Nacional de la Mujer
    San Salvador, El Salvador
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 53 months.

Of 77 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 54. This study's 53 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 81 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 25, 2018
First posted
Feb 12, 2018
StartActual
Oct 30, 2020
Primary completionActual
Mar 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2025
Last update
Aug 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03429582
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI), Basic Health International, Inc., WISAP Medical Technologies GMBH, University of Southern California, Medical College of Wisconsin, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2018
Start date
Oct 30, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2025
Completion
Jul 1, 2025
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Miriam Cremer, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion