An interventional study of Standard C02 Cryotherapy and Single Tip Thermoablation in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.
Sponsored by The Cleveland Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Among 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China — 10 open to participants now, 14 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Uterine Cervical Dysplasia · China.
Among the 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China, this one is the 9th largest by enrollment of the 34 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2020, is one of 12 with no phase, and was the 24th registered.
409 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia; 76 are open to participants now.
Browse Uterine Cervical Dysplasia studies →10 of the 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital · Sites in China
Ages up to 45 · Women only
First Hospital of China Medical University · Sites in China
Ages 18–65 · Women only
Shanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co.,Ltd · Sites in China
Ages 12–34 · Women only · Healthy volunteers
Tongji Hospital · Sites in China
Ages 18–50 · Women only
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University · Sites in China
Ages 18 days+ · Women only
A study can be open while its sites in China have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in China →
Of the 42 Uterine Cervical Dysplasia studies recruiting now, 18 (43%) set no upper age limit and 21 (50%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 11 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · female · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
55 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2005; this study’s year is marked. 6 started in 2020.
This study's enrollment of 1,154 is above the median of 167 across 285 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia.
Median enrollment 330 across the 34 interventional studies, 1,200 across the 21 observational. Of the 18 that completed or were terminated, 5 (28%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
11 of 55 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
The Cleveland Clinic is the lead sponsor of 831 studies on the registry; 119 are open to participants now.
Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (81%) have results posted.
The Cleveland Clinic has 3 studies filed under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
2 of the studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT07833852Shanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co.,LtdLong-Term Immune Persistence After Bivalent HPV Vaccination in Females From Study 311-HPV-1005 | 2026-12 |
| NCT06243666Xiamen UniversityLong-term Effectiveness and Immuno-persistence Study of a Recombinant HPV 16/18 Bivalent Vaccine in Preadolescent Girls | 2026-12-31 |
Among the 55 studies in Uterine Cervical Dysplasia with a site in China, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The purpose of this academic-industrial partnership will be to compare two thermoablation modalities using devices adapted to low and middle income countries (LMICs) to traditional CO2-based cryotherapy for the treatment of cervical precancer. The investigators will investigate whether the cure rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and more severe diagnoses (CIN2+) with these devices are non-inferior compared to that of conventional cryotherapy. The results of this study will affect other research areas by serving as a springboard to exploring treatment alternatives that are amenable to low-resource settings and thus will reach the most vulnerable populations.
The standard treatment for cervical pre-cancer is gas-based cryotherapy, the freezing of tissue to ablate (destroy) lesions. Although cryotherapy is relatively simple to perform, the necessary gas tanks are generally expensive, difficult to obtain and transport, and pose a danger of explosion. An urgent need exists for a point-of-care treatment technology that is accessible, portable, and inexpensive. An alternative ablative procedure in use since the 1970s is thermoablation (also known as cold coagulation or thermocoagulation), which utilizes heat to destroy pre-cancer. Despite its long-standing use, there are no standardized guidelines for thermoablation. There is also little data on patient and provider acceptability, potential side effects, and the impact of different treatment protocols on quality of life. For these reasons, international and national agencies have been hesitant to adopt the technique as an alternative to cryotherapy. The purpose of this research study is to develop a patient-centered thermoablation protocol that is simple, safe, and effective.
Currently, the most common treatment technique for thermoablation involves a multiple-tip protocol, which uses differently shaped probe-tips to cover the affected area. This technique requires a considerable degree of expertise, and may not be the most appropriate strategy for settings where highly trained healthcare providers are scarce. In collaboration with WiSAP Medical Technology (Brunnthal, Germany), the manufacturer of the most widely used thermoablator, the investigators modified the original device to meet the needs of low-resource settings. The LMIC-adapted thermoablator is lightweight, portable, and easy to operate. The investigators will further modify the LMIC-adapted thermoablator to test the non-inferiority of two thermoablation treatment approaches against the standard of care (i.e. gas-based cryotherapy). The experimental approaches include:
These will be tested against traditional CO2 cryotherapy treatment using a MedGyn device in a standard double-freeze procedure (3 minute freeze, 5 minute thaw, 3 minute freeze).
Women will be recruited at colposcopy clinics run by the Ministry of Health and the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) in the Mexico City metropolitan region. Eligible women will be those over the age of 18, who are able and willing to provide informed consent and a reliable or permanent address, and with a biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ diagnosis. Women wo are pregnant, plan to become pregnant during the study duration, with a history of total hysterectomy, past surgeries destructive to the cervix within the last 5 years, with a disfigure or hard-to-reach cervix, and those with contraindications for ablative treatment will be excluded from the study.
The investigators will approach 1,602 women with CIN2+ during a four-year enrollment phase (48 months). Assuming an 80% participation rate, approximately 1,282 women will be enrolled; of these, 1,155 (90%) will be eligible for ablation treatment (i.e. no contraindications) and 129 will be ineligible and undergo alternative treatments (i.e. LEEP or invasive cancer treatment). The investigators estimate that approximately 20% will be lost to follow-up at the 12-month visit, resulting in complete data on a total of 924 women (57.7% of 1,602) treated with CO2-based cryotherapy, single-tip thermoablation, or multiple-tip thermoablation. The investigators will monitor the percentages of ineligible women, contraindications, and loss to follow-up in real time and adjust recruitment accordingly to achieve the target sample size.
The clinical endpoint of the study will be residual disease at the 12-month follow-up visit as determined by colposcopy, four-quadrant biopsy, and endocervical curettage (ECC). HPV testing will also be performed at this visit to differentiate between persistent or new infection. Cytology, VIA and care HPV tests will also be performed to evaluate the most effective post treatment screening strategy.
At a pre-treatment visit, consented women will receive a pregnancy test as part of the eligibility criteria for enrollment in the study. Pre-vaginal cultures will be collected to be analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The same cultures will be collected at a 6-week follow-up visit. Consented women will be enrolled and undergo a pelvic exam and visual inspection of the cervix following placement of diluted acetic acid on the cervix. Images of the cervix will be taken with a mobile colposcopy device will be taken before and after treatment. Women will be asked to evaluate their pain level after speculum insertion, immediately before treatment, and immediately after treatment. These women will also complete a quality of life assessment. Women deemed ineligible for cryotherapy will undergo LEEP immediately. In the case of suspected cancer, women will be appropriately referred.
Six weeks post-treatment, women who return for a visit for evaluation of treatment side effects; these women will be administered a post-treatment patient satisfaction survey, and complete a questionnaire to assess the presence of pain or cramps, bleeding, stenosis, watery discharge, malodorous discharge and be evaluated for evidence of cervicitis. In addition, vaginal cultures will be collected and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis, yeast, gonorrhea, and chlamydia.
One year post-treatment, women will return for a follow-up visit to determine residual disease, which is the primary endpoint. Residual disease will be determined by colposcopy and four-quadrant biopsies. In addition, VIA, cytology, and high-risk HPV DNA testing with careHPV will be performed. Genotyping and next-generation sequencing will be repeated to differentiate between persistent and new infections. The investigators will evaluate sensitivity of VIA, cytology, and HPV testing post-treatment. Women will be asked to again complete the quality of life assessment and treatment acceptability instrument. Women diagnosed with recurrent/untreated CIN2+ on biopsy will be asked to return to undergo LEEP. Women with suspected cancer on biopsy will be referred to the local cancer hospital for standard of care.
Criteria for inclusion
Criteria for exclusion
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Biopsy and archival tissue
A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.
Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue
Device: Standard C02 Cryotherapy
Thermoablator outfitted with a 19mm conical tip
Device: Single Tip Thermoablation
Thermoablator outfitted with detachable probes
Device: Multiple Tip Thermoablation
Standard therapy using carbon dioxide for freezing of tissue
Thermoablator outfitted with a 19mm conical tip
Thermoablator outfitted with detachable probes
Residual CIN2+ diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis Diagnosis of recurrent and or untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or with cervical cancer diagnosis
To compare CIN2+ cure rates 12-months post-treatment for CO2-based cryotherapy and both single versus multiple tips thermoablation strategies
Time frame: 12-months post treatment
Patient's pain assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES scale
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Patients with Cervical Dysplasia Version 4 (FACIT-CD). Consists of 5-subscales listed below. For all subscales and the scale, 0 is the worst outcome, higher scores are better outcomes. All subscales are summed. Subscale ranges are as follows: Physical well-being:0 to 32, Treatment satisfaction:0 to 16, General perceptions:0 to 28, Emotional well-being:0 to 44, Relationship support: 0 to 16 Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale, construct being measured is pain for anyone over the age of 3. Scale range: Minimum = 0, Maximum = 10. For each scale range, what is a better or worse outcome: 0 is a better outcome (no pain), higher scores are worse outcomes, and 10 is the worst outcome (worst pain). There are no subscales.
Time frame: Immediately after speculum insertion, immediately before treatment, and immediately after treatment
Patient's satisfaction with treatment assessed with the FACIT-CD questionnaire (FACIT Measurement System)
FACIT-CD Version 4: 5-subscales. For all subscales and the scale, 0 is the worst outcome, higher scores are better outcomes. All subscales are summed. Subscale ranges are as follows: Physical well-being:0 to 32, Treatment satisfaction: 0 to 16, General perceptions: 0 to 28, Emotional well-being:0 to 44, Relationship support: 0 to 16
Time frame: At enrollment, 6-week visit, and 12-month follow-up visit
Patient's hope for the future using the Herth Hope Index
Herth Hope Index. The construct is hope in adults in clinical settings. Scale ranges: 1 to 4. For the total index, 12 is the worst outcome. Higher scores are better outcomes. There are no subscales.
Time frame: At enrollment and at 12-month follow-up visit
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in Mar 2025, 53 months.
Of 77 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 54. This study's 53 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 81 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 54.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.