A Phase 4 interventional study of Dalbavancin and Vancomycin in Bone Infection, Osteomyelitis and Septic Arthritis, sponsored by Infectious Diseases Physicians, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-03.
Sponsored by Infectious Diseases Physicians, Inc. · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Because of its prolonged terminal half-life, dalbavancin is an extremely attractive option in treating Gram-positive infections caused by S. aureus including MRSA, and streptococcal species. Systemic bacterial infections due to Staphylococci such as osteomyelitis and septic arthritis, are conditions which require prolonged IV therapy, typically for at least 3-6 weeks, though sometimes more. Due to dalbavancin's prolonged terminal half-life, it may offer the opportunity to substantially reduce costs and morbidity in native joint and prosthetic joint infections with one infusion every fourteen days until completion of therapy.
Dalbavancin, currently FDA approved for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), is a lipoglycopedptide with bactericidal activity in vitro against Staphylococcus aureus, including MRSA and VISA strains, and Streptococcus pyogenes. Its bactericidal action results primarily from inhibition of cell-wall biosynthesis, specifically the prevention of N-acetylmuramic acid (NAM) and N-acetylglucosamine (NAG)-peptide subunits incorporation into the peptidoglycan matrix. Dalbavancin alters bacterial-cell-membrane permeability and RNA synthesis. It is highly protein bound, primarily to albumin, with a half-life of 346 hours. Approximately 33% of unchanged drug is excreted in the urine, 20% via feces and 12% as the minor metabolite, hydroxyl-dalbavancin. There is minimal potential for drug-drug interactions; it is not a substrate, inducer or inhibitor of hepatic CYP450 isoenzymes and the administration of CYP450 substrates, inhibitors or inducers does not affect its clearance rate. In SSTI trials, Dalbavancin was demonstrated to be non-inferior to vancomycin and linezolid.
Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are an emerging health problem. Although the incidence of these infections is historically low (approximately 0.5%-1.0of implants), because of the rapid increase in the number of hip, knee and other joint implants, the absolute number of cases of infection is increasing. In 2010, 332,000 hip joints and 719,000 knee joints were implanted. This alone conservatively translates to 5,000-10,000 cases, with an economic impact of $1 billion. Management of PJI is particularly challenging because long term antibiotic therapy in most cases is accompanied by removal of the prosthesis and re-implantation.
For long term antimicrobial administration, current standard of care requires a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or other indwelling intravascular catheter, and daily/multiple daily infusions. There is substantial cost of maintaining the intravascular access, drugs, home health care and monitoring, as well as the infection risk of the chronic indwelling line which is being accessed frequently. There is a clear need for alternative care models to the current approach. Dalbavancin, because of its activity profile against Gram-positive organisms and its pharmacokinetics which would allow weekly or every other week dosing, is a favorable option. This option would eliminate the need for long term IV access, because at most, weekly IV infusions would be performed.
In terms of bone infection, dalbavancin has favorable pharmacokinetic properties. A PK study performed in subjects undergoing elective orthopedic surgery found that dalbavancin (dosed at 1000mg IV at enrollment and then 500mg weekly for up to 7 weeks) maintained levels in cortical bone at bactericidal levels , at >50X the MIC of typical staphylococcal organism (including MRSA). Animal studies in a rat osteomyelitis model also found that dalvabancin was comparable to vancomycin. Because of these same PK properties, dalbavancin offers the opportunity to substantially reduce costs and morbidity in native joint and prosthetic joint infections.
This is a two-center, randomized, open label trial of dalbavancin versus standard intravenous therapy control comparator in the treatment of subjects with gram positive native joint or prosthetic joint infections. The primary outcome variable is clinical cure at day 42 after start of treatment in all randomized patients. Safety and tolerability will also be assessed throughout the study period via laboratory measurements and AE monitoring. Additionally, clinical response will be measured by patient reported outcomes with change from baseline symptoms and by Quality of Life questionnaire.
Eligible subjects with confirmed gram positive joint infections, will be randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to receive open label dalbavancin or standard IV therapy. Standard IV therapy will depend on the antibiotic susceptibility of the causative pathogen. Subjects randomized to dalbavancin may have received standard of care therapy for no more than 120 hours prior to first dalbavancin dose. Subjects randomized to standard of care can continue with treatment course if already started, or receive the first dose at the baseline visit.
105 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteomyelitis; 30 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 74 across 60 interventional studies indexed under Osteomyelitis.
Browse Osteomyelitis studies →This is the only study on the registry with Infectious Diseases Physicians, Inc. as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Male or female patients, aged 18-80, with the following osteoarticular infections:
If female, meet the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
The number of CD4 cells, a type of white blood cell, in a given amount of blood. It is used to follow how well the immune system is doing in HIV.
The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.
It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.
A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Postmenopausal
Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
CD4 count
The number of CD4 cells, a type of white blood cell, in a given amount of blood. It is used to follow how well the immune system is doing in HIV.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)
The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.
It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Child-Pugh class
A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Dalbavancin 1,500mg intravenously every fourteen days for two to four infusions
Drug: Dalbavancin
Standard of care intravenous antibiotic based on microbiology susceptibility testing. Infusions may be one to three times daily for three to eight weeks. Examples of standard of care include vancomycin, daptomycin, nafcillin, cefazolin.
Drug: Vancomycin
Dalbavancin 1,500mg intravenously every fourteen days for two to four infusions
Also known as: Dalvance, Xydalba, Zevan
Examples of standard of care arm; infusions one to three times per day depending on the antibiotic for a total of three to eight weeks
Also known as: Daptomycin, Nafcillin, Cefazolin
Clinical response (non-failure) to assigned treatment at day #42
This is defined as the absence of wound drainage, sinus tract formation, fever or joint instability at study day 42, without having switched or extended treatment for any reason. This will be reported as the % of participants from each treatment arm, who are determined to be a treatment responder.
Time frame: Evaluated at Day 42
Sustained Clinical Response at day #90
This is defined as the absence of drainage, sinus tract formation, fever, cellulitis, infectious effusion (culture +) or joint instability.
Time frame: Evaluated at Day 90
Sustained Clinical Response at day #180
This is defined as the absence of drainage, cellulitis, infectious effusion (culture +) or joint instability.
Time frame: Evaluated at Day 180
Sustained Clinical Response at day #365
This is defined as the absence of drainage, cellulitis, infectious effusion (culture +) or joint instability.
Time frame: Evaluated at Day 365
CRP Improvement at day #90
Normalized or, at least 75% reduction from baseline
Time frame: Evaluated at Day 90
CRP Improvement at day #180
Normalized or, at least 75% reduction from baseline
Time frame: Evaluated at Day 180
CRP Improvement at day #365
Normalized or, at least 75% reduction from baseline
Time frame: Evaluated at Day 365
Plan to share: Undecided — Upon conclusion of the statistical analysis, the study team may write their findings for an infectious disease journal article
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Dalbavancin