ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03424499CathetersUpdated Jul 6, 2022

Sterile Single-use vs Reused Polyvinylchloride Catheter For Intermittent Catheterization In Neurogenic Bladder

An interventional study of Single-use catheter and Reused catheter in Neurogenic Bladder Due to Spina Bifida (Disorder), sponsored by Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez. Completed. Open to participants aged 2 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-06.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2016, registered Jan 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
113
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to determine whether single-use polyvinylchloride (PVC) catheters reduce urinary tract infections (UTI) compared to reused PVC catheters for patients with neurogenic bladder due to spina bifida that require intermittent catheterization for bladder emptying. The investigators conducted a clinical trial with an 8-week follow-up comparing single-use and reused (washed with soap and water, and stored in a container with benzalkonium chloride or washed with soap and water alone) PVC intermittent catheterization. Evaluations were established on days 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56. Participants reported symptoms and urine culture results, collecting urine samples from a fresh midstream catheter specimen using a sterile technique.

Read the detailed description

The investigators performed a 3-arm clinical trial at the "Dr. José Eleuterio González" University Hospital, a tertiary-care academic hospital in Monterrey, Mexico. The study population were patients from a charity institution for individuals with SB (Asociación de Espina Bífida de Nuevo León A.B.P.) who were treated in our hospital. Patients and parents were offered optional entrance to the study. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 2 years, diagnosis of SB, self-IC or performed by a trained person, ≥ 3 months using a reused PVC catheter (1 per week) with a clean technique, able to read and understand the informed consent. Exclusion criteria were other causes of NB, symptomatic UTI at the time of initial evaluation (defined as a positive urine culture with pyuria, and odorous urine, flank pain, malaise, or fever), inconsistent IC, an indwelling catheter, allergy to PVC, urethral pathology (eg, stricture, false passage, hypospadias) and rejection to participate in the trial. The use of a prophylactic antibiotic was not an exclusion criterion provided that the participant continued with their usual therapy for the study duration.

The sample size was calculated considering a total of 135 active patients with SB treated in our hospital, using a power of 80%, an expected difference of 50% between arms, and an alpha level set at 0.05. The sample size needed was 75 subjects, using methods for correlated binary data and repeated measures. Subjects were assigned into 3 groups: Group 1 was assigned to use a single-use PVC catheter. Groups 2 and 3 were assigned to use the standard practice modality, a reused PVC catheter. All groups had a follow-up of 8 weeks. Subjects were assigned to block sizes of 6 using a computer-generated list. A blinding process was impossible due to the nature of the intervention.

All groups were instructed to use sterile water-soluble lubricant in each catheterization. In the reused catheter groups, after catheterization, the PVC catheter was washed with water and soap and stored in a container with 0.5% benzalkonium chloride or washed with water and soap alone. Each catheter was programmed to last a week. Patients and parents were instructed to use clean technique by hand washing with water and soap, and penis/vulva cleansing with antiseptic wipes. Researchers reinforced the IC technique before the trial. All participants provided written informed consent.

The primary outcome measure was UTIs. A positive urine culture was defined as the growth of >100,000 CFU. Positive urine cultures were then classified as asymptomatic bacteriuria, defined as a positive urine culture with no symptoms, and UTI, defined as a positive urine culture with cloudy, odorous urine, flank pain, malaise or fever. A total of 6 urine samples were performed per participant, considering baseline the first urine culture, and follow-up the following samples. Participants at baseline were classified as asymptomatic bacteriuria or sterile sample, considering that UTI was an exclusion criterion on baseline sample. Follow-up outcome was classified as sterile (negative urine cultures in all follow-up samples), asymptomatic bacteriuria (at least 1 positive urine culture with no symptoms at any sample), and UTI (at least 1 positive urine culture with symptoms).

The secondary outcomes included person-urine sample UTI, febrile UTI, non-febrile UTI, asymptomatic bacteriuria, and antibiotic use for any reason. Demographics, pharmacologic therapy, urological background, and urodynamic characteristics were evaluated in order to establish an association with the presence of UTI. Urine cultures were programmed at days 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56. Researchers collected all urine samples from a fresh midstream catheter specimen using sterile technique.

An impartial statistician analyzed the data. Categorical variables were expressed in frequencies and percentages. Numerical variables were expressed as means and standard deviation. Clinical and demographic characteristics were analyzed using the χ2 test for categorical variables, and the t-test (or Mann-Whitney test in the absence of normal distribution) for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at p \<0.05. SPSS® software version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) was used for all analyses. No funding organization had an influence in the study design, analysis or conclusions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neurogenic Bladder Due to Spina Bifida (Disorder)

Keywords

  • neurogenic bladder
  • intermittent urethral catheterization
  • Clean intermittent catheterization
03

In context

Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 113 is above the median of 39 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic.

Browse Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 2 years,
  • diagnosis of spina bifida,
  • had self-IC or performed by a trained person ≥ 3 months using reused PVC catheter (1 per week) with clean technique,
  • able to read and understand

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other causes of neurogenic bladder,
  • symptomatic UTI at the time of initial evaluation,
  • inconsistent IC,
  • indwelling catheter,
  • allergy to PVC,
  • urethral pathology (ie stricture, false passage, hypospadias)
  • rejection to participate in trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
113 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Single-use catheter

    Participants will use a sterile single-use catheter of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) for intermittent urethral catheterization. Intermittent Bladder Catheterization will be done using clean technique, each PVC catheter will be sterile and used only once for each catheterization. A Urine culture will be performed at day 0, 7, 14, 28, 49 and 56 (a total of 8 cultures)

    Procedure: Single-use catheter · Diagnostic Test: Urine culture

  • Experimental
    Reused catheter with 0.5% benzalkonium chloride

    Participants will use a clean reused catheter of polyvinyl chloride for intermittent urethral catheterization. Intermittent Bladder Catheterization will be done using clean technique. The PVC catheter will be used for 1 week, cleaning the catheter with water and soap after each catheterization and stored in a container with 0.5% benzalkonium chloride. A Urine culture will be performed at day 0, 7, 14, 28, 49 and 56 (a total of 8 cultures)

    Procedure: Reused catheter · Diagnostic Test: Urine culture

  • Experimental
    Reused catheter with soap and water

    Participants will use a clean reused catheter of polyvinyl chloride for intermittent urethral catheterization. Intermittent Bladder Catheterization will be done using clean technique. The PVC catheter will be used for 1 week, cleaning the catheter with water and soap after each catheterization. A Urine culture will be performed at day 0, 7, 14, 28, 49 and 56 (a total of 8 cultures)

    Procedure: Reused catheter · Diagnostic Test: Urine culture

Interventions

  • ProcedureSingle-use catheter

    Each urethral catheterization will be done with a new sterile catheter in a period of 8 weeks. Frequency of urethral catheterization will depend of the conditions of each patient (from 3-5 per day). Patients and parents were instructed to use clean technique by hand washing with water and soup, and penis/vulva cleansing with antiseptic wipes. Researchers reinforced the intermittent catheterization technique before the trial.

    Also known as: Single-use catheter intermittent urethral catheterization

  • ProcedureReused catheter

    Each catheter is programmed to last 1 week. Evaluation will last a period of 8 weeks. Frequency of urethral catheterization will depend of the conditions of each patient (from 3-5 per day). after catheterization. Each catheter was programmed to last a week. Patients and parents were instructed to use clean technique by hand washing with water and soup, and penis/vulva cleansing with antiseptic wipes. Researchers reinforced the intermittent catheterization technique before the trial.

    Also known as: Reused clean catheter intermittent urethral catheterization

  • Diagnostic testUrine culture

    A midstream urine sample will be obtained using sterile catheterization for urine culture performed by health provider. Urine cultures will be done in days 0, 7, 14, 28, 42 and 56.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. UTIs

    A positive urine culture is defined as a growth \>100,000 CFU of organisms. Positive urine cultures were classified as bacteriuria, defined as a positive urine culture with no symptoms, and UTI, defined as a positive urine culture with cloudy, odorous, flank pain, malaise or fever. A total of 6 urine samples were performed per participant. Outcomes will be measured by Mean and Standard Deviation for UTI, Febrile UTI, Non-febrile UTI and Bacteriuria.

    Time frame: Urine cultures were done at day 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 (8 weeks).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of bacteriuria and UTI in baseline and follow-up urine cultures.

    Baseline was considered the first urine culture (day 0), and follow-up the following samples (from day 7 to 56). Participants on baseline were classified as bacteriuria or sterile sample, considering that UTI was an exclusion criterion on baseline sample. Follow-up outcome was classified as sterile (negative urine cultures in all follow-up samples), bacteriuria (at least 1 positive urine culture with no UTI at any sample), and UTI (at least 1 positive urine culture with symptoms).

    Time frame: Urine cultures were done at day 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 (8 weeks).

  2. Comorbidities associated to increased frequency of UTI

    Demographic characteristics: gender (frequency and percentage), age in years (mean and standard deviation), and Body Mass Index (weight in kilograms and height in meters will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2) Pharmacologic therapy: The use of antimuscarinic treatment (Frequency and percentage) and antibiotic prophylaxis (Frequency and percentage). Urological comorbidities: Bladder diverticula, Vesicoureteral reflux and hydronephrosis (Frequencies and percentages). Urodynamic characteristics: hypertonic bladder, overactive detrusor, areflexic bladder, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergy, and filling sensation (Frequencies and percentages). This data were evaluated in order to stablish association with the presence of UTI. Clinical and demographic characteristics were analyzed using χ2 test for categorical variables, and T-test (or Mann-Whitney test in the absence of normal distribution) for continuous variables.

    Time frame: Day 0, 7, 14, 28, 42 and 56 (8 weeks).

  3. Mean person-urine culture UTI, febrile UTI, non-febrile UTI and bacteriuria

    A positive urine culture is defined as a growth \>100,000 CFU of organisms. Positive urine cultures were classified as bacteriuria, defined as a positive urine culture with no symptoms, and UTI, defined as a positive urine culture with cloudy, odorous, flank pain, malaise or fever. A total of 6 urine samples were performed per participant. Outcomes will be measured by Mean and Standard Deviation for UTI, Febrile UTI, Non-febrile UTI and Bacteriuria.

    Time frame: Urine cultures were done at day 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 (8 weeks).

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Snow-Lisy DC, Yerkes EB, Cheng EY. Update on Urological Management of Spina Bifida from Prenatal Diagnosis to Adulthood. J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.107. Epub 2015 Apr 1. PubMed 25839383 ↗
  • Oakeshott P, Hunt GM, Poulton A, Reid F. Expectation of life and unexpected death in open spina bifida: a 40-year complete, non-selective, longitudinal cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Aug;52(8):749-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03543.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9. PubMed 20015251 ↗
  • Lapides J, Diokno AC, Silber SJ, Lowe BS. Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease. J Urol. 1972 Mar;107(3):458-61. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)61055-3. No abstract available. PubMed 5010715 ↗
  • Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001 Mar;34(3):114-20. doi: 10.1159/000056005. PubMed 11359098 ↗
  • Guttmann L, Frankel H. The value of intermittent catheterisation in the early management of traumatic paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia. 1966 Aug;4(2):63-84. doi: 10.1038/sc.1966.7. No abstract available. PubMed 5969402 ↗
  • Shamout S, Biardeau X, Corcos J, Campeau L. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2017 Jul;55(7):629-643. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.192. Epub 2017 Jan 24. PubMed 28117329 ↗
  • Campbell JB, Moore KN, Voaklander DC, Mix LW. Complications associated with clean intermittent catheterization in children with spina bifida. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2420-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000125200.13430.8a. PubMed 15126866 ↗
  • Schlager TA, Dilks S, Trudell J, Whittam TS, Hendley JO. Bacteriuria in children with neurogenic bladder treated with intermittent catheterization: natural history. J Pediatr. 1995 Mar;126(3):490-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70477-9. PubMed 7869216 ↗
  • The prevention and management of urinary tract infections among people with spinal cord injuries. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Consensus Statement. January 27-29, 1992. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1992 Jul;15(3):194-204. doi: 10.1080/01952307.1992.11735873. PubMed 1500945 ↗
  • Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, Mevorach RA. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter. J Urol. 1996 Dec;156(6):2041-3. PubMed 8911385 ↗
  • Moore KN, Burt J, Voaklander DC. Intermittent catheterization in the rehabilitation setting: a comparison of clean and sterile technique. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Jun;20(6):461-8. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr975oa. PubMed 16892928 ↗
  • Chaudhry R, Balsara ZR, Madden-Fuentes RJ, Wiener JS, Routh JC, Seed P, Ross SS. Risk Factors Associated With Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Neurogenic Bladders Managed by Clean Intermittent Catheterization. Urology. 2017 Apr;102:213-218. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.049. Epub 2017 Jan 5. PubMed 28065810 ↗
  • Mukai S, Shigemura K, Nomi M, Sengoku A, Yamamichi F, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S. Retrospective study for risk factors for febrile UTI in spinal cord injury patients with routine concomitant intermittent catheterization in outpatient settings. Spinal Cord. 2016 Jan;54(1):69-72. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.170. Epub 2015 Oct 13. PubMed 26458969 ↗
  • Dean GE. Are Single Use Catheters Worth the Expense? J Urol. 2015 Jul;194(1):12-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.071. Epub 2015 Apr 16. No abstract available. PubMed 25892142 ↗
  • Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, Hayter E, Spinks J, Pellowe C. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e8639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8639. PubMed 23303886 ↗
  • Prieto J, Murphy CL, Moore KN, Fader M. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 10;(9):CD006008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub3. PubMed 25208303 ↗
  • Pachler J, Frimodt-Moller C. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization. BJU Int. 1999 May;83(7):767-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00013.x. PubMed 10368193 ↗
  • Kiddoo D, Sawatzky B, Bascu CD, Dharamsi N, Afshar K, Moore KN. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection. J Urol. 2015 Jul;194(1):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.096. Epub 2015 Jan 10. PubMed 25584995 ↗
  • Madero-Morales PA, Robles-Torres JI, Vizcarra-Mata G, Guillen-Lozoya AH, Mendoza-Olazaran S, Garza-Gonzalez E, Gutierrez-Gonzalez A. Randomized Clinical Trial Using Sterile Single Use and Reused Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization with a Clean Technique in Spina Bifida Cases: Short-Term Urinary Tract Infection Outcomes. J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):153-158. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000244. Epub 2019 Jun 7. PubMed 30916625 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2016 to primary completion in Aug 2021, 60 months.

Of 47 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 45. This study's 60 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 51 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 23, 2018
First posted
Feb 7, 2018
StartActual
Aug 2016
Primary completionActual
Aug 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2021
Last update
Jul 6, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03424499
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez
Responsible party
Adrián Gutiérrez González (Dr. med. Adrián Gutiérrez González, Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. Gonzalez) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 7, 2018
Start date
Aug 2016
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2021
Completion
Aug 1, 2021
Last update
Jul 6, 2022

Study contacts

Adrian Gutiérrez-González
principal investigator · Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion