ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03422198SAVEUpdated Dec 12, 2025Results posted

Short Course Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy in Treating Participants With Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy and Short course vaginal cuff brachytherapy in Endometrial Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma, Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma and Endometrial Serous Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by University of Utah. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-12.

Sponsored by University of Utah · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2018; still recruiting 8 years 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
188
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized phase III trial studies short course vaginal cuff brachytherapy to see how well it works compared with standard of care vaginal cuff brachytherapy in treating participants with stage I-II endometrial cancer. Short course vaginal cuff brachytherapy, also known as internal radiation therapy, uses (over a shorter period) radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor in the upper portion of the vagina to kill tumor cells.

After completion of cohort 1 (108 participants), the protocol was expended to add a second cohort of 80 additional participants, and re-opened study recruitment.

Read the detailed description

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the Western world and primarily affects postmenopausal women. The primary form of treatment is surgery, consisting of a total abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy for endometrial cancer has been studied in prospective trials for at least four decades. All trials have demonstrated an improvement in local regional control. However, improvement in survival has not been observed in prospective randomized trials in early-stage patients.

There is great heterogeneity in prognoses in stage I patients. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines consequently recommend no treatment in general for low-stage patients, adjuvant brachytherapy for patients with intermediate- and high-intermediate-risk disease, and for patients with deeply invasive tumors with high-grade lesions, external beam radiotherapy is an option (NCCN Guidelines 2016). Over the ensuing decades, there has been a shift toward increasing use of vaginal cuff brachytherapy.

This is a phase III, unblinded, randomized trial comparing an experimental arm and a control arm of vaginal cuff brachytherapy: The experimental arm will treat subjects with 2 fractions of vaginal brachytherapy. The control arm will treat subjects with standard-of-care vaginal cuff brachytherapy of 3-5 fractions. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the different treatment arms.

After completion of cohort 1 (108 participants), the protocol was expanded to add a second cohort of 80 additional participants, and reopened study recruitment.

Cohort 1 evaluated the non-inferiority of patient Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in the experimental arm compared to the control arm using the Global Health Status from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Cohort 2 will evaluate the frequency and severity of patient-reported financial toxicity in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer treated with vaginal cuff-brachytherapy (VCB) at one month post-VCB.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrial Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
  • Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
  • Endometrial Serous Adenocarcinoma
  • Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer
  • Stage IA Uterine Corpus Cancer
  • Stage IB Uterine Corpus Cancer
  • Stage II Uterine Corpus Cancer
  • Uterine Corpus Carcinosarcoma
  • Uterine Corpus Sarcoma
03

In context

Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell

46 studies on the registry are indexed under Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 188 is above the median of 47 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell.

Browse Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Utah is the lead sponsor of 994 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Of its 114 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed endometrial carcinoma: endometrioid type, serous, and clear cell, to include tumors originating in the cervix, but are primarily located in the uterus, and for whom vaginal cuff brachytherapy is indicated. Carcinosarcoma and other sarcomas are permitted; Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I and stage II, with one of the following combinations of stage and grade:

    • Stage IA, grade 1 with LVSI, 2, 3
    • Stage IB, grades 1-3
    • Stage II, grades 1-3
    • Stage IIIA, grades 1-3, not receiving EBRT as part of therapy.
  • Participants post-hysterectomy and free from residual disease.
  • World Health Organization (WHO)/ (ECOG)-performance status 0-2.
  • Able to provide and willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines.
  • of >2 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stages of endometrial carcinoma other than described.
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy.
  • Concurrent requiring non-protocol anti-cancer treatment other than surgery.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
188 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Short course vaginal cuff brachytherapy

    Participants undergo short course vaginal cuff brachytherapy for 2 fractions with 1 week apart.

    Radiation: Short course vaginal cuff brachytherapy

  • Active comparator
    Vaginal cuff brachytherapy

    Participants undergo standard of care vaginal cuff brachytherapy for 3-5 fractions over no more than 3 weeks.

    Radiation: Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy

Interventions

  • RadiationVaginal Cuff Brachytherapy

    Undergo standard of care vaginal cuff brachytherapy

    Also known as: best practice, standard of care, standard therapy

  • RadiationShort course vaginal cuff brachytherapy

    Undergo short course vaginal cuff brachytherapy

    Also known as: BRACHYTHERAPY, internal radiation, Internal Radiation Brachytherapy, Internal Radiation Therapy, Radiation Brachytherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 1 Month

    The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-30) is used to evaluate quality of life in cancer patients. The questionnaire was given before and one month following treatment. The quality of life score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Baseline scores can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module. This outcome reports the average change from baseline to Month 1.

    Time frame: At 1 month post treatment

  2. Cohort 2: Participant-Reported Financial Toxicity

    One month post-brachytherapy, participants will be given the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) (FACIT-COST) questionnaire. The score range is 0-44, with higher scores indicating better financial well-being. Mean scores will be reported.

    Time frame: One month after brachytherapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment-related Symptoms on HRQOL Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC EN24), Question 48

    The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Endometrial-24 (QLQ-EN24) was used to evaluate quality of life in cancer patients with endometrial cancers. The questionnaire was given before and one month following treatment. From this assessment, one question was selected as an indicator for this outcome, which measured whether participants felt less feminine as a result of their disease or treatment. The score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating feeling less feminine. Baseline scores can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module. This outcome reports the average change from baseline to Month 1.

    Time frame: one month post-treatment

  2. USD Amount Charged for Procedures

    The amount charged to participants or their insurance in US Dollars (USD) was collected to evaluate cost of experimental versus standard of care courses of treatment. Data was collected at approximately six months after treatment.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months after treatment

  3. Cohort 2: Participant-Reported Diet

    Participants will be asked to complete the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Diet History Questionnaire 3 (DHQIII) through the NCI website. Additional information about the questionnaire, methods, and measurements will be updated when results are reported for this outcome.

    Time frame: One month after brachytherapy

  4. Cohort 2: Participant-Reported Activity Levels

    Participants will be asked to complete the NCI Activities Completed over Time in 24-hours (ACT24) questionnaire through the NCI website. Additional information about the questionnaire, methods, and measurements will be updated when results are reported for this outcome.

    Time frame: One month after brachytherapy

  5. Cohort 2: Financial Toxicity Correlated With Quality of Life

    Mean scores from the FACIT-COST (from Outcome Measure 2: Participant-Reported Financial Toxicity) will be correlated with mean QoL scores (from Outcome Measure 1). Additional information about the methods and measurements will be updated when results are reported for this outcome.

    Time frame: One month after brachytherapy

07

Results

Posted Dec 23, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneExperimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy
Started5454
Completed5454
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Quality of Life From Baseline to 1 Month

The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-30 (QLQ-30) is used to evaluate quality of life in cancer patients. The questionnaire was given before and one month following treatment. The quality of life score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Baseline scores can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module. This outcome reports the average change from baseline to Month 1.

Time frame:
At 1 month post treatment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 1 Month
score on a scaleExperimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy
Change in Quality of Life From Baseline to 1 Month2.08 ± 15.022.08 ± 18.23
PrimaryCohort 2: Participant-Reported Financial Toxicity

One month post-brachytherapy, participants will be given the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) (FACIT-COST) questionnaire. The score range is 0-44, with higher scores indicating better financial well-being. Mean scores will be reported.

Time frame:
One month after brachytherapy

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryTreatment-related Symptoms on HRQOL Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC EN24), Question 48

The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Endometrial-24 (QLQ-EN24) was used to evaluate quality of life in cancer patients with endometrial cancers. The questionnaire was given before and one month following treatment. From this assessment, one question was selected as an indicator for this outcome, which measured whether participants felt less feminine as a result of their disease or treatment. The score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating feeling less feminine. Baseline scores can be found in the Baseline Characteristics module. This outcome reports the average change from baseline to Month 1.

Time frame:
one month post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Treatment-related Symptoms on HRQOL Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC EN24), Question 48
score on a scaleExperimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy
Treatment-related Symptoms on HRQOL Using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Endometrial Cancer Module (EORTC EN24), Question 480.65 ± 22.6-6.25 ± 29.7
SecondaryUSD Amount Charged for Procedures

The amount charged to participants or their insurance in US Dollars (USD) was collected to evaluate cost of experimental versus standard of care courses of treatment. Data was collected at approximately six months after treatment.

Time frame:
Approximately 6 months after treatment
Reported as:
Mean · US Dollars (USD)
USD Amount Charged for Procedures
US Dollars (USD)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy
USD Amount Charged for Procedures33204.97 ± 16867.7645919.55 ± 19808.48
SecondaryCohort 2: Participant-Reported Diet

Participants will be asked to complete the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Diet History Questionnaire 3 (DHQIII) through the NCI website. Additional information about the questionnaire, methods, and measurements will be updated when results are reported for this outcome.

Time frame:
One month after brachytherapy

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCohort 2: Participant-Reported Activity Levels

Participants will be asked to complete the NCI Activities Completed over Time in 24-hours (ACT24) questionnaire through the NCI website. Additional information about the questionnaire, methods, and measurements will be updated when results are reported for this outcome.

Time frame:
One month after brachytherapy

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryCohort 2: Financial Toxicity Correlated With Quality of Life

Mean scores from the FACIT-COST (from Outcome Measure 2: Participant-Reported Financial Toxicity) will be correlated with mean QoL scores (from Outcome Measure 1). Additional information about the methods and measurements will be updated when results are reported for this outcome.

Time frame:
One month after brachytherapy

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over 12 months after start of brachytherapy. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy2/54 (3.7%)2/54 (3.7%)46/54 (85.2%)
Control: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy1/54 (1.9%)2/54 (3.7%)50/54 (92.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventExperimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy
Cardiac disorders - Other, specifyCardiac disorders0/541/54
HypotensionVascular disorders0/541/54
HypoxiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/541/54
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) - Other, specifyNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/540/54
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/541/54
SepsisInfections and infestations1/540/54
Skin infectionInfections and infestations1/540/54
Wound dehiscenceInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/541/54
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 121
Most frequent other events
EventExperimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy
FatigueGeneral disorders20/5423/54
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders12/5416/54
Urinary incontinenceRenal and urinary disorders4/5410/54
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders5/549/54
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders4/549/54
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/549/54
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders4/549/54
Pelvic painReproductive system and breast disorders4/548/54
Vaginal hemorrhageReproductive system and breast disorders4/548/54
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/545/54

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years223153
>=65 years322355
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
Mean65.31 ± 10.2563.65 ± 9.6864.48 ± 9.95
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
Median66.5 (40 to 84)63.5 (30 to 87)65 (30 to 87)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
Female5454108
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
Hispanic or Latino5611
Not Hispanic or Latino464894
Unknown or Not Reported303
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American5510
White414586
More than one race112
Unknown or Not Reported729
Baseline EORTC Quality of Life Score
Baseline EORTC Quality of Life Score(score on a scale)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
Mean72.28 ± 21.567.88 ± 21.7470.17 ± 21.26
Baseline EORTC Symptom Score
Baseline EORTC Symptom Score(score on a scale)Experimental: Short Course Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyControl: Standard of Care Vaginal Cuff BrachytherapyTotal
Mean10.46 ± 26.2416.67 ± 28.3513.47 ± 27.32
08

Study locations

3 of 5 sites recruiting
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):103-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.02.012. No abstract available. PubMed 19367689 ↗
  • Briet JM, Hollema H, Reesink N, Aalders JG, Mourits MJ, ten Hoor KA, Pras E, Boezen HM, van der Zee AG, Nijman HW. Lymphvascular space involvement: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.033. PubMed 15721428 ↗
  • Cohn DE, Horowitz NS, Mutch DG, Kim SM, Manolitsas T, Fowler JM. Should the presence of lymphvascular space involvement be used to assign patients to adjuvant therapy following hysterectomy for unstaged endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Dec;87(3):243-6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6825. PubMed 12468320 ↗
  • Thomas GM. A role for adjuvant radiation in clinically early carcinoma of the endometrium? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Oct;20(11 Suppl 2):S64-6. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f5c688. PubMed 20975365 ↗
  • Bosse T, Peters EE, Creutzberg CL, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Mens JW, Lutgens LC, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Smit VT, Nout RA. Substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) is a significant risk factor for recurrence in endometrial cancer--A pooled analysis of PORTEC 1 and 2 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(13):1742-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jun 3. PubMed 26049688 ↗
  • Lee CM, Szabo A, Shrieve DC, Macdonald OK, Gaffney DK. Frequency and effect of adjuvant radiation therapy among women with stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma. JAMA. 2006 Jan 25;295(4):389-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.4.389. PubMed 16434629 ↗
  • Kirchheiner K, Czajka-Pepl A, Ponocny-Seliger E, Scharbert G, Wetzel L, Nout RA, Sturdza A, Dimopoulos JC, Dorr W, Potter R. Posttraumatic stress disorder after high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer with 2 fractions in 1 application under spinal/epidural anesthesia: incidence and risk factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Jun 1;89(2):260-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Apr 7. PubMed 24721589 ↗
  • Aalders J, Abeler V, Kolstad P, Onsrud M. Postoperative external irradiation and prognostic parameters in stage I endometrial carcinoma: clinical and histopathologic study of 540 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Oct;56(4):419-27. PubMed 6999399 ↗
  • Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, Lybeert ML, Jobsen JJ, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, De Winter KA, Lutgens LC, van den Bergh AC, van de Steen-Banasik E, Beerman H, van Lent M. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet. 2000 Apr 22;355(9213):1404-11. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02139-5. PubMed 10791524 ↗
  • Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, Zaino RJ, Spirtos NM, Bloss JD, Pearlman A, Maiman MA, Bell JG; Gynecologic Oncology Group. A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Mar;92(3):744-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.048. PubMed 14984936 ↗
  • ASTEC/EN.5 Study Group; Blake P, Swart AM, Orton J, Kitchener H, Whelan T, Lukka H, Eisenhauer E, Bacon M, Tu D, Parmar MK, Amos C, Murray C, Qian W. Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC and NCIC CTG EN.5 randomised trials): pooled trial results, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009 Jan 10;373(9658):137-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61767-5. Epub 2008 Dec 16. PubMed 19070891 ↗
  • Nout RA, Smit VT, Putter H, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LC, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Mens JW, Slot A, Kroese MC, van Bunningen BN, Ansink AC, van Putten WL, Creutzberg CL; PORTEC Study Group. Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Mar 6;375(9717):816-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62163-2. PubMed 20206777 ↗
  • Nout RA, Putter H, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LC, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Mens JW, Slot A, Stenfert Kroese MC, van Bunningen BN, Smit VT, Nijman HW, van den Tol PP, Creutzberg CL. Quality of life after pelvic radiotherapy or vaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer: first results of the randomized PORTEC-2 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 20;27(21):3547-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.2424. Epub 2009 Jun 22. PubMed 19546404 ↗
  • Sorbe B, Straumits A, Karlsson L. Intravaginal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized study of two dose-per-fraction levels. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.079. PubMed 16029797 ↗
  • McMeekin DS, The University of Oklahoma OC, OK, United States, Filiaci VL, et al. 1A randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiation therapy (PXRT) versus vaginal cuff brachytherapy followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy (VCB/C) in patients with high risk (HR), early stage endometrial cancer (EC): A Gynecologic Oncology Group trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134: 438.
  • Harkenrider MM, Block AM, Alektiar KM, Gaffney DK, Jones E, Klopp A, Viswanathan AN, Small W Jr. American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer: A comprehensive review. Brachytherapy. 2017 Jan-Feb;16(1):95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 31. PubMed 27260082 ↗
  • Delaney G, Jacob S, Barton M. Estimation of an optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for gynecologic carcinoma: part II--carcinoma of the endometrium. Cancer. 2004 Aug 15;101(4):682-92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20445. PubMed 15305397 ↗
  • Lee CM, Szabo A, Shrieve DC, Macdonald OK, Tward JD, Skidmore TB, Gaffney DK. Descriptive nomograms of adjuvant radiotherapy use and patterns of care analysis for stage I and II endometrial adenocarcinoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results population study. Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):2092-100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22997. PubMed 17849468 ↗
  • Punglia RS, Weeks JC, Neville BA, Earle CC. Effect of distance to radiation treatment facility on use of radiation therapy after mastectomy in elderly women. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Sep 1;66(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.059. Epub 2006 Jul 11. PubMed 16814955 ↗
  • Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK et al (2008) EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
  • Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, Fayers PM, Brown JM. Quality, interpretation and presentation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 data in randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer. 2008 Sep;44(13):1793-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Jul 1. PubMed 18599286 ↗
  • Maringwa JT, Quinten C, King M, Ringash J, Osoba D, Coens C, Martinelli F, Vercauteren J, Cleeland CS, Flechtner H, Gotay C, Greimel E, Taphoorn MJ, Reeve BB, Koch JS, Weis J, Smit EF, van Meerbeeck JP, Bottomley A; EORTC PROBE project and the Lung Cancer Group. Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Nov;19(11):1753-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-1016-5. Epub 2010 Oct 1. PubMed 20886240 ↗
  • Zafar SY, Peppercorn JM, Schrag D, Taylor DH, Goetzinger AM, Zhong X, Abernethy AP. The financial toxicity of cancer treatment: a pilot study assessing out-of-pocket expenses and the insured cancer patient's experience. Oncologist. 2013;18(4):381-90. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0279. Epub 2013 Feb 26. PubMed 23442307 ↗
  • Neugut AI, Subar M, Wilde ET, Stratton S, Brouse CH, Hillyer GC, Grann VR, Hershman DL. Association between prescription co-payment amount and compliance with adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2534-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.3179. Epub 2011 May 23. PubMed 21606426 ↗
  • de Souza JA, Yap BJ, Wroblewski K, Blinder V, Araujo FS, Hlubocky FJ, Nicholas LH, O'Connor JM, Brockstein B, Ratain MJ, Daugherty CK, Cella D. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476-484. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30369. Epub 2016 Oct 7. PubMed 27716900 ↗
  • Bouberhan S, Shea M, Kennedy A, Erlinger A, Stack-Dunnbier H, Buss MK, Moss L, Nolan K, Awtrey C, Dalrymple JL, Garrett L, Liu FW, Hacker MR, Esselen KM. Financial toxicity in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;154(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30. PubMed 31053404 ↗
  • Liang MI, Summerlin SS, Blanchard CT, Boitano TKL, Huh WK, Bhatia S, Pisu M. Measuring Financial Distress and Quality of Life Over Time in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer-Making the Case to Screen Early in the Treatment Course. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1576-e1583. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00907. Epub 2021 Feb 17. PubMed 33596114 ↗
  • Soisson S, Ganz PA, Gaffney D, Rowe K, Snyder J, Wan Y, Deshmukh V, Newman M, Fraser A, Smith K, Herget K, Hanson HA, Wu YP, Stanford J, Al-Sarray A, Werner TL, Setiawan VW, Hashibe M. Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Endometrial Cancer Survivors in a Large, Population-Based Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Dec 1;110(12):1342-1351. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.12.025. PubMed 29741696 ↗
  • Lee E, Zhu J, Velazquez J, Bernardo R, Garcia J, Rovito M, Hines RB. Evaluation of Diet Quality Among American Adult Cancer Survivors: Results From 2005-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Feb;121(2):217-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.086. Epub 2020 Nov 3. PubMed 33158797 ↗
  • Smits A, Lopes A, Das N, Bekkers R, Massuger L, Galaal K. The effect of lifestyle interventions on the quality of life of gynaecological cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Dec;139(3):546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 9. PubMed 26441008 ↗
  • Friedenreich CM, Cook LS, Wang Q, Kokts-Porietis RL, McNeil J, Ryder-Burbidge C, Courneya KS. Prospective Cohort Study of Pre- and Postdiagnosis Physical Activity and Endometrial Cancer Survival. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):4107-4117. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01336. Epub 2020 Oct 7. PubMed 33026939 ↗
  • Kitson S, Ryan N, MacKintosh ML, Edmondson R, Duffy JM, Crosbie EJ. Interventions for weight reduction in obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD012513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012513.pub2. PubMed 29388687 ↗
  • Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ III) | EGRP/DCCPS/NCI/NIH. Accessed October 29, 2022. https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/dhq3/
  • Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, Wilson MM, Reedy J. Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1591-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021. PubMed 30146071 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03422198
Lead sponsor
University of Utah
Collaborators
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 5, 2018
Start date
Feb 2, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2029 (estimated)
Results posted
Dec 23, 2022
Last update
Dec 12, 2025

Study contacts

Rachel Kingsford
Contact
Rachel.Kingsford@hci.utah.edu
801-585-0115
Cristina DeCesaris, MD
principal investigator · Huntsman Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion