ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03412396Updated Oct 22, 2026Results posted

Apalutamide in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Apalutamide and Quality-of-Life Assessment in Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8, sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 22, 2026Study completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This phase II trial studies how well apalutamide works in treating patients with prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. Androgen can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Hormone therapy using apalutamide may fight prostate cancer by lowering the amount of androgen the body makes and may make it less likely for patients to receive radiation therapy after surgery.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To determine whether 6 months (24 weeks) of neoadjuvant apalutamide prior to prostatectomy for intermediate risk prostate cancer results in a reduction of aggregate pathologic risk features that drive post-operative radiotherapy recommendations from 35% to 15%.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the safety and tolerability of 6 months (24 weeks) neoadjuvant apalutamide followed by radical prostatectomy for intermediate risk prostate cancer.

II. To estimate the frequency of clinical complete responses and "near" complete responses (currently defined as \< 6 mm total tumor volume).

III. To characterize the molecular features of the treated prostate cancers and link them to morphologic characterization.

IV. To measure the 3-5 year biochemical recurrence rate of treated patients as a baseline to inform a larger phase III trial.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive apalutamide orally (PO) daily for 24 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Within 2 weeks of completing apalutamide, patients undergo radical prostatectomy.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Adenocarcinoma
  • Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 3,047 studies on the registry; 578 are open to participants now.

Of its 612 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 409 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing and able to provide written
  • confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • A minimum of 10 core have been performed at baseline and available. A prostate biopsy within 6 months from screening is allowed for entry requirements. Biopsies performed within 6-12 months from screening are acceptable if the treating physician would allow treatment without further biopsy. Patients must meet intermediate risk criteria from Gleason score, T stage, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria: cT2b-T2c or Gleason 7 (3+4 or 4+3) or PSA 10-20 ng/mL. In addition, the Gleason 3+4 or 4+3 must be present
  • Pathology review at MD Anderson Cancer Center. The volume of disease must be high enough for the surgeon to agree to include an extended template pelvic lymph node dissection
  • Serum testosterone > 200 ng/mL
  • Patient and urologist must agree that patient is suitable for prostatectomy
  • No evidence of on imaging. This risk group does not require metastatic studies, but if performed they must be negative (as determined by urologist or radiologist). Suspicious lymph nodes permissible if \< 10 mm
  • (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
  • >= 10.0 g/dL
  • count >= 100,000 x 10\^9/microliter
  • (GFR) >= 45 mL/min
  • Serum potassium >= 3.5 mmol/L
  • Serum albumin >= 3.0 g/dL
  • Able to swallow the study drug whole as a tablet
  • Serum \< 1.5 x (ULN); Note: In subjects with Gilbert's syndrome, if total bilirubin is > 1.5 x ULN, measure direct and indirect bilirubin and if direct bilirubin is =\< 1.5 x ULN, subject may be eligible
  • (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \< 2.5 x ULN
  • Normal coagulation profile and no history of substantial non-iatrogenic bleeding diathesis
  • Agrees to use a condom (even men with vasectomies) and another effective method of if he is having sex with a woman of or agrees to use a condom if he is having sex with a woman who is pregnant while on study drug and for 3 months following the last dose of study drug. Must also agree not to donate sperm during the study and for 3 months after receiving the last dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Histological variants in the primary tumor, other than adenocarcinoma; for example: neuroendocrine tumor, small cell or sarcomatoid
  • Serious or uncontrolled co-existent non-malignant disease, including active and uncontrolled infection
  • PSA is > than 20 ng/mL (NOTE: unless other valid PSAs were =\< 20 and the treating physician considers a value > 20 related to the or other non-malignant cause. The treating physician must consider the patient intermediate risk in aggregate)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with a history of hypertension are allowed provided blood pressure is controlled by anti-hypertensive therapy. Note that this is NOT a criterion related to particular blood pressure (BP) results at the time of assessment for eligibility, nor does it apply to acute BP excursions that are related to iatrogenic causes, acute pain or other transient, reversible causes
  • Active or symptomatic viral hepatitis or chronic liver disease
  • heart disease as evidenced by myocardial infarction, arterial thrombotic events in the past 6 months, severe or unstable angina, class III-IV heart failure
  • Other , except non-melanoma skin cancer, that is active or has a >= 30% probability of recurrence within 12 months
  • History of gastrointestinal disorders (medical disorders or extensive surgery) which may interfere with the absorption of the study drug
  • Known history of pituitary and/or adrenal disease (or dysfunction)
  • Prior hormone therapy for prostate cancer including orchiectomy, antiandrogens, ketoconazole, or estrogens (5-alpha reductase inhibitors allowed), or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists/antagonists
  • Severely compromised immunological state, including being positive for the (HIV)
  • Patients who are not appropriate surgical candidates for radical prostatectomy based on the evaluation of co-existent medical diseases and competing potential causes of death (such as but not limited to, unstable angina, myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months, or use of ongoing maintenance therapy for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension)
  • History of seizure, seizure disorder, or any condition that may predispose to seizure including, but not limited to underlying brain injury, stroke, primary brain tumors, , or alcoholism. Also, history of loss of consciousness or within 12 months of enrollment (day 1 visit). Drugs may not be used which are known to decrease the seizure threshold
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(19)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment (apalutamide, radical prostatectomy)

    Patients receive apalutamide PO daily for 24 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Within 2 weeks of completing apalutamide, patients undergo radical prostatectomy.

    Drug: Apalutamide · Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment · Procedure: Radical Prostatectomy

Interventions

  • Given PO

    Also known as: ARN 509, ARN-509, ARN509, Erleada, JNJ 56021927, JNJ-56021927

  • OtherQuality-of-Life Assessment

    Ancillary studies

    Also known as: Quality of Life Assessment

  • ProcedureRadical Prostatectomy

    Undergo radical prostatectomy

    Also known as: Prostatovesiculectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Adverse Surgical Pathology Features at Risk of Pelvic Radiation Therapy

    To determine whether 6 months (24 weeks) of neoadjuvant apalutamide prior to prostatectomy for intermediate risk prostate cancer results in a reduction of surgical pathology features at risk of pelvic RT, defined as pT3a, pT3b stage, N1 and/or positive surgical margin. All patients who receive at least 9 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy of apalutamide and undergo radical prostatectomy will be evaluable for the primary endpoint.

    Time frame: Assessed at time of surgical specimen microscopic evalution Assessed at time of surgical specimen microscopic evaluation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety and Tolerability of 6 Months Neoadjuvant Apalutamide Followed by Radical Prostatectomy

    Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). All patients who receive any dose of apalutamide will be evaluable for safety.

    Time frame: From initiation of apalutamide through 30 days post-surgery. For those participants who did not have surgery, we assessed the reported AEs until 30 days after the last dose of apalutamide.

  2. Clinical Complete Responses (pT0) and "Near" Complete Responses (<6mm Total Tumor Volume)

    The numbers of patients with \<6 mm total tumor volume in their surgical specimens, assessed by study Pathologist.

    Time frame: Assessed at time of surgical specimen microscopic evaluation

  3. Biochemical Recurrence Rate

    Number of patients who had a PSA value of equal of more than 0.2 ng/dL after surgery and through 3 years of follow up.

    Time frame: From surgery through 3-year post-op follow up

07

Results

Posted Jul 3, 2025

Participant flow

Between May 2018 and February 2020, 45 men were enrolled, initiated preoperative apalutamide, and were evaluable for safety outcomes. Of those, two patients withdrew consent prior to surgery, one patient stopped apalutamide at \<9 weeks after initiation, and two patients did not undergo a Radical Prostatectomy (RP)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOpen Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Started45
Completed40
Not completed5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2
Withdrew: "stopped apalutamide at <9 weeks after initiation"1
Withdrew: Did not undergo rp2

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Adverse Surgical Pathology Features at Risk of Pelvic Radiation Therapy

To determine whether 6 months (24 weeks) of neoadjuvant apalutamide prior to prostatectomy for intermediate risk prostate cancer results in a reduction of surgical pathology features at risk of pelvic RT, defined as pT3a, pT3b stage, N1 and/or positive surgical margin. All patients who receive at least 9 weeks of neoadjuvant therapy of apalutamide and undergo radical prostatectomy will be evaluable for the primary endpoint.

Time frame:
Assessed at time of surgical specimen microscopic evalution Assessed at time of surgical specimen microscopic evaluation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Adverse Surgical Pathology Features at Risk of Pelvic Radiation Therapy
ParticipantsOpen Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Number of Adverse Surgical Pathology Features at Risk of Pelvic Radiation Therapy16
SecondarySafety and Tolerability of 6 Months Neoadjuvant Apalutamide Followed by Radical Prostatectomy

Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). All patients who receive any dose of apalutamide will be evaluable for safety.

Time frame:
From initiation of apalutamide through 30 days post-surgery. For those participants who did not have surgery, we assessed the reported AEs until 30 days after the last dose of apalutamide.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Safety and Tolerability of 6 Months Neoadjuvant Apalutamide Followed by Radical Prostatectomy
ParticipantsOpen Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Any TEAEs45
Grade ≥3 TEAE13
TEAE leading to discontinuation4
SecondaryClinical Complete Responses (pT0) and "Near" Complete Responses (<6mm Total Tumor Volume)

The numbers of patients with \<6 mm total tumor volume in their surgical specimens, assessed by study Pathologist.

Time frame:
Assessed at time of surgical specimen microscopic evaluation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Complete Responses (pT0) and "Near" Complete Responses (<6mm Total Tumor Volume)
ParticipantsOpen Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Clinical Complete Responses (pT0) and "Near" Complete Responses (<6mm Total Tumor Volume)0
SecondaryBiochemical Recurrence Rate

Number of patients who had a PSA value of equal of more than 0.2 ng/dL after surgery and through 3 years of follow up.

Time frame:
From surgery through 3-year post-op follow up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Biochemical Recurrence Rate
ParticipantsOpen Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Biochemical Recurrence Rate6

Adverse events

Collected over From initiation of apalutamide through 30 days post-surgery. For those participants who did not have surgery, we assessed the reported AEs until 30 days after the last dose of apalutamide.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Open Label Apalutamide and Surgery1/45 (2.2%)2/45 (4.4%)45/45 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOpen Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Death NOSCardiac disorders1/45
EnterocolitisGastrointestinal disorders1/45
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/45
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent other events
EventOpen Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Elevated testosteroneBlood and lymphatic system disorders20/45
GynecomastiaReproductive system and breast disorders20/45
FatigueGeneral disorders17/45
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders15/45
HyperglycemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders11/45
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disordersSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10/45
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders10/45
Elevated TSHBlood and lymphatic system disorders10/45
Erectile DysfunctionReproductive system and breast disorders10/45
Decreased libidoGeneral disorders9/45

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Open Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Median60 (56.8 to 67)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Open Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Female0
Male40
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Open Label Apalutamide and Surgery
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino38
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Open Label Apalutamide and Surgery
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American4
White34
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Open Label Apalutamide and Surgery
United States40
08

Study locations

1 site
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2024, 78 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2025, 9 months after primary completion.

Of 610 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 86. This study's 78 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 724 studies reached it within 53 months; a quarter within 34 and three quarters within 80.

Completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Mar 2026 → Mar 2028, on Oct 22, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 19, 2018
First posted
Jan 26, 2018
StartActual
Mar 22, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 3, 2024
CompletionEst.
Mar 30, 2028was Mar 2026
Results first posted
Jul 3, 2025
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Study completion
Mar 30, 2026→Mar 30, 2028
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Study completion Mar 30, 2026→Mar 30, 2028

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03412396
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2018
Start date
Mar 22, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 3, 2024
Completion
Mar 30, 2028 (estimated)
Results posted
Jul 3, 2025
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

John W Davis
principal investigator · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Apalutamide

Start the discussion