ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03412045HAVOCUpdated Jul 28, 2026Results posted

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Sickle Cell Pain

An interventional study of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in Vaso-occlusive Crisis and Sickle Cell Anemia Crisis, sponsored by University of Nebraska. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-28.

Sponsored by University of Nebraska · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 60 studies in Vaso-Occlusive Crises with a site in United States — 13 open to participants now, 15 under way, 5 of them phase 3. Vaso-Occlusive Crises · United States.

Enrollment
48th of 56
8 · median 63
Started
2022
with 6 others
No phase
9 of 60
4 open now
Registered
29th of 60
by date

Among the 60 studies in Vaso-Occlusive Crises with a site in United States, this one is the 48th largest by enrollment of the 56 interventional ones, is one of 7 that started in 2022, is one of 9 with no phase, and was the 29th registered.

By phase

60 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 218 · 4 open
Phase 317 · 3 open
No phasethis study9 · 4 open
Phase 46 · 1 open
Observational4 · 0 open
Phase 14 · 1 open
Phase 1/22 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2000; this study’s year is marked. 7 started in 2022.

Size and results

Median enrollment 63 across the 56 interventional studies, 82 across the 4 observational. Of the 41 that completed or were terminated, 21 (51%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 60 studies in Vaso-Occlusive Crises with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Sickle cell anemia is a genetic blood disorder where red blood cells are abnormally shaped, crescent- or sickle-shaped, instead of the normal, round shape. This misshapen cell is rigid and sticky, causing them to clump together and block small blood vessels. This blockage can lead to pain, infections, and organ damage, and the shortened lifespan of sickle cells causes anemia. The purpose of this study is to explore if hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy would decrease pain and hospital length of stay associated with acute sickle cell pain crisis. Adults presenting with an uncomplicated acute pain crisis (i.e., acute chest syndrome, acute myocardial infarction/stroke) would be eligible. The intervention would be 1-3 hyperbaric oxygen sessions depending on response to therapy. Each treatment session will be approximately two hours in length. Evaluation would be through participants' self--assessment via the visual analog scale for pain level before and after treatments as well as tracking length of stay in the hospital.

Read the detailed description

Sickle cell anemia is a genetic blood disorder where red blood cells are abnormally shaped, crescent- or sickle-shaped, instead of the normal, round shape. This misshapen cell is rigid and sticky, causing them to clump together and block small blood vessels. This blockage can lead to pain, infections, and organ damage, and the shortened lifespan of sickle cells causes anemia. Previous study suggest that hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) may help ameliorate symptoms and have positive effects for sickle cell patients. In addition, although a few studies did discuss pain reduction associated with HBO therapy, results are conflicting, and sample sizes are too small to carry any weight when compared against each other. No information has been gathered to date about how HBO therapy this may affect hospital length of stay. The purpose of this study is to determine if HBO treatment in participants experiencing sickle cell crisis would produce a decrease in pain and decrease in hospital length of stay.

Current standard of care at University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) and Nebraska Medicine for patients identified as having sickle cell and experiencing an uncomplicated pain crisis that is not responding to acute treatment in the emergency department over the course of a few hours is to admit the patient to the hematology service. They would receive IV fluid administration, oxygen, and usually large doses of pain medications, until their pain subsides. Patient's complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) are monitored during this time for acute changes. Once pain has subsided and no signs of complications such as infection, etc. are found, the patient is discharged with follow up in hematology clinic.

Interventions would be 1-3 hyperbaric oxygen sessions depending on response to the therapy. Each treatment session will be approximately two hours in length. Evaluation would be through participants' self-assessment via the visual analog scale for pain level before and after treatments as well as tracking length of stay in the hospital. Changes in pain ratings will use the visual pain scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is no pain and 100 being maximal pain imaginable for that participant. Pain ratings will be compiled and compared 1 hour before and after each treatment and from daily pain ratings assessed at hospital admission until discharge. Hospital length of stay is recorded for each participant from date of randomization until date of discharge or date of death from any cause and compared to data extracted from the electronic health record system EPIC.

03

Conditions studied

  • Vaso-occlusive Crisis
  • Sickle Cell Anemia Crisis

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 19 years old or older
  • Present with an uncomplicated sickle cell crisis at admission friom the emergency department

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \< 19 years old
  • pregnant female
  • complicated sickle cell crisis present (i.e., concomitant MI, stroke, acute chest syndrome at time of presentation)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    treatment

    This preliminary study will be a convenience sample of patients admitted to hospital for vaso-occlusive sickle cell crisis to be treated with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), the intervention, in an effort to ameliorate pain and shorten the length of hospital stay.

    Device: hyperbaric oxygen therapy

Interventions

  • Devicehyperbaric oxygen therapy

    Participants in vaso-occlusive crisis from sickle cell anemia will receive 1-3 hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) sessions depending on response to the therapy. Each session will be approximately 2 hours in length at 2.5 ATM. Minimum time between HBO sessions of 4 hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Analgesic Received in MME (Morphine Milligram Equivalents)

    Comparison of total analgesic administered to patient during control hospital stay versus intervention HBO treatment hospital stay. Each patient serves as their own control. The patient receives HBO treatment during one hospital admission, and the amount of analgesic received is compared to the patient's previous hospital admission.

    Time frame: admission to discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital Length of Stay

    Comparison of hospital length of stay in days during control hospital stay versus intervention HBO treatment hospital stay. Each patient serves as their own control. The patient receives HBO treatment during one hospital admission, and that length of stay is compared to the patient's previous hospital admission.

    Time frame: admission to discharge

07

Results

Posted Jul 28, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePatients Experiencing Acute Sickle Cell Crisis
Started8
Completed8
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryAnalgesic Received in MME (Morphine Milligram Equivalents)

Comparison of total analgesic administered to patient during control hospital stay versus intervention HBO treatment hospital stay. Each patient serves as their own control. The patient receives HBO treatment during one hospital admission, and the amount of analgesic received is compared to the patient's previous hospital admission.

Time frame:
admission to discharge
Reported as:
Median · MME (morphine milligram equivalents)
Analgesic Received in MME (Morphine Milligram Equivalents)
MME (morphine milligram equivalents)Treatment
Analgesic Received in MME (Morphine Milligram Equivalents)-193.00 (-2020.00 to 80.00)
SecondaryHospital Length of Stay

Comparison of hospital length of stay in days during control hospital stay versus intervention HBO treatment hospital stay. Each patient serves as their own control. The patient receives HBO treatment during one hospital admission, and that length of stay is compared to the patient's previous hospital admission.

Time frame:
admission to discharge
Reported as:
Median · hours
Hospital Length of Stay
hoursTreatment
Hospital Length of Stay-44.0 (-51.20 to 1.10)

Adverse events

Collected over from enrollment until hospital discharge. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Patients Experiencing Acute Sickle Cell Crisis
19 years and older8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Patients Experiencing Acute Sickle Cell Crisis
Female3
Male5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Patients Experiencing Acute Sickle Cell Crisis
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Unversity of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2022 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 33 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2026, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2017
First posted
Jan 26, 2018
StartActual
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Jun 5, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 5, 2025
Results first posted
Jul 28, 2026
Last update
Jul 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03412045
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 5, 2025
Completion
Jun 5, 2025
Results posted
Jul 28, 2026
Last update
Jul 28, 2026

Study contacts

Jeff S Cooper, MD
principal investigator · University of Nebraska

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion