CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03408743Updated Jul 5, 2019

Engineering an Online STI Prevention Program: CSE2

An interventional study of Knowledge Alone and Self-efficacy alone in Alcohol Consumption and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, sponsored by Penn State University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-05.

Sponsored by Penn State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,946
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall objective of the proposed research is to reduce the incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among college students. The investigators propose to accomplish this by using the innovative, engineering-inspired multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to develop a highly effective, appealing, economical, and readily scalable internet-delivered behavioral intervention targeting the intersection of alcohol use and sexual risk behavior. The rate of STIs on college campuses is alarming: one in four college students is diagnosed with an STI at least once during their college experience. Sexual activity when drinking alcohol is highly prevalent among college students. Alcohol use is known to contribute to the sexual risk behaviors that are most responsible for the transmission of STIs, namely unprotected sex, contact with numerous partners, and "hook-ups" (casual sexual encounters). Few interventions have been developed that explicitly target the intersection of alcohol use and sexual risk behaviors, and none have been optimized. In order to reduce the incidence of STI transmission among this and other high-risk groups, a new approach is needed. MOST is a comprehensive methodological framework that brings the power of engineering principles to bear on optimization of behavioral interventions. MOST enables researchers to experimentally test the individual components in an intervention to determine their effectiveness, indicating which components need to be revised and re-tested. Given the high rates of alcohol use and sex among college students, the college setting provides an ideal opportunity for intervening on alcohol use and sexual risk behaviors. The proposed study will include a diverse population of college students on 4 campuses which will increase the generalizability of the findings. The specific aims are to (1) develop and pilot test an initial set of online intervention components targeting the link between alcohol use and sexual risk behaviors, (2) use the MOST approach to build an optimized preventive intervention, and (3) evaluate the effectiveness of the newly optimized preventive intervention using a fully powered randomized controlled trial (RCT). This work will result in a new, more potent behavioral intervention that will reduce the incidence of STIs among college students in the US, and will lay the groundwork for a new generation of highly effective STI prevention interventions aimed at other subpopulations at risk.

Read the detailed description

As part of the MOST approach, the investigators will conduct a series of screening experiments to build an optimized intervention. The current study is the second (of two) screening experiments. The first screening experiment corresponds to clinicaltrials.gov ID # NCT02897804.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Consumption
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Keywords

  • Multiphase optimization strategy
  • College students
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently enrolled at an American college or university
  • A first-year student or first-year transfer student
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Have not gone through previous versions of itMatters before

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not a first-year student or transfer student
  • Younger than 18 years of age
  • Have gone through previous versions of itMatters
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,946 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Knowledge alone

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Knowledge Alone

  • Experimental
    Self-efficacy alone

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the self-efficacy module for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Self-efficacy alone

  • Experimental
    Perceived benefits alone

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the perceived benefits module for a period up to 3 weeks. \*Also referred to as 'benefits' in other arm descriptions\*\*

    Behavioral: Perceived benefits alone

  • Experimental
    Benefits and self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus perceived benefits and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Benefits and self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Injunctive norms alone

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the injunctive norms module for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Injunctive norms alone

  • Experimental
    Injunctive norms and self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus injunctive norms and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Injunctive norms and self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Injunctive norms and benefits

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus injunctive norms and perceived benefits modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Injunctive norms and benefits

  • Experimental
    Injunctive norms, benefits, self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the injunctive norms, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Injunctive norms, benefits, self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Descriptive norms alone

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the descriptive norms modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive norms alone

  • Experimental
    Descriptive norms and self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the descriptive norms and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive norms and self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Descriptive norms and perceived benefits

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the descriptive norms and perceived benefits modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive norms and perceived benefits

  • Experimental
    Descriptive norms, benefits, self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the descriptive norms, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive norms, benefits, self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Descriptive norms and injunctive norms

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the descriptive norms and injunctive norms modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive norms and injunctive norms

  • Experimental
    Descriptive and injunctive norms, self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the injunctive norms and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive and injunctive norms, self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Descriptive and injunctive norms, and benefits

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and perceived benefits modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive and injunctive norms, and benefits

  • Experimental
    Descriptive & injunctive norms, benefits, efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the descriptive norms, injunctive norms, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Descriptive & injunctive norms, benefits, efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies alone

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies module for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies alone

  • Experimental
    Expectancies and self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies and self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies and perceived benefits

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies and perceived benefits modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies and perceived benefits

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, benefits, self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, benefits, self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies and injunctive norms

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies and injunctive norms modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies and injunctive norms

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, injunctive norms, self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, injunctive norms, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, injunctive norms, self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, injunctive norms, and benefits

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, injunctive norms, and perceived benefits modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, injunctive norms, and benefits

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, injunctive norms, benefits, efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, injunctive norms, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, injunctive norms, benefits, efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies and descriptive norms

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies and descriptive norms modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies and descriptive norms

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, descriptive norms, self-efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, descriptive norms, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, descriptive norms, & self-efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, descriptive norms, benefits

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, descriptive norms, and perceived benefits modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, descriptive norms, benefits

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, descriptive norms, benefits, efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, descriptive norms, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, descriptive norms, benefits, efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, descriptive and injunctive norms

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies , descriptive norms, and injunctive norms modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, descriptive and injunctive norms

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, descriptive & injunctive norms, efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies , descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, descriptive & injunctive norms, efficacy

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, descriptive & injunctive norms, benefits

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and perceived benefits modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, descriptive & injunctive norms, benefits

  • Experimental
    Expectancies, descriptive & injunctive, benefits, efficacy

    Participants will have access to the knowledge module plus the expectancies, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, perceived benefits, and self-efficacy modules for a period up to 3 weeks.

    Behavioral: Expectancies, descriptive & injunctive, benefits, efficacy

Interventions

  • BehavioralKnowledge Alone

    Increase knowledge relate d STIs, STI risk, alcohol impairment, condom use skills, alcohol use behavior tracking skills, testing \& treatment services.

  • BehavioralSelf-efficacy alone

    Increase self-efficacy to us e protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralPerceived benefits alone

    Increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol.

  • BehavioralBenefits and self-efficacy

    Increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralInjunctive norms alone

    Correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking.

  • BehavioralInjunctive norms and self-efficacy

    Correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralInjunctive norms and benefits

    Correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking and increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralInjunctive norms, benefits, self-efficacy

    Correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralDescriptive norms alone

    Correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors.

  • BehavioralDescriptive norms and self-efficacy

    Correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralDescriptive norms and perceived benefits

    Correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors and increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol.

  • BehavioralDescriptive norms, benefits, self-efficacy

    Correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralDescriptive norms and injunctive norms

    Correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors and correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking.

  • BehavioralDescriptive and injunctive norms, self-efficacy

    orrect misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralDescriptive and injunctive norms, and benefits

    Correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; and increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol.

  • BehavioralDescriptive & injunctive norms, benefits, efficacy

    Correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol; and Increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies alone

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter.

  • BehavioralExpectancies and self-efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies and perceived benefits

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter and increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, benefits, self-efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies and injunctive norms

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter and correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, injunctive norms, self-efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, injunctive norms, and benefits

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; and increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, injunctive norms, benefits, efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies and descriptive norms

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter and correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, descriptive norms, & self-efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, descriptive norms, benefits

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; and increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, descriptive norms, benefits, efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, descriptive and injunctive norms

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; and correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, descriptive & injunctive norms, efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, descriptive & injunctive norms, benefits

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; and increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol.

  • BehavioralExpectancies, descriptive & injunctive, benefits, efficacy

    Decrease the expectation that alcohol is needed to have good sexual encounter; correct misperceptions of prevalence of alcohol-induced sexual risk behaviors, alcohol use/misuse, and sexual risk behaviors; correct misperceptions regarding approval of alcohol misuse \& sexual risk taking; increase perceived benefits to use protective behavioral strategies to reduce the negative consequences of engaging in sexual behaviors under the influence of alcohol; and increase self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies (e.g., condom negotiation skills) to reduce unprotected sex.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Descriptive norms about the intersection of alcohol and sex collected via an online questionnaire.

    This scale consists of 6 items and will be created as a weighted scale score. Analyses will report the mean and standard deviation and expected mean values from a regression analysis. The scale will reflect the average perceived prevalence of the alcohol and sex behaviors.

    Time frame: This measure will be assessed immediately following the 3-week intervention.

  2. Injunctive norms about the intersection of alcohol and sex collected via an online questionnaire.

    This scale consists of 6 items and will be created as a weighted scale score. Analyses will report the mean and standard deviation and expected mean values from a regression analysis. The scale will reflect the average perceived approval of the alcohol and sex behaviors, ranging from strongly disapprove to strongly approve.

    Time frame: his measure will be assessed immediately following the 3-week intervention.

  3. Expectancies about the intersection of alcohol use and sex collected via an online questionnaire.

    This scale consists of 10 items and will be created as a weighted scale score. Analyses will report the mean and standard deviation and expected mean values from a regression analysis. The scale will reflect the average number of drinks expected to experience the 10 different outcomes.

    Time frame: This measure will be assessed immediately following the 3-week intervention.

  4. Perceived benefits about using protective behavioral strategies collected via an online questionnaire.

    This scale consists of 11 items and will be created as a weighted scale score. Analyses will report the mean and standard deviation and expected mean values from a regression analysis. The scale will reflect the average likelihood of contracting an STI using the listed behaviors.

    Time frame: This measure will be assessed immediately following the 3-week intervention.

  5. Self-efficacy to use protective behavioral strategies collected via an online questionnaire.

    This scale consists of 9 items and will be created as a weighted scale score. Analyses will report the mean and standard deviation and expected mean values from a regression analysis. The scale will reflect the average level of confidence is using protective behavioral strategies to reduce the risk of contracting and STI, ranging from not at all confident to extremely confident.

    Time frame: This measure will be assessed immediately following the 3-week intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Binge drinking behavior collected via an online questionnaire.

    This item asks how many times in the past two weeks a male has 5 or more drinks in a 2-hour period (or females 4 or more drinks in a 2-hour period). This variable will be collapsed into 1 or more times versus other and reported as a prevalence of this behavior and used as a dichotomous outcome in regression analyses.

    Time frame: This measure will be assessed 1 month following the completion of the intervention.

  2. Unprotected sex behavior at most recent sex collected via an online questionnaire.

    This item asks whether or not a condom was used for oral, anal or vaginal sex. This variable will be collapsed into a dichotomous variable with unprotected anal or vaginal sex versus other and reported as a prevalence of this behavior and used as a dichotomous outcome in regression analyses.

    Time frame: This measure will be assessed 1 month following the completion of the intervention.

  3. Penetrative sex at most recent hookup collected via an online questionnaire.

    This item asks whether or not the most recent hookup included vaginal or anal sex. This variable will be collapsed into a dichotomous variable with penetrative sex versus other and reported as a prevalence of this behavior and used as a dichotomous outcome in regression analyses.

    Time frame: This measure will be assessed 1 month following the completion of the intervention.

06

Study locations

4 sites
  • Fresno State University
    Fresno, California 93740, United States
  • North Dakota State University
    Fargo, North Dakota 58108, United States
  • Middle Tennessee State University
    Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, United States
  • Texas A&M University
    College Station, Texas 77843, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03408743
Lead sponsor
Penn State University
Collaborators
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Responsible party
Linda Collins (Distinguished Professor, Department of Human Development and Family Studies Professor, Department of Statistics, Penn State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2018
Start date
Sep 18, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2017
Completion
Dec 31, 2017
Last update
Jul 5, 2019

Study contacts

Linda M Collins, PhD
principal investigator · Penn State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion