CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03406689Updated Apr 4, 2018

Comparison of the Efficacy of Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3 % on Pain Associated With Intravitreal Injections

An interventional study of Nepafenac 0.1% Oph Susp and Nepafenac 0.3% Oph Susp in Pain, sponsored by University Hospital of Patras. Completed at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-04.

Sponsored by University Hospital of Patras · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
99
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The analgestic efffect of Nepafenac 0.1% Eye Drops and Nepafenac 0.3% Eye Drops on pain related to intravitreal injections will be evalutated.

Pain perception will be assessed by the Short Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

Intravitreal injection (IVI) is a preferred route of administration of drugs in the posterior segment of the eye. Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs constitutes the mainstay for the treatment of various retinal diseases such as AMD, RVO, DME etc. The procedure of the IVI is, however, associated with a level of discomfort for the patient.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the activity of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2, and thereby, the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition leads to the anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic effects of NSAIDs. Ophthalmic NSAIDs constitute an established and effective treatment option for the management of inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery and of pain associated with corneal refractive surgery, for inhibition of intraoperative miosis and for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

The primary goal of this study is to assess the analgesic effect of Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3% Eye Drops on pain related to intravitreal injections immediately after and up to six hours postIVI.

A number of patients scheduled to undergo IVIs of anti-VEGFs will be randomized and divided in three groups. All patients must have already undergone at least one IVI. In patients receiving IVIs in both eyes only one eye will be included in the study.

The patients of the first group will receive Nepafenac 0.1 % Eye Drops 45 minutes prior to the injection.

The patients of the second group will recieve Nepafenac 0.3 % Eye Drop 45 minutes prior to the injection. The patients of the third group will receive Artificial Tears 45 minutes prior to the injection.

Patients will be required to complete the greek version of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) comprising of the Visual Analogue Scale, the main component of the SF-MPQ and the Present Pain Intensity Scale immediately after the injection and 6 hours post-IVI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Intravitreal Injection
  • Anti-VEGF
  • Nepafenac eye drops
  • Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All participants will be patients of the Medical Retina Department of our Clinic, who are scheduled to receive IVIs of ranibizumab (Lucentis; Novartis Pharma S.A.S., Huningue, France) or aflibercept (Eylea; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany) in one eye and had already undergone at least one IVI of an anti-VEGF agent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of previous eye surgery other than cataract extraction surgery, herpetic eye disease, uncontrolled glaucoma, uveitis, active conjunctivitis, keratitis and bullous keratopathy, a previously known allergic response to nepafenac or other NSAIDs and salicylates, any contraindication to NSAIDs administration such as cardiovascular disease, gastrointenstinal disease with risk of GI ulceration,bleeding and perforation, renal and hepatic disease and any systemic or topical use of NSAIDs or any use of sedative medications within 7 days from the visit and during the day of IVI.
  • Patients with poor cooperation in understanding and answering the questions of the SF-MPQ, including the visual analogue scale (VAS).
  • Unsuccessful blinding
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Nepafenac 0.1% Oph Susp

    One drop of Nepafenac 0.1% will be administered 45' prior to the injection

    Drug: Nepafenac 0.1% Oph Susp

  • Active comparator
    Nepafenac 0.3% Oph Susp

    One drop of Nepafenac 0.3% will be administered 45' prior to the injection

    Drug: Nepafenac 0.3% Oph Susp

  • Placebo comparator
    Artificial tears

    One drop of Artificial Tears will be administered 45' prior to the injection

    Drug: Artificial tear

Interventions

  • DrugNepafenac 0.1% Oph Susp

    One drop of Nepafenac 0.1% will be instilled 45' prior to the IVI.

    Also known as: NEVANAC EY.DRO.SUS 1MG/ML

  • DrugNepafenac 0.3% Oph Susp

    One drop of Nepafenac 0.3% will be instilled 45' prior to the IVI.

    Also known as: NEVANAC EY.DRO.SUS 3MG/ML

  • DrugArtificial tear

    One drop Artificial Tears will be instilled 45' prior to the IVI.

    Also known as: TEARS NATURALE EY.DRO.SOL 0,1%+0,3%

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of topical Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3% analgesic effect in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs

    As measured by the Visual Analogue Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale (abbreviation VAS) is a self report pain score chart designed as a 10 cm horizontal line marked at both ends. Each boundary of the line represents the extremes of painful experience (0=no pain and 10= the worst pain ever experienced). The patient is asked to mark on the scale the exact point corresponding to their perception of pain intensity and the score is calculated by measuring from the left hand side to the mark made by the patient, ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.

    Time frame: Immediately after the injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of topical Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3% analgesic effect in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs

    As measured by the Visual Analogue Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale (abbreviation VAS) is a self report pain score chart designed as a 10 cm horizontal line marked at both ends. Each boundary of the line represents the extremes of painful experience (0=no pain and 10= the worst pain ever experienced). The patient is asked to mark on the scale the exact point corresponding to their perception of pain intensity and the score is calculated by measuring from the left hand side to the mark made by the patient,ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.

    Time frame: Six hours after injection

  2. Assessment of topical Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3% analgesic effect in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs

    As measured by the Main Component of the Short Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The main component of the Short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (abbreviation SF-MPQ) comprises of 15 adjectives describing the pain experienced (11 sensory and 4 affective). The patient is asked to grade the intensity of each specific pain quality on an intensity scale from 0 to 3 (0= none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score of the main component is derived by adding the rank values given by the patient for each descriptor out of 45. Scores can range from 0 to 45. A higher score of the main component of the SF-MPQ reflects more serious pain.

    Time frame: Immediately after the injection

  3. Assessment of topical Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3% analgesic effect in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs

    As measured by the Main Component of the Short Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The main component of the Short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (abbreviation SF-MPQ) comprises of 15 adjectives describing the pain experienced (11 sensory and 4 affective). The patient is asked to grade the intensity of each specific pain quality on an intensity scale from 0 to 3 (0= none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score of the main component is derived by adding the rank values given by the patient for each descriptor out of 45. Scores can range from 0 to 45. A higher score of the main component of the SF-MPQ reflects more serious pain.

    Time frame: Six hours after injection

  4. Assessment of topical Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3% analgesic effect in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs

    As measured by the Present Pain Intensity score. The PPI index is a numerical verbal rating scale consisting of 6 adjectives of gradually increasing pain sensation (0, none; 1, mild; 2, discomforting; 3, distressing; 4, horrible; and 5, excruciating). The patient is instructed to choose the adjective indicating their pain state. The score for the PPI is derived from the number next to the patients' adjective of choice, ranging from 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate more intense pain.

    Time frame: Immediately after the injection

  5. Assessment of topical Nepafenac 0.1% and Nepafenac 0.3% analgesic effect in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs

    As measured by the Present Pain Intensity score. The Present Pain Intensity (abbreviation PPI) index is a numerical verbal rating scale consisting of 6 adjectives of gradually increasing pain sensation (0, none; 1, mild; 2, discomforting; 3, distressing; 4, horrible; and 5, excruciating). The patient is instructed to choose the adjective indicating their pain state. The score for the PPI is derived from the number next to the patients' adjective of choice, ranging from 0 to 5. Higher scores indicate more intense pain.

    Time frame: Six hours after injection

06

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital of Patras
    Patra, Achaia 26504, Greece
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03406689
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of Patras
Responsible party
Constantinos D. Georgakopoulos, MD, PhD (Associate Professor in Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Patras) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 23, 2018
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2018
Completion
Mar 28, 2018
Last update
Apr 4, 2018

Study contacts

Constantine Georgakopoulos, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Associate Professor of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University of Patras, Greece

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion