ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03406104RESTOREUpdated Mar 2, 2026Results posted

RESCUE and REVERSE Long-term Follow-up

A Phase 3 interventional study of GS010 and Sham Intravitreal Injection in Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy, sponsored by GenSight Biologics. Completed at 7 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-02.

Sponsored by GenSight Biologics · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of GS010, a gene therapy, and assess the quality of life in subjects with LHON due to the G11778A ND4 mitochondrial mutation and who were treated in the Rescue or Reverse studies.

Read the detailed description

Seven investigational centers from the RESCUE and REVERSE studies also participated in the RESTORE study, located in the European union and in the USA.

Primary objectives: to assess the long term safety of intravitreal injection up to 5 years of post treatment in subjects who were treated in the RESCUE or REVERSE studies.

Secondary objectives: (1) to assess the long-term efficacy of intravitreal GS010 administration up to 5 years post-treatment in subjects who were treated in the RESCUE or REVERSE studies; and (2) to assess the quality of life (QoL) in subjects who were treated with GS010 in the RESCUE or REVERSE studies for up to 5 years post-treatment.

Methodology: This was a Phase III prospective long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinical study of subjects previously treated with GS010 and Sham during 2 Phase III studies-RESCUE and REVERSE. The LTFU study followed subjects for an additional 3 years, for a total of 5 years post-injection. The LTFU study included 5 visits at 2, 2.5, 3, 4, and 5 years after the investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection. Safety, efficacy, and QoL variables were assessed during each of the 5 LTFU visits, and descriptive summaries and statistical testing were used for the analysis of the data.

This report presents the final analysis of results at Year 5 after treatment administration in RESCUE and REVERSE.

Number of analysed subjects: all subjects completing RECUE and REVERSE studies who provided consent for the RESTORE study: 62 subjects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

Keywords

  • Heredity Optic Atrophy
  • Leber Hereditary Optic Atrophy
  • Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy
  • LHON
  • Eye Diseases
  • Hereditary Eye Diseases
  • Inborn Genetic Disease
  • Gene Therapy
  • Intravitreal Injections
  • Mitochondrial Disease
  • AAV2 Vectors
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Neurodegenerative Disease
  • Heredodegenerative Disorders of the Nervous System
03

In context

Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 62 is above the median of 36 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber.

Browse Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber studies →

Lead sponsor

GenSight Biologics is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject was treated with GS010 IVT injection in either of the RESCUE or REVERSE Phase III clinical studies
  • Subject of legal consent age has provided ; subjects that are not of legal consent age have undergone their country-approved clinical trial enrollment consent process

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol requirements
  • Subject has any medical or psychological condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may compromise his or her safe participation in the study
  • Subject is taking or intending to take idebenone during the long-term follow-up study period
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GS010-treated Eyes

    Lenadogene nolparvovec Intravitreal ocular unilateral Injection Each participant will have one eye randomly selected to receive a single injection of GS010 and the other eye will receive a sham injection. GS010-treated Eyes: GS010 is a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector serotype 2 (rAAV2/2) containing the wild-type ND4 gene (rAAV2/2-ND4). Participants will receive a single dose of GS010 in one of their randomly selected eyes, via intravitreal injection containing 9E10 viral genomes in 90μL balanced salt solution (BSS) plus 0.001% Pluronic F68®.

    Genetic: GS010

  • Sham comparator
    Sham-treated Eyes

    Sham Intravitreal ocular unilateral Injection Each participant will have one eye randomly selected to receive GS010 and the other eye will receive a sham injection. Eyes receiving sham injection will undergo the same preparatory procedures as eyes receiving GS010 injection, including pupillary dilation, topical anti-infection and topical anesthetic procedures. Sham intravitreal injection will be performed by applying pressure to the eye at the location of a typical intravitreal injection procedure using the blunt end of a syringe without a needle.

    Other: Sham Intravitreal Injection

Interventions

  • GeneticGS010

    Lenadogene nolparvovec Intravitreal ocular unilateral Injection

    Also known as: Lenadogene Nolparvovec

  • OtherSham Intravitreal Injection

    Lenadogene nolparvovec Intravitreal ocular unilateral Injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ocular Adverse Events (AEs)

    Number of Eyes with Ocular Adverse events related to study treatment or study procedures as judged by the investigator reported from year 2 to year 5 post treatment

    Time frame: from year 2 to year 5 post treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Acuity

    Change from Nadir to 5 Years post-treatment, Assessed at Baseline in RESCUE and REVERSE studies to year 5 post-treatment, expressed in LogMAR. On chart visual acuity: Visual acuity inferior or equal to LogMAR +1.6 Off chart visual acuity: Visual acuity superior to LogMar +1.7 Normal vision LogMar: 0 and less than 0

    Time frame: Nadir to 5 Years post-treatment, Assessed at Baseline in RESCUE and REVERSE studies to year 5 post-treatment

  2. Responder Analysis: Clinically Relevant Recovery

    CRR clinically relevant recovery from Nadir defined as i/ for eyes on chart at Nadir, an improvement of at least -0.2 LogMar from Nadir and ii/ for eyes off chart at Nadir eyes that became on chart. Off chart visual acuity expressed in LogMar: more than +1.7 On chart visual acuity expressed in LogMar: less than 1.6 Normal vision LogMar: 0 and less than 0

    Time frame: Nadir to 5 Years post-treatment, Assessed at Baseline in RESCUE and REVERSE studies to year 5 post-treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Eyes on Chart

    Definition: Visual acuity inferior or equal to LogMAR +1.6 at 5 Years post treatment

    Time frame: Year 5 post-treatment

07

Results

Posted Jan 25, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Patient Treated in RECUE and REVERSE Studies
Started62
Completed55
Not completed7
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2
Withdrew: Due to covid patient did not want to travel1
Withdrew: Death2

Outcome measures

PrimaryOcular Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of Eyes with Ocular Adverse events related to study treatment or study procedures as judged by the investigator reported from year 2 to year 5 post treatment

Time frame:
from year 2 to year 5 post treatment
Reported as:
Number · eyes
Ocular Adverse Events (AEs)
eyesGS010 Treated EyesSham Treated Eyes
Ocular Adverse Events (AEs)51
SecondaryVisual Acuity

Change from Nadir to 5 Years post-treatment, Assessed at Baseline in RESCUE and REVERSE studies to year 5 post-treatment, expressed in LogMAR. On chart visual acuity: Visual acuity inferior or equal to LogMAR +1.6 Off chart visual acuity: Visual acuity superior to LogMar +1.7 Normal vision LogMar: 0 and less than 0

Time frame:
Nadir to 5 Years post-treatment, Assessed at Baseline in RESCUE and REVERSE studies to year 5 post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · LogMar
Visual Acuity
LogMarGS010 Treated EyesSham Treated Eyes
Visual Acuity-0.44 ± 0.46-0.39 ± 0.36
SecondaryResponder Analysis: Clinically Relevant Recovery

CRR clinically relevant recovery from Nadir defined as i/ for eyes on chart at Nadir, an improvement of at least -0.2 LogMar from Nadir and ii/ for eyes off chart at Nadir eyes that became on chart. Off chart visual acuity expressed in LogMar: more than +1.7 On chart visual acuity expressed in LogMar: less than 1.6 Normal vision LogMar: 0 and less than 0

Time frame:
Nadir to 5 Years post-treatment, Assessed at Baseline in RESCUE and REVERSE studies to year 5 post-treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eye
Responder Analysis: Clinically Relevant Recovery
percentage of eyeGS010 Treated EyesSham Treated Eyes
Responder Analysis: Clinically Relevant Recovery6066
Other pre-specifiedEyes on Chart

Definition: Visual acuity inferior or equal to LogMAR +1.6 at 5 Years post treatment

Time frame:
Year 5 post-treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Eyes on Chart
percentage of eyesGS010-treated EyesSham-treated Eyes
Eyes on Chart7679

Adverse events

Collected over from 2 to 5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Subjects2/62 (3.2%)8/62 (12.9%)19/62 (30.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventSubjects
hip fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/62
humerus fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/62
cardiac arrestCardiac disorders1/62
ileusGastrointestinal disorders1/62
lower limb fractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/62
limb injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/62
cerebral haemorrageNervous system disorders1/62
glioblastoma multiformeNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/62
appenditis perforatedInfections and infestations1/62
pneumoniaInfections and infestations1/62
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSubjects
CataractEye disorders6/62
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase IncreasedInvestigations5/62
Intraocular Pressure IncreasedEye disorders4/62
Covid-19Infections and infestations4/62

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Lenadogene Nolparvovec and Sham All Participants
<=18 years7
Between 18 and 65 years55
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lenadogene Nolparvovec and Sham All Participants
Mean35.9 ± 15.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lenadogene Nolparvovec and Sham All Participants
Female13
Male49
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Lenadogene Nolparvovec and Sham All Participants
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Lenadogene Nolparvovec and Sham All Participants
United States31
Italy1
United Kingdom5
France16
Germany9
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Best Corrected Visual Acuity(LogMAR)Lenadogene Nolparvovec and Sham All Participants
Mean1.40 ± 0.50
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Doheny Eye Center UCLA
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
  • Emory University Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Wills Eye Institute
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • CHNO Les Quinze Vingts
    Paris, 75012, France
  • LMU Klinikum der Universität München / Friedrich-Baur-Institut
    Munich, 80336, Germany
  • Ospedale Bellaria
    Bologna, 40139, Italy
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital
    London, Greater London EC1V 2PD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Yu-Wai-Man P, Newman NJ, Biousse V, Carelli V, Moster ML, Vignal-Clermont C, Klopstock T, Sadun AA, Sergott RC, Hage R, Degli Esposti S, La Morgia C, Priglinger C, Karanja R, Taiel M, Sahel JA; LHON Study Group. Five-Year Outcomes of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy in Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 1;143(2):99-108. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5375. PubMed 39699886 ↗
  • Carelli V, Newman NJ, Yu-Wai-Man P, Biousse V, Moster ML, Subramanian PS, Vignal-Clermont C, Wang AG, Donahue SP, Leroy BP, Sergott RC, Klopstock T, Sadun AA, Rebolleda Fernandez G, Chwalisz BK, Banik R, Girmens JF, La Morgia C, DeBusk AA, Jurkute N, Priglinger C, Karanjia R, Josse C, Salzmann J, Montestruc F, Roux M, Taiel M, Sahel JA; the LHON Study Group. Indirect Comparison of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Versus Natural History in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Mutation. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):401-429. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00611-x. Epub 2022 Nov 30. PubMed 36449262 ↗
  • Newman NJ, Yu-Wai-Man P, Carelli V, Biousse V, Moster ML, Vignal-Clermont C, Sergott RC, Klopstock T, Sadun AA, Girmens JF, La Morgia C, DeBusk AA, Jurkute N, Priglinger C, Karanjia R, Josse C, Salzmann J, Montestruc F, Roux M, Taiel M, Sahel JA. Intravitreal Gene Therapy vs. Natural History in Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A ND4 Mutation: Systematic Review and Indirect Comparison. Front Neurol. 2021 May 24;12:662838. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.662838. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34108929 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2022, 53 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2024, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 15, 2018
First posted
Jan 23, 2018
StartActual
Jan 9, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 4, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 4, 2022
Results first posted
Jan 25, 2024
Last update
Mar 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03406104
Lead sponsor
GenSight Biologics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 23, 2018
Start date
Jan 9, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 4, 2022
Completion
Jul 4, 2022
Results posted
Jan 25, 2024
Last update
Mar 2, 2026

Study contacts

Nancy Newman, MD
principal investigator · Emory University Hospital Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion