ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03293524REFLECTUpdated Apr 16, 2026Results posted

Efficacy & Safety Study of Bilateral IVT Injection of GS010 in LHON Subjects Due to the ND4 Mutation for up to 1 Year

A Phase 3 interventional study of GS010 and Placebo in Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy, sponsored by GenSight Biologics. Completed at 13 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-16.

Sponsored by GenSight Biologics · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of GS010 gene therapy - (lenadogene nolparvovec) in subjects with LHON due to the G11778A ND4 mitochondrial mutation with a vision loss up to one year.

Read the detailed description

The REFLECT study is a Phase 3, international, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT) of GS010 compared to IVT of placebo in second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes at 1.5 years post-treatment, by analyzing the change from baseline of the visual acuity in ND4 LHON subjects with vision loss up to one year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

Keywords

  • Leber Hereditary Optic Atrophy
  • Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy
  • LHON
  • Eye Diseases
  • Hereditary Eye Diseases
  • Inherited retinal dystrophies or degeneration
  • Gene Therapy
  • Intravitreal Injections
  • Mitochondrial Disease
  • AAV2 Vectors
  • Hereditary Optic Atrophy
03

In context

Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is above the median of 36 across 31 interventional studies indexed under Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber.

Browse Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber studies →

Lead sponsor

GenSight Biologics is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Main Selection Criteria:

  • Age 15 years or older on the date of signed .
  • Clinically manifested vision loss due to ND4 LHON, to any extent, in at least one eye.
  • Vision loss duration of ≤ 365 days (i.e. ≤ 1 year) in each affected eye at Inclusion Visit (Visit 2).

Main Non-Selection Criteria:

  • to intravitreal injection in any eye.
  • Subjects refusing to discontinue idebenone.
  • Previous vitrectomy in either eye.
  • Narrow angle in any eye contra-indicating pupillary dilation.
  • Presence of known/documented mutations, other than the G11778A ND4 LHON-causing mutation, which are known to cause pathology of the optic nerve, retina or afferent visual system.
  • History of recurrent uveitis (idiopathic or immune-related) or active ocular inflammation.

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vision loss duration of ≤ 365 days (i.e. ≤ 1 year) in each affected eye at Inclusion Visit (Visit 2).
  • Each eye of the subject must maintain at least Hand Motion (HM) visual acuity, as defined by the study's SOP for visual acuity testing.
  • Documented results of genotyping showing the presence of the G11778A mutation in the ND4 gene and the absence of the other primary LHON-associated mutations (ND1 or ND6) in the subject's mitochondrial DNA.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Light Perception (LP) or No Light Perception (NLP) visual acuity in any eye, as defined by the study's standard operating procedure (SOP) for visual acuity testing.
  • Presence of active infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis or endophthalmitis in either eye.
  • Presence of alcoholism, alcohol dependence, or alcohol or drug abuse (excluding nicotine).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GS010-GS010

    Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in both their first-affected eye and their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye at a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) dose of 1.2/1.3E11 vg in 90 μL for each eye. Treatment could be performed either on a single day (1 IVT injection in each eye on Day 0) or on 2 consecutive days (1st IVT injection on Day -1 and 2nd IVT injection on Day 0).

    Genetic: GS010

  • Placebo comparator
    GS010-Placebo

    Patients received single IVT injection of GS010 in their first-affected eye and placebo IVT injection in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye. Patients received IVT lenadogene nolparvovec in their first-affected eye (ddPCR dose of 1.2/1.3E11 vg in a volume of 90 μL) and placebo IVT injection (volume of 90 μL) in their second-affected/not-yet-affected eye. Treatment could be performed either on a single day (1 IVT injection in each eye on Day 0) or on 2 consecutive days (1st IVT injection on Day -1 and 2nd IVT injection on Day 0).

    Genetic: GS010 · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • GeneticGS010

    GS010 is a recombinant adeno-associated viral vector serotype 2 (rAAV2/2) containing the wild-type ND4 gene (rAAV2/2-ND4). GS010 was administrated via intravitreal injection containing 1.2/1.3E11 vg in 90 μL balanced sterile saline solution (BSSS).

    Also known as: Lenadogene nolparvovec

  • DrugPlacebo

    The placebo is a balanced sterile saline solution (BSSS) used for IVT. The placebo was administered via intravitreal injection in a volume of 90 μL.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported With Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) at 1.5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes

    The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 1.5-year post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.

    Time frame: at 1.5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline of the BCVA Reported With LogMAR at 5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes

    Change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.

    Time frame: at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes

  2. Proportion of Patients Who Switched From Off-chart Eyes to On-chart Eyes at 5 Years Post-treatment

    Proportion of patients with both eyes off-chart, defined as those patients unable to read letter on the ETDRS chart, who had at least one eye on-chart, defined as those patients able to read letters on the ETDRS chart (at either 4 meters or 1 meter) at 5 years

    Time frame: From baseline to 5 years post-treatment

  3. Responder Analyses - Improvements From Nadir (Gainer Eyes) at 5 Years

    Proportion of patients with an improvement of at least -0.3 LogMAR (≥ +15 ETDRS letters) from nadir to year 5 in at least one eye. Nadir was defined for each eye of each subject as the worst value observed from baseline to year 5

    Time frame: From nadir to 5 years post-treatment

  4. Responder Analyses - Clinically Relevant Recovery From Nadir at 5 Years

    Proportion of patients with clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir that was defined as patient with a CRR in at least one eye - Patient with at least one eye which was on chart at nadir, and which had an improvement of at least -0.2 LogMAR from nadir, or which was off-chart at nadir but became on-chart

    Time frame: From nadir to 5 years post-treatment

  5. Responder Analyses- Clinically Relevant Benefit at 5 Years

    Proportion of patients who had clinically relevant stabilization (CRS), defined as eyes with LogMAR BCVA \< 1 at baseline and at 5 years post-treatment or had a clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir. The best response observed in either eye was considered.

    Time frame: From baseline nadir to 5 years post-treatment

  6. Quality of Life Questionnaire: VFQ-25 - Composite Score

    Change from baseline to 5 years follow up in the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) composite score. The VFQ-25 is a patient-reported outcome instrument assessing vision-related quality of life and consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs plus an additional single-item general health rating question. Each item was converted to a 0-100 scale for scoring, where 100 represents the best possible score on the measure and 0 represents the worst. Items within each subscale were averaged to create 12 subscale scores (11 subscales related to vision + 1 subscale related to general health). The vision-related subscale scores (excluding the general health rating question) were then averaged to calculate the composite score.

    Time frame: From baseline to 5 years post-treatment

07

Results

Posted Apr 16, 2026

Participant flow

108 patients (≥ 15 years old) were screened for eligibility in 13 sites (Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom: 1 site each, and the United States: 7 sites). Of these, 98 were randomized: 48 to treatment Arm 1 (GS010-GS010) and 50 to treatment Arm 2 (GS010-placebo). The remaining 10 participants were screen failures.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Started4850
Completed4036
Not completed814
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject46
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up44
Withdrew: Death02
Withdrew: Email by patient 9 months after final visit01
Withdrew: Non-compliant to visits01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported With Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) at 1.5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes

The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 1.5-year post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.

Time frame:
at 1.5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes
Reported as:
Least squares mean · logMAR
Change From Baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported With Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) at 1.5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes
logMARGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Change From Baseline of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported With Log of the Minimal Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) at 1.5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes-0.09 ± 0.072-0.04 ± 0.071
Statistical analysis
  • GS010-GS010 vs GS010-Placebo · ANCOVA · p = = 0.608 · Ls mean difference (final values): -0.05 · 95% CI -0.25 to 0.15
SecondaryChange From Baseline of the BCVA Reported With LogMAR at 5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes

Change from baseline of BCVA reported with LogMAR at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of ND4 LHON patients with vision loss up to one year. LogMAR BCVA was used to represent BCVA.

Time frame:
at 5 years post-treatment, in the second-affected/not-yet affected eyes
Reported as:
Least squares mean · LogMAR
Change From Baseline of the BCVA Reported With LogMAR at 5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes
LogMARGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Change From Baseline of the BCVA Reported With LogMAR at 5 Years Post-treatment, in the Second Affected/Not-yet Affected Eyes-0.13 ± 0.080-0.05 ± 0.079
Statistical analysis
  • GS010-GS010 vs GS010-Placebo · ANCOVA · p = = 0.5086 · Ls mean difference: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.30 to 0.15
SecondaryProportion of Patients Who Switched From Off-chart Eyes to On-chart Eyes at 5 Years Post-treatment

Proportion of patients with both eyes off-chart, defined as those patients unable to read letter on the ETDRS chart, who had at least one eye on-chart, defined as those patients able to read letters on the ETDRS chart (at either 4 meters or 1 meter) at 5 years

Time frame:
From baseline to 5 years post-treatment
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients Who Switched From Off-chart Eyes to On-chart Eyes at 5 Years Post-treatment
Percentage of participantsGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Proportion of Patients Who Switched From Off-chart Eyes to On-chart Eyes at 5 Years Post-treatment61.5433.33
SecondaryResponder Analyses - Improvements From Nadir (Gainer Eyes) at 5 Years

Proportion of patients with an improvement of at least -0.3 LogMAR (≥ +15 ETDRS letters) from nadir to year 5 in at least one eye. Nadir was defined for each eye of each subject as the worst value observed from baseline to year 5

Time frame:
From nadir to 5 years post-treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Responder Analyses - Improvements From Nadir (Gainer Eyes) at 5 Years
percentage of participantsGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Responder Analyses - Improvements From Nadir (Gainer Eyes) at 5 Years68.866.0
Statistical analysis
  • GS010-GS010 vs GS010-Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = = 0.7605 · Odds ratio (or): 1.1 · 95% CI 0.5 to 2.7
SecondaryResponder Analyses - Clinically Relevant Recovery From Nadir at 5 Years

Proportion of patients with clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir that was defined as patient with a CRR in at least one eye - Patient with at least one eye which was on chart at nadir, and which had an improvement of at least -0.2 LogMAR from nadir, or which was off-chart at nadir but became on-chart

Time frame:
From nadir to 5 years post-treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Responder Analyses - Clinically Relevant Recovery From Nadir at 5 Years
percentage of participantsGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Responder Analyses - Clinically Relevant Recovery From Nadir at 5 Years75.060.0
Statistical analysis
  • GS010-GS010 vs GS010-Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = = 0.1352 · Odds ratio (or): 1.9 · 95% CI 0.8 to 4.6
SecondaryResponder Analyses- Clinically Relevant Benefit at 5 Years

Proportion of patients who had clinically relevant stabilization (CRS), defined as eyes with LogMAR BCVA \< 1 at baseline and at 5 years post-treatment or had a clinically relevant recovery (CRR) from nadir. The best response observed in either eye was considered.

Time frame:
From baseline nadir to 5 years post-treatment
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Responder Analyses- Clinically Relevant Benefit at 5 Years
percentage of participantsGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Responder Analyses- Clinically Relevant Benefit at 5 Years75.062.0
Statistical analysis
  • GS010-GS010 vs GS010-Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = = 0.1995 · Odds ratio (or): 1.8 · 95% CI 0.7 to 4.3
SecondaryQuality of Life Questionnaire: VFQ-25 - Composite Score

Change from baseline to 5 years follow up in the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) composite score. The VFQ-25 is a patient-reported outcome instrument assessing vision-related quality of life and consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs plus an additional single-item general health rating question. Each item was converted to a 0-100 scale for scoring, where 100 represents the best possible score on the measure and 0 represents the worst. Items within each subscale were averaged to create 12 subscale scores (11 subscales related to vision + 1 subscale related to general health). The vision-related subscale scores (excluding the general health rating question) were then averaged to calculate the composite score.

Time frame:
From baseline to 5 years post-treatment
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Points
Quality of Life Questionnaire: VFQ-25 - Composite Score
PointsGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Quality of Life Questionnaire: VFQ-25 - Composite Score11.8 ± 2.4815.0 ± 2.51
Statistical analysis
  • GS010-GS010 vs GS010-Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.3605

Adverse events

Collected over From the time of the ICF was signed throughout the completion of the study follow-up (Year 5). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GS010-GS0100/49 (0%)5/49 (10.2%)49/49 (100%)
GS010-Placebo2/49 (4.1%)6/49 (12.2%)49/49 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Gastritis (Systemic)Gastrointestinal disorders1/490/49
Death (Systemic)General disorders0/491/49
Sudden cardiac death (Systemic)General disorders0/491/49
Appendicitis (Systemic)Infections and infestations1/490/49
Clostridium difficile infection (Systemic)Infections and infestations0/491/49
Subdural haemorrhage (Systemic)Injury, poisoning and procedural complications0/491/49
Hypomagnesaemia (Systemic)Metabolism and nutrition disorders0/491/49
Muscle spasms (Systemic)Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/490/49
Multiple sclerosis (Systemic)Nervous system disorders1/491/49
Psychotic disorder (Systemic)Psychiatric disorders1/490/49
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventGS010-GS010GS010-Placebo
Vitritis (First-Affected Eye)Eye disorders17/4922/49
Vitritis (Second-affected/not-Yet-Affected Eye)Eye disorders17/492/49
Iridocyclitis (Second-affected/not-Yet-Affected Eye)Eye disorders14/492/49
Keratic precipitates (First-Affected Eye)Eye disorders14/4914/49
Keratic precipitates (Second-affected/not-Yet-Affected Eye)Eye disorders14/491/49
Iridocyclitis (First-Affected Eye)Eye disorders12/4911/49
Iritis (First-Affected Eye)Eye disorders7/4911/49
Headache (Systemic)Nervous system disorders11/498/49
Punctate keratitis (First-Affected Eye)Eye disorders10/497/49
Uveitis (First-Affected Eye)Eye disorders10/496/49

Baseline characteristics

The intent-to-treat analysis (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects. The analyses were based on the planned treatment (as randomized).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
Age at screening32.4 ± 14.431.8 ± 13.432.1 ± 13.8
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
Between 15 and 18 years3710
Between 18 and 60 years424183
≥ 60 years325
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(participants)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
Female11920
Male374178
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
East Asia8715
Europe111627
United States292756
Age at onset of the disease
Age at onset of the disease(years)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
Mean31.7 ± 14.431.2 ± 13.431.5 ± 13.8
Current alcohol use
Current alcohol use(Participants)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
≤ 1 drink/day or occasionally :242751
> 1 to 2 drinks/day :5510
> 2 drinks/day :246
No use :161329
Missing :112
Affected eye status
Affected eye status(Participants)GS010-GS010GS010-PlaceboTotal
Unilateral101
Bilateral475097

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

13 sites
  • Doheny Eye Center UCLA Pasadena
    Pasadena, California 91105, United States
  • University of Colorado Health Eye Center
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Emory Healthcare - The Emory Clinic
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Departments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Hospital and Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Vanderbilt Eye Institute
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
  • CHNO Les Quinze Vingts
    Paris, Paris 75012, France
  • IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (ISNB) Clinica Neurologica
    Bologna, 40139, Italy
  • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
    Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital
    London, Greater London EC1V 2PD, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Carelli V, Newman NJ, Yu-Wai-Man P, Biousse V, Moster ML, Subramanian PS, Vignal-Clermont C, Wang AG, Donahue SP, Leroy BP, Sergott RC, Klopstock T, Sadun AA, Rebolleda Fernandez G, Chwalisz BK, Banik R, Girmens JF, La Morgia C, DeBusk AA, Jurkute N, Priglinger C, Karanjia R, Josse C, Salzmann J, Montestruc F, Roux M, Taiel M, Sahel JA; the LHON Study Group. Indirect Comparison of Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy Versus Natural History in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Carrying the m.11778G>A MT-ND4 Mutation. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):401-429. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00611-x. Epub 2022 Nov 30. PubMed 36449262 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2024, 76 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2026, 1 year 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 19, 2017
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
StartActual
Mar 12, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 23, 2024
CompletionActual
Jul 23, 2024
Results first posted
Apr 16, 2026
Last update
Apr 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03293524
Lead sponsor
GenSight Biologics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
Start date
Mar 12, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 23, 2024
Completion
Jul 23, 2024
Results posted
Apr 16, 2026
Last update
Apr 16, 2026

Study contacts

Nancy Newman, MD
principal investigator · Emory University Hospital Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, PhD
principal investigator · John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, United Kingdom

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion