ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03403257BASIC-CUpdated May 22, 2026

Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi--Cognitive (BASIC-Cognitive)

An observational study in Dementia, Dementia Alzheimers and Dementia, Vascular, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-22.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
634
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 1,049 studies in Dementia with a site in United States — 211 open to participants now, 278 under way, 15 of them phase 3. Dementia · United States.

Enrollment
66th of 199
634 · median 200
Started
2018
with 50 others
Observational
199 of 1,049
50 open now
Registered
410th of 1,049
by date

Among the 1,049 studies in Dementia with a site in United States, this one is the 66th largest by enrollment of the 199 observational ones, is one of 51 that started in 2018, is one of 199 observational ones, and was the 410th registered.

By phase

1,049 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase561 · 119 open
Observationalthis study199 · 50 open
Phase 2102 · 16 open
Phase 358 · 4 open
Phase 150 · 8 open
Phase 433 · 4 open
Phase 1/223 · 7 open
Phase 2/321 · 3 open
Other kind2 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1981; this study’s year is marked. 51 started in 2018.

Size and results

Median enrollment 92 across the 845 interventional studies, 200 across the 199 observational. Of the 712 that completed or were terminated, 308 (43%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 1,049 studies in Dementia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The Mexican American population in the U.S. is rapidly growing and aging. This project seeks to determine the prevalence and outcomes of cognitive impairment and dementia in Mexican Americans. It also seeks solutions to help patients with cognitive impairment and dementia and their caregivers get the resources they need.

Read the detailed description

Hispanic/Latinos will comprise more than 30% of the U.S. population by mid-century, and Mexican Americans account for the largest share of this growing segment of society. This proposal aims to use door-to-door surveillance in Nueces County, Texas, a non-immigrant, bi-ethnic community, to determine the prevalence and trajectory over time of cognitive impairment and dementia in Mexican Americans and non Hispanic whites. The study will elucidate the mechanisms that explain the hypothesized ethnic disparity in Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer-related dementias by evaluating the roles of vascular disease risk factors, educational attainment and socio-economic status among others. This research will also delve deeply into the differences in informal caregiving for Mexican American and non Hispanic whites with cognitive impairment and dementia. Caregiver burden and mental and physical health of caregivers will be examined toward efforts to develop interventions that build resilience in caregivers. A novel ability of this population-based study is to examine community resources for both patients and caregivers, and how these provisions differ by ethnicity. Using a rigorous mixed methods approach the study will identify the gap between available resources and needs for those with cognitive impairment and dementia. In this way we will be well positioned to propose ethnic-specific testable interventions that promote mental and physical health for those with cognitive impairment and dementia, as well as for those family members who provide the care. This research will therefore lead to improved well-being, autonomy and outcomes among those with cognitive impairment and dementia and their caregivers. The investigative team members have conducted research in this community for 20 years and are experts in Mexican American culture and health, cognitive impairment and dementia, epidemiologic methods, community needs assessment and health behavior research. As the Mexican American population continues its tremendous growth and aging it is vitally important to better understand the prevalence and outcomes of cognitive impairment and dementia in this population, and to rapidly develop interventions that address the burden of these common conditions in Mexican American adults, families, and communities.

03

Conditions studied

  • Dementia
  • Dementia Alzheimers
  • Dementia, Vascular
  • Dementia, Mixed

Keywords

  • Caregiving
  • Hispanic
  • Mexican American
  • Epidemiology
  • Community
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Residents of Nueces County, Texas

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1.65 years of age or older 2. \< 26 3. Nueces County resident at least 6 months a year 4. English or Spanish speaking 5. Community dwelling or nursing home

Exclusion Criteria: none

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
634 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Subjects with cognitive impairment

    Subjects with MoCA \<26

    Other: No interventions

  • Caregivers

    Primary caregivers of subjects

    Other: No interventions

Interventions

  • OtherNo interventions

    No intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Mexican Americans and non Hispanic whites

    Prevalence estimates

    Time frame: 2 year data collection

  2. Trajectory of cognitive function in Mexican Americans and non Hispanic whites

    Change in cognitive function among subjects entered at baseline

    Time frame: 2 year follow-up after baseline

  3. Caregiver outcomes and changes over time

    Comparative caregiver outcomes among Mexican Americans and non Hispanic whites

    Time frame: 4 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Needs and community available resources for cognitive impairment

    An asset map and determination of needs

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Corpus Christi Nueces County Health District
    Corpus Christi, Texas 78416, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Briceno EM, Mehdipanah R, Gonzales X, Heeringa S, Levine DA, Langa KM, Garcia N, Longoria R, Morgenstern LB. Methods and Early Recruitment of a Community-Based Study of Cognitive Impairment Among Mexican Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites: The BASIC-Cognitive Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(1):185-196. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190761. PubMed 31771059 ↗
  • Briceno EM, Mehdipanah R, Gonzales XF, Heeringa SG, Levine DA, Langa KM, Zahs D, Garcia N, Longoria R, Morgenstern LB. Bilingualism, assessment language, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Mexican Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1971-1981. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17209. Epub 2021 May 7. PubMed 33963535 ↗
  • Mehdipanah R, Briceno EM, Gonzales XF, Heeringa SG, Levine DA, Langa KM, Garcia N, Longoria R, Morgenstern LB. Dementia care needs for individuals and caregivers among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Whites. Aging Ment Health. 2022 Aug;26(8):1630-1641. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1925222. Epub 2021 Jun 7. PubMed 34096422 ↗
  • Briceno EM, Mehdipanah R, Gonzales XF, Heeringa SG, Levine DA, Langa KM, Zahs D, Garcia N, Longoria R, Vargas A, Morgenstern LB. Differential Relationships Between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Informant-Rated Cognitive Decline Among Mexican Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2022 Jul;35(4):555-564. doi: 10.1177/08919887211029383. Epub 2021 Jul 22. PubMed 34291678 ↗
  • Khan N, Garcia N, Mehdipanah R, Briceno EM, Heeringa SG, Levine DA, Gonzales XF, Langa KM, Longoria R, Morgenstern LB. Lack of Any Caregiving for Those with Dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(2):531-535. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215418. PubMed 35068465 ↗
  • Gonzales XF, Heeringa SG, Briceno EM, Mehdipanah R, Levine DA, Langa KM, Garcia N, Longoria R, Morgenstern LB. Mexican Americans Participate in Research More than Expected while non-Hispanic Whites Participate Less than Expected. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(2):590-596. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0049. PubMed 35574862 ↗
  • Mehdipanah R, Briceno EM, Heeringa SG, Gonzales XF, Levine DA, Langa KM, Garcia N, Longoria R, Chang W, Morgenstern LB. Neighborhood SES and Cognitive Function Among Hispanic/Latinx Residents: Why Where You Live Matters. Am J Prev Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):574-581. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.016. Epub 2022 Jun 9. PubMed 35691843 ↗
  • Becker CJ, Heeringa SG, Chang W, Briceno EM, Mehdipanah R, Levine DA, Langa KM, Gonzales XF, Garcia N, Longoria R, Springer MV, Zahuranec DB, Morgenstern LB. Differential Impact of Stroke on Cognitive Impairment in Mexican Americans and Non-Hispanic White Americans. Stroke. 2022 Nov;53(11):3394-3400. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039533. Epub 2022 Aug 12. PubMed 35959679 ↗
  • Martins-Caulfield J, Mehdipanah R, Briceno EM, Chang W, Heeringa SG, Gonzales XF, Levine DA, Langa KM, Zahuranec DB, Garcia N, Morgenstern LB. Dementia Diagnosis Unawareness and Caregiver Burden in a Multi-ethnic Cohort. J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jul;40(10):2284-2291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09333-1. Epub 2025 Jan 14. PubMed 39808391 ↗
  • Morgenstern LB, Briceno EM, Mehdipanah R, Chang W, Lewandowski-Romps L, Gonzales XF, Levine DA, Langa KM, Garcia N, Khan N, Zahuranec DB, Heeringa SG. A Community-Based Study of Dementia in Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White Individuals. J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;97(2):649-658. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230729. PubMed 38143352 ↗
  • Khan N, Briceno EM, Mehdipanah R, Lewandowski-Romps L, Heeringa SG, Garcia N, Levine DA, Langa KM, Morgenstern LB. A community-based study of reporting demographic and clinical information concordance between informants and cognitively impaired participants. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jul;35(7):1571-1576. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02435-6. Epub 2023 May 19. PubMed 37204754 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data sharing plan conforms to NIH rules.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 96 months.

Of 271 non-industry observational studies under Dementia, half reached primary completion within 74 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 202. This study's 96 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 293 studies reached it within 67 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 188.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 11, 2018
First posted
Jan 18, 2018
StartActual
Apr 11, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2026
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
May 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03403257
Responsible party
Lewis Morgenstern (Professor, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 18, 2018
Start date
Apr 11, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026
Completion
Apr 30, 2026
Last update
May 22, 2026

Study contacts

Lewis Morgenstern, MD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion