CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03403140Updated Jan 23, 2018

Long Term Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Enerceptan in Rheumatoid Arthritis ( GEMENE002 )

A Phase 3 interventional study of Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Gema Biotech S.A.. Status unknown at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-23.

Sponsored by Gema Biotech S.A. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2018), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
141
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to asses the long term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of ENERCEPTAN® in combination with Methotrexate for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis up to 104 weeks

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective study, single treatment arm of 72 weeks of duration. Patients who completed the original study GEMENE001 may enroll in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Having completed the final active treatment visit of the GEMENE001 study, the same day or within 28 days prior to entry in this study.
  2. Women of childbearing age must commit to be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for up to 12 weeks after the last dose of Enerceptan®. Suitable methods of contraception are oral contraceptives, IUDs, bilateral tubal ligation, vasectomy or double barrier methods such as condoms or spermicidal diaphragm, sponge, contraceptive foam or gel, heterosexual abstinence. Men should not conceive up to 12 weeks after stopping the MTX
  3. Informed consent must be signed before making any study-specific procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have temporarily interrupted the investigational product in the final study visit GEMENE001 and, according to the investigator's opinion, this represents an unacceptable risk to the patient whether this participates in the GEMENE002 study.
  2. Simultaneous treatment with other investigational drug or participation in another clinical study that the investigator considers inadvisable.
  3. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  4. History of lack of response or loss of response to previous therapy with Etanercept in the GEMENE001 study.
  5. Chronic antibiotic therapy, if the investigator considers this may affect the safety of the subject or the assessment of the study results.
  6. Any previous or current serious medical conditions which had appeared during the study GEMENE001 that, in the opinion of the investigator, constitute a contraindication for the study treatment, as:
  7. Administration of vaccines:

    1. Subjects who have received a live attenuated vaccine within 3 months prior to the selection Visit (for example, varicella-zoster, oral polio, rabies, yellow fever vaccines.)
    2. Subjects who have received the BCG vaccine within the GEMENE001 study
  8. Presence of :

    a. At the time of the inclusion i. Active infections. ii. Fever (≥38 °C) or active, chronic or recurrent infections that require treatment with antibiotics, antiviral, or anti-fungal drugs within 4 weeks prior to Screening Visit, or history of frequent recurrent infections unacceptable to the investigator's opinion.

    iii. Non-healing infected skin ulcers. b. In the previous time: i. Background of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal (excluding superficial infections or nail bed mycosis), mycobacterial or other severe infections within the last month previous to selection.

    ii. Hospitalization for infection or Subjects who have received antibiotics intravenously within the last month or orally within the last 2 weeks.

    iii. Subjects with herpes zoster in the last 2 months.

  9. Past history of drug or alcohol abuse within the study GEMENE001.
  10. Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would not allow compliance with the guidelines of the study by the patient.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
141 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single arm

    Enerceptan®. Injectable Solution in prefilled syringes Source: GEMABIOTECH S. A. Formulation per unit: 1,0 ml of Enerceptan® contains 50 mg solution of Etanercept /Once a week Methotrexate 15 to 25 mg / Once a week

    Drug: Etanercept

Interventions

  • DrugEtanercept

    Enerceptan®. Injectable Solution in prefilled syringes Source: GEMABIOTECH S. A. Formulation per unit: 1,0 ml of Enerceptan® contains 50 mg solution of Etanercept /Once a week Methotrexate 15 to 25 mg / Once a week

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]).

    Infections, hematological disorders,.neurologic disorders and malignancies .

    Time frame: 72 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lab tests alterations [Safety and Tolerability]).

    Serum Hematological and chemistry values

    Time frame: 72 weeks

  2. Local reactions [Safety and Tolerability]).

    Incidence, description and severity of Local Adverse Drug Reactions

    Time frame: 72 weeks

  3. ACR20

    ACR (American College of Rheumatology) 20 The percentage of patients who achieved ACR20 at Week 32 is the primary end point. Signs and symptoms are assessed with a composite rating scale of the ACR (American College of Rheumatology) that includes 7 variables: * Tender Joints Count * Swollen Joints Count * Levels of an acute phase reactant (CRP level) * Patient's assessment of pain * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Physician's global assessment of disease activity * Patient's assessment of physical function

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  4. ACR50

    ACR50 is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve at least 50% improvement in both tender joint count and swollen joint count, and at least 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments.

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  5. ACR70

    ACR70 is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve at least 70% improvement in both tender joint count and swollen joint count, and at least 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 other assessments.

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  6. DAS (Disease activity state)

    It will be measured using the DAS (Disease activity state) 28. DAS28 is a composite score that includes 4 variables: * Tender Joints Count (based on 28 joints) * Swollen Joints Count (based on 28 joints) * Patient's global assessment of disease activity * Marker of inflammation: C REACTIVE PROTEIN

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  7. Change in modified van der Heijde Sharp score

    The Sharp method is a composite X-ray scoring system used to assess structural (joint) disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis. The method evaluates both joint erosions (JE) and joint space narrowing (JSN) in bilateral hand and foot joints. The Sharp/van der Heijde method assesses erosions and joint space narrowing separately in the hands and feet, and has a range from 0 to 448. Thirty-two joints in the hands and 12 in the feet are scored for erosions, with a maximum score of five per joint in the hands and 10 per joint in the feet. Joint space narrowing is graded from 0 to 4 in 30 joints in the hands and in 12 joints in the feet. The principal score used in the analyses is the total score, which is the sum of the erosion score and the joint space narrowing score.

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  8. Physical function

    Improvement in physical function is assessed by change from baseline in HAQ (Health Assessment Questionnaire).The HAQ-DI (disability index) is composed of 8 categories as follows: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, for which there are at least 2 questions by category. The patient will be asked to score how difficult he/she feels it is to perform such activities using a 0 to 3 scoring (0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty and 3=unable to do). If the patient is using assistance for any of these activities, scoring may be adjusted. For each category, the highest score given for one of the question is attributed to the category. The total score is the sum of all categories' scores divided by the number of answered categories (at least 3 categories should be answered)

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  9. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue scale (FACIT-Fatigue)

    The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire rated 0 to 4. The patient will be asked to answer to 13 questions rated 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=some what, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  10. Steady state concentration

    Etanercept concentration measure

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

  11. Immunogenicity

    Antibodies anti-Etanercept measure

    Time frame: 20 and 72 Weeks

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Instituto Medico CER
    Bs As, Argentina
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03403140
Lead sponsor
Gema Biotech S.A.
Collaborators
QUID Quality in Drugs and Devices Latin American Consulting SRL
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2018
Start date
Oct 6, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 23, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion