ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03400969Updated Oct 29, 2018

Effectiveness of Three Different Oral Moisturizers in Palliative Care Patients.

An interventional study of Glycerol 17% and Aequasyal (OGT) in Xerostomia, sponsored by University of Bergen. Status unknown at 1 site in Norway. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-29.

Sponsored by University of Bergen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares the effectiveness of 3 different oral moisturizers; 17% watery solution of glycerol, OGT oral spray, Aequasyal, and a newly developed Product, Salient.

Read the detailed description

Background:

A majority of patients in palliative care have problems with dry mouth caused by medication or as a direct result of the mortal condition. Dry mouth will cause a variety of problems that commonly affect the disease negatively and contribute to reduced quality of life in the patient's last stage of life. A Cochrane review from 2011 concludes that "there are several moisturising agents available, but no strong evidence that any topical therapy is effective for relieving the symptom of dry mouth." It also concludes that "Oxygenated glycerol triester (OGT) oral spray is more effective than an aqueous electrolyte spray."1

Objectives:

To compare the effectiveness of 3 different oral moisturisers, ; 17 % watery solution of glycerol, OGT oral spray, Aequasyal® and a newly developed product, Salient®.

Methods/design:

30 patients will be recruited from a Norwegian palliative care unit. Eligibility criteria for participants are:

  1. The patients have xerostomia (subjective feeling of dry mouth). 2
  2. The patients are palliative and in institutionalized care.
  3. Curative treatment of existing diseases has been completed.
  4. WHOs functional status 3/Karnofsky functional status 30 - 40 % (only capable of limited self-care, tied to bed or chair more than 50% of wake time).3, 4
  5. Participants are cognitively functioning, capable of and willing to consent, capable of giving responses to a limited questionnaire and are expected to remain at the care centre for a minimum of 3 days.

Patients treated with radiotherapy in head and neck region, are excluded from this trial.

The different moisturizers will be compared in a double blind, cross-over design. All patients will be randomized to all three treatments in the cross-over trial, with a minimum of 24 hours wash-out period between the treatments. Patient responses will be collected at baseline, immediately after exposure and after 2 hours. Medical history and medication will be recorded. Primary outcome variables are the subjective feeling of xerostomia, pain/discomfort and speech disturbance.

Ethical considerations:

An application for approval of this study will be sent to the Regional Ethical Committee (REC). There are no known side effects of the agents or methods that will be applied.

Discussion:

To the investigators knowledge, the proposed randomized controlled trial of the effect of three different oral moisturizers will be the first study of this kind to be performed in patients in palliative institutionalized ward. There are no known adverse effects of the products used in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Xerostomia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Palliative
  • Moisturisers
  • Dry mouth
  • Xerostomia
03

In context

Xerostomia

286 studies on the registry are indexed under Xerostomia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 44 across 235 interventional studies indexed under Xerostomia.

Browse Xerostomia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Bergen is the lead sponsor of 143 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The patients have xerostomia (subjective feeling of dry mouth). 2
  2. The patients are palliative and in institutionalized care.
  3. Curative treatment of existing diseases has been completed.
  4. WHOs functional status 3/ functional status 30 - 40 % (only capable of limited self-care, tied to bed or chair more than 50% of wake time).
  5. Participants are cognitively functioning, capable of and willing to consent, capable of giving responses to a limited questionnaire and are expected to remain at the care centre for a minimum of 3 days.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients treated with radiotherapy in head and neck region.

-

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Glycerol 17 %

    Oral moisturizer

    Device: Glycerol 17%

  • Active comparator
    Aequasyal (OGT)

    Oral moisturizer

    Device: Aequasyal (OGT)

  • Active comparator
    Salient (new product)

    Oral moisturizer

    Device: Salient (new product)

Interventions

  • DeviceGlycerol 17%

    Glycerol will be applied, using gauze on a lockable tweezer, at the end of the oral care procedure performed by a dentist.

  • DeviceAequasyal (OGT)

    Aequasyl (OGT) will be sprayed on the mucosa, at the end of the oral care procedure, preformed by a dentist.

  • DeviceSalient (new product)

    Salient (new Product) will be applied/given on a spoon, at the end of the oral care procedure, preformed by a dentist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Subjective xerostomia

    Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Subjective feeling of dry mouth: 1. Not dry 2. Insignificantly dry 3. Fairly dry 4. Almost completely dry 5. Completely dry

    Time frame: 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain/discomfort

    Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Subjective feeling pain/discomfort: 1. No pain 2. Insignificant pain/discomfort 3. Some pain/discomfort 4. Much pain/discomfort 5. Strong pain/discomfort

    Time frame: 3 days

  2. Speech

    Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: Xerostomia regarding impact on ability to speak: 1. Not difficulties 2. Insignificant difficulties 3. Some difficulties 4. Significant difficulties 5. Major difficulties

    Time frame: 3 days

  3. Diurnal variation

    Measured on a 5-point Likert-scale: At what times are xerostomia most pronounced: 1. At night 2. In the morning 3. In the afternoon 4. In the evening 5. No diurnal difference

    Time frame: 3 days

  4. Situational dry mouth

    Measured on a 3-point Likert-scale: 1. By intake of medication 2. By worsening of the disease 3. In Connection with thirst

    Time frame: 3 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Bergen
    Bergen, Hordaland 5099, Norway
    Recruiting
    • Signe Solberg · Contactsigne.solberg@uib.no · +47 55 58 66 88
    • Anne Åstrøm, PhD · Contactanne.astrom@uib.no · +47 55 58 64 83
    • Stein A Lie, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Gunhild V Strand, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Siri F Kvalheim, MDS · Sub investigator
    • Einar Berg, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymous data will be available by request after publication of effect article.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will be available after publication of article.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2018, 9 months after the start.

Of 85 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Xerostomia, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 33. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 101 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 33.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 14, 2017
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
StartActual
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2018
CompletionEst.
Mar 15, 2019
Last update
Oct 29, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03400969
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 15, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2018

Study contacts

Siri F. Kvalheim, DDS
Contact
Siri.Kvalheim@uib.no
0047 55586488
Stein-Atle Lie, PhD
Contact
Stein.Lie@uib.no
0047 55586477
Gunhild V Strand, DDS, PhD
principal investigator · University of Bergen, Norway

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion