ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03393533Updated Oct 10, 2018

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of the Therapeutic Bandage Method in Third Molar Surgery

An interventional study of Group I and Group II in Pain, sponsored by Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-10.

Sponsored by Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Extraction of lower third molars semi-included or included is one of the most performed procedures in oral surgery, and inherent to the procedure there is a postoperative inflammatory response. Among the factors most routine to this response are pain, edema and trismus. The therapy taping has advantages in its use in the physiotherapy of several specialities, leading to the correction of muscular functions, reduction of edema, muscular spasms and reduction of pain. Thus, the objective of this split mouth, randomized, blind, clinical trial will be to evaluate the postoperative period of 32 third molars in the patients from the São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brasil. These evaluations will be performed on the third and seventh days after the extraction, where the patients will be analyzed by evaluator who will measure the edema, the opening of the mouth (evaluation of muscle spasm) and collect the pain table delivered in the immediate postoperative period, comparing thus, the benefit of therapeutic banding in the postoperative period of the extraction of lower third molars. The analogue pain scale (VAS), together with the Ustün et al. (2003) and the millimeter rule will be used to compare the data and the results will be submitted to descriptive statistics and compared by means of the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with significance level of 5%.

Read the detailed description

Extraction of third molars is the procedure of oral and maxillofacial surgery most commonly performed around the world, usually at the outpatient level. Its execution may result in the appearance of reversible and / or irreversible disorders, but the most observed signs and symptoms are pain, edema and trismus to a greater or lesser degree. Thus, there seems to be no consensus within the literature for a better type of post-surgical treatment that leads to less patient discomfort when undergoing this kind of surgery.

The objective of this randomized, blinded trial will be to evaluate the use of therapeutic bandaging, Therapy Tex ©, In reducing the signs and symptoms inherent to the postoperative period of the third molar extracts, semi-included or included .

The sample will consist of 32 lower third molars, semi-inclusively or included, divided into two groups simultaneously, namely:

Group I (16 teeth) - without therapeutic bandaging on face. Group II (16 teeth) - with therapeutic bandaging on face. The therapeutic bandaging method will be applied in the patients of group II, according to the previous randomization.The bandage will be applied immediately after surgery and before the end of the anesthetic effect. The skin should be cleaned with 70% alcohol in order to remove residue and oiliness, and then should be dried. If necessary, scrape the hairs of the region in which the tape will rest. The application of the bandage will be in the proposed regions using the "I" cutout, in which no additional trimming is made on the tape. The length may vary depending on the size of the patient's face. After being applied the bandage should be gently wiped to activate the acrylic components that generate adhesiveness and should remain on the face for 3 days.

The patient is asked to occlude, the dimension of the masseter muscle is determined by palpation. During palpation, point A is selected in the lower portion of the zygomatic arch and point B is close to the angle of the mandible. The tape will be placed along the direction of the muscle fibers.

Placement of the second tape will occur from the mandibular angle to the mental symphysis, accompanying the entire mandibular body in its medial portion covering the milo-hyoid muscles and the anterior belly of the digastric.

The results of the clinical evaluations will be submitted to descriptive statistics and compared by means of the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test with significance level of 5%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain

Keywords

  • Third molar;
  • Oral surgery;
  • Pain;
  • Edema;
  • Trismus.
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with need for extraction of third molars, regardless of gender;
  2. Teeth in opposite hemiarches with similar positions;
  3. Between 15 and 40 years of age;
  4. That they agree to participate in the research voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients presenting with local or systemic alterations that contraindicate the procedure;
  2. Use of anti-inflammatories in the last 15 days;
  3. Third lower third molars in position and different inclusion classification on both sides;
  4. Third erupted lower third molars.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Group I

    Extraction third molar with pre and postoperative evaluation of edema, pain and trismus

    Procedure: Group II

  • Active comparator
    Group II

    Extraction third molar with therapeutic bandage pre and postoperative evaluation of edema, pain and trismus

    Procedure: Group I

Interventions

  • ProcedureGroup I

    Extraction third molar without the application of therapeutic bandaging in the face and with evaluation of edema, pain and trismus

  • ProcedureGroup II

    Extraction third molar with the application of therapeutic bandaging in the face and with evaluation of edema, pain and trismus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain assessment

    Evaluated in patients in groups I and II. Scale of vas, with values from zero to ten, being zero without pain and ten the maximum of pain. This scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days.

    Time frame: The scale will be provided on paper and divided into postoperative hours up to 3 days for the patient to note the degree of pain that varies between zero and ten

Secondary outcomes

  1. Edema assessment with a millimeter rule.

    Evaluated in patients in groups I and II. Used the method of Ustün et al. (2003) with a millimeter rule to obtain the measures.

    Time frame: For investigators to measure facial edema, with pre and postoperative evaluations of 3 and 7 days

Other outcomes

  1. Trismus assessment with a millimeter rule.

    Evaluated in patients in groups I and II

    Time frame: To measure the buccal opening, the distance between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, obtained with the patient sitting upright. Evaluated in the pre and postoperative periods of 3 and 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Michelle Bianchi de Moraes
    São José dos Campos, SP 12245000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brignardello-Petersen R, Carrasco-Labra A, Araya I, Yanine N, Beyene J, Shah PS. Is adjuvant laser therapy effective for preventing pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;70(8):1789-801. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Mar 6. PubMed 22398186 ↗
  • UStun Y, Erdogan O, Esen E, Karsli ED. Comparison of the effects of 2 doses of methylprednisolone on pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Nov;96(5):535-9. doi: 10.1016/S1079210403004645. PubMed 14600686 ↗
  • Maxwell C. Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physical classroom experiment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Jul;6(1):15-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb01676.x. PubMed 666944 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03393533
Lead sponsor
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Responsible party
Michelle Bianchi de Moraes (Assistant Professor, Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Brazil., Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 8, 2018
Start date
Oct 20, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 4, 2018
Completion
Aug 4, 2018
Last update
Oct 10, 2018

Study contacts

Michelle B Moraes, PHD
principal investigator · Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion