ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03392662Updated Nov 16, 2022

Hemopatch Performance Evaluation: A Prospective Observational Registry

An observational study in Dura Mater Nick Cut or Tear, Hemostatis and Air Leakage, sponsored by Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Completed at 15 sites in 5 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-16.

Sponsored by Baxter Healthcare Corporation · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
621
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the clinical performance and safety of HEMOPATCH Sealing Hemostat in a post-marketing setting in cardiovascular, thoracic, urologic, neurological, and other general surgical procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dura Mater Nick Cut or Tear
  • Hemostatis
  • Air Leakage
  • Body Fluid Leakage

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lacerations

174 studies on the registry are indexed under Lacerations; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 621 is above the median of 100 across 37 observational studies indexed under Lacerations.

Browse Lacerations studies →

Lead sponsor

Baxter Healthcare Corporation is the lead sponsor of 80 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patient who had undergone a general, cardiovascular, thoracic, urological, or neurological surgery during which the use of a patch was required to repair the dura or to achieve hemostasis, control leakage of air or other body fluid because pressure, ligature or conventional procedures were ineffective or impractical and during which Hemopatch was used according to Instructions for use.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients of any age
  • Patients who had undergone open or minimal invasive surgical (MIS) procedures requiring the use of a patch to achieve dura repair, hemostasis, or control of leakage of air or other body fluid when pressure, ligature or other conventional procedures had been ineffective or impractical and where use of hemopatch was deemed appropriate by the surgeon according to its IFU in the following organ systems:

    1. Hepato-biliary (liver, pancreas, gallbladder)
    2. General surgery (in thyroid and other regions)
    3. Cardiovascular (heart and vessels)
    4. thoracic (lung and mediastinum)
    5. Urological (kidney, prostate, and bladder
    6. Neurological (dura mater, brain and spinal cord)
  • Provision of written /assent, as applicable, up to 72 hours after the date of surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with known to bovine proteins or brilliant blue
  • Patients who had intraoperative pulsatile or severe bleeding at the target application site (TAS)
  • Patients who had an active infection at the TAS
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
621 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
4 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Hemopatch Sealant Use with Hepatobiliary Surgery

    Device: Hemopatch

  • Hemopatch Sealant Use with General Surgery

    Device: Hemopatch

  • Hemopatch Sealant Use with Lung Surgery

    Device: Hemopatch

  • Hemopatch Sealant Use with Cardiovascular Surgery

    Device: Hemopatch

  • Hemopatch Sealant Use with Neurological/Spinal Surgery

    Device: Hemopatch

  • Hemopatch Sealant Use with Urologic Surgery

    Device: Hemopatch

Interventions

  • DeviceHemopatch

    Patients received product at the discretion of their surgeon.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients achieving hemostasis after 2 minutes of surgery

    Time frame: Day 1 (up to 2 minutes postoperative)

  2. Percentage of patients achieving hemostasis without re-bleeding at the time of surgical closure

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  3. Absence of air leak in lung at time of surgical closure

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  4. Tight closure achieved in dura mater at time of surgical closure

    No leak after inspection per local standard of care

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  5. Number of patients with chest tube drainage >=5 days after thoracic/lung surgery

    Time frame: Day 5 up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  6. Number of patients needing reinsertion of chest tube for pneumothorax after thoracic/lung surgery

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  7. Number of patients with postoperative pancreatic fistulas after hepatobiliary surgery

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  8. Duration of bile leakage after hepatobiliary surgery

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  9. Number of patients with postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage after neurological surgery

    External or internal accumulation including pseudomeningocele

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  10. Number of patients with postoperative urinary fistula formation after urological surgery

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  11. Gastrointestinal anastomosis leakage/fistula after general surgery

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  12. Number of patients with related Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Hemopatch units applied

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  2. Surgical revisions/reoperations due to bleeding, air, or other body fluid leakage

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  3. Number of intraoperative transfusions by type and amount of blood product transfused

    Unit of measure will be number of transfusion procedures and will be summarized as a single outcome measure.

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  4. Number of postoperative transfusions by type and amount of blood product transfused up to 72 hours after surgery

    Unit of measure will be number of transfusion procedures and will be summarized as a single outcome measure.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours (postoperative)

  5. Surgery duration

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  6. Length of hospital stay

    Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (postoperative)

  7. Ease of product preparation

    Surgeon's overall product assessment and satisfaction recorded on questionnaire.

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  8. Ease of product handling

    Surgeon's overall product assessment and satisfaction recorded on questionnaire.

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  9. Assessment of product tissue adherence

    Surgeon's overall product assessment and satisfaction recorded on questionnaire.

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  10. Surgeon's overall satisfaction of product

    Surgeon's overall product assessment and satisfaction recorded on questionnaire.

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  11. Product characteristics appreciated by Surgeon

    Surgeon's overall product assessment and satisfaction recorded on questionnaire.

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

  12. Product characteristics liked least by Surgeon

    Surgeon's overall product assessment and satisfaction recorded on questionnaire.

    Time frame: Day 1 (intraoperative)

07

Study locations

15 sites
  • Innsbruck Universitaetsklinik
    Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně
    Brno, 65691, Czechia
  • Krajská Nemocnice Liberec
    Liberec, 46063, Czechia
  • Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava
    Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
  • Thomayerova Nemocnice
    Praha 4, 14059, Czechia
  • Marien-Krankenhaus Bergisch Gladbach
    Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • ASKLEPIOS Klinik St. Georg
    Hamburg, 20099, Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Regensburg
    Regensburg, 93042, Germany
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
    Firenze, 50134, Italy
  • Hospital de Vall d'Hebrón
    Barcelona, 8035, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta
    Girona, 17007, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Hospital La Paz
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
    Sevilla, 41013, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lombardo C, Lopez-Ben S, Boggi U, Gutowski P, Hrbac T, Krska L, Marquez-Rivas J, Russello D, York E, Zacharias M. Hemopatch(R) is effective and safe to use: real-world data from a prospective European registry study. Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1521-1531. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01353-y. Epub 2022 Aug 20. PubMed 35986865 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 13 months.

Of 20 observational studies under Lacerations, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 35. This study's 13 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 19, 2017
First posted
Jan 8, 2018
StartActual
Nov 29, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 28, 2019
CompletionActual
Jan 28, 2019
Last update
Nov 16, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 16, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03392662
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 8, 2018
Start date
Nov 29, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 28, 2019
Completion
Jan 28, 2019
Last update
Nov 16, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion