ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03389269Updated Oct 12, 2018

Investigation of Acute Physiological Effects of Aspiration Therapy

An observational study in Obesity and Weight Loss, sponsored by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-12.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 19 studies in Obesity by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen — 3 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Obesity · University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen.

Started
2017
with 1 other
Observational
4 of 19
none open now
Registered
6th of 19
by date

Among the 19 studies in Obesity by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen, this one is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 4 observational ones, and was the 6th registered.

Obesity

11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.

Browse Obesity studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 19 studies in Obesity by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 3 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 1,336 Obesity studies recruiting now, 377 (28%) set no upper age limit and 856 (64%) stop at 75 or younger; 168 take children under 18; 491 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 75 Years · all sexes.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 19 studies in Obesity by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

In the present study, the investigators aim to investigate postprandial physiology in patients who have had the Aspire Assist® inserted. This will involve a standardised mixed meal test (MMT) with subsequent aspiration of gastric content compared to MMT without aspiration. Furthermore, a comparison will be made between the aspiration group and a control group in order to evaluate whether continuous treatment with aspiration therapy affect the postprandial physiology. The primary outcomes of the trial are differences in postprandial plasma/serum glucose, insulin and gut hormone excursions during MMT with and without aspiration. Secondary outcomes encompass evaluation of satiety, gastric emptying and gallbladder motility following MMT with and without aspiration. Also, food intake during a subsequent ad libitum meal will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

It is generally agreed that the increasing incidence of obesity mainly is caused by the adoption of a sedentary lifestyle combined with excessive caloric intake. So far, preventive measures and interventions based on lifestyle modifications have not been able to affect the western lifestyle to a degree that remedies the increasing prevalence of obesity. Likewise, no medical interventions have yet been able to induce and maintain significant major weight loss in obese populations. In contrast, bariatric surgery prompts a significant and often sustained weight loss, which frequently triggers remission of obesity-related comorbidities. However, bariatric surgery is invasive, irreversible and costly. Aspiration therapy was introduced as a less invasive and cheaper treatment for obesity. According to some studies, aspiration therapy is nearly as effective as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in terms of excess weight loss after one year. Thus, aspiration therapy may aspire as an alternative treatment option for obesity with lower risk of complications than bariatric surgery.

The risk of developing impaired glucose tolerance and overt type 2 diabetes rises along with increasing obesity. The estimated risk of developing type 2 diabetes increases 3-fold with a body mass index (BMI) of 25-29.9 kg/m2 (overweight) and \~20-fold with a BMI >35 kg/m2 (severely obese) compared to a normal BMI (\<25 kg/m2) (6). Type 2 diabetes is a complex, multi-organ metabolic disorder and is associated with serious complications, reduced quality of life and early death. The disease is characterized by hyperglycaemia and, thus, elevated haemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) (>6.5% or >48mmol/mol), which is a blood parameter used clinically as a measure of mean blood glucose over time (\~3 months). Studies have shown that up to 70% of the mean plasma glucose levels is caused by postprandial plasma glucose excursions. Moreover, postprandial hyperglycaemia in itself seems to be associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease due to unfavourable effect on both small and large blood vessels. Accordingly, postprandial hyperglycaemia has been suggested to constitute a better predictor of mortality risk than fasting plasma glucose concentrations in both patients with type 2 diabetes and individuals with normal glucose tolerance. Since the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance is \~2-fold higher in obese compared to lean individuals, postprandial hyperglycaemia poses a great risk of developing severe comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes for obese individuals and may increase mortality in this group. It is yet unknown whether aspiration therapy can attenuate the plasma glucose response to a meal. Due to the reduced amount of food reaching the intestine after aspiration, it seems likely that aspiration therapy reduces postprandial plasma glucose excursions and thereby prevents potential postprandial hyperglycaemia.

It is well known that an orally administered glucose load elicits a greater insulin secretion response compared to an intravenous infusion of glucose resulting in identical plasma glucose elevations. This phenomenon is called the incretin effect. The incretin effect is primarily driven by the insulinotropic gut hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). These so-called incretin hormones play crucial roles in regulation of glucose homeostasis and appetite. GLP-1 is produced in the intestinal mucosa by the so-called enteroendocrine L cells, which are predominantly localised in the distal part of the small intestine and the colon. GIP originates from enteroendocrine K 5 cells in the gut mucosa. K cells are assumed to be predominant in the proximal part of the small intestine. Both GLP-1 and GIP are secreted in response to ingestion of nutrients and have strong glucose-dependent insulinotropic effects on pancreatic beta cells. The incretin hormones are of interest in the present study, because impaired incretin effect is an early sign of dysmetabolism in obese individuals and a distinctive feature of type 2 diabetes, suggesting that the impaired glucose tolerance of these patients is, at least in part, due to a defective incretin system. Whether aspiration of gastric content after a meal affects postprandial incretin hormone response has not been elucidated. The investigators plan to investigate meal-induced incretin hormone excursions in plasma with and without aspiration therapy and compare the results to a matched control group.

In addition to GLP-1 and GIP, several other gut-related hormones are known to regulate glucose homeostasis and appetite. Glucagon is a peptide hormone secreted from the pancreatic alpha cells. Glucagon acts opposite to insulin by promoting hepatic gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis causing increased plasma glucose concentrations. Oxyntomodulin and pancreatic peptide YY3-36 (PYY) are peptide hormones secreted by the enteroendocrine L cells in response to feeding and both suppress appetite. Gastrin is a hormone secreted by G cells localised in the pyloric antrum, duodenum and pancreas. Gastrin stimulates acid (HCl) secretion and gastric emptying by increasing gastric motility. Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a peptide hormone secreted by the enteroendocrine I cells in the duodenum. CCK promotes bile release from the gallbladder and also acts as an appetite suppressant. To this point, it is unknown how aspiration therapy affects these appetite- and glucose-regulating hormones during a meal. The investigators aim to investigate this during standardised mixed meal tests with and without aspiration.

Furthermore, it is relevant to examine the effect of aspiration therapy on satiety. Thus, the investigators aim to evaluate the effect of aspiration therapy on satiety before, during and after a mixed meal as well as food intake after the MMT with and without aspiration evaluated through an ad libitum meal provided at the end of the experimental days.

03

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Weight Loss
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

It is planned to recruit up to 25 patients who have had the Aspire Assist inserted. Furthermore, 10 healthy control participants matched for age, weight, height, BMI and sex will be recruited

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient who have had the Aspire Assist inserted (the aspiration therapy group)
  • Age between 18-75 years
  • Able to understand written patient information and sign

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes
  • Severe comorbidities that, at the discretion of the investigators, exclude study participation (e.g. (COPD) stage III, significant cardiac arrhythmias etc.)
  • Previous gastrointestinal surgery (excluding cholecystectomy and appendectomy)
  • Gastrointestinal conditions making the participant unsuitable for participation (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn´s disease, food allergies, candidiasis etc.)
  • Anaemia with a value \<6.2 mmol/l (\<10 g/dl) for women and \<7.4 mmol/l (\< 12 g/dl) for men at time of screening
  • Abuse of alcohol and/or drugs, or any other co-existing conditions that will make the participant unsuitable to attend to the study schedule, as deemed by the investigators
  • Pregnancy or desire to become pregnant during the study period
  • Exceptional conditions which, at the discretion of the investigators, preclude the participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
14 Days
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Obese patients treated with AspireAssist

    Healthy, obese with BMI \> 27, treated with AspireAssist for weight management, the postprandial glucose metabolism will be tested with a meal test

    Other: Meal test

  • Matched controls

    Healthy, obese with BMI \> 27, the postprandial glucose metabolism will be tested with a meal test

    Other: Meal test

Interventions

  • OtherMeal test

    240 min mixed meal test with aspiration using AspireAssist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Plasma glucose concentration

    mmol/l, collected during mixed meal test and analysed by YSI STAT 2300

    Time frame: 0-240 min

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serum Insulin

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  2. plasma GLP-1

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  3. Indirect Calorimetry

    Resting metabolic rate measured by O2 consumption during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  4. Gallbladder volume

    Measured during mixed meal test by UL and calculated by this equation: π/6\*D1\*D2\*D3/1000, D1 = longitudinal diameter, D2 = cross section width, D3 = cross sectional width

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  5. Ad libitum meal intake

    post meal test

    Time frame: 30 min

  6. Appetite

    Evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10, where 0 is no appetite and 10 is very hungry) during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  7. Plasma GLP-2

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  8. Plasma GIP

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  9. Plasma Glucagon

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  10. Plasma PYY

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  11. Plasma Oxyntomodulin

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  12. plasma ghrelin

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  13. Plasma acetaminophen

    mmol/L, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  14. plasma c-peptide

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  15. Plasma CCK

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

  16. plasma gastrin

    pmol/l, Collected during mixed meal test

    Time frame: 0-240 min

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Center for Diabetes Research
    Hellerup, 2900, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2018, 17 months.

Of 791 non-industry observational studies under Obesity, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 106. This study's 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 836 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 96.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2017
First posted
Jan 3, 2018
StartActual
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 1, 2018
CompletionActual
Aug 1, 2018
Last update
Oct 12, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03389269
Responsible party
Christina Charlotte Nexoe-Larsen (MD, pH.D student, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2018
Start date
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2018
Completion
Aug 1, 2018
Last update
Oct 12, 2018

Study contacts

Filip K Knop, MD, Proff
principal investigator · Center for diabetes research, gentofte hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion