CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03386643Updated Mar 27, 2020

Effect of Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis HN019 on Oral Lichen Planus

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 and Clobetasol propionate 0.05% in Oral Lichen Planus, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-27.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory mucocutaneous disease, which often results in oral manifestations, receiving the name of oral lichen planus (OLP). Its frequency varies from 0,1 to 4% of the general population, with a higher incidence in women, around the 4th and 5th decades of life. Although the pathogenesis of OLP is related to a immune-cellular response, mainly mediated by T lymphocytes, its cause remains unknown. Considering its chronic nature, control of OLP aims to reduce symptoms and improve function, and agents with anti-inflammatory action, especially topical corticosteroids result in some degree of success in most patients, depending on the clinical presentation. However, some cases are resistant to the use of corticosteroids, thus justifying the search for new therapeutic options. The immunomodulation proved to be one of the main functions of probiotic bacteria, and recent studies have shown effect of probiotics on decreasing the expression of inflammatory markers, which enables the study of this therapy as an alternative to the control of OLP. Thus, this project aims to evaluate the effects of therapy with Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 comparing with clobetasol propionate 0.05% in symptomatic patients with OLP referred for diagnosis and treatment of School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo (USP). The impact of the topical therapy (probiotic or corticosteroid) on the clinical, histopathological and immunopathological features will be evaluated. This project was previously submitted and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto/USP, and all patients must give informed consent to participate in this study.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized double-blind clinical trial with symptomatic patients presenting OLP, which will be randomly assigned to either topical Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis HN019 or clobetasol propionate 0.05%. The selected patients will receive capsules to be diluted in 15 ml of water containing 6 x 109 CFUs of Bifidobacterium subsp. lactis HN019 (experimental group) or 0.05% clobetasol propionate (control group) for mouth washing, twice a day for 4 weeks. Patients will be instructed to maintain normal brushing and not to use or consume another corticosteroid and /or probiotic during the study. Outcomes measures will be symptoms (VAS and Likert-like scale), quality of life (SF-36 form), and clinical changes (erythema, reticulation, erosion/ulcer based on clinical photographs), which will be performed at baseline, 15 days (only VAS, Likert-like scale and photographs) and and at one month of treatment. All patients will undergo biopsies for the diagnosis of OLP, and those who consent will be submitted to an optional biopsy at the end of the topical treatment for histopathological and immunopathological characterization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oral Lichen Planus

Keywords

  • Oral lichen planus
  • Probiotics
  • Immunomodulation.
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical inclusion

    • Adults ≥ 18 years old, both genres, who consent to participate of the study;
    • Presence of symptomatic reticular lesion and/or white-gray papules. In afro-descendent individuals, reticular lesions may be associated with hyperpigmented lesions;
    • Additional clinical features such as ulcerative, erythematous, plaque and bullous lesions will be accepted in the presence of bilateral and symmetrical reticular lesions.
  • Histopathological inclusion criteria

    • Presence of subepithelial infiltrate predominantly lymphocytic, in band and confined to the subepithelial area.
    • Liquefaction degeneration of the basal cells layer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical exclusion criteria

    • Exclusion of contact lichenoid lesions: the pattern of reticular lesion and / or papules should not be present only in areas of physical contact with restorative materials;
    • Exclusion of lichenoid reaction to the drug: difficult to differentiate from OLP, however it is necessary to report all drugs in use by the patient; the comparison between patients on medication, and those who do not use medication is important to establish subgroups of OLP;
    • Exclusion of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD): differentiation between OLP and GVHD is established in most cases by medical history;
    • Exclusion of immunocompromised patients or patients with systemic diseases of high complexity.
    • Exclusion of patients who have previously used probiotic bacteria in the last 4 weeks prior to the study.
  • Histopathological criteria for exclusion • Presence of epithelial dysplasia, absence of the lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate band and liquefaction degeneration.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis

    Intervention: Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019

    Drug: Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019

  • Active comparator
    Clobetasol propionate 0.05%

    Intervention: Clobetasol propionate 0.05%

    Drug: Clobetasol propionate 0.05%

Interventions

  • DrugBifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019

    The selected patients will receive capsules to be diluted in 15 ml of water containing 6 x 109 CFUs of Bifidobacterium subsp. lactis HN019 for mouthwash twice a day for 4 weeks.

    Also known as: Probiotic

  • DrugClobetasol propionate 0.05%

    The selected patients will receive capsules to be diluted in 15ml of water containing clobetasol propionate 0.05% for mouthwash twice a day for 4 weeks.

    Also known as: Topical corticosteroid

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in symptoms intensity measure

    Self reported symptoms at baseline, 15 and 30 days after therapy through an visual analogue scale (VAS). It consists of a subjective scale scoring the symptoms from 0 to 10 (0 = no symptoms and 10 = as bad as can be).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Histopathological analysis

    Biopsies will be collected at the baseline stage or at the time of the diagnosis of OLP (optional), consisting of a 5mm x 5mm fragment or a 4mm punch of reticular lesions. The second biopsy will be optional, with patient consent, close to the area of the first biopsy for comparative purposes. The histological findings will be determined quantitatively and qualitatively regarding the presence of epithelial hyperplasia, degeneration by liquefaction of the basal cells layer, lymphocytic infiltrate in the subepithelial connective tissue, and apoptotic cells. Photographs will be used at 400x and quantification using the Image J. program.

    Time frame: Before (baseline) and one month after intensive topical therapy

  2. Immunohistochemical analysis

    The population of inflammatory cells will be characterized by analysis of oral mucosa samples, with emphasis on the T cell line (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD103, perforin, granzyme B and Foxp3), B cells (CD20 / CD20), dendritic cells (CD123 and CD303), submucosal dendritic cells (CD209 and factor XIIIa), Langerhans cells (CD1a and CD207), endothelial activity (e-selectin and CD31), mast cells ), macrophages (CD68 and CD163), myeloid dendritic cells (S100 and CD11c), cell proliferation markers (Ki-67, MCM-2, MCM-5, cyclin D1) and extracellular matrix (laminin-5). For immunohistochemical reactions, histological sections of 3μm thickness will be performed, which will be placed on slides coated with organosilane (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of intensive therapy.

  3. Venous blood collection

    10 ml of venous blood to evaluate the probiotic systemic effect, by means of the research of pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines.

    Time frame: Before (baseline) and after 4 weeks of topical therapy

06

Study locations

1 site
  • School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo
    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo 14040-904, Brazil
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Han X, Zhang J, Tan Y, Zhou G. Probiotics: A non-conventional therapy for oral lichen planus. Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Sep;81:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 Apr 26. PubMed 28499235 ↗
  • Garcia-Pola MJ, Gonzalez-Alvarez L, Garcia-Martin JM. Treatment of oral lichen planus. Systematic review and therapeutic guide. Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Oct 23;149(8):351-362. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 28. English, Spanish. PubMed 28756997 ↗
  • Sivaraman S, Santham K, Nelson A, Laliytha B, Azhalvel P, Deepak JH. A randomized triple-blind clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of topical triamcinolone acetonate (0.1%), clobetasol propionate (0.05%), and tacrolimus orabase (0.03%) in the management of oral lichen planus. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016 Oct;8(Suppl 1):S86-S89. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.191976. PubMed 27829754 ↗
  • Ricoldi MST, Furlaneto FAC, Oliveira LFF, Teixeira GC, Pischiotini JP, Moreira ALG, Ervolino E, de Oliveira MN, Bogsan CSB, Salvador SL, Messora MR. Effects of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis on the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis. A histomorphometric, microtomographic and immunohistochemical study in rats. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179946. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28662142 ↗
  • Gerhard D, Sousa FJDSS, Andraus RAC, Pardo PE, Nai GA, Neto HB, Messora MR, Maia LP. Probiotic therapy reduces inflammation and improves intestinal morphology in rats with induced oral mucositis. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jul 3;31:e71. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0071. PubMed 28678976 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03386643
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Responsible party
Ana Carolina Fragoso Motta, DDS, PhD (Teacher of Oral Diagnosis-Department of Stomatology, Public Oral Health and Forensic Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 29, 2017
Start date
Nov 6, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2018
Completion
Dec 6, 2019
Last update
Mar 27, 2020

Study contacts

Michel Reis Messora, DDS, PhD
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Sergio L. Souza Salvador, DDS, PhD
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Átila V. Vitor Nobre, DDS
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Cristhiam de J. Hernández Martínez, DDS
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Kleber Tanaka Suzuki, DDS
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Marina C. Gabriel Del Arco
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Lara Maria A Innocentini, DDS,PhD
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Gilberto A Silva, MS
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Ellen E Monteiro, Student
study chair · University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion