ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03386474Updated Jan 5, 2021Results posted

Study of Safety and Efficacy of Brolucizumab 6 mg Drug Product Intended for Commercialization in Patients With nAMD

A Phase 3 interventional study of Brolucizumab 6 mg and Aflibercept 2 mg in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 65 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-05.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
151
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 20 studies testing brolucizumab in Macular Degeneration — none open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. brolucizumab · Macular Degeneration.

Enrollment
9th of 20
151 · median 101
Started
2018
with 1 other
Phase 3
11 of 20
none open now
Registered
4th of 20
by date
Lead sponsor
12 of 20
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Among the 20 studies testing brolucizumab in Macular Degeneration, this one is the 9th largest by enrollment, is one of 2 that started in 2018, is one of 11 in phase 3, and was the 4th registered.

Macular Degeneration

1,459 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 236 are open to participants now.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 20 studies testing brolucizumab in Macular Degeneration is open now. The open studies under Macular Degeneration, anywhere →

About brolucizumab

brolucizumab: first FDA approval 2019 (BEOVU), first EMA approval 2020. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 165 Macular Degeneration studies recruiting now, 116 (70%) set no upper age limit and 5 (3%) stop at 75 or younger; 19 take children under 18; 35 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 50 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 20 studies testing brolucizumab in Macular Degeneration as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this extension study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg ophthalmic solution when given to the same patients who received brolucizumab in the core trial CRTH258A2301 (also known as CRTH258-C002). The medical condition treated in the core and extension trials was neo-vascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Read the detailed description

Subjects in the United States who had completed the 96 week core trial, CRTH258A2301 (also referred as CRTH258-C002), were eligible to participate in the extension trial provided the core trial Visit 26 at week 96, was less than or equal to 12 weeks from the Baseline Visit in the extension trial, CRTH258A2301E1.

Subjects who were treated with aflibercept during the core trial and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial continued to receive aflibercept in this extension trial in order to maintain the masking during the extension trial. No hypothesis testing or descriptive analyses were planned.

Subjects who were treated in the core trial with brolucizumab 3mg or brolucizumab 6 mg, and met the eligibility requirements of this extension trial, received the new formulation of brolucizumab 6 mg solution in the extension trial.

Enrolled subjects were to receive three intravitreal (IVT) ophthalmic injections. The study eye was the same eye that received the treatment in the core study. The extension trial consisted of 7 study visits at 4 week intervals over a period of 24 weeks.

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding core-study efficacy and safety data serving as the reference. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned.

03

Conditions studied

  • Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

  • double-masked, extension study
  • neovascular age-related macular degeneration
  • intravitreal injection
  • brolucizumab
  • aflibercept
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Sign written
  • Completed the core study, CRTH258A2301, also known as CRTH258-C002 as defined by assessments at Visit 26/Week 96 within ≤12 weeks of the baseline.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient discontinued the treatment or the core study prematurely at any time
  • Patient received standard of care treatment for nAMD after completion of the core study
  • Pregnant or nursing women and women of
  • Stroke or MI (myocardial infarction) within 3 months of the baseline extension visit
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorized to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
151 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brolucizumab

    Brolucizumab 6 mg solution for IVT injection, single injection at Day 1 (baseline), Week 8, and Week 16 or Week 20

    Drug: Brolucizumab 6 mg

  • Other
    Aflibercept

    Aflibercept 2 mg solution for IVT injection, single injection at Day 1 (baseline), Week 8 and Week 16 to maintain the masking of the extension trial only.

    Drug: Aflibercept 2 mg

Interventions

  • Administered as opthalmic solution for an intravitreal injection to the study eye

    Also known as: RTH258

  • Administered as an opthalmic solution for intravitreal injection to the study eye

    Also known as: EYELEA

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Number of participants with ocular and non-ocular treatment emergent events with the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg in this extension trial up to week 24 vs. the corresponding last 6 months of brolucizumab treatment in the Core trial \>= 2%. Safety assessment of the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding Core safety data. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of Loss in BCVA of 15 Letters or More From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

  2. Change in BCVA From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Time frame: Extension baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

  3. Patients With Positive q12w Treatment Status at Week 20

    The estimate for the proportion of patients with a positive q12w treatment status at Week 24 was derived from Kaplan Meier time-to-event analyses for the event 'first q8w-need'. The outcome of the Kaplan-Meier analysis was estimated probability for maintaining on q12w up to the Disease Activity Assessment (DAA) at exWeek 20. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Time frame: Week 20

  4. Change in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Measurement of the central subfield thickness of the retina was assessed using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at each visit for the study eye. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24

  5. Percentage of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status for Brolucuzumab 6 mg in Extension

    Positive integrated anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status is defined as induced ADA status with ADA negative at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value of greater than or equal to 30 at any time point or boosted ADA status with ADA positive at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value increase by more than 3-fold (1 dilution) at any time point. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

    Time frame: Extension Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

07

Results

Posted Apr 30, 2020

Participant flow

150 subjects who completed the 96 week CORE trial (RTH258-C001) were eligible to continue in the extension. 62 CORE sub. were treated w/ brolucizumab 3mg \& 45 CORE sub. w/ brolucizumab 6mg. These 107 sub. were treated in the extension w/ new formulation 6 mg brolucizumab. 43 subjects treated with aflibercept 2 mg in the CORE continued aflibercept.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBrolucizumab - Overall Extension StudyAflibercept
Started10743
Completed10642
Not completed11
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Adverse event01

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Number of participants with ocular and non-ocular treatment emergent events with the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg in this extension trial up to week 24 vs. the corresponding last 6 months of brolucizumab treatment in the Core trial \>= 2%. Safety assessment of the new formulation brolucizumab 6 mg was based on a within-patient comparison with the last 6 months of corresponding Core safety data. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
ParticipantsBrolucizumab - Overall Extension StudyBrolucizumab Overall Last 6 Months From Core Study
Ocular AEs2025
Non-Ocular AEs5150
SecondaryChange of Loss in BCVA of 15 Letters or More From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame:
Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Number of Participants
Change of Loss in BCVA of 15 Letters or More From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Number of ParticipantsBrolucizumab 6 mg - 3 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab 6 mg - 6 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab - Overall Extension Study
exWeek 4 (>=15 letters loss)202
exWeek 8 (>=15 letters loss)404
exWeek 12 (>=15 letters loss)404
exWeek 16 (>=15 letters loss)606
exWeek 20 (>=15 letters loss)404
exWeek 24 (>=15 letters loss)303
SecondaryChange in BCVA From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

Best-corrected visual acuity for the study eye was tested at all study visits in a sitting position using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing protocol at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame:
Extension baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Letter read
Change in BCVA From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
Letter readBrolucizumab 6 mg - 3 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab 6 mg - 6 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab - Overall Extension Study
exWeek 4-1.3 ± 6.260.5 ± 3.81-0.5 ± 5.42
exWeek 8-1.7 ± 6.90-0.4 ± 4.29-1.2 ± 5.96
exWeek 12-2.7 ± 7.73-0.3 ± 5.17-1.7 ± 6.84
exWeek 16-3.9 ± 8.420.8 ± 5.36-1.9 ± 7.63
exWeek 20-3.4 ± 7.660.5 ± 7.34-1.8 ± 7.75
exWeek 24-2.0 ± 8.170.3 ± 6.79-1.0 ± 7.67
SecondaryPatients With Positive q12w Treatment Status at Week 20

The estimate for the proportion of patients with a positive q12w treatment status at Week 24 was derived from Kaplan Meier time-to-event analyses for the event 'first q8w-need'. The outcome of the Kaplan-Meier analysis was estimated probability for maintaining on q12w up to the Disease Activity Assessment (DAA) at exWeek 20. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of patients
Patients With Positive q12w Treatment Status at Week 20
Percentage of patientsBrolucizumab 6 mg - 3 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab 6 mg- 6 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab - Overall Extension Study
Patients With Positive q12w Treatment Status at Week 2063.363.163.3
SecondaryChange in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit

Measurement of the central subfield thickness of the retina was assessed using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at each visit for the study eye. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame:
Extension Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · micrometer
Change in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) From Extension Baseline at Each Post-baseline Visit
micrometerBrolucizumab 6 mg - 3 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab 6 mg- 6 mg in Core StudyBrolucizumab - Overall Extension Study
exWeek 4-19.2 ± 39.29-17.5 ± 40.76-18.5 ± 39.74
exWeek 8-6.3 ± 25.47-18.9 ± 31.74-11.6 ± 28.82
exWeek 12-17.9 ± 43.07-28.9 ± 48.80-22.5 ± 45.66
exWeek 16-7.8 ± 31.94-11.7 ± 39.83-9.4 ± 35.35
exWeek 20-10.1 ± 59.04-15.3 ± 46.20-12.3 ± 53.84
exWeek 24-19.8 ± 37.67-24.6 ± 42.10-21.8 ± 39.47
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status for Brolucuzumab 6 mg in Extension

Positive integrated anti-drug antibodies (ADA) status is defined as induced ADA status with ADA negative at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value of greater than or equal to 30 at any time point or boosted ADA status with ADA positive at pre-dose and a post-dose titer value increase by more than 3-fold (1 dilution) at any time point. Outcome measure was prespecified for brolucizumab arm only. Neither the patient selection process nor expected sample sizes supported a valid comparison between aflibercept and brolucizumab. The aflibercept arm was included only to maintain the masking in the extension trial. Data was presented descriptively for only brolucizumab in line with the study objective. No formal hypothesis testing was planned. Missing brolucizumab data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Time frame:
Extension Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status for Brolucuzumab 6 mg in Extension
Percentage of participantsBrolucizumab - Overall Extension Study
Percentage of Subjects With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status for Brolucuzumab 6 mg in Extension54

Adverse events

Collected over From first treatment in the extension study, through study completion, to an average of 24 weeks. Adverse events and serious adverse events were collected for the maximum actual duration of treatment exposure and follow up for a participant per the protocol for approximately 6 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Brolucizumab 6mg Overall Extension Study1/107 (0.9%)7/107 (6.5%)12/107 (11.2%)
Brolucizumab Overall Last 6 Months Core Study0/107 (0%)7/107 (6.5%)14/107 (13.1%)
Aflibercept 2 mg0/43 (0%)10/43 (23.3%)13/43 (30.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent serious events
EventBrolucizumab 6mg Overall Extension StudyBrolucizumab Overall Last 6 Months Core StudyAflibercept 2 mg
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/1070/1073/43
Anaemia macrocyticBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1070/1071/43
LymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1070/1071/43
Left ventricular failureCardiac disorders0/1070/1071/43
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/1070/1071/43
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders0/1070/1071/43
Necrotising fasciitisInfections and infestations0/1070/1071/43
OsteomyelitisInfections and infestations0/1070/1071/43
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/1070/1071/43
SepsisInfections and infestations0/1070/1071/43
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventBrolucizumab 6mg Overall Extension StudyBrolucizumab Overall Last 6 Months Core StudyAflibercept 2 mg
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations4/1076/1076/43
Cataract - Fellow eyeEye disorders1/1071/1073/43
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration - Fellow eyeEye disorders2/1072/1073/43
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/1074/1073/43
HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders0/1071/1073/43

Baseline characteristics

The Extension safety set includes all subjects who entered the extension study and received at least one injection of study treatment in this extension study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Brolucizumab - Overall Extension StudyAfliberceptTotal
Mean80.6 ± 8.6377.9 ± 9.2079.8 ± 8.85
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Brolucizumab - Overall Extension StudyAfliberceptTotal
Female692291
Male382159
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Brolucizumab - Overall Extension StudyAfliberceptTotal
Hispanic or Latino11617
Not Hispanic or Latino9537132
Unknown or Not Reported101
08

Study locations

65 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Peoria, Arizona 85381, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85014, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Arcadia, California 91006, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Loma Linda, California 92354, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Oakland, California 94609, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Redlands, California 92374, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sacramento, California 95841, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80909, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bridgeport, Connecticut 06606, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    New London, Connecticut 06320, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33064, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912-7125, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ocala, Florida 34474, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pensacola, Florida 32503, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tallahassee, Florida 32308, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vero Beach, Florida 32960, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Winter Haven, Florida 33880, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Boise, Idaho 83713, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bloomington, Illinois 61704, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46280, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Leawood, Kansas 66211, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66204, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21237-4350, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Waldorf, Maryland 20602, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89144, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Reno, Nevada 89502, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Toms River, New Jersey 08755, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rochester, New York 14620, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Shirley, New York 11967, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Syracuse, New York 13224, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28210, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Southern Pines, North Carolina 28387, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dublin, Ohio 43016, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fairfield, Ohio 45014, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Abilene, Texas 79606, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Austin, Texas 78731, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Houston, Texas 77025, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Plano, Texas 75093, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78215, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78240, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23235, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Warrenton, Virginia 20186, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Silverdale, Washington 98383, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    University Place, Washington 98467, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Arecibo, 00612, Puerto Rico
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    San Juan, 00907, Puerto Rico
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Sep 2018, 7 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2020, 1 year 7 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Feb 2019.

Of 77 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Macular Degeneration, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 33. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 83 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 11, 2017
First posted
Dec 29, 2017
StartActual
Jan 15, 2018
Primary completionActual
Sep 6, 2018
CompletionActual
Sep 6, 2018
Results delay requested
Feb 15, 2019
Results first posted
Apr 30, 2020
Last update
Jan 5, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03386474
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 29, 2017
Start date
Jan 15, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 6, 2018
Completion
Sep 6, 2018
Results posted
Apr 30, 2020
Last update
Jan 5, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Track this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to track

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Brolucizumab

Start the discussion