CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03385408Updated Feb 22, 2023

Effectiveness of HILT in Shoulder Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of HIRO® 3.0 and Sham laser in Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder, sponsored by University of Rzeszow. Completed at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-22.

Sponsored by University of Rzeszow · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will determine the efficacy of High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) for the treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

Shoulder osteoarthritis (SO) is a musculoskeletal joint disease that affects the elderly. SO is characterized by degeneration of the articular cartilage in the involved joints and its underlying bone within a joint as well as bony overgrowth. It is one of the major causes of physical disability that has a social and public health impact due to pain, stiffness, joint instability, and muscle weakness.

The diagnosed patients with SO will be treated with HILT for a total of ten sessions during the entire duration of the treatment protocol. Parameters to be evaluated are: range of motion, pressure pain (algometer), pain perception (Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Modified Laitinen Pain Questionnaire), quality of life (WHOQoL-BREF) These parameters will be recorded before the first treatment (baseline), after completion of treatment, three and 12 months after completion treatment. A change in above parameters will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. painful osteoarthritis of the shoulder for at least 6 months
  2. not engage in any other treatment during treatment period
  3. pain ≥4 on the visual analog scale (VAS) in the previous 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. presence of any other musculoskeletal problems associated with the shoulder joint, such as fracture, tendon or ligament tears, meniscus injury, rheumatoid arthritis, or shoulder surgery
  2. receiving physical therapy and/or intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections during the last 6 months
  3. absolute and relative contraindications of Laser Therapy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HILT group

    High-intensity laser therapy application through HIRO 3.0 device

    Device: HIRO® 3.0

  • Sham comparator
    Placebo group

    Sham high-intensity laser therapy application through HIRO 3.0 device

    Device: Sham laser

Interventions

  • DeviceHIRO® 3.0

    Patients will receive pulsed Nd:YAG (yttrium aluminum garnet) laser, produced by HIRO 3.0 device (ASA, Vicenza, Italy). The total energy deliver to the patient during one session will be 3.000 J through three phases of treatment. HILT will be applied for a total of 4 weeks (three sessions/week).

  • DeviceSham laser

    For sham laser, the patient will attended the physical therapy clinic three times a week for 4 weeks and receive sham laser. It is applies the same time than experimental one but with 0 W.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the pain perception

    Evolution of pain (Visual Analogic Scale and the Modified Laitinen Pain Questionnaire) between baseline, after the end of the protocol treatment, 3 and 12 months after the end of the protocol treatment

    Time frame: at baseline, immediately after treatment completion, 3 and 12 months after treatment completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the quality of life

    Comparison of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire mean between baseline, immediately after treatment the end of the protocol treatment, 3 and 12 months after the end of the protocol treatment. Quantitative evaluation of the primary outcome.

    Time frame: at baseline, immediately after treatment completion, 3 and 12 months after treatment completion

  2. Change in the range of motion

    Comparison of the range of motion between baseline, immediately after the end of the protocol treatment, 3 and 12 months after the end of the protocol treatment. Quantitative evaluation of the primary outcome.

    Time frame: at baseline, immediately after treatment completion, 3 and 12 months after treatment completion

  3. Change in the pressure pain

    Comparison of the pressure pain (algometer) between baseline, immediately after the end of the protocol treatment, 3 and 12 months after the end of the protocol treatment. Quantitative evaluation of the primary outcome.

    Time frame: at baseline, immediately after treatment completion, 3 and 12 months after treatment completion

06

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Rzeszów
    Rzeszów, 35-205, Poland
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03385408
Lead sponsor
University of Rzeszow
Responsible party
Justyna Wyszyńska (Principal Investigator, University of Rzeszow) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 28, 2017
Start date
Jan 2, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 21, 2018
Completion
Aug 21, 2019
Last update
Feb 22, 2023

Study contacts

Justyna Wyszyńska, PhD
principal investigator · University of Rzeszow

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion