ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03383341HOPUpdated Apr 4, 2019

What's Hopping? Cricket Protein and Human Gut Microbiota

An interventional study of Cricket Protein Powder and Placebo control in Healthy, sponsored by Colorado State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-04.

Sponsored by Colorado State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2017, registered Dec 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Edible insects are often considered a nutritious, protein-rich, environmentally sustainable alternative to traditional meat. They represent a new food for North American consumers. While the nutrient composition of several insects is characterized, all potential health impacts have not been evaluated. Crickets contain chitin and other fibers that may influence gut health. In this study, we evaluated the effects of consuming 25 grams/day whole cricket powder on gut microbiota composition, while assessing safety and tolerability. Twenty healthy adults participated in this six-week, double-blind, crossover dietary intervention. Participants were randomized into two treatment arms and consumed either cricket-containing or control breakfast foods for 14 days, followed by a 14-day washout period and assignment to the opposite arm. Blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and after each treatment period to assess liver function and microbiota changes. Results demonstrate that cricket consumption is tolerable and non-toxic at the treatment dose. Cricket powder supported growth of the probiotic bacteria, Bifidobacterium animalis, which increased more than 5.7-fold. Cricket consumption was also associated with reduced plasma TNF-a. These data suggest that eating crickets may improve gut health and reduce systemic inflammation; however, more research is needed to understand these effects and underlying mechanisms.

Read the detailed description

Although no research on the impact of edible insect protein powder on the human microbiome, there is plenty of evidence that edible insects offer a good source nutrition. Extensive research demonstrates that edible insects provide a source of high-quality bioavailable animal protein as many edible insects contain all essential amino acids for human nutrition and have high crude protein levels containing between 40 and 75% protein by dry weight. House crickets, for example, have more protein by dry weight than ground beef or broiled cod fish. Insects are also rich in healthy fatty acids, B vitamins (riboflavin, pantothenic acid, biotin, and folate, as well as important minerals such as iron and zinc. In addition to their nutrient content, and as arthropods, edible insects are also rich in dietary fiber, including chitin, which is found in the exoskeleton.

Chitin is a modified polysaccharide containing nitrogen; it is considered an insoluble fiber with potential prebiotic properties that could benefit human health by selectively promoting the growth of beneficial bacterial species in the intestines. Previous studies on the impact of chitin-glucan derived from Aspergillus niger mycelium on oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) in adults, a risk factor for atherosclerosis, found that chitin-glucan intakes of 4.5g/day significantly reduced OxLDL in 6 weeks. Additionally, a study of chito-oligosaccharides found that chitosan derivatives from shrimp cells with a great content of acetylated residues did not cause a putatively prebiotic effect in human gut microbiota-although this study was conducted on human fecal microbiota in batch cultures (not in humans). To date, no comprehensive study has evaluated the impact of whole insect consumption on the microbiota in humans, which would include consumption of insect-derived dietary fibers and chitins with potential health benefits. An assessment of the tolerability of whole insect consumption is also needed, despite the fact that around 2 billion people consume insects on a regular basis in 130 countries or more.

The "What's Hopping? Cricket Protein and Human Gut Microbiota" study will determine the impact of a commercially available insect flour, containing high levels of protein and dietary fiber on human gut bacterial composition and functional capacity. A secondary aim is to establish whether insect powder acts as a prebiotic. In this study, a 100% insect-based flour/powder derived from edible crickets (Acheta domesticus) will be assessed. The objective of this study is to determine if Insect powder consumption changes gut bacteria and reduces inflammation in your intestinal tract compared to a placebo. To this end, we intend to enroll 20 healthy individuals to participate in a crossover diet intervention study. Participants will consume meals made with cricket powder and placebo meals daily for 2 weeks per treatment arm with a 2-week washout period. Both study participants and study personnel (clinical coordinators, PI's, statisticians) will be blinded to the intervention group. Anthropometric measures, as well as stool and blood samples, will be collected at each of 3 clinic visits (baseline, and the end of each intervention period). Primary outcome measures will include gut microbiota and microbial metabolism (determined by measuring fecal short chain fatty acids), local and systemic inflammatory markers, comprehensive metabolic panels and GI health questionnaires to assess safety and tolerability of the intervention foods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • gut microbiota
  • cricket powder
  • prebiotic fiber
  • inflammation
  • dietary intervention
03

In context

Inflammation

3,536 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 642 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 2,577 interventional studies indexed under Inflammation.

Browse Inflammation studies →

Lead sponsor

Colorado State University is the lead sponsor of 117 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Apparently healthy males and non-pregnant or lactating healthy females of any race or ethnicity and between the ages of 18-65 with a between 18.5-29.9.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals younger than 18 years of age or older than 65 years, and those outside of the range of 18.5-29.9 will be excluded. Individuals will also be excluded if they have taken antibiotics or commercial probiotic/prebiotic supplements within two months of the start of the study treatment. Subjects who self-report food allergies will be excluded from the study because some proteins in insect foods are similar to those found in shellfish that could trigger an allergic reaction and tree nut or dairy products may be used in the breakfast foods.

Additionally, current medications and dietary supplements will be assessed on a case by case basis and will result in exclusion if there is a possibility that the drugs or supplements used would influence the endpoints of the study. This would include statins, metformin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI), and botanical supplements that target the gastrointestinal tract or gut microbiota. Individuals with current diagnosis of cancer, liver or kidney disease, gastrointestinal diseases, and metabolic disorders will also be excluded. Pregnant and breastfeeding women will be excluded from the study as well. Additionally, exclusion will be determined if the individual feels they are unable to adhere to the study requirements which include consuming 1 prepared breakfast per day (treatment or placebo) for a total of 28 days (treatment periods), making 3 clinic visits, and providing 3 blood and stool samples.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cricket powder protein

    Participants were provided with frozen 70 gram breakfast muffins and pre-mixed powder packets to prepare smoothies. Participants were asked to consume one muffin package and one smoothie (mixed with water or choice of milk/milk substitutes) daily for 14 days. The amount of intervention food consumed daily contained 25 grams of cricket protein powder.

    Dietary Supplement: Cricket Protein Powder

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Control

    Participants were provided with a placebo comparator that included frozen 70 gram breakfast muffins and pre-mixed powder packets to prepare smoothies. Participants were asked to consume one muffin package and one smoothie (mixed with water or choice of milk/milk substitutes) daily for 14 days. These foods were formulated to taste and appear similar to the cricket intervention foods but did not consume any cricket powder.

    Other: Placebo control

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementCricket Protein Powder

    Cricket powder was supplied by Entomo farms and consists of roasted and milled whole crickets.

  • OtherPlacebo control

    Placebo controls consisted of intervention foods (muffin and smoothie powder packet) that were visually and organoleptically similar to cricket-containing foods but contained no cricket powder.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in gut microbiota with intervention foods

    Characterization of microbes in fecal samples using 16s sequencing methodologies.

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in liver function with intervention foods

    Comprehensive metabolic panel

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

  2. Tolerability of intervention foods based on change in GI symptoms

    Self assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms determined by completion of a questionnaire

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

  3. Change in mucosal immunity with intervention foods

    ELISA analysis of secretory Immunoglobulin A (sIgA) in stool samples

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

  4. Change in microbial metabolism with intervention foods

    Gas Chromatography determination of fecal short chain fatty acids

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

  5. Change in lipid metabolism with intervention foods

    Liquid Chromatography determination of fecal secondary and primary bile acids

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

  6. Change in systemic inflammation with intervention foods

    Luminex panel to examine 13 circulating cytokines (pro and anti-inflammatory)

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in lipid absorption with intervention foods

    Colorimetric measure of fecal triglycerides

    Time frame: T=0; Baseline visit prior to starting diet intervention, T1: End of Treatment 1 (2-weeks after the start of intervention), T2: End of study (approximately 6-weeks after T=0 and 2-weeks after starting treatment 2.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Colorado State University
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1571, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Stull VJ, Finer E, Bergmans RS, Febvre HP, Longhurst C, Manter DK, Patz JA, Weir TL. Impact of Edible Cricket Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 17;8(1):10762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29032-2. PubMed 30018370 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03383341
Responsible party
Tiffany Weir (Associate Professor, Colorado State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 26, 2017
Start date
Feb 1, 2017
Primary completion
May 10, 2017
Completion
May 10, 2017
Last update
Apr 4, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion