ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03383211IMMUNEOUpdated Oct 20, 2021

Immune Response to BCG Vaccination in Neonates Born to HIV and LTBI Infected and Non-infected Mothers

An observational study in HIV Infections, Neonatal Infection and LTBI - Latent Tuberculosis Infection, sponsored by George Washington University. Completed at 2 sites in Moldova, Republic of. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-20.

Sponsored by George Washington University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Maternal infections affect the basal immune status of neonates. One of the possible mechanism is the fetomaternal microchimerism, in which some cells and active substances are exchanged bi-directionally between maternal and fetal circulation through placenta. Even in the absence of a direct (vertical) transmission of pathogens to fetuses, certain infections make the neonates more prone to allergies and some adverse events of early vaccinations. We postulate that the basal immune status of neonates born to HIV and LTBI infected mothers is primed by gestational exposure to immunological active molecules, which could results in an altered response to early BCG vaccination. Transcripts expression identified by RNA sequencing are compared between sets of mother-child and their respective umbilical cord blood, and between groups of infected and non-infected pairs.

Read the detailed description

The study is comparing the transcriptomic profiles of maternal peripheral blood with those of the corresponding umbilical cord blood and neonatal peripheral blood pre- and post-BCG vaccination.

For RNA sequencing, the samples are collected in Tempus RNA Blood tubes at 5 time-points (TP): maternal peripheral blood at the time of initial diagnosis with HIV (first OBGYN consultation @ 12-16 weeks of pregnancy - TP1); repeated HIV test in 3rd trimester of pregnancy (34-36 weeks- TP2); umbilical cord blood (after delivery and ligation- TP3); neonates (24 hours after birth and after HBV vaccination, prior to BCG vaccination- TP4); and neonates (7 days after BCG vaccination- TP5).

As an indicator of the inflammatory status, the peripheral blood samples collected at the same TP are stained for serological markers of inflammation, exhaustion, maturation and activation.

An advanced bioinformatics analysis examines the immune-associated transcripts in RNAseq samples to assess the V(D)J recombination of T-cell and B-cell receptors along with immune-associated SNPs.

The main goal of the study is to identify in umbilical cord blood the genomic biomarkers of the neonatal basal immune status for guiding an optimal BCG immunization protocol for such neonates and to avoid potential adverse events after vaccination.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infections
  • Neonatal Infection
  • LTBI - Latent Tuberculosis Infection
  • Immune Tolerance

Keywords

  • RNAseq
  • Next Generation Sequencing
  • Transcriptome
  • Peripheral blood transcripts
  • Tempus Blood RNA Tubes
03

In context

HIV Infections

4,734 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 244 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is below the median of 200 across 781 observational studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

George Washington University is the lead sponsor of 192 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (85%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant women, 18-45 years old who consented for participation in the study. All women are managed by the local national healthcare system without any interventions from the research team. The collection of samples is performed by the local trained medical personnel, and the samples are processed in a research laboratory.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Pregnant women, 18-45 years old, capable of reading and understanding the and the purpose of the study The newborns of the enrolled pregnant women. Women of reproductive age with or without and LTBI infections

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant women younger than 18 years or older than 45 years of age Pregnant women and infants with known genetic abnormalities, including primary immunodeficiencies; or receiving therapy; Infants infected in utero, perinatally, or neonatally with virus, Treponema pallidum (syphilis), Toxoplasma gondii, rubella virus, cytomegalovirus, or herpes simplex virus.

Pregnant women with known history of alcohol or drug abuse, cancer diagnosis and treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, radiation.

Pregnant women with history of organ transplantation.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • HIV+

    Pregnant women diagnosed with HIV infection during pregnancy. No intervention beyond the standard care provided for such cohort.

    Other: RNAseq

  • LTBI

    Pregnant women diagnosed with Latent form of TB infection (LTBI). No intervention beyond the standard of care provided for such cohort.

    Other: RNAseq

  • HV+/LTBI

    Pregnant women diagnosed with HIV and LTBI co-infection. No intervention beyond the standard of care provided for such cohort.

    Other: RNAseq

  • Healthy Control

    Healthy pregnant women without HIV or LTBI. No intervention beyond the standard of care provided for such cohort.

    Other: RNAseq

Interventions

  • OtherRNAseq

    Transcriptome profiling of peripheral blood using RNA sequencing technology

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in immune-associated transcripts

    Identification of transcripts that are differential expressed between groups

    Time frame: Collection of samples 7-days after BCG vaccination

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Clinical Municipal Hospital No. 1
    Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of
  • National Center for Mother and Child Health
    Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Genomic data will be submitted to the NCBI SRA archive

Time frame: Upon completion of analysis

Access criteria: NCBI standard access criteria

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 38 months.

Of 187 non-industry observational studies under HIV Infections, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 69. This study's 38 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 201 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 69.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 19, 2017
First posted
Dec 26, 2017
StartActual
Jun 16, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Oct 20, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03383211
Collaborators
Universitatea de Stat de Medicina si Farmacie Nicolae Testemiţanu, Children's National Research Institute, DC-Center for Aids Research (DC-CFAR), SeqLL, Inc.
Responsible party
Ian Toma, MD, PhD (Associate Research Professor, George Washington University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 26, 2017
Start date
Jun 16, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2020
Completion
Jun 30, 2021
Last update
Oct 20, 2021

Study contacts

Ian Toma, MD, PhD
principal investigator · George Washington University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion