ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03377686Updated Dec 19, 2017

Breath Analysis in Children by New Point-of-care Instruments

An observational study in Asthma and Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 16 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-19.

Sponsored by Maastricht University Medical Center · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
56
Ages
6 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 11 studies in Asthma by Maastricht University Medical Center — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Asthma · Maastricht University Medical Center.

Started
2016
the only one that year
Observational
5 of 11
none open now
Registered
10th of 11
by date

Among the 11 studies in Asthma by Maastricht University Medical Center, this one is the only one that started in 2016, is one of 5 observational ones, and was the 10th registered.

Asthma

4,846 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 603 are open to participants now.

Browse Asthma studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 11 studies in Asthma by Maastricht University Medical Center is open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 417 Asthma studies recruiting now, 140 (34%) set no upper age limit and 205 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 147 take children under 18; 105 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 6 Years to 16 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Asthma by Maastricht University Medical Center, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

In this study new hand-held devices for measuring exhaled breath will be tested in children with asthma, CF, and healthy controls. Main objectives will be feasibility and discriminative value of these techniques.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Assessment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is a new recently developed non-invasive technique to assess airway inflammation. The non-invasive character makes it highly suitable for use in (preschool) children. However, the analysis of VOCs by gas chromatography mass spectrometry technique (GC-MS), the gold standard, is expensive and time consuming. Therefore, new hand-held devices (such as electronic Noses (eNoses) and Ion Mobility Spectrometer techniques) have been developed. However, these new point-of-care instruments have not been studied in children.

Objectives: 1) To test whether new point-of-care instruments for the measurement of VOCs in exhaled breath are feasible for use in children aged 6 to 16 years; 2) To explore whether these techniques can differentiate between healthy children, asthmatic children and children with Cystic Fibrosis (CF).

Study design: Cross-sectional study design. Several VOCs tests will be performed in all participants.Besides, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) will be measured.

Study population: Three groups of children aged 6 to 16 years: 20 healthy children, 20 children with doctor's diagnosed asthma, 20 children with CF.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Each technique will be evaluated for its use and feasibility in children. For each technique, VOC profiles between study groups will be evaluated for its discriminative power.

03

Conditions studied

  • Asthma
  • Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

  • paediatrics
  • breath analysis
  • volatile organic compounds
  • respiratory diseases
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Three groups of children aged 6 to 16 years: 20 healthy children, 20 children with doctor's diagnosed asthma, 20 children with CF.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 6 to 16 years
  • Healthy group: See exclusion criteria
  • Asthma group: Doctor's diagnosed asthma
  • Cystic Fibrosis group: A diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, confirmed by a sweat test or genetic analysis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Recent course of prednisone or antibiotics (\< 1 month before test)
  • Passive smoking
  • Other chronic inflammatory disease (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatic disease, auto-immune disease)
  • Healthy children:

    • No current or history of respiratory symptoms
    • No current or history of allergic rhinitis
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Asthma

    Inflammation markers in exhaled breath will be used in 20 children aged 6 to 16 years with doctor's diagnosed asthma

    Diagnostic Test: inflammation markers in exhaled breath

  • Cystic fibrosis

    Inflammation markers in exhaled breath will be used in 20 children aged 6 to 16 years with CF

    Diagnostic Test: inflammation markers in exhaled breath

  • Healthy

    Inflammation markers in exhaled breath will be used in 20 children aged 6 to 16 years old without respiratory diseases

    Diagnostic Test: inflammation markers in exhaled breath

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testinflammation markers in exhaled breath

    non-invasive, cross-sectional, assessment of inflammation markers in exhaled breath with various techniques (observational)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with adverse events directly related to the various point-of-care tests used

    Any adverse event of any kind will be noted. Furthermore, each participant will be asked whether the test was easy to perform. This question can be answered on a 5-point scale (0=totally agree that test was easy to perform, 4= totally disagree that test was easy to perform)

    Time frame: Questionnaire will be done directly after specific test (1 day). No long term (S)AE is expected and measurement of each test is only performed once.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of new point-of-care Aeonose eNose in diagnosing asthma.

    Aeonose eNose measurements will be analysed by in house software program (Aethena) developed by eNose company (Zutphen, Netherlands). To test sensitivity and specificity, first an area under the receiver operating curve must be calculated with the aforementioned software program. Hereafter sensitivity and specificity of the eNose can be calculated.

    Time frame: Measurements will be analysed within 6 to 12 months

  2. Sensitivity and Specificity of new point-of-care Aeonose eNose in diagnosing cystic fibrosis.

    Aeonose eNose measurements will be analysed by in house software program (Aethena) developed by eNose company (Zutphen, Netherlands). To test sensitivity and specificity, first an area under the receiver operating curve must be calculated with the aforementioned software program. Hereafter sensitivity and specificity of the eNose can be calculated.

    Time frame: Measurements will be analysed within 6 to 12 months

  3. Sensitivity and Specificity of Ion Mobility Spectrometry in diagnosing asthma.

    IMS measurements will be analysed by software program developed for using IMS data (Visual Now, Ganshorn, Dortmund, Germany). By IMS different VOCs peaks are generated. By using the aforementioned software, these peaks can be analysed and sensitivity and specificity between asthma and healthy children can be calculated.

    Time frame: Measurements will be analysed within 6 to 12 months

  4. Sensitivity and Specificity of Ion Mobility Spectrometry in diagnosing cystic fibrosis.

    IMS measurements will be analysed by software program developed for using IMS data (Visual Now, Ganshorn, Dortmund, Germany). By IMS different VOCs peaks are generated. By using the aforementioned software, these peaks can be analysed and sensitivity and specificity between CF and healthy children can be calculated.

    Time frame: Measurements will be analysed within 6 to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre
    Maastricht, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bannier MAGE, van de Kant KDG, Jobsis Q, Dompeling E. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of an electronic nose in children with asthma and cystic fibrosis. J Breath Res. 2019 May 8;13(3):036009. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aae158. PubMed 30213921 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2016 to primary completion in Nov 2017, 20 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 29, 2016
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
StartActual
Mar 2016
Primary completionActual
Nov 2017
CompletionActual
Dec 2017
Last update
Dec 19, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03377686
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Nov 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Last update
Dec 19, 2017

Study contacts

Edward Dompeling, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maastricht University Medical Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion