ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03372278Updated Sep 29, 2026

PMCF Study on the Safety and Performance of the Zimmer® Maxera™ Acetabular System in Total Hip Arthroplasty

An observational study in Rheumatoid Arthritis With Adequate Bone Quality, Inflammatory Arthritis and Osteoarthritis, Hip, sponsored by Zimmer Biomet. Active, not recruiting at 8 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-29.

Primary conditionOsteoarthritis, HipRegistry: ArthritisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Arthritis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Osteoarthritis, Hip, a narrower term within Arthritis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Zimmer Biomet · Observational

Updated Sep 29, 20262 sites added2 sites removedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a multicenter, prospective, non-controlled post market clinical follow-up study. The objectives of this study are to confirm the safety and performance of the commercially available Zimmer® Maxera™ Acetabular System in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

The objectives of this study are to confirm the safety and performance of the Zimmer Maxera Cup mated with either a BIOLOX® delta or BIOLOX® OPTION femoral head when used in primary total hip arthroplasty.

In total 250 patients will be enrolled into the study at up to 10 sites.All potential study subjects will be required to participate in the Informed Consent Process.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis With Adequate Bone Quality
  • Inflammatory Arthritis
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip
  • Avascular Necrosis
  • Post-traumatic; Arthrosis
  • Congenital Hip Dysplasia

Keywords

  • Total hip arthroplasty
  • Medical Device
  • Safety
  • Prothesis
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Hip Reclassified

641 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 250 is above the median of 135 across 158 observational studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

Zimmer Biomet is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (86%) have results posted.

Compared within Osteoarthritis, Hip, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Arthritis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients suffering from severe hip pain and disability requiring total hip arthroplasty and who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is 18 to 75 years of age, inclusive.
  • Patient is skeletally mature.
  • Patient qualifies for primary unilateral or simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on physical exam and medical history including at least one of the following:

    • Osteoarthritis
    • Avascular necrosis (AVN)
    • Inflammatory arthritis
    • Rheumatoid arthritis with adequate bone quality
    • Post-traumatic arthritis
    • Congenital hip dysplasia.
  • Patient has no history of previous total hip replacement or arthrodesis of the affected hip joint(s). Patient has a Harris Hip Score \<70 in the affected hip and a Harris Hip pain rating of moderate, marked, or disabled.
  • Patient is willing and able to provide written .
  • Patient is willing and able to cooperate in the required post-operative therapy.
  • Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the Informed Consent.
  • Patient has participated in the Informed Consent process and has signed the Ethics Committee approved informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is:

    • A prisoner
    • Mentally incompetent or unable to understand what participation in the study entails.
    • A known alcohol or drug abuser
    • Anticipated to be non-compliant
  • The patient has a neuromuscular disorder, vascular disorder or other condition that could contribute to prosthesis instability, prosthesis fixation failure, or complications in postoperative care.
  • The patient has local bone tumors and/or cysts in the portion of bone to be retained in the operative hip that could inhibit implant fixation.
  • The patient has insufficient bone stock or poor bone quality to fix the component. Insufficient bone stock exists in the presence of metabolic bone disease (i.e. osteoporosis), cancer, and radiation. Note: Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) may be required to assess the presence of adequate bone stock.
  • The patient has rapid disease progression as obvious by joint destruction or bone absorption seen on x-ray.
  • The patient has osteoradionecrosis in the affected hip.
  • The patient has a neuromuscular condition in the ipsilateral or contralateral limb which affects lower limb function.
  • The patient has loss of abductor musculature in the affected hip.
  • The patient has a vascular (large and small vessel disease) insufficiency.
  • The patient has had previous prosthetic hip replacement device (any type, including surface replacement arthroplasty, endoprosthesis, etc.) in the joint to be operated.
  • The patient has had previous girdlestone procedure (resection arthroplasty) or surgical fusion of the hip to be operated.
  • The patient has an acute femoral neck fracture in the operative hip.
  • The patient has had a procedure on the operative hip in the last 6 months (i.e. arthroscopy, ORIF femoral neck fracture, etc).
  • The patient has undergone a total hip replacement, endoprosthesis, or surface arthroplasty of the contralateral (opposite side) hip within the past 6 months regardless of whether the previous hip was enrolled in this clinical study.
  • The patient has a moderate to severe limb length discrepancy greater than 3.2 cm.
  • The patient has an active, old or remote infection in or about the affected hip joint or an infection distant from the hip joint that may spread to the hip hematogenously.
  • The patient has poor skin coverage around the affected hip joint.
  • The patient has a diagnosed systemic disease that could affect his/her safety or the study outcome.
  • The patient is currently receiving, or within the past three months, has received any drug known to potentially interfere with bone/soft tissue healing (e.g. long-term chronic systemic or inhaler steroid therapy).
  • The patient has received an drug or device within the previous 6 months.
  • The patient is known to be pregnant.
  • The patient is unwilling or unable to give , or to comply with the followup program.
  • The patient is known to have a highly communicable disease that may limit follow-up.
  • The patient has a known sensitivity or allergic reaction to one or more of the implanted materials which include metal and ceramic.
  • The patient is Grade III obese with a (BMI) > 35.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
250 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients who received the Maxera Cup

    Subjects in need of a total hip arthroplasty, who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and who received the Maxera Cup.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Implant survival based on removal or intended removal of the device and determined using the Kaplan-Meier method

    Time frame: 10 years post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain and functional performance based on the Harris Hip Score

    Time frame: 10 years post-surgery

  2. Pain and functional performance based on the UCLA Score

    Time frame: 10 years post-surgery

  3. Subject quality-of-life determined by the EQ-5D (EuroQoI) score

    Time frame: 10 years post-surgery

  4. X-rays evaluated for radiolucencies, osteolysis, hypertrophy, subsidence, heterotopic ossification, etc

    Time frame: 10 years post-surgery

  5. Safety based on eventual complications occurred including dislocations and revisions/removals

    Time frame: 10 years post-surgery

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • The Mater Hospital, Concord Hospital
    Sydney, Australia
  • UZ Leuven
    Pellenberg, Belgium
  • Center Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
    Montreal, Canada
  • Jokilaakson terveys oy
    Jämsä, Finland
  • Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan
    Perpignan, France
  • Reinier de Graaf Groep
    Delft, Netherlands
  • Hospital Son Llatzer
    Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Teaching Hospitals
    Liverpool, United Kingdom
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2013 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2027, 168 months after the start.

Of 81 observational studies under Osteoarthritis, Hip, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 113. This study's planned 168 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 30, 2017
First posted
Dec 13, 2017
StartActual
Jan 2013
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Sep 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
2 sites added, 2 sites removed
Show 2 added (1 Canada, 1 Spain)
  • Center Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital · Montreal, Canada
  • Hospital Son Llatzer · Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Show 2 removed
  • Center Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital · Montréal, Canada
  • Hospital Son Llatzer · Palma De Mallorca, Spain
Sep 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 29, 2026
    2 sites added, 2 sites removed
    Show 2 added (1 Canada, 1 Spain)
    • Center Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital · Montreal, Canada
    • Hospital Son Llatzer · Palma de Mallorca, Spain
    Show 2 removed
    • Center Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital · Montréal, Canada
    • Hospital Son Llatzer · Palma De Mallorca, Spain
    + 3 other changes: index terms, verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03372278
Lead sponsor
Zimmer Biomet
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2017
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 29, 2026

Study contacts

Hassan Achakri
study director · Zimmer Biomet

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion