ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03371992NO3DEXPLUpdated Mar 27, 2020

Pilot Study of Nilogen 3D-EX and Its Ability to Predict Therapeutic Response to Anti-PD1 or Anti-PDL1 in NSCLC

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Nivolumab and 3D-EX in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by Nilogen Oncosystems. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-27.

Sponsored by Nilogen Oncosystems · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Basic science

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2020), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 120 studies testing nivolumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung — 22 open to participants now, 44 under way, 6 of them phase 3. Nivolumab · Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Planned enrollment
85th of 120
25 · median 66
Started
2018
with 14 others
Phase 1
15 of 120
1 open now
Registered
57th of 120
by date

Among the 120 studies testing nivolumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, this one is the 85th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 15 that started in 2018, is one of 15 in phase 1, and was the 57th registered.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

7,624 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,837 are open to participants now.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Open to participants now

22 of the 120 studies testing nivolumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung are open now, in 12 countries. Recruiting first, the newest first:

17 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 22 open studies →

About nivolumab

Nivolumab: first FDA approval 2014 (OPDIVO), first EMA approval 2015. What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 1,326 Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies recruiting now, 988 (75%) set no upper age limit and 225 (17%) stop at 75 or younger; 34 take children under 18; 40 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 120 studies testing nivolumab in Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Subjects will be eligible for this study if they are about to start on a drug called nivolumab for lung cancer. Some patients' cancers respond to nivolumab but a majority of patients do not. To better determine which patients will most likely respond to nivolumab or not, the investigators are testing an assay that tests biopsy tissue to determine if the subject's tumor will likely respond to nivolumab.

The main purpose of this research study is to see if this specialized test can help identify people with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who are more likely to benefit from treatment with nivolumab. The results of the tests will not affect whether or not subjects receive nivolumab but may help identify future patients who are more likely to benefit from nivolumab. The study assay is extra and experimental.

Read the detailed description

Overview of PD-1 inhibition for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC Lung cancer (LC) is the most common malignancy-related death in the United States (causing deaths in \~ 86,380 men and \~71,660 women in 2015. Fifteen percent of LC patients present with Stage I disease, which is treated primarily with surgery, leading to a 5-year survival rate of 54%. Approximately 57% of LC patients are initially diagnosed with metastatic disease (Stage IV) with a corresponding 5-year survival rate of 4.2%.

More recently, major treatment responses have been observed with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor proteins expressed on the surface of lymphocytes and other immune cells, most notably on cytotoxic T-cells. When bound to their specific ligand, often another surface-bound protein on a neighboring cell, they can transmit stimulatory or inhibitory signals to activate or inhibit the cellular adaptive immune response. Several studies showed that the predominant mechanism by which NSCLC evades detection and elimination by the immune system is by exploiting one such inhibitory pathway through the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1, B7-H1). PD-L1 then binds to its receptor, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), on surveilling lymphocytes and initiates a signaling cascade which leads to lymphocyte exhaustion, a state of impaired function. The most successful immune checkpoint inhibitors so far are anti PD1 or anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies that prevent PD1-PD-L1 interaction at the tumor-immune interface. In this pilot study, the investigators will investigate if Nilogen's functional ex vivo bioassay can predict therapeutic response to anti PD1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) or anti PD-L1 (atezolizumab) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Functional bioassay as a potential predictive biomarker. The intent of using anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as an anti-cancer therapeutic is to block one of the ways that tumors inhibit T cell function within the tumor microenvironment, allowing restoration of T cell function. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a bioassay that directly measures restoration of T cell function in the context of all of the elements of the tumor microenvironment could accurately predict whether or not a patient will be clinically responsive to a particular immunotherapeutic agent that is designed to target the tumor microenvironment. A tumor biopsy from a patient who will be clinically responsive to anti-PD-1 will contain inactive T cells that may have their functional activity restored by the provision of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ex vivo, much like what is seen in the ex vivo experiments performed at Nilogen using the 3D-EX platform (www.nilogen.com). To assess tumor response to nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab the investigators will use their proprietary immune cell function analysis in tumor samples obtained by FNA biopsy upon treatment with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab ex vivo.

Hypothesis

  1. In 80% of patients, FNA samples will provide a sufficient number of viable tumor cells to perform ex vivo functional bioassays with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab.
  2. Patients whose tumor FNA samples fail to respond to nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab, in the 3D Ex-Vivo assays will likely not show a clinical response to systemic nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab treatment.

Study Objectives

Primary Objective To test whether it is feasible to perform the 3D-EX functional response bioassay in the context of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving treatment with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab in a standard clinical setting.

Overall study design Eligible patients will have a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of NSCLC; advanced-stage disease who are appropriate candidates for therapy with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab, and age greater than 18 years. Prior surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are allowed. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are outlined in the appropriate section. All inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed within 6 weeks prior to the first dose of nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. Baseline radiographic studies should be performed within 30 days of screening. This clinical study will require central IRB approval. Informed consent will be obtained from each patient prior to screening and enrolling in the study.

Nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab will be administered as per the established standard of care for the eligible population.

Prediction of Response to Nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab by Nilogen's 3D-EX Bioassay.

In previous preclinical and clinical studies the investigators showed that FNA samples provide a sufficient number of viable tumor cells to perform drug sensitivity assays ex-vivo. The assay protocol is optimized to process tumor FNA samples, where the tumor microenvironment is intact and contains tumor cells and all other tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells as well as specialized tumor stroma. Prior to initiation of therapy, tumor samples will be collected by FNA from accessible tumor tissue. For the ex vivo assays, aspirates will be obtained from each patient after collection of biopsy samples required for SOC. The FNA samples will be immediately shipped to the Nilogen Laboratory. All proposed assays will be performed at the Nilogen Oncosystems laboratory in Tampa, FL according to CLIA standards.

Patients who do not have a site of disease that will provide enough tumor cells for analyses will be taken off study. In adequate samples, tumor FNA samples will be treated nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab at clinically relevant concentrations. At the end of incubation T-cell activation will be assessed by a proprietary approach including evaluation of drug-mediated changes in three parameters: (1) T-cell activation, (2) cytokine release and (3) gene expression profiles. The response rate to treatment will be scored for T-cell activity and correlated with patient outcome.

The investigators hypothesize that tumors that fail to respond ex vivo will not be likely to be responsive in vivo in cancer patients.

03

Conditions studied

  • Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • immunotherapy
  • anti-PD1
  • anti-PDL1
  • biomarker
  • drug mechanism
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible for participation in this trial, the subject must:

  1. Be willing and able to provide written for the trial.
  2. Be at least 18 years of age on the day of signing informed consent.
  3. Have a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of Stage IV NSCLC.
  4. Must be medically eligible to receive nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab as the standard of care for the next (must have previously received first line platinum doublet chemotherapy) as determined by their oncologist.
  5. Have based on 1.1 (see section 7.1 or appropriate number).
  6. Be willing and medically fit to undergo a fresh (newly obtained) diagnostic of a lesion or primary site of disease before receiving nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. "Fresh (newly-obtained)" is defined as a specimen obtained up to 6 weeks prior to initiation of treatment with nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab on Day 1.
  7. Fit in either of these categories:

    1. Stage I-III NSCLC patients who develop metastatic disease within 6 months of receiving definitive (curative) treatment that includes platinum-based chemotherapy, and who require biopsy for either confirmation of diagnosis or further molecular or immunohistochemical testing to guide treatment.
    2. Stage IV NSCLC patients with progression of disease following platinum based chemotherapy, and who require biopsy for either confirmation of diagnosis or further molecular or immunohistochemical testing to guide treatment.
    3. Stage IV NSCLC patients who will receive nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab as the standard of care in special circumstances (eg, when chemotherapy is or if a patient declines to be treated with chemotherapy).
  8. Be willing to undergo at least 4 fine needle aspirations for experimental purposes at the time of the standard of care biopsy.
  9. Have a performance status of 0 or 1 on the Performance Scale.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The subject must be excluded from participating in the trial if the subject:

  1. Is currently participating in and receiving therapy as part of a different clinical trial.
  2. Is not a candidate to receive nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab as determined by the patient's oncologist.
  3. Has an active infection requiring systemic therapy.
  4. Has a history or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might; (1) confound the results of the trial, (2) that would substantially increase risk of incurring adverse events (AEs) from nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab, (3) that would interfere with the subject's participation for the full duration of the trial, or (4) is not in the best interest of the subject to participate, in the opinion of the treating investigator.
  5. Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial.
  6. Is pregnant or breastfeeding.
  7. Has a known history of (HIV) (HIV 1/2 antibodies).
  8. Has known active (e.g., HBsAg reactive) or (e.g., HCV RNA [qualitative] is detected).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Lung Cancer Patients

    Lung cancer patients receiving one of three standard of care immunotherapy drugs including nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. 3D-EX will be performed on biopsies from patients enrolled in the study to correlate with the patient's evaluation of response by RECIST.

    Drug: Nivolumab · Diagnostic Test: 3D-EX · Other: Evaluation of Response by RECIST

Interventions

  • Nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab will be administered as per the established standard of care for the eligible population.

    Also known as: pembrolizumab, atezolizumab

  • Diagnostic test3D-EX

    Analysis of drug-mediated changes in the tumor microenvironment.

    Also known as: 3D ex vivo assay

  • OtherEvaluation of Response by RECIST

    Evaluation of tumor response using the set of published rules to determine if a tumor has responded, is stable or progressed during treatments.

This study also gives Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab. No intervention listed here names it: that was found by reading the record.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of target lesions by RECIST

    Complete Response (CR) is defined as disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR) is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest dimension (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions Stable Disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum LD since the treatment started

    Time frame: Tumor size is assessed via CT every 8 weeks and RECIST criteria will be documented every 8 weeks after the first treatment for progression or date of death, whichever comes first, for up to 60 months.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Henry Ford Health Systems
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5. PubMed 25559415 ↗
  • Brahmer JR, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: making immunotherapy a reality for the treatment of lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013 Aug;1(2):85-91. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0078. Epub 2013 Jul 22. PubMed 24777499 ↗
  • Taube JM, Klein A, Brahmer JR, Xu H, Pan X, Kim JH, Chen L, Pardoll DM, Topalian SL, Anders RA. Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 1;20(19):5064-74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3271. Epub 2014 Apr 8. PubMed 24714771 ↗
  • Jiang Y, Li Y, Zhu B. T-cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Death Dis. 2015 Jun 18;6(6):e1792. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.162. PubMed 26086965 ↗
  • Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crino L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, Antonia S, Pluzanski A, Vokes EE, Holgado E, Waterhouse D, Ready N, Gainor J, Aren Frontera O, Havel L, Steins M, Garassino MC, Aerts JG, Domine M, Paz-Ares L, Reck M, Baudelet C, Harbison CT, Lestini B, Spigel DR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627. Epub 2015 May 31. PubMed 26028407 ↗
  • Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, Chow LQ, Vokes EE, Felip E, Holgado E, Barlesi F, Kohlhaufl M, Arrieta O, Burgio MA, Fayette J, Lena H, Poddubskaya E, Gerber DE, Gettinger SN, Rudin CM, Rizvi N, Crino L, Blumenschein GR Jr, Antonia SJ, Dorange C, Harbison CT, Graf Finckenstein F, Brahmer JR. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Epub 2015 Sep 27. PubMed 26412456 ↗
  • Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, Leighl N, Balmanoukian AS, Eder JP, Patnaik A, Aggarwal C, Gubens M, Horn L, Carcereny E, Ahn MJ, Felip E, Lee JS, Hellmann MD, Hamid O, Goldman JW, Soria JC, Dolled-Filhart M, Rutledge RZ, Zhang J, Lunceford JK, Rangwala R, Lubiniecki GM, Roach C, Emancipator K, Gandhi L; KEYNOTE-001 Investigators. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501824. Epub 2015 Apr 19. PubMed 25891174 ↗
  • Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, Park K, Smith D, Artal-Cortes A, Lewanski C, Braiteh F, Waterkamp D, He P, Zou W, Chen DS, Yi J, Sandler A, Rittmeyer A; POPLAR Study Group. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10. PubMed 26970723 ↗
  • Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, Cortinovis DL, Leach J, Polikoff J, Barrios C, Kabbinavar F, Frontera OA, De Marinis F, Turna H, Lee JS, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, He P, Chen DS, Sandler A, Gandara DR; OAK Study Group. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X. Epub 2016 Dec 13. Erratum In: Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):e5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30904-2. PubMed 27979383 ↗
  • Butte MJ, Keir ME, Phamduy TB, Sharpe AH, Freeman GJ. Programmed death-1 ligand 1 interacts specifically with the B7-1 costimulatory molecule to inhibit T cell responses. Immunity. 2007 Jul;27(1):111-22. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.016. Epub 2007 Jul 12. PubMed 17629517 ↗
  • Stamper CC, Zhang Y, Tobin JF, Erbe DV, Ikemizu S, Davis SJ, Stahl ML, Seehra J, Somers WS, Mosyak L. Crystal structure of the B7-1/CTLA-4 complex that inhibits human immune responses. Nature. 2001 Mar 29;410(6828):608-11. doi: 10.1038/35069118. Erratum In: Nature 2001 May 31;411(6837):617. PubMed 11279502 ↗
  • Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available. PubMed 7165009 ↗
  • Rubio-Viqueira B, Mezzadra H, Nielsen ME, Jimeno A, Zhang X, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Maitra A, Hidalgo M, Altiok S. Optimizing the development of targeted agents in pancreatic cancer: tumor fine-needle aspiration biopsy as a platform for novel prospective ex vivo drug sensitivity assays. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007 Feb;6(2):515-23. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0388. PubMed 17308050 ↗
  • Hidalgo M, Amador ML, Jimeno A, Mezzadra H, Patel P, Chan A, Nielsen ME, Maitra A, Altiok S. Assessment of gefitinib- and CI-1040-mediated changes in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in HuCCT-1 human cholangiocarcinoma by serial fine needle aspiration. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006 Jul;5(7):1895-903. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0525. PubMed 16891476 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Participant data will not be shared but the results of the clinical trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2020, 33 months after the start.

Of 473 industry-sponsored phase 1 interventional studies under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, half reached primary completion within 49 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 33 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 699 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 70.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2017
First posted
Dec 13, 2017
StartActual
Mar 9, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2020
CompletionEst.
Jun 2021
Last update
Mar 27, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03371992
Lead sponsor
Nilogen Oncosystems
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2017
Start date
Mar 9, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2020

Study contacts

Soner Altiok, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Nilogen Oncosystems
Igor Rybkin, MD
principal investigator · Henry Ford Health System

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nivolumab

Start the discussion