CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03368235Updated Oct 5, 2020Results posted

Early Phase Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of AZD9567 Versus Prednisolone in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 2 interventional study of AZD9567 and Prednisolone in Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-05.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a phase 2a study to be run in 2-3 countries in European Union involving 5-6 sites. It will enroll approximately 80 patients to ensure 40 randomized with active rheumatoid arthritis. The treatment period is 2 weeks and total study duration per patient is approximately 1 month. The study drugs are AZD9567 40 mg (an oral SGRM) and the comparator is prednisolone 20mg. The primary endpoint is DAS28 including evaluation of 28 joints and C-reactive protein. Safety parameters will also be evaluated and a biomarker program is included for future research.

Read the detailed description

This randomized double blind with double dummy technique phase 2a study will be run in 2-3 EU countries, most likely Sweden, Denmark and The Netherlands involving 5-6 sites. It is estimated that 80-100 patients have to be enrolled to ensure the randomization target of 40. The study population is patients with rheumatoid arthritis on stable treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with an active flare. It is a two-arm parallel study and the randomization ratio is 1:1 to the two weeks of once daily treatment of 40 mg of AZD9567 and 20 mg prednisolone.

The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of AZD9567 40 mg, compared to prednisolone 20 mg in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis in spite of stable treatment with conventional and/or s.c/i.v. biological DMARDs and the primary variable is change from baseline in 28 joint Disease Activity Score using CRP (DAS28 - CRP). As secondary variables swollen and tenderness of 66-68 joints and safety variables are also included. For exploratively purposes there is also a biomarker program, collecting blood samples for future research.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • rheumatoid arthritis, swollen joints, tender joints, autoimmunity
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Established RA diagnosis according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR classification or the 1987 criteria
  2. Active RA (DAS28-CRP score ≥ 3.2) with at least 3 swollen joints and 3 tender joints using the DAS28 joint count
  3. Patients must have be on stable dosing of conventional and/or s.c./i.v biological DMARDs for the last 8 weeks prior to Visit 1
  4. CRP levels >5mg/L at screening if seronegative for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide antibody (anti-CCP Ab), or >2mg/L if seropositive for either marker
  5. BMI between 18 and 35 (inclusive)
  6. Negative pregnancy test (serum) for female subjects of childbearing potential

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History or current inflammatory rheumatic disease other than RA (secondary Sjogren's syndrome excluded)
  2. History or current clinically important disease which may either put the subject at risk because of participation in the study, or influence the results or the subject's ability to participate in the study
  3. Any clinical contraindications to treatment with steroids
  4. Oral or parenteral steroids (beyond study medication) 8 weeks prior to study start and during the study. Stable use and dose of topical and inhaled steroids for longer than 4 w prior to randomization is acceptable
  5. Use of any prohibited medication during the study or if the required washout time of such medication was not adhered to
  6. History of severe allergy/hypersensitivity or ongoing clinically important allergy/hypersensitivity to drugs with a similar class to study drugs
  7. Any concomitant medications that are known to be associated with Torsades de Pointes
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AZD9567

    oral suspension of 40 mg AZD9567 once daily (OD) for two weeks

    Drug: AZD9567

  • Active comparator
    Prednisolone

    oral OD treatment of 20 mg prednisolone administered as capsules

    Drug: Prednisolone

Interventions

  • DrugAZD9567

    oral OD SGRM administered as suspension

  • DrugPrednisolone

    oral capsules of 20 mg prednisolone administered OD for two weeks

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Least Square (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Disease Activity Score Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Day 15

    The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in RA. The score includes the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28), CRP level (a measure of inflammation in the blood), and the patient's global assessment (PGA) of health (ranging from very well to very poor). The DAS28-CRP was derived as follows: 0.56 x √\[tender joint count 28 (TJC28)\] + 0.28 x √\[swollen joint count 28 (SJC28)\] + 0.014 x global health (GH) + 0.36 x Ln(CRP+1) + 0.96 to produce the overall DAS28-CRP score on a scale ranged from 0-10 with higher score indicating worse RA symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50 and ACR70 Responses

    The ACR20, ACR50 or ACR70 was achieved if there was at least a 20%, 50% or 70% improvement from baseline in swollen joint count 66 (SJC66) and tender joint count 68 (TJC68) and 3 or more of the 5 following assessments: participant's assessment of pain, GH, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of physical function and CRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Day 15

  2. LS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC66 Score at Day 15

    A total of 66 joints (33 left, 33 right) were evaluated for swelling. The swollen joint count represents the number of joints in which there was synovial fluid and or soft tissue swelling, but not if bony overgrowth was found. A swollen joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The SJC66 was calculated as sum of swollen joints with present status on electronic case report form (eCRF). The swollen joint count ranged from 0-66 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  3. LS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC68 Score at Day 15

    A total of 68 joints (34 left, 34 right) were evaluated for tenderness. The tender joint count represents the number of joints in which pain was reported. A tender joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The TJC68 was calculated as sum of tender joints with present status on eCRF. The tender joint count ranged from 0-68 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  4. LS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC28 Score at Day 15

    TJC28 was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. A total of 28 joints (14 left, 14 right) were evaluated for tenderness as obtained from the joint count right or left eCRF. The tender joint count represents the number of joints in which pain was reported. A tender joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The TJC28 was calculated as sum of tender joints with present status on eCRF. The tender joint count ranged from 0-28 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  5. LS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC28 Score at Day 15

    SJC28 was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. A total of 28 joints (14 left, 14 right) were evaluated for swelling as obtained from the joint count right or left eCRF. The swollen joint count represents the number of joints in which there was synovial fluid and or soft tissue swelling, but not if bony overgrowth was found. A swollen joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The SJC28 was calculated as sum of swollen joints with present status on eCRF. The swollen joint count ranged from 0-28 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  6. LS Mean Change From Baseline in GH Score at Day 15

    GH was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. Participant's GH was measured using PGA of disease activity by means of the visual analogue scale (VAS). The PGA VAS consists of a 100 millimeter (mm) long scale ranging from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  7. LS Mean Change From Baseline in CRP at Day 15

    CRP was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. The CRP was collected at the local laboratory during screening and central laboratory on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  8. LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Score at Day 15

    Participant's assessment of pain score was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the ACR. Participant's assessment of pain score was assessed from the amount of pain due to RA on a VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  9. LS Mean Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score at Day 15

    Physician's global assessment of disease activity score was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the ACR. The physician's global assessment of disease activity was measured on a VAS ranging from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  10. LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Physical Function Score at Day 15

    Participant's assessment of physical function score was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the ACR. The participant's assessment of physical function across 8 functional areas was measured by health assessment questionnaire. The total score ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 24 (inability to perform tasks). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 15

  11. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Until the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of AZD9567

    The AUClast was determined using non-compartmental method and calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations were increased and the logarithmic trapezoidal rule when concentrations were decreased.

    Time frame: Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.

  12. Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 6 Hours After Dose (AUC0-6) of AZD9567

    The AUC0-6 was determined using non-compartmental method and calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations were increased and the logarithmic trapezoidal rule when concentrations were decreased.

    Time frame: Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.

  13. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AZD9567

    The Cmax of AZD9567 was determined using non-compartmental method.

    Time frame: Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.

  14. Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AZD9567

    The tmax of AZD9567 was determined using non-compartmental method.

    Time frame: Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.

  15. Last Plasma Concentration Measured Before the Last Dose (Ctrough) of AZD9567

    The Ctrough of AZD9567 was determined using non-compartmental method before the last dose on Day 15.

    Time frame: Predose on Day 15

06

Results

Posted Oct 5, 2020

Participant flow

This was a Phase 2a study conducted in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in spite of stable treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs at 5 investigational sites across Sweden and The Netherlands between 18 January 2018 and 12 November 2019.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAZD9567Prednisolone
Started1110
Completed1110
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryLeast Square (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Disease Activity Score Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Day 15

The DAS28-CRP is a measure of disease activity in RA. The score includes the number of tender and swollen joints (out of 28), CRP level (a measure of inflammation in the blood), and the patient's global assessment (PGA) of health (ranging from very well to very poor). The DAS28-CRP was derived as follows: 0.56 x √\[tender joint count 28 (TJC28)\] + 0.28 x √\[swollen joint count 28 (SJC28)\] + 0.014 x global health (GH) + 0.36 x Ln(CRP+1) + 0.96 to produce the overall DAS28-CRP score on a scale ranged from 0-10 with higher score indicating worse RA symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Least Square (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Disease Activity Score Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
Least Square (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in 28 Joint Disease Activity Score Using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) at Day 15-1.931 ± 0.3460-2.403 ± 0.3373
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.315 (Based on MMRM model with the baseline DAS28-CRP score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 0.472 · 95% CI -0.487 to 1.431
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50 and ACR70 Responses

The ACR20, ACR50 or ACR70 was achieved if there was at least a 20%, 50% or 70% improvement from baseline in swollen joint count 66 (SJC66) and tender joint count 68 (TJC68) and 3 or more of the 5 following assessments: participant's assessment of pain, GH, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of physical function and CRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Day 15
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50 and ACR70 Responses
percentage of participantsAZD9567Prednisolone
ACR2063.670.0
ACR5036.470.0
ACR7018.250.0
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.807 (Logistic regression model with the treatment group, country and baseline DAS28-CRP as covariate.) · Odds ratio (or): 0.807 · 95% CI 0.12 to 5.34
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · Fisher Exact · p = 0.198
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · Fisher Exact · p = 0.183
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC66 Score at Day 15

A total of 66 joints (33 left, 33 right) were evaluated for swelling. The swollen joint count represents the number of joints in which there was synovial fluid and or soft tissue swelling, but not if bony overgrowth was found. A swollen joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The SJC66 was calculated as sum of swollen joints with present status on electronic case report form (eCRF). The swollen joint count ranged from 0-66 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC66 Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC66 Score at Day 15-6.24 ± 0.894-6.66 ± 0.860
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.717 (The MMRM with the baseline SJC66 score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 0.42 · 95% CI -1.98 to 2.81
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC68 Score at Day 15

A total of 68 joints (34 left, 34 right) were evaluated for tenderness. The tender joint count represents the number of joints in which pain was reported. A tender joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The TJC68 was calculated as sum of tender joints with present status on eCRF. The tender joint count ranged from 0-68 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC68 Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC68 Score at Day 15-9.02 ± 2.463-7.90 ± 2.362
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.724 (The MMRM with the baseline TJC68 score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: -1.12 · 95% CI -7.69 to 5.46
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC28 Score at Day 15

TJC28 was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. A total of 28 joints (14 left, 14 right) were evaluated for tenderness as obtained from the joint count right or left eCRF. The tender joint count represents the number of joints in which pain was reported. A tender joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The TJC28 was calculated as sum of tender joints with present status on eCRF. The tender joint count ranged from 0-28 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC28 Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in TJC28 Score at Day 15-6.12 ± 1.251-6.07 ± 1.208
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.973 (The MMRM with the baseline TJC28 score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: -0.05 · 95% CI -3.43 to 3.32
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC28 Score at Day 15

SJC28 was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. A total of 28 joints (14 left, 14 right) were evaluated for swelling as obtained from the joint count right or left eCRF. The swollen joint count represents the number of joints in which there was synovial fluid and or soft tissue swelling, but not if bony overgrowth was found. A swollen joint was scored as 0 (absent) and 1 (present) for each joint. The SJC28 was calculated as sum of swollen joints with present status on eCRF. The swollen joint count ranged from 0-28 with higher score indicating disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC28 Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in SJC28 Score at Day 15-5.14 ± 0.653-5.40 ± 0.628
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.757 (The MMRM with the baseline SJC28 score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 0.26 · 95% CI -1.50 to 2.03
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in GH Score at Day 15

GH was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. Participant's GH was measured using PGA of disease activity by means of the visual analogue scale (VAS). The PGA VAS consists of a 100 millimeter (mm) long scale ranging from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in GH Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in GH Score at Day 15-27.7 ± 7.26-37.4 ± 7.11
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.325 (The MMRM with the baseline GH score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 9.8 · 95% CI -10.5 to 30.1
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in CRP at Day 15

CRP was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the DAS28-score. The CRP was collected at the local laboratory during screening and central laboratory on Days 1, 8, 15 and 28. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg per liter (L)
LS Mean Change From Baseline in CRP at Day 15
mg per liter (L)AZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in CRP at Day 15-10.830 ± 2.4207-15.586 ± 2.5245
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.187 (The MMRM with the baseline CRP score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 4.756 · 95% CI -2.514 to 12.025
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Score at Day 15

Participant's assessment of pain score was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the ACR. Participant's assessment of pain score was assessed from the amount of pain due to RA on a VAS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Score at Day 15-27.3 ± 8.17-43.4 ± 7.71
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.144 (The MMRM with the baseline participant's assessment of pain score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 16.0 · 95% CI -6.0 to 38.1
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score at Day 15

Physician's global assessment of disease activity score was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the ACR. The physician's global assessment of disease activity was measured on a VAS ranging from 0 (very well) to 100 (very poor). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score at Day 15-37.0 ± 4.38-40.9 ± 4.30
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.512 (The MMRM with the baseline disease activity score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 3.8 · 95% CI -8.3 to 16.0
SecondaryLS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Physical Function Score at Day 15

Participant's assessment of physical function score was evaluated as one of the components that comprised the ACR. The participant's assessment of physical function across 8 functional areas was measured by health assessment questionnaire. The total score ranging from 0 (no difficulty) to 24 (inability to perform tasks). Higher score indicated greater disease severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) prior to the first dose of study treatment.

Time frame:
Baseline and Day 15
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Physical Function Score at Day 15
score on a scaleAZD9567Prednisolone
LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Physical Function Score at Day 15-0.441 ± 0.1758-0.571 ± 0.1712
Statistical analysis
  • AZD9567 vs Prednisolone · MMRM · p = 0.589 (The MMRM with the baseline physical function score as a continuous covariate and country, visit and treatment group as categorical fixed effects, as well as visit interaction with treatment group, using unstructured covariance matrix.) · Ls mean difference: 0.131 · 95% CI -0.370 to 0.631
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Until the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of AZD9567

The AUClast was determined using non-compartmental method and calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations were increased and the logarithmic trapezoidal rule when concentrations were decreased.

Time frame:
Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hour*nanomole per L (h*nmol/L)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Until the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of AZD9567
hour*nanomole per L (h*nmol/L)AZD9567
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Until the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of AZD956717800 ± 35.02
SecondaryArea Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 6 Hours After Dose (AUC0-6) of AZD9567

The AUC0-6 was determined using non-compartmental method and calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule when concentrations were increased and the logarithmic trapezoidal rule when concentrations were decreased.

Time frame:
Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h*nmol/L
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 6 Hours After Dose (AUC0-6) of AZD9567
h*nmol/LAZD9567
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 6 Hours After Dose (AUC0-6) of AZD956717740 ± 35.34
SecondaryMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AZD9567

The Cmax of AZD9567 was determined using non-compartmental method.

Time frame:
Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nmol/L
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AZD9567
nmol/LAZD9567
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AZD95674468 ± 26.89
SecondaryTime to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AZD9567

The tmax of AZD9567 was determined using non-compartmental method.

Time frame:
Predose and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hour postdose on Day 15.
Reported as:
Median · hour
Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AZD9567
hourAZD9567
Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AZD95670.67 (0.33 to 1.03)
SecondaryLast Plasma Concentration Measured Before the Last Dose (Ctrough) of AZD9567

The Ctrough of AZD9567 was determined using non-compartmental method before the last dose on Day 15.

Time frame:
Predose on Day 15
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nmol/L
Last Plasma Concentration Measured Before the Last Dose (Ctrough) of AZD9567
nmol/LAZD9567
Last Plasma Concentration Measured Before the Last Dose (Ctrough) of AZD9567NA ± 95.67

Adverse events

Collected over From first administration of study treatment (Day 1) up to 2 weeks after last administration of study treatment, approximately 28 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AZD95670/11 (0%)1/11 (9.1%)10/11 (90.9%)
Prednisolone0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)9/10 (90%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAZD9567Prednisolone
Depression suicidalPsychiatric disorders1/110/10
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 42
Most frequent other events
EventAZD9567Prednisolone
FatigueGeneral disorders3/110/10
Hot flushVascular disorders3/110/10
Eye painEye disorders2/110/10
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders2/110/10
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders2/110/10
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/111/10
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders2/110/10
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/111/10
Periorbital swellingEye disorders0/111/10
Oral discomfortGastrointestinal disorders0/111/10

Baseline characteristics

The Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AZD9567PrednisoloneTotal
Mean64.5 ± 8.4155.5 ± 13.5860.2 ± 11.82
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AZD9567PrednisoloneTotal
Female8513
Male358
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AZD9567PrednisoloneTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino111021
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AZD9567PrednisoloneTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White111021
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Research Site
    Enschede, 7512 KZ, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Maastricht, 6229 HX, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
  • Research Site
    Göteborg, 413 45, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Lund, 221 85, Sweden
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 19, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 28, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03368235
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 11, 2017
Start date
Jan 18, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 12, 2019
Completion
Nov 12, 2019
Results posted
Oct 5, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2020

Study contacts

Jacob M Van Laar, Professor
principal investigator · UMC Utrecht

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion